Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Integrating LSTM and BERT for Long-Sequence Data Analysis in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.05136 v1 pith:PQIQMLST submitted 2024-04-24 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords dataknowledgetracingintelligentlbktsystemstutoringdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of Knowledge Tracing aims to understand how students learn and master knowledge over time by analyzing their historical behaviour data. To achieve this goal, many researchers have proposed Knowledge Tracing models that use data from Intelligent Tutoring Systems to predict students' subsequent actions. However, with the development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, large-scale datasets containing long-sequence data began to emerge. Recent deep learning based Knowledge Tracing models face obstacles such as low efficiency, low accuracy, and low interpretability when dealing with large-scale datasets containing long-sequence data. To address these issues and promote the sustainable development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, we propose a LSTM BERT-based Knowledge Tracing model for long sequence data processing, namely LBKT, which uses a BERT-based architecture with a Rasch model-based embeddings block to deal with different difficulty levels information and an LSTM block to process the sequential characteristic in students' actions. LBKT achieves the best performance on most benchmark datasets on the metrics of ACC and AUC. Additionally, an ablation study is conducted to analyse the impact of each component of LBKT's overall performance. Moreover, we used t-SNE as the visualisation tool to demonstrate the model's embedding strategy. The results indicate that LBKT is faster, more interpretable, and has a lower memory cost than the traditional deep learning based Knowledge Tracing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-KT: Aligning Large Language Models with Knowledge Tracing using a Plug-and-Play Instruction

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-KT injects question text and sequence-model ID embeddings into a fine-tuned LLM through plug-in tokens and reports state-of-the-art knowledge tracing results on four benchmarks.

  2. Classroom Simulacra: Building Contextual Student Generative Agents in Online Education for Learning Behavioral Simulation

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new reflection-based AI method makes LLM-generated virtual students predict real students' future quiz performance better than deep learning knowledge-tracing baselines.

  3. TutorLLM: Customizing Learning Recommendations with Knowledge Tracing and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.IR 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Chrome-plugin tutor system combining MLFBK knowledge tracing with RAG-enhanced GPT-4 shows a non-significant trend toward better quiz scores and lacks a baseline for its satisfaction claim.

Pith tools