Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13632 v2 pith:Q4QAQKBY submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords faithfulnesscross-lingualhallucinationstransferenglishevenlossmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hallucinations pose a significant challenge to the reliability of neural models for abstractive summarisation. While automatically generated summaries may be fluent, they often lack faithfulness to the original document. This issue becomes even more pronounced in low-resource settings, such as cross-lingual transfer. With the existing faithful metrics focusing on English, even measuring the extent of this phenomenon in cross-lingual settings is hard. To address this, we first develop a novel metric, mFACT, evaluating the faithfulness of non-English summaries, leveraging translation-based transfer from multiple English faithfulness metrics. We then propose a simple but effective method to reduce hallucinations with a cross-lingual transfer, which weighs the loss of each training example by its faithfulness score. Through extensive experiments in multiple languages, we demonstrate that mFACT is the metric that is most suited to detect hallucinations. Moreover, we find that our proposed loss weighting method drastically increases both performance and faithfulness according to both automatic and human evaluation when compared to strong baselines for cross-lingual transfer such as MAD-X. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/yfqiu-nlp/mfact-summ.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs for Customized Marketing Content Generation and Evaluation at Scale

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MarketingFM generates e-commerce ad copy with RAG and an LLM; AutoEval uses LLM-as-a-Judge plus rule checks and self-refines its prompts, with online tests showing significant clicks and impressions lifts but no signi...

  2. Span-Level Hallucination Detection for LLM-Generated Answers

    cs.CL 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A SemEval-2025 system combines semantic role labeling, textual entailment, and logit confidence to detect hallucinated spans, but its confidence formula degenerates to one over unit length.

  3. Loki's Dance of Illusions: A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM hallucination research that formalizes hallucination types and argues, via incompleteness and undecidability arguments, that hallucinations cannot be fully eliminated.

Pith tools