Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Amplifying human performance in combinatorial competitive programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.19744 v1 pith:PHBOITSX submitted 2024-11-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NEcs.PL

Amplifying human performance in combinatorial competitive programming

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.NEcs.PL
keywords humanprogrammingcompetitivecodecombinatorialcompetitionhashheuristic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have seen a significant surge in complex AI systems for competitive programming, capable of performing at admirable levels against human competitors. While steady progress has been made, the highest percentiles still remain out of reach for these methods on standard competition platforms such as Codeforces. Here we instead focus on combinatorial competitive programming, where the target is to find as-good-as-possible solutions to otherwise computationally intractable problems, over specific given inputs. We hypothesise that this scenario offers a unique testbed for human-AI synergy, as human programmers can write a backbone of a heuristic solution, after which AI can be used to optimise the scoring function used by the heuristic. We deploy our approach on previous iterations of Hash Code, a global team programming competition inspired by NP-hard software engineering problems at Google, and we leverage FunSearch to evolve our scoring functions. Our evolved solutions significantly improve the attained scores from their baseline, successfully breaking into the top percentile on all previous Hash Code online qualification rounds, and outperforming the top human teams on several. Our method is also performant on an optimisation problem that featured in a recent held-out AtCoder contest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Open-Source Training Dataset for Foundation Models for Black-box Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    BBO-Pile is the first large-scale open dataset of real optimization trajectories used to train and scale foundation models that imitate black-box optimization methods.

  2. Evolving Quantum Error-Correcting Encodings for Molecular Simulation

    quant-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    LLM-driven evolutionary program synthesis discovers Generalized Superfast Encodings with exact distance 5 (and 6 on one instance) for molecular Hamiltonians, the first beyond distance 3.

  3. Learning the ARTS of Search for Automated Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ARTS improves automated scientific discovery by using reasoning LMs with test-time training to separate hypothesis merit from execution quality in tree search, achieving 15.3% relative gains on 22 MLGym and MLEBench tasks.

  4. From Agentic to Autogenic Network Management for AI-Native 6G and Beyond: A Standards Perspective

    cs.NI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Autogenic network management extends agentic AI with self-programming, self-reflection, self-orienting, and self-architecting so 6G management planes can generate and evolve their own automation software at runtime.