REVIEW 1 cited by
QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught
read the original abstract
Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon $\alpha_s(Q)$. There is no way to measure $\alpha_s(Q)$ experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neural network expansion of Euclidean path integrals and its application to interacting scalar fields
An RBF neural-network expansion of the interaction factor turns Euclidean path integrals into factorized Gaussian integrals that reproduce the 1+1 phi^4 phase transition line in seconds.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.