Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Biometrics in Extended Reality: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.10489 v1 pith:OXLNJGU5 submitted 2024-11-14 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CV
keywords biometricdifferentdiscussrealityaddressedauthenticationbiometricscomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the domain of Extended Reality (XR), particularly Virtual Reality (VR), extensive research has been devoted to harnessing this transformative technology in various real-world applications. However, a critical challenge that must be addressed before unleashing the full potential of XR in practical scenarios is to ensure robust security and safeguard user privacy. This paper presents a systematic survey of the utility of biometric characteristics applied in the XR environment. To this end, we present a comprehensive overview of the different types of biometric modalities used for authentication and representation of users in a virtual environment. We discuss different biometric vulnerability gateways in general XR systems for the first time in the literature along with taxonomy. A comprehensive discussion on generating and authenticating biometric-based photorealistic avatars in XR environments is presented with a stringent taxonomy. We also discuss the availability of different datasets that are widely employed in evaluating biometric authentication in XR environments together with performance evaluation metrics. Finally, we discuss the open challenges and potential future work that need to be addressed in the field of biometrics in XR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ocular Verification for Virtual Reality

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Standard ISO iris quality metrics behave inconsistently on VR-captured eyes (margin adequacy fails), while periocular-heavy score-level fusion reduces equal-error rate from 0.44 to 0.33 on VRBiom.

Pith tools