REVIEW 2 cited by
GPT-4 as a Homework Tutor can Improve Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
GPT-4 as a Homework Tutor can Improve Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes
read the original abstract
This work contributes to the scarce empirical literature on LLM-based interactive homework in real-world educational settings and offers a practical, scalable solution for improving homework in schools. Homework is an important part of education in schools across the world, but in order to maximize benefit, it needs to be accompanied with feedback and followup questions. We developed a prompting strategy that enables GPT-4 to conduct interactive homework sessions for high-school students learning English as a second language. Our strategy requires minimal efforts in content preparation, one of the key challenges of alternatives like home tutors or ITSs. We carried out a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in four high-school classes, replacing traditional homework with GPT-4 homework sessions for the treatment group. We observed significant improvements in learning outcomes, specifically a greater gain in grammar, and student engagement. In addition, students reported high levels of satisfaction with the system and wanted to continue using it after the end of the RCT.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Designing Needs- and Attention-Aware AI Learning Tools for Engineering Education: Insights from Psychological Outcomes
Engineering students perceive AI chatbots as most helpful for relieving competence frustration, less for autonomy, and least for relatedness; inattention weakens those perceived benefits.
-
Small, Private Language Models as Teammates for Educational Assessment Design
SLMs achieve competitive performance with LLMs on pedagogically grounded metrics for assessment design but exhibit biases in model-based evaluation versus experts, supporting bounded AI use with human oversight.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.