Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Correlated phases in twisted trilayer graphene form a magic continuum, with AHE in moiré polycrystals and superconductivity in moiré quasicrystals.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Correlated states in twisted trilayer graphene appear along two 'magic' twist-angle lines, with superconductivity in quasicrystalline samples and anomalous Hall effect in polycrystalline samples.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Strong experimental transport data, but the paper's broad 'magic continuum' claim leans on unmeasured twist angles for three of seven devices; worth serious peer review. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.03583 v1 pith:PYU6EQBW submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Magic continuum in multi-moir\'e twisted trilayer graphene

Li-Qiao Xia , Aviram Uri , Jiaojie Yan , Aaron Sharpe , Filippo Gaggioli , Nicole S. Ticea , Julian May-Mann , Kenji Watanabe
show 5 more authors
Takashi Taniguchi Liang Fu Trithep Devakul Jurgen H. Smet Pablo Jarillo-Herrero
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords twisted trilayer graphenemagic continuummoiré quasicrystalmoiré polycrystalanomalous Hall effectsuperconductivitysupermoiré modulationlattice relaxation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twisted trilayer graphene has two independent twist angles, so instead of a single magic angle it can support an extended region—a 'magic continuum'—where electrons feel strong correlations. The paper reports that several new devices whose twist angles sit near two continuous lines in this two-angle space all show either superconductivity or an anomalous Hall effect, depending on how the lattice relaxes. Relaxation into moiré polycrystals produces locally periodic domains with broken inversion symmetry, which host topological bands and yield an anomalous Hall effect. Relaxation into moiré quasicrystals leaves the local stacking to vary smoothly, and these devices superconduct generically, with some showing two-step transitions attributed to superconductivity modulated on the supermoiré scale. If correct, the picture replaces isolated magic points with a continuous design rule for correlated phases in multi-moiré graphene.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that strong correlations in twisted trilayer graphene are not confined to isolated magic angles: they live on two continuous branches—a magic continuum—in the (θ12, θ23) twist-angle plane. Devices whose angles fall near these branches show correlated states, and which correlated state appears is set by lattice relaxation. When relaxation organizes the structure into moiré polycrystals with periodic d = ±δ domains, helical configurations show an anomalous Hall effect at odd integer fillings, attributed to a Chern mosaic of locally C2z-broken topological bands. When relaxation leaves d to vary smoothly across the supermoiré, moiré quasicrystals show superconductivi

What carries the argument

The central objects are the two moiré lattices formed by adjacent layers and their relative displacement d between the AA-stacking sites of the top and bottom pairs. Because the two moiré periods are generally incommensurate, the paper approximates the structure as locally periodic with twist-angle ratio p/q, so that the local moiré band structure depends on d; d itself varies slowly over the supermoiré length lsm ≈ 2a0/|(p+q)pq θ0²|. A magic angle for each ratio is found by maximizing the density of states averaged over d, which traces the two continuum branches. Lattice relaxation then determines the outcome: near ratios ±1 and 2, relaxation creates periodic d = ±δ domains (moiré polycryst

Load-bearing premise

For three devices, the larger twist angle is not measured directly; the paper only infers it from the absence of certain resistance features, so placing those devices on the magic continuum depends on that angle estimate being right.

What would settle it

Measure the actual larger twist angle in Devices B2, C, and D through direct imaging or Landau-level spectroscopy; if the true ratio falls outside the ranges [−2.14,−1.86], [−3.13,−2.87], or [2.92,3.07], those devices no longer lie on the claimed continuum branches. Independently, imaging the supermoiré period and the local superconducting regions would show directly whether the two-step transition comes from spatially modulated superconductivity.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Correlated phases in twisted trilayer graphene are governed by two continuous twist-angle branches, so future devices can target the continuum lines instead of fine-tuned isolated magic angles.
  • Moiré polycrystals with θ23/θ12 ≈ 2 realize a Chern mosaic: locally topological domains with opposite valley Chern numbers separated by gapless domain walls, producing a non-quantized anomalous Hall effect at odd fillings.
  • Superconductivity in moiré quasicrystals is generic along the continuum, indicating that local flat bands alone are insufficient—local symmetry and the supermoiré modulation also matter.
  • In quasicrystals near angle ratios −2 and 3, the two-step superconducting transition and the comparison ξGL ≈ 15–50 nm < lsm ≳ 100 nm indicate spatially modulated superconductivity, i.e., a natural Josephson-junction-array-like system without lithographic patterning.
  • The magic-continuum concept extends beyond TTG to multi-dimensional parameter spaces—multiple angles, strain, pressure—offering a route to engineer correlated and topological phases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relaxation dichotomy is the deciding factor, deliberately straining or gating a single TTG device to cross between polycrystal and quasicrystal regimes should switch it between AHE and superconductivity; the paper does not test this directly.
  • The island picture for the two-step transition predicts flux-periodic resistance oscillations when the flux through supermoiré cells is varied; the paper notes these oscillations were not observed, likely due to supermoiré disorder, so cleaner samples provide a sharp test.
  • The continuum idea implies inherent tolerance to twist-angle disorder along the branches, which could explain why correlated states reproduce across devices despite small angle uncertainties—an editorial inference beyond the paper's explicit claims.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports transport measurements on seven twisted trilayer graphene (TTG) devices with two independent twist angles, and argues that correlated ground states lie along two continuous 'magic continuum' lines in the (θ12, θ23) parameter space. In a relaxed 'moire polycrystal' device with θ23/θ12 ≈ 2, the authors observe an anomalous Hall effect, which they attribute to topological flat bands in moire-periodic domains with broken C2z symmetry. In 'moire quasicrystal' devices with θ23/θ12 ≈ −2, −3, and +3, they observe superconductivity in all devices, including two-step transitions, Fraunhofer-like interference patterns, and BKT-type behavior. A subset of devices shows two-step superconducting transitions interpreted as supermoire-modulated superconductivity, with superconducting islands of size lSC satisfying ξGL ≲ lSC < lsm. The authors place all devices on two theoretical magic-continuum branches and conclude that magic conditions in multi-moire materials are not isolated points but extended manifolds.

Significance. The experimental dataset is rich and in many respects convincing: multiple independently fabricated devices, temperature-dependent transport, V-I characteristics with Fraunhofer-like interference, Landau fans, and two-step transitions reproduced in Devices B1, B2, and D. The central dichotomy—AHE in helically twisted moire polycrystals versus superconductivity in moire quasicrystals—is a valuable empirical pattern that goes beyond the single-moire paradigm. The paper also benefits from a clean comparison to prior theory: the magic-continuum calculations come from Refs. [2–5], and the experiments target, but do not fit, those predictions. If the branch assignment were established, the paper would be a significant step toward a 'magic manifold' picture in multi-moire materials. However, the assignment of three of the five key quasicrystal devices (B2, C, D) to specific branches rests on an indirect and underdetermined inference about the larger twist angle θ23, and the paper's universal 'all samples' claim is contradicted by one of its own devices. These issues currently limit the strength of the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods C; Extended Data Fig. 12] For Devices B2, C, and D, the larger twist angle θ23 is not directly measured. The quoted ratio ranges (e.g., [−2.14,−1.86] for Device B2) are obtained by combining the fabrication target (p,q) with the null observation of Rxx peaks at the supermoire density and the estimate lsm/lm ≳ 7. This inference is conditional on the assumed branch. A weak or disorder-broadened supermoire potential would suppress those peaks for any lsm, and angle ratios closer to θ23/θ12 ≈ −1 (alternating) or ≈ +1 (helical) produce even larger supermoire wavelengths, so the same null observation is compatible with previously studied MATTG/HTG branches. Because the placement of these devices in Fig. 1a, the quoted values lsm ≳ 100 nm, and the comparison ξGL ≲ lSC < lsm in Methods E–G all depend on these ranges, the branch assignment and the quantitative supermoire-modulation claim are not established for these devi
  2. [Main text, p. 3; Extended Data Fig. 2b] The statement 'Remarkably, all samples with twist angles near two continuous lines in the parameter space exhibit either superconductivity or AHE' is not supported by the data as presented. Device F (Extended Data Fig. 2b) lies on the alternating magic-continuum asymptote with θ23 ≈ −15° and shows neither superconductivity nor AHE at T = 300 mK; the caption attributes this to 'higher T or sample not having the optimal twist angle.' This may be a plausible explanation, but as written the universal claim is false. The sentence and the abstract should be qualified, or Device F should be excluded from the universality statement.
  3. [Methods C] The key bound lsm/lm ≳ 7 is asserted to follow 'from the width of the Rxx peak at charge neutrality,' but no derivation, quantitative criterion, or reference is supplied. Since this bound is the only quantitative input for the θ23 ranges of Devices B2, C, and D, the Methods section should either provide the estimation procedure in detail or replace this step with a direct measurement. As written, the bound is not reproducible and is load-bearing for the branch assignment.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods C] The text says 'we can calculate the range of θ23 for each device' and then reports 'The resultant twist angle ratio ranges are...' The relationship between the θ23 ranges and the quoted ratio ranges is confusing; please clarify whether the numbers are θ23, θ23/θ12, or both.
  2. [Methods E] In Eq. (1), the fitting parameters A, B, and ξn are introduced without definitions. Please specify the physical meaning of A and B (or refer explicitly to the corresponding expressions in Ref. [28]) so that the fit is reproducible.
  3. [Fig. 1a] The legend labels 'Ref. 8' and 'Ref. 17' are ambiguous. Please spell out the structures (e.g., 'moire quasicrystal, Ref. 8' and 'MATBG+MLG, Ref. 17') or use full citations in the caption.
  4. [Extended Data Fig. 9] The caption notes that Device D changed slightly during a thermal cycle. Please state explicitly how this affects the quantitative comparison in Extended Data Fig. 12 and whether the θ23 range remains valid for the data used in the ξGL extraction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the magic-continuum prediction comes from prior independent theory and the experiments test rather than fit it.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) prior theory (Refs 2-5, including external groups) predicts magic-continuum branches in (θ12, θ23) parameter space; (ii) devices are fabricated targeting specific angle ratios; (iii) θ12 is extracted from moiré density, while θ23 is directly measured for Device B1 and estimated or bounded for B2/C/D from the absence of supermoiré-density peaks; (iv) observed correlated states, AHE, and superconductivity are compared with band-structure calculations for those ratios. No predicted quantity (branch location, lsm, or the lsm-vs-ξGL comparison) is obtained by fitting the same data it is supposed to explain. The only self-referential element is Device A: Methods C infers the local angle ratio is exactly 2 from the observation of AHE, and the AHE is subsequently rationalized by the topological band structure calculated at that ratio. This is a consistency check, not an independent confirmation, and the paper explicitly states the qualitative conclusions do not depend on the exact θ23 value. Similarly, the lower bound lsm/lm ≳ 7 for B2/C/D is inferred from the absence of Rxx peaks at the supermoiré density and then used to motivate the supermoiré-modulation interpretation; this is an underdetermined inference and a robustness limitation, but not a circular derivation. The central magic-continuum claim rests on prior theory and on directly measured Device B1; the unmeasured θ23 values for B2/C/D warrant direct angle measurements but do not make the argument circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims mostly rest on standard fabrication and measurement procedures, not on new mathematical axioms. The main assumptions are the BM continuum model, the local periodic approximation that deforms the middle layer, the relaxation-based classification, and the inference of θ23 from the absence of supermoiré density peaks. These are reasonable domain assumptions, but they are load-bearing for the magic-continuum and supermoiré-modulation interpretation. The only genuinely fitted numbers are the proximity-model parameters and indirectly inferred twist angles.

free parameters (3)
  • Proximity model fitting parameters (R0xx, A, B, ξn) = device-dependent, fit to Rxx(T) between superconducting transitions
    Used in Eq. 1 to model Rxx(T) between the two transitions; these are free parameters in an interpretive fit, not predictions.
  • θ23 for Device A = approximately 2.6°, inferred from AHE rather than measured directly
    The ratio θ23/θ12 ≈ 2 is inferred from the observation of AHE (Methods C), and the relaxed-domain calculation then uses this ratio to explain the AHE.
  • θ23 ranges for Devices B2, C, and D = estimated ranges [−2.14, −1.86], [−3.13, −2.87], [2.92, 3.07]
    These angles are not directly measured; the lsm vs ξGL comparison and the magic-continuum assignment depend on them (Methods C).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Generalized Bistritzer-MacDonald continuum model with first-harmonic interlayer tunnelling describes the low-energy electronic structure of multi-moiré TTG.
    Invoked in Methods H (Eqs 8-10) to compute local moiré bands; parameters vF, w, ξ, and κ are taken from prior work, not fitted here.
  • domain assumption The incommensurate TTG structure can be approximated by a local periodic structure in which the middle layer is slightly deformed (Eq. 5); the deformation is O(θ0) (Eq. 7) and is assumed not to change the physics.
    Underlies the local moiré band calculations and the definition of the moiré unit cell used for filling factors.
  • domain assumption Lattice relaxation determines whether TTG becomes a moiré polycrystal or quasicrystal, and the relaxation model of Refs 20-22 is accurate.
    The paper uses this to classify Device A as a moiré polycrystal and Devices B-D as quasicrystals.
  • ad hoc to paper Absence of Rxx peaks at the supermoiré density implies lsm/lm ≳ 7 and thereby constrains θ23.
    This inferential step in Methods C converts a null observation into a bound on the larger twist angle.
  • domain assumption Electronic structure varies smoothly with twist angles, so observations at discrete points can be extended to continuous magic lines.
    Stated explicitly after Fig. 1a; underlies the 'magic continuum' wording and the extrapolation from seven devices to continuous branches.
  • domain assumption The superconducting proximity model of Ref 28 (Eq. 1) accounts for Rxx(T) between the two transitions.
    Used in Methods E to fit the two-step resistance traces and extract island transition temperatures.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magic continuum in multi-moir\'e twisted trilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYU6EQBW

@misc{pith2026250903583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magic continuum in multi-moir\'e twisted trilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYU6EQBW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03583}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Moir\'e lattices provide a highly tunable platform for exploring the interplay between electronic correlations and band topology. Introducing a second moir\'e pattern extends this paradigm: interference between the two moir\'e patterns produces a supermoir\'e modulation, opening a route to further tailor electronic properties. Twisted trilayer graphene generally exemplifies such a system: two distinct moir\'e patterns arise from the relative twists between adjacent graphene layers. Here, we report the observation of correlated phenomena across a wide range of twisted trilayer graphene devices whose twist angles lie along two continuous lines in the twist-angle parameter space. Depending on the degree of lattice relaxation, twisted trilayer graphene falls into two classes: moir\'e polycrystals, composed of periodic domains with locally commensurate moir\'e order, and moir\'e quasicrystals, characterized by smoothly varying local moir\'e configurations. In helically twisted moir\'e polycrystals, we observe an anomalous Hall effect, consistent with topological bands arising from domains with broken $xy$-inversion symmetry. In contrast, superconductivity appears generically in our moir\'e quasicrystals. A subset of these systems exhibits signatures of spatially modulated superconductivity, which we attribute to the supermoir\'e structure. Our findings uncover the organizing principles of the observed correlated phases in twisted trilayer graphene, highlight the critical roles of the supermoir\'e modulation and lattice relaxation, and suggest a broader framework in which magic conditions arise not as isolated points but as extended manifolds within the multi-dimensional twist-angle space of complex moir\'e materials.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mesoscopic transport in a Chern mosaic

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Simple domain-wall networks in Chern mosaics produce zero, integer, or fractional multiples of the resistance quantum in both longitudinal and Hall channels.

  2. Link between thermodynamic correlation signatures and superconductivity in twisted trilayer graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    In helically twisted trilayer graphene, the superconducting critical temperature scales with the sawtooth compressibility strength as a function of twist angle, with electron-hole asymmetry, while showing no direct li...

  3. Anomalous metal and superconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Gate-tuned rhombohedral graphene hosts adjacent zero-resistance superconducting and finite-resistance anomalous-metal pockets with similar Tc but distinct critical fields, constraining extrinsic origins of anomalous metals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The errors in θ12 depend on the uncertainty in the fits to Rxx peaks and Landau levels, which are less than 0.05° in general. The determination of the larger angle, θ23, is more challenging given that the breakdown voltage of the hBN dielectric usually does not allow us to access ν±4 fillings for layers 2 and 3. Here, we comment on this issue for each dev...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We can now calculate the local electronic properties

    (7) is only non-zero at order θ0 (in this analysis, we have assumed p/q ≠−1). We can now calculate the local electronic properties. We consider three graphene sheets in the commensurate structure. Importantly, we allow each layer to be displaced in-plane according to a vector sℓ, such that the sublattice σ ∈ {A, B} carbon atoms in layer ℓ are positioned a...

    work page

  3. [3]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 201 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Z. Zhu, S. Carr, D. Massatt, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Twisted trilayer graphene: A precisely tunable platform for correlated electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 116404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    F. K. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky, Magic angle butterfly in twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043079 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    C. Yang, J. May-Mann, Z. Zhu, and T. Devakul, Multi-moir´ e trilayer graphene: Lattice relaxation, electronic structure, and magic angles, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115434 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    D. C. W. Foo, Z. Zhan, M. M. Al Ezzi, L. Peng, S. Adam, and F. Guinea, Extended magic phase in twisted graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013165 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    L.-Q. Xia, S. C. de la Barrera, A. Uri, A. Sharpe, Y. H. Kwan, Z. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, L. Fu, T. Devakul, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Topological bands and correlated states in helical trilayer graphene, Nature Physics 21, 239 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    J. C. Hoke, Y. Li, Y. Hu, J. May-Mann, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Devakul, and B. E. Feldman, Imaging supermoire relaxation and conductive domain walls in helical trilayer graphene (2024), arXiv:2410.16269 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, M. T. Randeria, D. Rodan-Legrain, T. Devakul, P. J. D. Crowley, N. Paul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Lifshitz, L. Fu, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moir´ e quasicrystal, Nature620, 762 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional supercon- ductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´ e heterostructure, Science367, 900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-h. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 590, 249 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Z. Hao, A. M. Zimmerman, P. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, D. H. Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, and P. Kim, Electric field–tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene, Science 371, 1133 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 12233 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    C.-Y. Hao, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantale´ on, J.-Q. He, Y.-X. Zhao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Guinea, and L. He, Robust flat bands in twisted trilayer graphene moir´ e quasicrystals, Nature Communications15, 8437 (2024). 14

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    J. C. Hoke, Y. Li, J. May-Mann, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Bradlyn, T. L. Hughes, and B. E. Feldman, Uncovering the spin ordering in magic-angle graphene via edge state equilibration, Nature Communications 15, 4321 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, H. Polshyn, A. Shragai, Z. Xia, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, and A. F. Young, Imaging orbital ferromagnetism in a moir´ e chern insulator, Science 372, 1323 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Evidence of orbital ferromagnetism in twisted bilayer graphene aligned to hexagonal boron nitride, Nano Letters 21, 4299 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. B. Torrisi, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Relaxation and domain formation in incom- mensurate two-dimensional heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 98, 224102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Cazeaux, M

    P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and D. Massatt, Energy minimization of two dimensional incommensurate heterostructures, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 235, 1289 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Z. Zhu, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Modeling mechanical relaxation in incommensurate trilayer van der waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 101, 224107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Grover, M

    S. Grover, M. Bocarsly, A. Uri, P. Stepanov, G. Di Battista, I. Roy, J. Xiao, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, K. Pareek, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Yan, A. Stern, E. Berg, D. K. Efetov, and E. Zeldov, Chern mosaic and berry-curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene, Nature Physics 18, 885 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Devakul, P

    T. Devakul, P. J. Ledwith, L.-Q. Xia, A. Uri, S. C. de la Barrera, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and L. Fu, Magic-angle helical trilayer graphene, Science Advances 9, eadi6063 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Guerci, Y

    D. Guerci, Y. Mao, and C. Mora, Chern mosaic and ideal flat bands in equal-twist trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    K. P. Nuckolls, R. L. Lee, M. Oh, D. Wong, T. Soejima, J. P. Hong, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, B. A. Bernevig, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, N. Regnault, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Quantum textures of the many-body wavefunc- tions in magic-angle graphene, Nature 620, 525 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    H. Kim, Y. Choi, ´E. Lantagne-Hurtubise, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, L. Kong, H. Zhou, E. Baum, Y. Zhang, L. Holleis, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. F. Young, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Imaging inter-valley coherent order in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 623, 942 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    D. W. Abraham, C. J. Lobb, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Resistive transition in two-dimensional arrays of super- conducting weak links, Phys. Rev. B 26, 5268 (1982)

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    D. J. Resnick, J. C. Garland, J. T. Boyd, S. Shoemaker, and R. S. Newrock, Kosterlitz-thouless transition in proximity- coupled superconducting arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1542 (1981)

    work page 1981

  32. [32]

    S. Eley, S. Gopalakrishnan, P. M. Goldbart, and N. Mason, Approaching zero-temperature metallic states in mesoscopic superconductor–normal–superconductor arrays, Nature Physics 8, 59 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Z. Han, A. Allain, H. Arjmandi-Tash, K. Tikhonov, M. Feigel’man, B. Sac´ ep´ e, and V. Bouchiat, Collapse of supercon- ductivity in a hybrid tin–graphene josephson junction array, Nature Physics 10, 380 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    C. G. L. Bøttcher, F. Nichele, M. Kjaergaard, H. J. Suominen, J. Shabani, C. J. Palmstrøm, and C. M. Marcus, Super- conducting, insulating and anomalous metallic regimes in a gated two-dimensional semiconductor–superconductor array, Nature Physics 14, 1138 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Robust superconductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family, Nature Materials 21, 877 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Zhang, R

    Y. Zhang, R. Polski, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, Y. Peng, Y. Choi, H. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, F. von Oppen, G. Refael, and S. Nadj-Perge, Promotion of superconductivity in magic-angle graphene multilayers, Science 377, 1538 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    G. W. Burg, E. Khalaf, Y. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Tutuc, Emergence of correlations in alternating twist quadrilayer graphene, Nature Materials 21, 884 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene, Nature 583, 215 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, Y. Ronen, H. Yoo, D. Haei Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, and P. Kim, Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature 583, 221 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, and A. F. Young, Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator, Nature 588, 66 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Waters, R

    D. Waters, R. Su, E. Thompson, A. Okounkova, E. Arreguin-Martinez, M. He, K. Hinds, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, Y.-H. Zhang, J. Folk, and M. Yankowitz, Topological flat bands in a family of multilayer graphene moir´ e lattices, Nature Communications 15, 10552 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Sac´ ep´ e, M

    B. Sac´ ep´ e, M. Feigel’man, and T. M. Klapwijk, Quantum breakdown of superconductivity in low-dimensional materials, Nature Physics 16, 734 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Y. Cao, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Pauli-limit violation and re-entrant supercon- ductivity in moir´ e graphene, Nature595, 526 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    M. Oh, K. P. Nuckolls, D. Wong, R. L. Lee, X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Yazdani, Evidence for unconven- tional superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600, 240 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    H. Kim, Y. Choi, C. Lewandowski, A. Thomson, Y. Zhang, R. Polski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj- Perge, Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 606, 494 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Tanaka, J

    M. Tanaka, J. ˆI.-j. Wang, T. H. Dinh, D. Rodan-Legrain, S. Zaman, M. Hays, A. Almanakly, B. Kannan, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and W. D. Oliver, Superfluid stiffness of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 638, 99 (2025). 15

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Banerjee, Z

    A. Banerjee, Z. Hao, M. Kreidel, P. Ledwith, I. Phinney, J. M. Park, A. Zimmerman, M. E. Wesson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Westervelt, A. Yacoby, P. Jarillo-Herrero, P. A. Volkov, A. Vishwanath, K. C. Fong, and P. Kim, Superfluid stiffness of twisted trilayer graphene superconductors, Nature 638, 93 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    J. M. Park, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Simultaneous transport and tunneling spectroscopy of moir´ e graphene: Distinct observation of the superconducting gap and signatures of nodal superconductivity (2025), arXiv:2503.16410 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and E. Kaxiras, Pressure dependence of the magic twist angle in graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085144 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Morales-Dur´ an, J

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, J. Wang, G. R. Schleder, M. Angeli, Z. Zhu, E. Kaxiras, C. Repellin, and J. Cano, Pressure-enhanced fractional chern insulators along a magic line in moir´ e transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L032022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Inbar, J

    A. Inbar, J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. Yan, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg, and S. Ilani, The quantum twisting microscope, Nature 614, 682 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    H. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Ni, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, S. Fan, E. Mazur, A. Yacoby, and Y. Cao, On-chip multi-degree-of-freedom control of two-dimensional materials, Nature 632, 1038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Sun and P

    S. Sun and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Optimized fabrication procedure for high-quality graphene-based moir´ e superlattice devices, JoVE , e68230 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    L. Wang, I. Meric, P. Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. M. Campos, D. A. Muller, J. Guo, P. Kim, J. Hone, K. L. Shepard, and C. R. Dean, One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material, Science 342, 614 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    A Twisted Pair Cryogenic Filter

    L. Spietz, J. Teufel, and R. J. Schoelkopf, A twisted pair cryogenic filter (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0601316 [cond-mat.other]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, J. Wang, P. Ledwith, Z. Cai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Khalaf, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Strong interactions and isospin symmetry breaking in a supermoir´ e lattice, Science 389, 736 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    S. L. Tomarken, Y. Cao, A. Demir, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, Electronic com- pressibility of magic-angle graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 046601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    K. P. Nuckolls, M. Oh, D. Wong, B. Lian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Strongly correlated chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 588, 610 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    Y. Choi, H. Kim, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, C. Lewandowski, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. S. Arora, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Correlation-driven topological phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 589, 536 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Flavour hund’s coupling, chern gaps and charge diffusivity in moir´ e graphene, Nature592, 43 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    S. Wu, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Chern insulators, van hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Materials 20, 488 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, L. Rademaker, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. A. Abanin, and A. F. Young, Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry-broken chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 17, 478 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    I. Das, X. Lu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z.-D. Song, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Symmetry- broken chern insulators and rashba-like landau-level crossings in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 17, 710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Stepanov, M

    P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Competing zero-field chern insulators in superconducting twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    J. Yu, B. A. Foutty, Z. Han, M. E. Barber, Y. Schattner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Phillips, Z.-X. Shen, S. A. Kivelson, and B. E. Feldman, Correlated hofstadter spectrum and flavour phase diagram in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 18, 825 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    M. He, X. Wang, J. Cai, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, R. Peng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Stern, B. A. Bernevig, M. Yankowitz, O. Vafek, and X. Xu, Strongly interacting hofstadter states in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025-02997-4 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02997-4 2025

  68. [68]

    Finney, A

    J. Finney, A. L. Sharpe, L. K. Rodenbach, J. Kang, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, O. Vafek, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Extended fractional chern insulators near half flux in twisted bilayer graphene above the magic angle (2025), arXiv:2503.12819 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Wang and O

    X. Wang and O. Vafek, Theory of correlated chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X14, 021042 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    T. P. Orlando, J. E. Mooij, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Phenomenological model of vortex dynamics in arrays of josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 43, 10218 (1991)

    work page 1991

  71. [71]

    A. B. Pippard, Magnetoresistance in metals, Vol. 2 (Cambridge university press, 1989)

    work page 1989

  72. [72]

    M. S. Rzchowski, S. P. Benz, M. Tinkham, and C. J. Lobb, Vortex pinning in josephson-junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 42, 2041 (1990)

    work page 2041

  73. [73]

    Tinkham, D

    M. Tinkham, D. W. Abraham, and C. J. Lobb, Periodic flux dependence of the resistive transition in two-dimensional superconducting arrays, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6578 (1983)

    work page 1983

  74. [74]

    Y. H. Kwan, T. Tan, and T. Devakul, Fractional chern mosaic in supermoir´ e graphene (2024), arXiv:2411.08880 [cond- mat.str-el]. 16 a hgfe d c b TTG Graphite or PdAu bottom gate Au top gate Vbg Vtg Device B1 Device A Device B2 Device D Device C Device E Device F Extended Data Fig. 1 . Circuit diagram and optical micrographs of TTG devices. a , Circuit di...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.