Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The CP2K Program Package Made Simple

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The review claims CP2K's standard GTH/MOLOPT protocol reproduces all-electron FP-LAPW equations of state across the periodic table, while its property-organized templates cover the package's main static and dynamical methods.

desk verdict A useful, unusually candid CP2K user guide; the one real weakness is that the 'highly transferable' UZH pseudopotential claim is only benchmarked on unary cubic crystals. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15559 v1 pith:PCTNM5YC submitted 2025-08-21 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech

Marcella Iannuzzi , Jan Wilhelm , Frederick Stein , Augustin Bussy , Hossam Elgabarty , Dorothea Golze , Anna Hehn , Maximilian Graml
show 19 more authors
Stepan Marek Beliz Sertcan Gökmen Christoph Schran Harald Forbert Rustam Z. Khaliullin Anton Kozhevnikov Mathieu Taillefumier Rocco Meli Vladimir Rybkin Martin Brehm Robert Schade Ole Schütt Johann V. Pototschnig Hossein Mirhosseini Andreas Knüpfer Dominik Marx Matthias Krack Jürg Hutter Thomas D. Kühne
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords CP2KQuickstepGaussianandplanewave(GPW)GAPWGTHpseudopotentialsMOLOPTbasissetsdensityfunctionaltheoryGWapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

CP2K is presented as a single open-source package that spans gas-phase molecules, low-dimensional materials, crystals, liquids, and soft matter, combining quantum and classical force methods with geometry optimization, transition-state search, and sampling. The review's load-bearing quantitative claim is that the standard protocol--MOLOPT Gaussian basis sets paired with GTH pseudopotentials--reproduces all-electron FP-LAPW equations of state for a large set of elements, as measured by the epsilon(a,b) metric of Eq. 7. If true, a user can take the paper's property-organized input templates as reliable starting points for total energies and forces, band structures, GW/BSE excited states, NMR/EPR parameters, X-ray spectra, and dynamical simulations. The paper is organized as a practical guide: each section introduces just enough theory, then gives a concrete CP2K input snippet.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the mixed Gaussian/plane-wave representation (GPW) inside Quickstep: Kohn-Sham orbitals are expanded in atom-centered Gaussian functions while the density is represented on a plane-wave grid, giving O(M log M) electrostatics via FFTs while keeping a compact localized basis. GAPW extends the same machinery to all-electron calculations by separating hard and soft density contributions. The accuracy argument is carried by the protocol--MOLOPT generally contracted basis sets paired with GTH norm-conserving pseudopotentials fitted to atomic scalar-relativistic reference data--and quantified by the epsilon(a,b) metric of Eq. 7, which compares energy-volume curves while re

What would settle it

Run the same epsilon(a,b) comparison for a set of binary compounds (e.g., oxides, nitrides, or magnetic f-electron materials) using TZV2P MOLOPT with the corresponding GTH pseudopotentials against all-electron FP-LAPW. If the metric for several binary or low-symmetry systems exceeds the range observed for unary cubic crystals, the protocol's implied transferability to general condensed-phase environments is not supported. Alternatively, take any documented property template in the review and compare output energies or excitation energies against the stated reference values; a failure at the st

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that CP2K's Quickstep engine, built on the Gaussian-and-plane-wave (GPW) representation and its all-electron GAPW extension, provides one coherent framework for essentially the full range of static and dynamical atomistic properties, and that the accompanying protocol--MOLOPT basis sets plus the corresponding norm-conserving GTH pseudopotentials--makes that framework accurate out of the box. The supporting evidence is a benchmark in which Quickstep with a TZV2P MOLOPT basis and GTH pseudopotentials is compared against all-electron FP-LAPW calculations from the integrated SIRIUS code for four mono-elemental cubic crystals per element up to Rn, using the dimensionless epsi

Load-bearing premise

The whole protocol rests on parameters fitted to isolated-atom all-electron reference data, and the review assumes those fits remain accurate in arbitrary periodic condensed-phase environments, though its benchmark covers only a set of mono-elemental cubic crystals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single input framework, organized by the property to be computed, covers isolated molecules, periodic solids, surfaces, interfaces, liquids, and amorphous systems.
  • The protocol gives a default starting point for DFT calculations: TZV2P MOLOPT with corresponding GTH pseudopotentials reproduces all-electron FP-LAPW energy-volume curves for the tested elements, so users do not need to revalidate baselines for those cases.
  • For properties that depend on core electrons, GAPW with all-electron basis sets is the required route, enabling NMR/EPR parameters, hyperfine couplings, and X-ray absorption/emission spectra.
  • GW-BSE and RT-TDDFT implementations put quasiparticle band structures, optical absorption, exciton descriptors, and excited-state dynamics within reach of the same code, with documented convergence settings giving agreement at the few-to-tens of meV level on molecular test sets.
  • Low-scaling RI-RPA/SOS-MP2 and ADMM/RI-HFX variants extend post-HF and hybrid calculations to larger periodic systems, with the paper noting the trade-offs in scaling, memory, and accuracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unary-crystal benchmark leaves open a natural extension: running the same epsilon(a,b) comparison for binary compounds, low-symmetry structures, and magnetic or f-electron systems would test whether the atomic-fitted protocol transfers to chemically richer environments; the paper does not report such tests.
  • The review's property-first organization implies that the method hierarchy is secondary to the observable; a user could mix, say, DFT+U for correlated oxides and RI-RPA for dispersion, but the paper does not discuss cross-method consistency checks.
  • Because the templates include specific convergence keywords, the recipes carry an implicit reproducibility claim: a competent user with the same inputs should obtain the stated accuracy, and a systematic regression of each template against the reported references would make that claim testable.
  • The GW/BSE guidance (evGW0@PBE, specific basis extrapolation) suggests a transferable protocol for molecular excitations, but the paper only validates it on selected test sets; extending to disordered or heterogeneous environments remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a practical review of the CP2K program package, organized by target property rather than by method. It covers total-energy and force methods (GPW/GAPW DFT, HFX and its ADMM/RI variants, MP2/RPA, DFT+U), band-structure methods (SIRIUS PP-PW/FP-LAPW, GW with k-point and Gamma-only variants), embedding approaches (SCCS, QM/MM, DFET), magnetic and optical spectroscopies, real-time excited-state dynamics, X-ray spectroscopy, and related workflows. The text provides numerous ready-to-use input templates and is unusually candid about implementation limits, including CPU-only HFX, missing k-points for DFT+U, and the restriction of periodic GW-k to 2D cells. The main quantitative support is the "UZH protocol" benchmark in Section 2.1.2, which compares Quickstep/GTH-MOLOPT equations of state against all-electron FP-LAPW/SIRIUS results using the metric of Eq. (7).

Significance. If the descriptions are accurate, this review will be a valuable practical reference that lowers the barrier for new CP2K users and complements the earlier theory/code paper. Its strengths include a clear property-oriented organization, a large set of concrete input templates, explicit statements of unsupported combinations, and quantitative convergence/accuracy statements for GW and BSE (e.g. 10 meV and 5 meV claims). The UZH-protocol benchmark, if properly quantified, would also provide a useful default-basis validation for condensed-phase GPW calculations. The paper does not present new methodology, but for a software review that is appropriate.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.1.2, Eq. (7)] The benchmark metric as written does not remove a constant energy offset. The numerator is Σ_i [E_a(V_i) − E_b(V_i)]^2, while the denominator normalizes by the energy spreads of each curve. Since Quickstep/GTH and SIRIUS/FP-LAPW total energies have arbitrary absolute references, any constant offset C between the two methods contributes N·C² to the numerator. Unless the energies are explicitly aligned (e.g. shifted to a common minimum, or the numerator is centered by subtracting the mean difference), the metric will be dominated by the offset rather than by shape agreement of the equations of state. The text does not state any alignment procedure. Because Fig. 1 is the only quantitative support for the UZH protocol accuracy claim, this needs to be clarified or the metric corrected.
  2. [Section 2.1.2, UZH protocol transferability] The text calls the UZH-protocol GTH pseudopotentials and MOLOPT basis sets 'highly transferable' and recommends the protocol as a general default, but the quantitative validation in Fig. 1 covers only four mono-elemental cubic crystals per element up to Rn. This samples unary, high-symmetry, mostly s/p-metallic environments. It does not test ionic/covalent compounds, low-symmetry distortions, magnetic ordering, or f-electron open shells, where atom-fitted pseudopotentials and molecularly optimized basis sets are known to require special care. The paper itself notes that separate lanthanide/actinide and nonlinear-core-correction pseudopotentials exist. The transferability claim is therefore broader than the evidence. Please qualify the claim to the tested subset or add representative compound/low-symmetry benchmarks. This is an external-validity gap rather than an internal inconsistency,
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2.2, RI-HFX input snippet] The input example closes a subsection with '&EBD SUBSYS'; this should be '&END SUBSYS'.
  2. [Section 2.1.2, Fig. 1 caption] The main text says 'a large number of different unary crystal structures', while the caption specifies 'four mono-elemental cubic crystals per element up to Rn'. Please harmonize the wording so that 'large number' is understood as the number of elements times four, not as structural diversity.
  3. [Section 2.4, DFT+U] The sentence 'k-points are not available with DFT+U, yet' is slightly awkward; consider 'k-points are not yet available with DFT+U'.
  4. [Section 3.2.4, GW k-point sampling] The statement that a 32×32 k-point mesh 'is expected to reach convergence of the GW band gap within 10 meV for a 2D material' would be easier to use if accompanied by an example material or a reference to the specific convergence test in Ref. 125.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review is descriptive, and its key benchmark validates atom-fitted pseudopotentials/basis sets against an independent all-electron method.

full rationale

The paper is a user-oriented review of CP2K, not a derivational manuscript. The only quantitative validation central to the review is the UZH protocol benchmark in Section 2.1.2 (Eq. 7, Fig. 1), where Quickstep with GTH pseudopotentials and TZV2P-MOLOPT basis sets is compared to all-electron FP-LAPW calculations with SIRIUS. Although the GTH potentials and MOLOPT basis sets are fitted to atomic all-electron scalar-relativistic DFT data from CP2KATOM (Section 2.1.2), the benchmark quantity is the equation-of-state metric for unary crystals, which is not the fitting target; the comparison method (FP-LAPW) is independent of the pseudopotential parameterization. Similarly, the GW implementation claims 10 meV accuracy against the external GW100 test set (Section 3.2.3), and BSE is compared to FHI-aims on Thiel's dataset (Section 6.2.2), both independent references. The paper's many self-citations document specific implementations and recommended settings (e.g., Refs. 14, 82, 84, 103, 125, 126), but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for an independent benchmark that would make a claimed prediction reduce to its own fitted input. The skeptical concern about transferability to compounds and low-symmetry systems is an external-validity gap, not a circularity, because the comparison is against an independent all-electron method. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, this paper introduces no new physical entities and no free parameters of its own; the ledger records the fitted parameters carried by the described methods (SCCS, sTDA, DFT+U) and the assumptions the description relies on. The UZH protocol's GTH PP and MOLOPT basis parameters are inputs from prior literature (Refs. 30-34), fitted by the same group but validated here against the independent all-electron FP-LAPW method.

free parameters (3)
  • SCCS solvation parameters alpha, beta, gamma = solvent-specific, e.g., alpha 50.0 mN/m, beta -0.35 GPa, gamma 0.0 for water (example input, Section 4.1)
    Eq. 34: DeltaG_sol = DeltaG_el + (alpha+gamma)S + beta V. The review calls alpha and beta 'solvent-specific tunable parameters', i.e., fitted to reproduce experimental solvation free energies.
  • sTDA kernel parameters eta, a_XC, alpha, beta = recommended a_XC = 0.1 to 0.2; eta, alpha, beta are system and dataset dependent
    Eq. 80 defines the semiempirical gamma_J and gamma_K operators of the sTDA TDDFT kernel from chemical hardness eta, Fock-exchange mixing a_XC, and powers alpha and beta. Semiempirical methods fit these to data by construction.
  • DFT+U effective Hubbard parameter U_eff = U - J = example U_MINUS_J = 2.0 eV for 5f orbitals of uranium (Section 2.4)
    The Dudarev DFT+U correction (Refs. 106, 107) requires a user-supplied on-site U_eff per element and angular momentum, chosen by hand or fitted. The review's example enforces occupation patterns that depend on this parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation of electronic and nuclear motion
    Section 1: 'assuming the so-called Born-Oppenheimer approximation, which is underlying most of the methods within CP2K'. Every method described in the review inherits this assumption.
  • standard math Correctness of the underlying quantum and statistical mechanical frameworks (KS-DFT, TDDFT, Hedin equations, BSE, MD)
    The capability claims assume these established formalisms are valid and that the implementations are faithful. The review cites prior validation, e.g., GW100 (Section 3.2.3) and Thiel's dataset (Section 6.2.2).
  • domain assumption Implementation consistency: documented keywords and input sections behave as described
    The central usability claim rests on the open-source code (github.com/cp2k/cp2k) implementing the features. No version, commit hash, or executable test is pinned in the review.
  • domain assumption Transferability of atomic-fitted GTH pseudopotentials and MOLOPT basis sets to periodic condensed phases
    Section 2.1.2: GTH PPs are 'optimized with respect to an atomic all-electron WF of scalar relativistic DFT reference calculations' via CP2KATOM (Ref. 34); the review asserts the UZH protocol is accurate for crystals. Fig. 1 supports this only for four mono-elemental cubic crystals per element up to Rn.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The CP2K Program Package Made Simple." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCTNM5YC

@misc{pith2026250815559,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The CP2K Program Package Made Simple},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCTNM5YC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15559}
}
read the original abstract

CP2K is a versatile open-source software package for simulations across a wide range of atomistic systems, from isolated molecules in the gas phase to low-dimensional functional materials and interfaces, as well as highly symmetric crystalline solids, disordered amorphous glasses, and weakly interacting soft-matter systems in the liquid state and in solution. This review highlights CP2K's capabilities for computing both static and dynamical properties using quantum-mechanical and classical simulation methods. In contrast to the accompanying theory and code paper [J. Chem. Phys. 152, 194103 (2020)], the focus here is on the practical usage and applications of CP2K, with underlying theoretical concepts introduced only as needed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.15559 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Values of the comparison metric ε for CP2K/Quickstep using the “UZH proto￾col” with respect to all-electron FP-LAPW cal￾culations using the CP2K/SIRIUS code. For each element up to Rn four mono-elemental cu￾bic crystals were considered55 . between SIRIUS and Quickstep employing a TZV2P MOLOPT basis set and corresponding GTH PPs is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of NNP and AIMD re￾sults for liquid water at 300 K as obtained from CP2K. (a) Time per MD step for 64, 512, and 4096 water molecules with the C-NNP model (solid lines with circles) and 64 water molecules with the revPBE0-D3 hybrid func￾tional (dashed line with crosses) reported on a logarithmic scale. (b) Radial distribution func￾tions and (c) vibrational density of states of the hydrogen atoms. Results i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Impact of NQEs on the structure and dynamics of hexagonal ice at 250 K. (a) Bead convergence of the virial kinetic energy estima￾tor using the PILE and PIQTB thermostat. (b) Radial distribution functions with classical and quantum nuclei and (b) vibrational density of states obtained with classical MD, RPMD and TRPMD, respectively. All simulations rely on using the C-NNP trained with revPBE0-D3 ref￾erence data321, a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature dependence of the heat capacity (a) and the superfluid fraction (b) of bulk 4He obtained using the canonical worm al￾gorithm to sample bosonic exchange and the winding number estimator to analyze super￾fluidity (see text). The numerical pair den￾sity matrix…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: For an illustration of the HPIMD/MC method, as implemented in CP2K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Potential energy Umol along one Trotter replica of quantum PIMD trajecto￾ries of (from top to bottom) the methane molecule (CH4), the protonated methane com￾plex (CH+ 5 ), the hydronium cation (H3O+), and the Zundel cation (H5O + 2 ) at 1.67 K using NNPs trained with C…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial distributions functions stem￾ming from all N helium atoms around a fixed molecular impurity (i.e. X·HeN ), as sampled from PIMC simulations (without bosonic ex￾change) at 1.67 K. The solute· · · helium inter￾action energies Uint used in the PIMC sampling of the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In HPIMD/MC, the efficient pair den￾sity matrix approach allows one to converge the solvent PI using a rather small replica number (here 80 at 1 K), which is not sufficient to rep￾resent the solute PI. Using a stride of two and thus 160 replicas to represent the solute…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distance distributions functions of H3O+· 4He8 at 1 K with BE sampling of the helium microsolvation environment. The intramolecular O–H, as well as the inter￾molecular O–He and H–He distance distribu￾tions are presented. The inset depicts the beads of the hydronium ion…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optical excitations in nanographenes from the Bethe-Salpeter equation and time-dependent density functional theory: absorption spectra and spatial descriptors

    physics.comp-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BSE@evGW0@PBE implemented in CP2K reproduces nanographene absorption after 1/L extrapolation and predicts a lowest bright exciton size of ~7.6 Å that TDDFT functionals cannot match in both size and spectrum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (1) Dirac, P. A. M. Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems.Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.1929,123, 714–733. (2) Billeter, S. R.; Curioni, A.; Andreoni, W. Efficient linear scaling geometry op- timization and transition-state search for direct wavefunction optimization schemes in density functional theory us- ing a plane-wave basis.Comp. Mat. Sci. 2003...

    1929

  2. [24]

    (210) Castro, A.; Marques, M. A. L.; Rubio, A. Propagators for the time-dependent Kohn-Sham equations.J. Chem. Phys. 2004,121, 3425–3433. (211) Moler, C.; Loan, C. V. Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later.SIAM Review2003,45, 3–49. (212) Andermatt, S.; Bani-Hashemian, M. H.; Brück, S.; VandeVondele, J.; Luisi...

    2004

  3. [25]

    M.; Alder, B

    (117) Ceperley, D. M.; Alder, B. J. Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method.Phys. Rev. Lett.1980,45,

    1980

  4. [30]

    and Identification of Spec- tral Contributions from Different H- Bond Conformations in Gaseous and Liq- uid Water.J. Phys. Chem. A2006,110, 13388–13393. (264) Ojha, D.; Karhan, K.; Kühne, T. D. On the hydrogen bond strength and vibra- tional spectroscopy of liquid water.Sci. Rep.2018,8, 16888. (265) Elgabarty, H.; Kaliannan, N. K.; Kühne, T. D. Enhancemen...

    2018

  5. [40]

    J.; Pack, J

    (70) Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin–zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B1976,13, 5188–5192. (71) Guidon, M.; Hutter, J.; VandeVondele, J. Robust Periodic Hartree-Fock Exchange for Large-Scale Simulations Using Gaus- sian Basis Sets.J. Chem. Theory Com- put.2009,5, 3010–3021. (72) Becke, A. D. Density-functional exchange-energy appro...

    2009

  6. [51]

    QUICKSTEP: Fast and accu- rate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves ap- proach.Comput

    (23) VandeVondele, J.; Krack, M.; Mo- hamed, F.; Parrinello, M.; Chassaing, T.; Hutter, J. QUICKSTEP: Fast and accu- rate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves ap- proach.Comput. Phys. Commun.2005, 167, 103–128. (24) Lippert, G.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. A hybrid Gaussian and plane wave density functional scheme.Mol. Phy...

    2005

  7. [63]

    D.; Shiga, M.; For- bert, H.; Marx, D

    (371) Witt, A.; Ivanov, S. D.; Shiga, M.; For- bert, H.; Marx, D. On the applicability of centroid and ring polymer path inte- gral molecular dynamics for vibrational spectroscopy.J. Chem. Phys.2009,130, 194510. (372) Rossi, M.; Ceriotti, M.; Manolopou- los, D. E. How to remove the spurious resonances from ring polymer molecular dynamics.J. Chem. Phys.201...

    2009

  8. [79]

    Sparse matrix multiplication: The distributed block- compressed sparse row library.Parallel Comput.2014,40, 47–58

    (495) Borštnik, U.; VandeVondele, J.; We- ber, V.; Hutter, J. Sparse matrix multiplication: The distributed block- compressed sparse row library.Parallel Comput.2014,40, 47–58. (496) Frigo, M.; Johnson, S. G. FFTW: an adaptive software architecture for the FFT. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processin...

    work page 2014

Show all 86 references
  1. [80]

    DLA-Future: A Task-Based Linear Algebra Library Which Pro- vides a GPU-Enabled Distributed Eigen- solver

    (504) Solcà, R.; Simberg, M.; Meli, R.; In- vernizzi, A.; Reverdell, A.; Biddis- combe, J. DLA-Future: A Task-Based Linear Algebra Library Which Pro- vides a GPU-Enabled Distributed Eigen- solver. Asynchronous Many-Task Sys- tems and Applications. Cham, 2024; pp 135–141, see h...

    2024

  2. [86]

    (547) Hynes, J. T. Physical chemistry - The protean proton in water.Nature1999, 397, 565–567. (548) Marx, D. Addendum to: Proton Trans- fer 200 Years after von Grotthuss: Insights from Ab Initio Simulations. ChemPhysChem2007,8, 209–210, Orig- inal article:549. (549) Marx, D. I...

    2006

  3. [109]

    116 (350) Callaway, D. J. E.; Rahman, A. Micro- canonical ensemble formulation of lattice gauge-theory.Phys. Rev. Lett.1982,49, 613–616. (351) Parrinello, M.; Rahman, A. Study of an F–center in molten KCl.J. Chem. Phys. 1984,80, 860–867. (352) Coalson, R. D. On the connection ...

    1982

  4. [116]

    (253) Ojha, D.; Kühne, T. D. Hydrogen bond dynamics of interfacial water molecules revealed from two-dimensional vibra- tional sum-frequency generation spec- troscopy.Sci. Rep.2021,11,

    2021

  5. [145]

    Why are insulators insulating and metals conducting?J

    (174) Resta, R. Why are insulators insulating and metals conducting?J. Phys. Con- dens. Matter2002,14, R625–R656. (175) Mauri, F.; Louie, S. Magnetic Suscepti- bility of Insulators from First Principles. Phys. Rev. Lett.1996,76, 4246–4249. (176) Keith, T. A.; Bader, R. F. W. C...

    1996

  6. [155]

    Structures of liq- uid and aqueous water isotopologues at ambient temperature from ab initio path integral simulations.Phys

    (541) Thomsen, B.; Shiga, M. Structures of liq- uid and aqueous water isotopologues at ambient temperature from ab initio path integral simulations.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2022,24, 10851–10859. (542) Togo, A.; Chaput, L.; Tadano, T.; Tanaka, I. Implementation strategies in phon...

    2022

  7. [181]

    A.; Plasser, F.; Krylov, A.; Dreuw, A

    (204) Mewes, S. A.; Plasser, F.; Krylov, A.; Dreuw, A. Benchmarking Excited-State Calculations Using Exciton Properties. J. Chem. Theory Comput.2018,14, 710–725. (205) Bruneval, F.; Rangel, T.; Hamed, S. M.; Shao, M.; Yang, C.; Neaton, J. B. Molgw 1: Many-body Perturbation The...

    2018

  8. [189]

    D.; Delle Site, L

    (132) Panahian Jand, S.; Kühne, T. D.; Delle Site, L. On the physical consistency of an open quantum region with a classi- cal reservoir in molecular simulation.Ad- vanced Theory and Simulations2024,7, 2400833. (133) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Conti...

    2005

  9. [197]

    P.; Altarawy, D.; Di- dier, B.; Gibsom, T

    (44) Pritchard, B. P.; Altarawy, D.; Di- dier, B.; Gibsom, T. D.; Windus, T. L. A New Basis Set Exchange: An Open, Up- to-date Resource for the Molecular Sci- ences Community.J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019,59, 4814–4820. (45) Zijlstra, E. S.; Huntemann, N.; Kalitsov, A.; Garcia, M....

    2019

  10. [198]

    (452) Medvedev, N. N. The Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Voronoi Polyhedra. J. Comput. Phys.1986,67, 223–229. (453) Pollak, M.; Rein, R. Molecular-Orbital Studies of Intermolecular Interaction En- ergies. II. Approximations Concerned with Coulomb Interactions and Compar- ison...

    1986

  11. [206]

    Time-dependent density func- tional calculations of ligand K-edge X-ray absorption spectra.IInorg

    109 (235) DeBeer George, S.; Petrenko, T.; Neese, F. Time-dependent density func- tional calculations of ligand K-edge X-ray absorption spectra.IInorg. Chim. Acta2008,361, 965–972. (236) Müller, P.; Karhan, K.; Krack, M.; Gerstmann, U.; Schmidt, W. G.; Bauer, M.; Kühne, T. D. ...

    2019

  12. [237]

    25; pp 29–

    (22) Krack, M.; Parrinello, M.High Perfor- mance Computing in Chemistry; NIC Se- ries; NIC-Directors, 2004; Vol. 25; pp 29–

    2004

  13. [241]

    S.; Miceli, G.; Rai- teri, P.; Krack, M.; Kühne, T

    (282) Cucinotta, C. S.; Miceli, G.; Rai- teri, P.; Krack, M.; Kühne, T. D.; Bernasconi, M.; Parrinello, M. Supe- rionic Conduction in Substoichiometric LiAl Alloy: An Ab Initio Study.Phys. Rev. Lett.2009,103, 125901. (283) Caravati, S.; Bernasconi, M.; Kühne, T. D.; Krack, M.;...

    2009

  14. [249]

    (143) Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of pa- rameters for semiempirical methods V: Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements.J. Mol. Model.2007,13, 1173–1213. (144) Elstner, M.; Porezag, D.; Jungnickel, G.; Elsner, J.; Haugk, M.; Frauenheim, T.; Suhai, ...

    2007

  15. [291]

    Excited state nuclear forces from the Tamm–Dancoff approximation to time–dependent density functional theory within the plane wave basis set framework.J

    (190) Hutter, J. Excited state nuclear forces from the Tamm–Dancoff approximation to time–dependent density functional theory within the plane wave basis set framework.J. Chem. Phys.2003,118, 3928–3934. (191) Grimme, S. A simplified Tamm-Dancoff density functional approach for...

    2003

  16. [297]

    A.; Bu, S.; Mundy, C

    (545) Johnson, B. A.; Bu, S.; Mundy, C. J.; Ananth, N. MixPI: Mixed-Time Slicing Path Integral Software for Quantized Molecular Dynamics Simulations.arXiv 2024,2411.11988. (546) CP2K Benchmark Suite.https://www. cp2k.org/performance,

    2024 arXiv

  17. [299]

    (433) Pipek, J.; Mezey, P. G. A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable forab initioand semiempirical linear combina- tion of atomic orbital wave functions.J. Chem. Phys.1989,90, 4916–4926. (434) Wannier, G. H. The Structure of Elec- tronic Excitation Levels in Insula...

    1989

  18. [364]

    Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases.J

    97 (30) VandeVondele, J.; Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases.J. Chem. Phys.2007,127, 114105. (31) Goedecker, S.; Teter, M.; Hutter, J. Sep- arable dual–space Gaussian pseudopo- tentials.Phys. Rev. B1996,54, 1703–

    2007

  19. [377]

    A bird’s-eye view of density- functional theory.Braz

    (119) Capelle, K. A bird’s-eye view of density- functional theory.Braz. J. Phys.2006, 36, 1318–1343. 102 (120) Caravati, S.; Bernasconi, M.; Kühne, T.; Krack, M.; Parrinello, M. First- principles study of crystalline and amorphousGe2Sb2Te5 and the effects of stoichiometric def...

    2006

  20. [385]

    (27) Møller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Note on an ap- proximation treatment for many-electron systems.Phys. Rev.1934,46,

    1934

  21. [398]

    D.; Luke, D

    99 (65) Marks, L. D.; Luke, D. Robust mixing for ab initio quantum mechanical calcu- lations.Phys. Rev. B2008,78, 075114. (66) Broyden, C. G. A Class of Meth- ods for Solving Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations.Mathematics of Computation 1965,19, 557–593. (67) Mermin, N. D. Therm...

    1965

  22. [399]

    Efficient and low- scaling linear-response time-dependent density functional theory implementa- tion for core-level spectroscopy of large and periodic systems.Phys

    (196) Bussy, A.; Hutter, J. Efficient and low- scaling linear-response time-dependent density functional theory implementa- tion for core-level spectroscopy of large and periodic systems.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2021,23, 4736–4746. (197) Ljungberg, M. P.; Koval, P.; Ferrari, F.;...

    2021

  23. [558]

    Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium.Phys

    (278) Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium.Phys. Rev. B 1994,49, 14251. (279) Car, R.; Parrinello, M. Unified Ap- proach for Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory.Phys. Rev...

    1994

  24. [566]

    The GW compendium: A practical guide to theoretical photoemission spectroscopy

    (118) Golze, D.; Dvorak, M.; Rinke, P. The GW compendium: A practical guide to theoretical photoemission spectroscopy. Front. Chem.2019,7,

    2019

  25. [579]

    Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learning.J

    (321) Schran, C.; Brezina, K.; Marsalek, O. Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learning.J. Chem. Phys.2020, 153, 104105. (322) Imbalzano, G.; Zhuang, Y.; Kapil, V.; Rossi, K.; Engel, E. A.; Grasselli, F.; Ceriotti, M. Uncertaint...

    2020 arXiv

  26. [609]

    (29) Gell-Mann, M.; Brueckner, K. A. Corre- lation energy of an electron gas at high density.Phys. Rev.1957,106,

    1957

  27. [618]

    A collective de- scription of electron interactions: III

    (28) Bohm, D.; Pines, D. A collective de- scription of electron interactions: III. Coulomb interactions in a degenerate electron gas.Phys. Rev.1953,92,

    1953

  28. [749]

    J.; Lestrange, P

    (479) Goings, J. J.; Lestrange, P. J.; Li, X. Real-Time Time-Dependent Electronic Structure Theory.WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.2018,8, e1341. (480) Chen, H.; Mcmahon, J. M.; Rat- ner, M. A.; Schatz, G. C. Classical Elec- trodynamics Coupled to Quantum Me- chanics for Calculation of...

    2018

  29. [809]

    W.; Rosenbluth, M

    (4) Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H.; Teller, E. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines.J. Chem. Phys.1953,21, 1087–1092. (5) Laio, A.; Parrinello, M. Escaping free- energy minima.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002,99, 12562–12566...

    1953

  30. [822]

    Nuclear Quantum Effects in Liquid Water Are Marginal for Its Average Structure but Significant for Dynamics.J

    (376) Stolte, N.; Daru, J.; Forbert, H.; Behler, J.; Marx, D. Nuclear Quantum Effects in Liquid Water Are Marginal for Its Average Structure but Significant for Dynamics.J. Phys. Chem. Lett.2024, 15, 12144–12150. (377) Malik, R.; Stolte, N.; Forbert, H.; Chan- dra, A.; Marx, D...

    2024

  31. [846]

    Auxiliary Density Matrix Methods for Hartree-Fock Exchange Calculations.J

    (50) Guidon, M.; Hutter, J.; VandeVondele, J. Auxiliary Density Matrix Methods for Hartree-Fock Exchange Calculations.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2010,6, 2348–

    2010

  32. [918]

    First-Principles Theory of the EPR G Tensor in Solids: Defectsin Quartz.Phys

    (182) Pickard, C.; Mauri, F. First-Principles Theory of the EPR G Tensor in Solids: Defectsin Quartz.Phys. Rev. Lett.2002, 88, 4–7. (183) Van Yperen-De Deyne, A.; Pauwels, E.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Waroquier, M. Ac- curate Spin–orbit and Spin–other-orbit Contributions to the G-t...

    2002

  33. [1072]

    BSSE-corrected consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple- zeta valence with polarization quality of the fifth period for solid-state calcula- tions.J

    (49) Laun, J.; Bredow, T. BSSE-corrected consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple- zeta valence with polarization quality of the fifth period for solid-state calcula- tions.J. Comput. Chem.2022,43, 839–

    2022

  34. [1085]

    M.; Reine, S.; Kjærgaard, T

    (76) Kumar, C.; Fliegl, H.; Jensen, F.; Teale, A. M.; Reine, S.; Kjærgaard, T. AcceleratingKohn-Shamresponsetheory using density fitting and the auxiliary- density-matrix method.Int. J. Quantum Chem.2018,118, e25639. (77) Gavini, V.; Baroni, S.; Blum, V.; Bowler, D. R.; Bucche...

    2018

  35. [1157]

    (354) Ceriotti, M.; Parrinello, M.; Mark- land,T.E.; Manolopoulos,D.E.Efficient stochastic thermostatting of path inte- gral molecular dynamics.J. Chem. Phys. 2010,133, 124104. (355) Martyna, G. J.; Klein, M. L.; Tuck- erman, M. Nosé-Hoover chains - The canonical ensemble via ...

    2010

  36. [1184]

    An Efficient Linear-Scaling Electrostatic Coupling for treating pe- riodic boundary conditions in QM/MM Simulations.J

    (153) Laino, T.; Mohamed, F.; Laio, A.; Par- rinello, M. An Efficient Linear-Scaling Electrostatic Coupling for treating pe- riodic boundary conditions in QM/MM Simulations.J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2005,2, 1370–1378. (154) Golze, D.; Iannuzzi, M.; Nguyen, M.- T.; Passerone, D.; H...

    2005

  37. [1212]

    On-the-Fly

    (447) Partovi-Azar, P.; Kühne, T. D. Efficient “On-the-Fly” calculation of Raman Spec- tra from Ab-Initio molecular dynamics: Application to hydrophobic/hydrophilic solutes in bulk water.J. Comp. Chem. 2015,36, 2188–2192. (448) Partovi-Azar, P.; Kühne, T. D.; Kag- hazchi, P. E...

    2015

  38. [1315]

    An efficient real space multi- grid QM/MM electrostatic coupling.J

    104 (152) Laino, T.; Mohamed, F.; Laio, A.; Par- rinello, M. An efficient real space multi- grid QM/MM electrostatic coupling.J. Chem. Theory Comp.2005,1, 1176–

    2005

  39. [1359]

    Acceler- ated path integral methods for atomistic simulations at ultra-low temperatures.J

    (364) Uhl, F.; Marx, D.; Ceriotti, M. Acceler- ated path integral methods for atomistic simulations at ultra-low temperatures.J. Chem. Phys.2016,145, 054101. (365) Cao, J. S.; Voth, G. A. A new perspective on quantum time-correlation functions. J. Chem. Phys.1993,99, 10070–100...

    2016

  40. [1450]

    Z.; Kühne, T

    (255) Elgabarty, H.; Khaliullin, R. Z.; Kühne, T. D. Covalency of hydro- gen bonds in liquid water can be probed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance experiments.Nat. Commun.2015,6,

    2015

  41. [1549]

    (277) Kresse,G.; Hafner,J.Abinitiomolecular dynamics for liquid metals.Phys. Rev. B 1993,47,

    1993

  42. [1710]

    Relativistic separable dual-space Gaus- sian pseudopotentials from H to Rn

    (32) Hartwigsen, C.; Goedecker, S.; Hutter, J. Relativistic separable dual-space Gaus- sian pseudopotentials from H to Rn. Phys. Rev. B1998,58, 3641–3662. (33) Krack, M. Pseudopotentials for H to Kr optimized for gradient-corrected exchange-correlation functionals.Theor. Chem....

    2005

  43. [1875]

    Nouvelles Applications Des Paramètres Continus à La Théorie Des Formes Quadratiques

    (451) Voronoi, G. Nouvelles Applications Des Paramètres Continus à La Théorie Des Formes Quadratiques. Deuxième Mé- moire. Recherches Sur Les Parallélloè- dres Primitifs.J. Reine Angew. Math. 1908,134,

    1908

  44. [1879]

    E.; Berne, B

    (374) Tuckerman, M. E.; Berne, B. J.; Mar- tyna, G. J.; Klein, M. L. Efficient molecular-dynamics and hybrid Monte- Carlo algorithms for path-integrals.J. Chem. Phys.1993,99, 2796–2808. (375) Spura, T.; John, C.; Habershon, S.; Kühne, T. D. Nuclear quantum effects in liquid wa...

    1993

  45. [1972]

    (346) Barker, J. A. A quantum–statistical Monte Carlo method; path integrals with boundary conditions.J. Chem. Phys. 1979,70, 2914–2918. (347) Chandler, D.; Wolynes, P. G. Exploit- ing the isomorphism between quantum- theory and classical statistical-mechanics of polyatomic fl...

    1979

  46. [1977]

    interaction induced local- ization

    (392) Sindzingre, P.; Klein, M. L.; Ceper- ley, D. M. Path-integral Monte Carlo study of low-temperature 4Heclusters. Phys. Rev. Lett.1989,63, 1601–1604. (393) Zeng, T.; Guillon, G.; Cantin, J. T.; Roy, P.-N. Probing the Superfluid Re- sponse of para-Hydrogen with a Sulfur Dio...

    1989

  47. [1991]

    (424) Spaldin, N. A. A beginner’s guide to the moderntheoryofpolarization.Journal of Solid State Chemistry2012,195, 2–10. (425) King-Smith, R. D.; Vanderbilt, D. The- ory of Polarization of Crystalline Solids. Phys. Rev. B1993,47, 1651–1654. (426) Resta, R. Macroscopic Electri...

    1993

  48. [2009]

    Car-Parrinello molecular dy- namics.WIREs Comput

    (10) Hutter, J. Car-Parrinello molecular dy- namics.WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.2011, 2, 604–612. (11) Kühne, T. D.; Krack, M.; Mo- hamed, F. R.; Parrinello, M. Efficient and accurate Car-Parrinello-like ap- proach to Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett.2007,98, 066...

    2011

  49. [2010]

    D.; Macaya, L.; Meng, F.; Richer, M.; Hernández- Esparza, R.; Yang, X

    (534) Verstraelen, T.; Adams, W.; Pujal, L.; Tehrani, A.; Kelly, B. D.; Macaya, L.; Meng, F.; Richer, M.; Hernández- Esparza, R.; Yang, X. D. et al. IOData: A python library for reading, writing, and converting computational chemistry file formats and generating input files.J....

    2021

  50. [2012]

    Elec- tronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function ap- proaches.Rev

    (217) Onida, G.; Reining, L.; Rubio, A. Elec- tronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function ap- proaches.Rev. Mod. Phys.2002,74, 601–659. (218) Marek, S.; Wilhelm, J. Linear and Non- linear Optical Properties of Molecules from Real-Time Propagation B...

    2002

  51. [2015]

    (162) Campañá, C.; Mussard, B.; Woo, T. K. Electrostatic Potential Derived Atomic Charges for Periodic Systems Using a Modified Error Functional.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2009,5, 2866–2878. (163) Huang, C.; Pavone, M.; Carter, E. A. Quantum mechanical embedding theory based on a ...

    2009

  52. [2017]

    (521) Riccardi, E.; Lervik, A.; Roet, S.; Aarøen, O.; van Erp, T. S. PyRETIS 2: an improbability drive for rare events.J. Comput. Chem.2020,41, 370–377. (522) Vervust, W.; Zhang, D. T.; Ghysels, A.; Roet, S.; van Erp, T. S.; Riccardi, E. PyRETIS 3: Conquering rare and slow eve...

    2020

  53. [2018]

    methodology discovery

    (511) Rocha, A. R.; Garcia-Suarez, V. M.; Bailey, S. W.; Lambert, C. J.; Ferrer, J.; Sanvito, S. Towards molecular spintron- ics.Nat. Mater.2005,4, 335–339, see https://github.com/StefanoSanvitoGroup/libsmeagol. (512) Posenitskiy, E.; Chilkuri, V. G.; Am- mar, A.; Hapka, M.; P...

    2005

  54. [2024]

    I.; Zaanen, J.; Ander- sen, O

    (105) Anisimov, V. I.; Zaanen, J.; Ander- sen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insu- lators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys. Rev. B1991,44, 943–954. (106) Dudarev, S. L.; Manh, D. N.; Sut- ton, A. P. Effect of Mott-Hubbard cor- relations on the electronic structure and structu...

    1998

  55. [2364]

    New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Prob- lem.Phys

    (51) Hedin, L. New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Prob- lem.Phys. Rev.1965,139, A796–A823. (52) Aryasetiawan, F.; Gunnarsson, O. The GW method.Reports on Progress in Physics1998,61, 237–312. (53) Whitten, J. L. Cou...

    1965

  56. [2421]

    Generalized variational den- sity functional perturbation theory.J

    (166) Putrino, A.; Sebastiani, D.; Par- rinello, M. Generalized variational den- sity functional perturbation theory.J. Chem. Phys.2000,113, 7102–7109. (167) Sebastiani, D.; Parrinello, M. A New ab-Initio Approach for NMR Chemi- cal Shifts in Periodic Systems.J. Phys. Chem. A2...

    2000

  57. [2453]

    J.; Ko- rnbluth, M.; Kozinsky, B

    (320) Musaelian, A.; Batzner, S.; Johans- son, A.; Sun, L.; Owen, C. J.; Ko- rnbluth, M.; Kozinsky, B. Learning lo- cal equivariant representations for large- scale atomistic dynamics.Nat. Commun. 2023,14,

    2023

  58. [2456]

    D.; Khaliullin, R

    (254) Kühne, T. D.; Khaliullin, R. Z. Elec- tronic signature of the instantaneous asymmetry in the first coordination shell of liquid water.Nat. Commun.2013,4,

    2013

  59. [2465]

    Quantum nature of the hydrogen bond from ambient con- ditions down to ultra-low temperatures

    (339) Schran, C.; Marx, D. Quantum nature of the hydrogen bond from ambient con- ditions down to ultra-low temperatures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2019,21, 24967–24975. (340) Ohto, T.; Dodia, M.; Xu, J.; Imoto, S.; Tang, F.; Zysk, F.; Kühne, T. D.; Shigeta, Y.; Bonn, M.; Wu, X. e...

    2019

  60. [2471]

    (411) Simko, I.; Schran, C.; Brieuc, F.; Fabri,C.; Schlemmer,O.A.S.; Marx,D.; Csasza, A. G. Quantum Nuclear Delo- calization and its Rovibrational Finger- prints.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2023,62, e202306744. (412) Davies, J. A.; Schran, C.; Brieuc, F.; Marx, D.; Ellis, A. M. Onset...

    2023

  61. [2643]

    Umbrella integration

    (356) Tuckerman, M. E.; Marx, D.; Klein, M. L.; Parrinello, M. Efficient and general algorithms for path integral Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics.J Chem Phys 104, 5579–5588. (357) Kästner, J.; Thiel, W. Bridging the gap between thermodynamic integration and umbrella sampling...

    2005

  62. [2832]

    TRAVIS - A free Analyzer and Visualizer for Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Trajec- tories.J

    (463) Brehm, M.; Kirchner, B. TRAVIS - A free Analyzer and Visualizer for Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Trajec- tories.J. Chem. Inf. Model.2011,51, 2007–2023. (464) Ewald, P. P. Die Berechnung optis- cher und elektrostatischer Gitterpoten- tiale.Ann. Phys.1921,369, 253–28...

    2011

  63. [3082]

    Convergence acceleration of it- erative sequences

    (64) Pulay, P. Convergence acceleration of it- erative sequences. the case of scf itera- tion.Chem. Phys. Lett.1980,73, 393–

    1980

  64. [3083]

    The GW method.Rep

    (21) Aryasetiawan, F.; Gunnarsson, O. The GW method.Rep. Prog. Phys.1998,61,

    1998

  65. [3227]

    R.; Isborn, C

    (478) Provorse, M. R.; Isborn, C. M. Elec- tron Dynamics with Real-Time Time- Dependent Density Functional Theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem.2016,116, 739–

    2016

  66. [3234]

    An efficient orbital transformation method for elec- tronic structure calculations.J

    (62) VandeVondele, J.; Hutter, J. An efficient orbital transformation method for elec- tronic structure calculations.J. Chem. Phys.2003,118, 4365–4369. (63) Kerker, G. Efficient iteration scheme for self-consistent pseudopotential calcula- tions.Phys. Rev. B1981,23,

    2003

  67. [3809]

    Insights into lithiummanganeseoxide-waterinterfaces using machine learning potentials.J

    (305) Eckhoff, M.; Behler, J. Insights into lithiummanganeseoxide-waterinterfaces using machine learning potentials.J. Chem. Phys.2021,155. (306) Khaliullin, R. Z.; Eshet, H.; Kühne, T. D.; Behler, J.; Parrinello, M. Graphite-diamond phase coexistence study employing a neural-...

    2021

  68. [3865]

    Precon- ditioned conjugate gradient method for the sparse generalized eigenvalue prob- lem in electronic structure calculations

    (69) Gan, C.; Haynes, P.; Payne, M. Precon- ditioned conjugate gradient method for the sparse generalized eigenvalue prob- lem in electronic structure calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun.2001,134, 33–

    2001

  69. [3981]

    M.; Neaton, J

    (199) Bruneval, F.; Hamed, S. M.; Neaton, J. B. A systematic bench- mark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys.2015,142, 244101. (200) Sander, T.; Maggio, E.; Kresse, G. Be- yond the Tamm-D...

    2015

  70. [4130]

    Ra- man spectra from ab initio molecular dynamics and its application to liquid S-methyloxirane.J

    (468) Luber, S.; Iannuzzi, M.; Hutter, J. Ra- man spectra from ab initio molecular dynamics and its application to liquid S-methyloxirane.J. Chem. Phys.2014, 141, 094503. (469) Albrecht, A. C. On the Theory of Ra- man Intensities.J. Chem. Phys.1961, 34, 1476–1484. (470) Tang, ...

    2014

  71. [5142]

    L.; Parrinello, M

    (430) Silvestrelli, P. L.; Parrinello, M. Water Molecule Dipole in the Gas and in the Liquid Phase — Erratum.Phys. Rev. Lett.1999,82,

    1999

  72. [5174]

    Developing the random phase approximation into a practical post- Kohn–Sham correlation model.J

    (95) Furche, F. Developing the random phase approximation into a practical post- Kohn–Sham correlation model.J. Chem. Phys.2008,129, 114105. (96) Boyd, J. P. Exponentially convergent Fourier-Chebshevquadratureschemeson bounded and infinite intervals.J. Sci. Comput.1987,2, 99–1...

    2008

  73. [5415]

    L.; Parrinello, M

    (431) Silvestrelli, P. L.; Parrinello, M. Struc- tural, electronic, and bonding properties of liquid water from first principles.J. Chem. Phys.1999,111, 3572–3580. (432) Boys, S. F. Construction of Some Molec- ularOrbitalstobeApproximatelyInvari- ant for Changes from One Molec...

    1999

  74. [6373]

    On-the-fly

    115 (332) Singh, R.; Azadi, S.; Kühne, T. D. An- harmonicity and finite-temperature ef- fects on the structure, stability, and vi- brational spectrum of phase III of solid molecular hydrogen.Phys. Rev. B2014, 90, 014110. (333) Spura, T.; Elgabarty, H.; Kühne, T. D. “On-the-fly...

    2015

  75. [7382]

    (203) Bechstedt, F.Many-Body Approach to Electronic Excitations: Concepts and Applications; Springer Series in Solid- State Sciences; Springer Berlin Heidel- berg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015; Vol

    2015

  76. [7859]

    O.; Granucci, G.; Kossoski, F.; Lischka, H.; Mennucci, B.; Mukherjee, S

    (231) Barbatti, M.; Bondanza, M.; Crespo- Otero, R.; Demoulin, B.; Dral, P. O.; Granucci, G.; Kossoski, F.; Lischka, H.; Mennucci, B.; Mukherjee, S. et al. Newton-X Platform: New Software De- velopments for Surface Hopping and Nu- clear Ensembles.J. Chem. Theory Com- put.2022,...

    2022

  77. [7895]

    (116) Slater, J. C. Wave functions in a periodic potential.Phys. Rev.1937,51,

    1937

  78. [8318]

    (256) Elgabarty, H.; Kühne, T. D. Tumbling with a limp: local asymmetry in wa- ter’s hydrogen bond network and its consequences.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020,22, 10397–10411. (257) Kühne, T. D.; Khaliullin, R. Z. Nature of the Asymmetry in the Hydrogen-Bond Networks of Hexagona...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.