Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Detecting AI-Generated Images via CLIP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08788 v1 pith:PQ4444HR submitted 2024-04-12 cs.CV cs.LG

Detecting AI-Generated Images via CLIP

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords aigiclipai-generatedarchitecturedetermineimagemodelsbecome
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI-generated image (AIGI) methods become more powerful and accessible, it has become a critical task to determine if an image is real or AI-generated. Because AIGI lack the signatures of photographs and have their own unique patterns, new models are needed to determine if an image is AI-generated. In this paper, we investigate the ability of the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) architecture, pre-trained on massive internet-scale data sets, to perform this differentiation. We fine-tune CLIP on real images and AIGI from several generative models, enabling CLIP to determine if an image is AI-generated and, if so, determine what generation method was used to create it. We show that the fine-tuned CLIP architecture is able to differentiate AIGI as well or better than models whose architecture is specifically designed to detect AIGI. Our method will significantly increase access to AIGI-detecting tools and reduce the negative effects of AIGI on society, as our CLIP fine-tuning procedures require no architecture changes from publicly available model repositories and consume significantly less GPU resources than other AIGI detection models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chroma Clues: Leveraging Color Statistics to Detect Synthetic Images

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Color transformations expose statistical discrepancies in synthetic images, supporting a classifier with 93.27% average accuracy and robustness to post-processing.

  2. A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    MS COCOAI provides 96,000 caption-aligned real and synthetic images from five generators, with baseline scores of about 0.80 for real-vs-AI detection and 0.45 for generator attribution.