Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLMs as Writing Assistants: Exploring Perspectives on Sense of Ownership and Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00027 v5 pith:OLSJ4UX3 submitted 2024-03-20 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords writingownershipassistantsclaimcontentllmssensetasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sense of ownership in writing confines our investment of thoughts, time, and contribution, leading to attachment to the output. However, using writing assistants introduces a mental dilemma, as some content isn't directly our creation. For instance, we tend to credit Large Language Models (LLMs) more in creative tasks, even though all tasks are equal for them. Additionally, while we may not claim complete ownership of LLM-generated content, we freely claim authorship. We conduct a short survey to examine these issues and understand underlying cognitive processes in order to gain a better knowledge of human-computer interaction in writing and improve writing aid systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JRE-L: Journalist, Reader, and Editor LLMs in the Loop for Science Journalism for the General Audience

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-role LLM loop improves readability-formula scores of automatically generated science journalism without fine-tuning the base models.

Pith tools