REVIEW 7 cited by
Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction
read the original abstract
The current paradigm of test-time scaling relies on generating long reasoning traces ("thinking" more) before producing a response. In agent problems that require interaction, this can be done by generating thinking traces before acting in the world. However, this process does not allow agents to acquire new information from the environment or adapt their behavior over time. In this work, we propose to scale test-time interaction, an untapped dimension of test-time scaling that increases the agent's interaction horizon to enable running rich behaviors such as exploration, backtracking, and dynamic re-planning within a single rollout. To demonstrate the promise of this scaling dimension, we study the domain of web agents. We first show that even prompting-based interaction scaling without any training can improve task success on web benchmarks non-trivially. Building on this, we introduce TTI (Test-Time Interaction), a curriculum-based online reinforcement learning (RL) approach that trains agents by adaptively adjusting their rollout lengths. Using a Gemma 3 12B model, TTI produces state-of-the-art open-source, open-data web agents on WebVoyager and WebArena benchmarks. We further show that TTI enables agents to balance exploration and exploitation adaptively. Our results establish interaction scaling as a powerful, complementary axis to scaling per-step compute, offering new avenues for training adaptive agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
EdgeBench: Unveiling Scaling Laws of Learning from Real-World Environments
Across ~38,000 hours on 134 ultra-long real-world tasks, aggregate agent performance follows a log-sigmoid of interaction time, and measured learning speed doubles about every three months.
-
PRO-CUA: Process-Reward Optimization for Computer Use Agents
PRO-CUA trains CUAs via decoupled on-policy rollouts and PRM-guided step-level optimization to enable dense credit assignment without expert trajectories or golden answers.
-
AsyncWebRL: Efficient Multi-Step RL for Visual Web Agents
AsyncWebRL reports up to 2.9x training speedup and new SOTA on WebGym OOD split via async overlap plus constant normalizer in GRPO, with largest gains on harder tasks.
-
Native Parallel Reasoner: Reasoning in Parallelism via Self-Distilled Reinforcement Learning
NPR trains LLMs to reason in parallel via self-distilled RL, delivering up to 24.5% performance gains and 4.6x speedups with 100% genuine parallel execution on reasoning benchmarks.
-
VeriOS: Query-Driven Proactive Human-Agent-GUI Interaction for Trustworthy OS Agents
VeriOS-Agent is an OS agent that proactively queries humans in untrustworthy scenarios via a query-driven framework and three-stage training, achieving 19.72% higher step-wise success rate over baselines while preserv...
-
On Training Large Language Models for Long-Horizon Tasks: An Empirical Study of Horizon Length
Longer action horizons bottleneck LLM agent training through instability, but training with reduced horizons stabilizes learning and enables better generalization to longer horizons.
-
Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems
This survey frames foundation agents using brain-inspired modular architectures and reviews challenges in evolution, collaboration, and safety.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.