Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 105 references

The paper claims that in the vacuum sector of massless Klein-Gordon theory, any modular flow that is local on a causal diamond's past null boundary is exactly the vacuum's own flow.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:40 UTC pith:PNAHK6IH

load-bearing objection Useful construction, but the headline uniqueness theorem rests on an unproved fixed-point claim about vacuum modular flow — send it out, but demand the gap be closed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20678 v1 pith:PNAHK6IH submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Uniqueness of null-local modular flow

Gautam Satishchandran , Jonathan Sorce This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T0546L1046L55
keywords modular flownull-local modular flowcausal diamondKlein-Gordon theoryConnes cocycleGaussian statesexcitabilityvacuum sector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to prove that 'instantaneously local' modular flow on a null slice is far more constrained than on a spacelike slice: in massless Klein-Gordon theory in a Minkowski causal diamond, any state or weight whose modular flow on the past null boundary is a geometric, angle-preserving diffeomorphism must be the vacuum state itself, up to rescaling. The authors first construct, for every sufficiently regular future-directed angle-preserving flow, a Gaussian state that has that flow as its modular flow, so the class is nonempty. They then prove that no two distinct such states are mutually excitable by local operators, and use the Connes cocycle to upgrade this to a uniqueness statement for arbitrary faithful normal semifinite weights. Why it matters: explicit modular operators are rare in quantum field theory, and the conjectured existence of many slice-local modular flows would have made modular theory applicable to generic subregions; this paper shows that on null slices ultraviolet universality instead forces uniqueness.

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.1: for D≥3, if τψ is any faithful, normal, semifinite weight on the causal diamond algebra in the vacuum sector whose modular flow on the past null boundary is an angle-preserving diffeomorphism ψs, then τψ = e^c ωvac. The proof route is as follows: the vacuum itself has geometrically local modular flow, generated by 2πu(1−u)∂u on the past null boundary. Any weight with another null-local flow would generate, via the Connes cocycle, a one-parameter family of Gaussian states in the vacuum sector whose two-point function has exactly the form of the family constructed in Section 3. Lemma 4.1 shows that only the vacuum member of that family lies in the vacuum secto

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the Gaussian states ωψ defined by the two-point kernel −(1/4π)δ_{S^{D−2}}/(ρ1−ρ2−iε)^2 in the flow-adapted coordinate ρ (equation (3.21)); KMS uniqueness guarantees that the chosen diffeomorphism is the modular flow. The obstruction is the excitability operator Qψ|ψ′−1, whose kernel is proportional to δ_{S^{D−2}} on the transverse sphere and hence cannot be Hilbert-Schmidt unless zero. The Connes cocycle w_{τψ|ωvac}(s) then converts any candidate weight into a Gaussian state of this family, forcing the cocycle to be scalar via the asserted ergodicity of vacuum modular flow.

Load-bearing premise

The proof hinges on the unproved assertion that the vacuum modular flow is ergodic on the diamond algebra—only scalar multiples of the identity are invariant—and on the asserted proportionality of Qψ|ψ′−1 to a delta function on the transverse sphere with infinite trace; if either premise fails, the uniqueness theorem collapses.

What would settle it

Find, in the causal diamond algebra of the massless vacuum, a single non-scalar operator invariant under the vacuum modular flow; then the Connes cocycle argument of Section 5 cannot force the cocycle to be a scalar, and a nontrivial null-local weight may exist. Alternatively, compute the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of Qψ|ψ′−1 on the angular subspace and check whether the claimed delta-function divergence actually occurs for two distinct regular flows.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For D≥3, no two distinct Gaussian states in the constructed family can be excited from one another using local operators in the causal diamond.
  • No non-vacuum Gaussian state with null-local modular flow can be realized in the global vacuum sector.
  • The uniqueness extends beyond states: any faithful normal semifinite weight in the vacuum sector with angle-preserving null-local modular flow is proportional to the vacuum weight.
  • The construction yields, for any sufficiently regular angle-preserving future-directed flow, a legitimate algebraic state with that flow as modular flow—so the result is a uniqueness theorem for an a priori nonempty family.
  • For massive scalars, Maxwell fields, and gravitons, analogous states exist but are not restrictions of the vacuum; whether they lie in the physical vacuum sector is left open.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed-point/ergodicity assertion in Section 5 is false—modular zero modes are known in other free-field settings—the conclusion τψ = e^c ωvac would not follow; the theorem's scope is therefore narrower than its statement.
  • The same excitability logic suggests a testable split for massive scalars: massless-vacuum null-local flow should be excitable out of the massive vacuum in low dimensions, while power-law angular singularities make excitability doubtful in higher dimensions—mirroring known spatial-slice results.
  • In curved backgrounds, the construction generalizes to sufficiently small diamonds via conformal-vacuum-type states; the open question is whether the resulting null-local-flow states are Hadamard, which the present argument does not settle.
  • Because the result relies on the singular short-distance structure on the null boundary—every point is at zero distance from the diamond's edge—it is plausible that uniqueness is a generic feature of null slices, not a special property of free massless scalars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies modular flows that are local on the past null boundary C− of a causal diamond in massless Klein-Gordon theory. In §3 the authors write down explicit Gaussian states whose two-point function is a flow-adapted conformal transform of the vacuum kernel, and verify commutation relations, positivity, and KMS; this yields states whose modular flow is a prescribed reparametrization of the null generators. In §4 they use the excitability criterion of [81] to argue that distinct such Gaussian states are not locally excitable from one another, and hence that within the vacuum sector only the vacuum is realized among these states. In §5 they use the Connes cocycle to extend the uniqueness claim to arbitrary faithful normal semifinite weights, concluding that the only null-local modular weight in the vacuum sector is the vacuum. Appendices sketch extensions to massive fields, Maxwell fields, and gravitons.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a striking rigidity result for null-local modular flow and an explicit construction of Gaussian states implementing a class of diffeomorphic modular flows. The explicit construction and the direct CCR/KMS checks in §3.2 are genuine strengths, and the overall strategy—using excitability theory to rule out non-vacuum flows in the vacuum sector—is well motivated. However, two operator-theoretic steps that are load-bearing for the paper's main theorem are asserted rather than proved, and a third reduction step needs explicit verification. The main uniqueness claim is therefore not established as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5, immediately after Eq. (5.11)] The proof of Theorem 5.1 uses the assertion that the vacuum modular flow is 'ergodic' in the sense that only scalar multiples of the identity are invariant. No proof or citation is given. Geometricity of a modular automorphism group does not imply triviality of its fixed-point algebra, and free-field settings admit modular zero modes and nontrivial centralizers (cf. refs. [11,66]). If a non-scalar unitary u lies in the fixed-point algebra, the cocycle w_{τψ|ωvac}(s) could be u ζ(s), and the argument from Eq. (5.11) to Eq. (5.18) would not go through. This is a load-bearing gap for Theorem 5.1.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (4.18)] The claim that Q_{ψ|ψ′}−1 is proportional to δ_{S^{D−2}} and hence has infinite trace is not established. The Hilbert-Schmidt classification of operators that are diagonal in a continuous direct integral is not settled by formal delta-function traces. One needs a rigorous identification of Q_{ψ|ψ′} on K_{μψ}, a proof that the kernel form is the one asserted, and a proof that a nonzero operator of this diagonal type cannot satisfy condition (4.6). This is load-bearing for Lemma 4.1 and for the vacuum-sector uniqueness argument.
  3. [§5, Eq. (5.10)] To apply Lemma 4.1 to the vector state |Ω_s>, that state must belong to the Gaussian family constructed in §3.2, which is defined under the regularity condition (3.24). The proof derives the two-point function (5.10) but does not verify that the induced diffeomorphism χ_s satisfies (3.24). Since §5 explicitly says that regularity is not imposed, the reduction to the Gaussian family is incomplete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract says 'any sufficiently regular future-directed vector field', but §3.2 only constructs flows generated by χ(u,x⊥)∂_u, leaving the transverse sphere coordinates fixed. Please state the restricted class explicitly in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [Eq. (3.36)] The 'frequency-space' expression contains dη1 dη2; this appears to be a typo for dρ1 dρ2.
  3. [§4.2] The sentence 'we do not actually need to check boundedness' is confusing because the kernel formula for Q assumes that Q is a bounded operator. Clarify that failure of the domination condition already implies non-excitability, and the kernel analysis is conditional.
  4. [References] The 'centralizer theorem' is cited to an unpublished preprint by one of the authors. If the theorem is used in a load-bearing way, please provide a published or independently verifiable source, or state and prove the needed version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Proof of Theorem 5.1 assumes the vacuum flow's fixed-point algebra is trivial, a premise implied by the theorem itself; Gaussian-sector uniqueness is non-circular.

specific steps
  1. other [Section 5, after Eq. (5.11) and before Eq. (5.12)]
    "A classic result known as the centralizer theorem— see e.g. [89, appendix B.3] for a simple proof — then implies that the cocycle operator must be fixed by vacuum modular flow. Since the vacuum modular flow is geometric in the diamond, it is “ergodic” in the sense that the only operator invariant under the flow are scalar multiples of the identity. This gives wτψ|ωvac(s) = ζ(s), ζ(s) ∈ U(1)."

    The scalar-cocycle step is made to rest on the assertion that the vacuum flow has trivial fixed-point algebra, which is not proved or cited. That assertion is a corollary of the theorem being proved: if a non-scalar unitary u were fixed by the vacuum flow, the state ω_u(a)=⟨uΩ|a|uΩ⟩ would be a state in Hvac with the same modular flow; Theorem 5.1 would then force ω_u=ωvac, hence uΩ∝Ω and u=1 by separating. So the proof assumes a special case of its own conclusion to rule out all other weights; no independent argument is given.

full rationale

The main construction is not circular: Section 3 defines ωψ by an explicit two-point function and independently verifies positivity, the CCR, and the KMS condition against the chosen flow; the modular-flow identification uses the KMS uniqueness theorem, so the desired flow is not smuggled into the state. Lemma 4.1 and §4.2 are applications of the excitability criterion from [81]; although [81] is self-cited (J. Sorce is a coauthor), it is a parameter-free theorem about Gaussian states and is not calibrated to the target uniqueness result, so under the stated rules it counts as independent support rather than circularity. The Connes-cocycle steps (5.3)–(5.11) legitimately show that the cocycle-generated states lie in the Section 3 family and hence equal the vacuum by Section 4.3. The genuine question-begging occurs at (5.12): the proof assumes that the vacuum modular flow is 'ergodic' with trivial fixed-point algebra. No proof or citation is given, and this premise is itself a consequence of Theorem 5.1—if a nontrivial fixed unitary existed, its vector state would have the same modular flow and violate the theorem. Thus the weight-uniqueness theorem partially reduces to assuming a special case of its own conclusion. The §4.2 delta/trace argument is heuristic and the ergodicity assertion is also a correctness risk, but the only circular reduction is the fixed-point step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters are introduced; the arbitrary diffeomorphism ψs is a label for a family of states, not a data-fitted constant. The main imported baggage is the excitability theory of [81] (self-cited, not reproduced) and an unproved ergodicity claim about vacuum modular flow. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conservation laws are postulated.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Tomita-Takesaki modular theory, KMS uniqueness theorem, and existence of the Connes cocycle for FNS weights.
    Used throughout Section 2.3 to identify modular flows of constructed states and to build |Ω_s> from the cocycle.
  • domain assumption Excitability characterization of Gaussian states from [81]: excitability is equivalent to boundedness of Q_{ψ|ψ′}, trivial kernel, and the Hilbert-Schmidt condition (4.6).
    Lemma 4.1 is proved entirely through this criterion. The criterion is a prior result coauthored by J. Sorce and is not reproduced or machine-checked in this paper.
  • standard math Reeh-Schlieder property of the vacuum.
    Section 4.3 uses it to identify H_{ωvac} with the global vacuum sector H_vac.
  • domain assumption The flows are angle-preserving: ψ_s acts as u ↦ ψ_s(u,x⊥), leaving x⊥ fixed, with generator χ(u,x⊥)∂_u.
    Section 3.2, Eq. (3.18). The construction and theorems do not cover vector fields with angular components, despite the abstract's broader wording.
  • ad hoc to paper The vacuum modular flow on the causal diamond is 'ergodic': the only operators invariant under it are scalar multiples of the identity.
    Section 5, after Eq. (5.11). This unproved assertion is used to conclude the cocycle is scalar. It is load-bearing for Theorem 5.1 and not obviously true given known modular zero modes in other settings.
  • domain assumption Regularity condition (3.24): u^{(D-2)/2}(ρ,x⊥) is square-integrable at ρ→−∞.
    Needed for finiteness of the constructed ωψ. The authors note it is mild and later remove it in Theorem 5.1.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29483 in / 15442 out tokens · 129870 ms · 2026-08-01T09:40:09.797898+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In arXiv:2306.01837, it was conjectured that one can engineer a large class of quantum field theory states for which the modular flow on a spacelike slice is "instantaneously local." Here we show that on null slices, such flows are highly constrained; ultraviolet universality essentially requires null-local modular flow to be unique. Concretely, we study massless Klein-Gordon theory in Minkowski spacetime, and construct, for any sufficiently regular future-directed vector field on the past null boundary of a causal diamond, a state that has this vector field as its instantaneous modular flow. We then show by explicit computation that no two distinct states in this class can be realized in the same local Hilbert space. Using a more abstract argument, we also show that in the vacuum sector of the theory, the only null-local modular flow in a causal diamond is provided by the vacuum state itself. We also comment on the construction of null-local modular flow for massive scalars, free Maxwell fields, free gravitons, and in curved backgrounds.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 80 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev

    E. Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018), no. 4 045003, [arXiv:1803.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Sorce,An intuitive construction of modular flow,JHEP12(2023) 079, [arXiv:2309.16766]

    J. Sorce,An intuitive construction of modular flow,JHEP12(2023) 079, [arXiv:2309.16766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class

    H. Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 205021, [arXiv:0804.2182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Bousso, H

    R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher, and J. Maldacena,Proof of a Quantum Bousso Bound, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 4 044002, [arXiv:1404.5635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Bousso, H

    R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher, and J. Maldacena,Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 8 084030, [arXiv:1406.4545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Cardy and E

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.1612(2016), no. 12 123103, [arXiv:1608.01283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Hollands and K

    S. Hollands and K. Sanders,Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory,arXiv:1702.04924

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Teste, and G. Torroba,Modular Hamiltonians on the null plane and the Markov property of the vacuum state,J. Phys. A50(2017), no. 36 364001, [arXiv:1703.10656]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Testé, and G. Torroba,Markov Property of the Conformal Field Theory Vacuum and the a Theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 26 261602, [arXiv:1704.01870]. 12Sinces bA bB =s ab(e bA)a(e bB)b is regular at the tip, we havesAB ∼O(u 2)nearu= 0(see footnote 11). – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Lashkari,Constraining Quantum Fields using Modular Theory,JHEP01(2019) 059, [arXiv:1810.09306]

    N. Lashkari,Constraining Quantum Fields using Modular Theory,JHEP01(2019) 059, [arXiv:1810.09306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Lashkari,Modular zero modes and sewing the states of QFT,JHEP21(2020) 189, [arXiv:1911.11153]

    N. Lashkari,Modular zero modes and sewing the states of QFT,JHEP21(2020) 189, [arXiv:1911.11153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Furuya, N

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, M. Moosa, and S. Ouseph,Information loss, mixing and emergent type III1 factors,JHEP08(2023) 111, [arXiv:2305.16028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    van Luijk, A

    L. van Luijk, A. Stottmeister, R. F. Werner, and H. Wilming,Relativistic Quantum Fields Are Universal Entanglement Embezzlers,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 26 261602

    2024

  14. [14]

    Faulkner, R

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang,Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2016) 038, [arXiv:1605.08072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Balakrishnan, T

    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z. U. Khandker, and H. Wang,A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2019) 020, [arXiv:1706.09432]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Ceyhan and T

    F. Ceyhan and T. Faulkner,Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC,Commun. Math. Phys. 377(2020), no. 2 999–1045, [arXiv:1812.04683]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. Longo,A New Proof of the QNEC,arXiv:2503.04651

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena, and S. J. Suh,Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,JHEP06(2016) 004, [arXiv:1512.06431]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall,Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:1601.05416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz,Bulk locality from modular flow,JHEP07(2017) 151, [arXiv:1704.05464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Li, and H. Wang,A modular toolkit for bulk reconstruction,JHEP04 (2019) 119, [arXiv:1806.10560]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Jefferson,Comments on black hole interiors and modular inclusions,SciPost Phys.6 (2019), no

    R. Jefferson,Comments on black hole interiors and modular inclusions,SciPost Phys.6 (2019), no. 4 042, [arXiv:1811.08900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Chen,Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow,JHEP03(2020) 033, [arXiv:1912.02210]

    Y. Chen,Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow,JHEP03(2020) 033, [arXiv:1912.02210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Faulkner,The holographic map as a conditional expectation,arXiv:2008.04810

    T. Faulkner,The holographic map as a conditional expectation,arXiv:2008.04810

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    D. L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou,Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,JHEP03(2022) 084, [arXiv:2009.04476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Levine, A

    A. Levine, A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, and R. M. Soni,Seeing the entanglement wedge, JHEP06(2021) 134, [arXiv:2009.11305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 8 086019, [arXiv:2110.05497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Gao and L

    P. Gao and L. Lamprou,Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK,JHEP06(2022) 143, [arXiv:2111.14010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023), no. 8 086020, [arXiv:2112.12156]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, and L. Lamprou,On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,arXiv:2211.16512

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Subregion-subalgebra duality: emergence of space and time in holography,arXiv:2212.13266

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Engelhardt and H

    N. Engelhardt and H. Liu,Algebraic ER=EPR and complexity transfer,JHEP07(2024) 013, [arXiv:2311.04281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Gao,Modular flow in JT gravity and entanglement wedge reconstruction,JHEP06 (2024) 151, [arXiv:2402.18655]

    P. Gao,Modular flow in JT gravity and entanglement wedge reconstruction,JHEP06 (2024) 151, [arXiv:2402.18655]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Parrikar, H

    O. Parrikar, H. Rajgadia, V. Singh, and J. Sorce,Relational bulk reconstruction from modular flow,JHEP07(2024) 138, [arXiv:2403.02377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Gesteau and H

    E. Gesteau and H. Liu,Toward stringy horizons,arXiv:2408.12642

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

    E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082, [arXiv:2206.10780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP04(2023) 009, [arXiv:2209.10454]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and States in JT Gravity,arXiv:2301.07257

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Sorce,Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,Rev

    J. Sorce,Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,Rev. Math. Phys.36 (2024), no. 02 2430002, [arXiv:2302.01958]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer,von Neumann algebras in JT gravity,JHEP06(2023) 067, [arXiv:2303.04701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023) 020, [arXiv:2306.01837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Ali Ahmad and R

    S. Ali Ahmad and R. Jefferson,Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 020, [arXiv:2306.07323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran,Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 2 025013, [arXiv:2309.15897]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, A. A. Rahman, G. Satishchandran, and A. J. Speranza,A covariant regulator for entanglement entropy: proofs of the Bekenstein bound and QNEC, arXiv:2312.07646

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Akers and J

    C. Akers and J. Sorce,Relative State Counting for Semiclassical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:2404.16098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. J. Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law, JHEP11(2024) 099, [arXiv:2405.00847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran,Algebraic Observational Cosmology,arXiv:2406.01669

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Chen and G

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington,A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,arXiv:2406.02116

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, arXiv:2411.08090. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and states in super-JT gravity,arXiv:2412.15549

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Sorce,A classical model for semiclassical state-counting,arXiv:2501.16437

    J. Sorce,A classical model for semiclassical state-counting,arXiv:2501.16437

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    M. S. Klinger, J. Kudler-Flam, and G. Satishchandran,Generalized Entropy is von Neumann Entropy II: The complete symmetry group and edge modes,arXiv:2601.07910

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann,On the Duality Condition for a Hermitian Scalar Field,J. Math. Phys.16(1975) 985–1007

    1975

  55. [55]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann,On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 303–321

    1976

  56. [56]

    G. L. Sewell,Quantum fields on manifolds: PCT and gravitationally induced thermal states, Annals Phys.141(1982) 201–224

    1982

  57. [57]

    A. C. Wall,A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 104049, [arXiv:1105.3445]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 069904 (2013)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    P. D. Hislop and R. Longo,Modular Structure of the Local Algebras Associated With the Free Massless Scalar Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.84(1982) 71

    1982

  59. [59]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2011) 036, [arXiv:1102.0440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    M. B. Fröb,Modular Hamiltonian for de Sitter diamonds,JHEP12(2023) 074, [arXiv:2308.14797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    H. J. Borchers and J. Yngvason,Modular groups of quantum fields in thermal states,J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 601–624, [math-ph/9805013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  62. [62]

    G. Wong, I. Klich, L. A. Pando Zayas, and D. Vaman,Entanglement Temperature and Entanglement Entropy of Excited States,JHEP12(2013) 020, [arXiv:1305.3291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Caminiti, F

    J. Caminiti, F. Capeccia, L. Ciambelli, and R. C. Myers,Geometric modular flows in 2d CFT and beyond,arXiv:2502.02633

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Reduced density matrix and internal dynamics for multicomponent regions,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 185005, [arXiv:0903.5284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  65. [65]

    Longo, P

    R. Longo, P. Martinetti, and K.-H. Rehren,Geometric modular action for disjoint intervals and boundary conformal field theory,Rev. Math. Phys.22(2010) 331–354, [arXiv:0912.1106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Klich, D

    I. Klich, D. Vaman, and G. Wong,Entanglement Hamiltonians for chiral fermions with zero modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 12 120401, [arXiv:1501.00482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Hollands,On the modular operator of multi-component regions in chiral CFT,Commun

    S. Hollands,On the modular operator of multi-component regions in chiral CFT,Commun. Math. Phys.384(2021), no. 2 785–828, [arXiv:1904.08201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Blanco and G

    D. Blanco and G. Pérez-Nadal,Modular Hamiltonian of a chiral fermion on the torus, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 2 025003, [arXiv:1905.05210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Fries and I

    P. Fries and I. A. Reyes,Entanglement Spectrum of Chiral Fermions on the Torus,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 21 211603, [arXiv:1905.05768]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Erdmenger, P

    J. Erdmenger, P. Fries, I. A. Reyes, and C. P. Simon,Resolving modular flow: a toolkit for free fermions,JHEP12(2020) 126, [arXiv:2008.07532]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Cadamuro, M

    D. Cadamuro, M. B. Fröb, and G. Pérez-Nadal,Modular Hamiltonian and modular flow of massless fermions on a cylinder,arXiv:2406.19360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Keyl,Remarks on the relation between causality and quantum fields,Class

    M. Keyl,Remarks on the relation between causality and quantum fields,Class. Quant. Grav. 10(1993) 2353–2362

    1993

  73. [73]

    Sorce,Analyticity and the Unruh effect: a study of local modular flow,JHEP24(2024) 040, [arXiv:2403.18937]

    J. Sorce,Analyticity and the Unruh effect: a study of local modular flow,JHEP24(2024) 040, [arXiv:2403.18937]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation,Physical Review D14(1976), no. 4 870

    1976

  75. [75]

    Dimock and B

    J. Dimock and B. S. Kay,Classical and Quantum Scattering Theory for Linear Scalar Fields on the Schwarzschild Metric. 1.,Annals Phys.175(1987) 366

    1987

  76. [76]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti, and N. Pinamonti,Rigorous construction and Hadamard property of the Unruh state in Schwarzschild spacetime,arXiv e-prints(July, 2009) arXiv:0907.1034, [arXiv:0907.1034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [77]

    Gérard, D

    C. Gérard, D. Häfner, and M. Wrochna,The Unruh state for massless fermions on Kerr spacetime and its Hadamard property,arXiv:2008.10995

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Brum and S

    M. Brum and S. E. Jorás,Hadamard state in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015), no. 1 015013, [arXiv:1405.7916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald, and J. Zahn,Quantum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reissner–Nordström–deSitter spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020), no. 11 115009, [arXiv:1912.06047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    C. K. M. Klein,Construction of the Unruh State for a Real Scalar Field on the Kerr-de Sitter Spacetime,Annales Henri Poincare24(2023), no. 7 2401–2442, [arXiv:2206.05073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.