Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Skin-in-the-Game: Decision Making via Multi-Stakeholder Alignment in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12933 v2 pith:PI7SSJCS submitted 2024-05-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmsreasoningmoralskigmultipleskin-in-the-gameablationaccountability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in tasks such as summarization, arithmetic reasoning, and question answering. However, they encounter significant challenges in the domain of moral reasoning and ethical decision-making, especially in complex scenarios with multiple stakeholders. This paper introduces the Skin-in-the-Game (SKIG) framework, aimed at enhancing moral reasoning in LLMs by exploring decisions' consequences from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Central to SKIG's mechanism is simulating accountability for actions, which, alongside empathy exercises and risk assessment, is pivotal to its effectiveness. We validate SKIG's performance across various moral reasoning benchmarks with proprietary and opensource LLMs, and investigate its crucial components through extensive ablation analyses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Multi-Path Collaborative Reactive and Reflection agents

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-path, reactive-plus-reflection agent framework improves gpt-3.5-turbo accuracy on MMLU physics, math, and moral reasoning subsets compared with CoT, self-consistency, and self-refine baselines.

Pith tools