Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

JADE: A Linguistics-based Safety Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00286 v3 pith:PJY7RDNB submitted 2023-11-01 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG
keywords jadellmsquestionsunsafecommercialcomplexityenglishplease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we present JADE, a targeted linguistic fuzzing platform which strengthens the linguistic complexity of seed questions to simultaneously and consistently break a wide range of widely-used LLMs categorized in three groups: eight open-sourced Chinese, six commercial Chinese and four commercial English LLMs. JADE generates three safety benchmarks for the three groups of LLMs, which contain unsafe questions that are highly threatening: the questions simultaneously trigger harmful generation of multiple LLMs, with an average unsafe generation ratio of $70\%$ (please see the table below), while are still natural questions, fluent and preserving the core unsafe semantics. We release the benchmark demos generated for commercial English LLMs and open-sourced English LLMs in the following link: https://github.com/whitzard-ai/jade-db. For readers who are interested in evaluating on more questions generated by JADE, please contact us. JADE is based on Noam Chomsky's seminal theory of transformational-generative grammar. Given a seed question with unsafe intention, JADE invokes a sequence of generative and transformational rules to increment the complexity of the syntactic structure of the original question, until the safety guardrail is broken. Our key insight is: Due to the complexity of human language, most of the current best LLMs can hardly recognize the invariant evil from the infinite number of different syntactic structures which form an unbound example space that can never be fully covered. Technically, the generative/transformative rules are constructed by native speakers of the languages, and, once developed, can be used to automatically grow and transform the parse tree of a given question, until the guardrail is broken. For more evaluation results and demo, please check our website: https://whitzard-ai.github.io/jade.html.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Backdoor Samples Detection Based on Perturbation Discrepancy Consistency in Pre-trained Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Backdoor text samples show smaller log-probability changes under mask-filling perturbations than clean samples, which enables zero-shot backdoor detection without the poisoned model.

  2. One Model Transfer to All: On Robust Jailbreak Prompts Generation against LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ArrAttack fine-tunes a judge on the SmoothLLM defense, uses it to filter rewriting-attack data, and trains a generator that produces jailbreak prompts transferring across defenses.

  3. Fine-Tuning Lowers Safety and Disrupts Evaluation Consistency

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning small LLMs on benign data raises harmfulness scores, but those scores vary widely across random seeds, temperatures, and repeated runs, making single-run safety comparisons unreliable.

Pith tools