pith. sign in

arxiv: 1603.01563 · v3 · pith:OHVFRFMGnew · submitted 2016-03-04 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order fleft( R,nabla_(μ) R,nabla_{μ₁}nabla_{μ₂}R,...,nabla_{μ₁}...nabla_{μ_(n) }Rright) theories of gravity

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords nablatheoriesleftrightscalar-multi-tensorialbrans-dickeequivalenceformalisms
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The equivalence between theories depending on the derivatives of $R$, i.e. $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $, and scalar-multi-tensorial theories is verified. The analysis is done in both metric and Palatini formalisms. It is shown that $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories are equivalent to scalar-multi-tensorial ones resembling Brans-Dicke theories with kinetic terms $\omega_{0}=0$ and $\omega_{0}= - \frac{3}{2}$ for metric and Palatini formalisms respectively. This result is analogous to what happens for $f(R)$ theories. It is worthy emphasizing that the scalar-multi-tensorial theories obtained here differ from Brans-Dicke ones due to the presence of multiple tensorial fields absent in the last. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are established for $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to be written as scalar-multi-tensorial theories. Finally, some examples are studied and the comparison of $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to $f\left( R,\Box R,...\Box^{n}R\right) $ theories is performed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.