Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multi-head or Single-head? An Empirical Comparison for Transformer Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09650 v1 pith:P6FWJFHE submitted 2021-06-17 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords attentiontransformermulti-headsingle-headpositionstrainingattendinglayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-head attention plays a crucial role in the recent success of Transformer models, which leads to consistent performance improvements over conventional attention in various applications. The popular belief is that this effectiveness stems from the ability of jointly attending multiple positions. In this paper, we first demonstrate that jointly attending multiple positions is not a unique feature of multi-head attention, as multi-layer single-head attention also attends multiple positions and is more effective. Then, we suggest the main advantage of the multi-head attention is the training stability, since it has less number of layers than the single-head attention, when attending the same number of positions. For example, 24-layer 16-head Transformer (BERT-large) and 384-layer single-head Transformer has the same total attention head number and roughly the same model size, while the multi-head one is significantly shallower. Meanwhile, we show that, with recent advances in deep learning, we can successfully stabilize the training of the 384-layer Transformer. As the training difficulty is no longer a bottleneck, substantially deeper single-head Transformer achieves consistent performance improvements without tuning hyper-parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Feature Shift Localization Network

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FSL-Net localizes shifted features between two datasets using a network trained on 1,350 datasets, matching DataFix's F1 while being about 36x faster on average.

  2. MiniKV: Pushing the Limits of LLM Inference via 2-Bit Layer-Discriminative KV Cache

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MiniKV combines 2-bit KV quantization with heavy-hitter and recent-window token selection plus pyramid layer budgets, achieving 86% KV cache compression with about 98.5% of full-model LongBench accuracy.

Pith tools