Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Auditing Gender Presentation Differences in Text-to-Image Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.03675 v2 pith:Q5KHO2WP submitted 2023-02-07 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords genderdifferencesmodelstext-to-imageattributesautomatichumanimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-image models, which can generate high-quality images based on textual input, have recently enabled various content-creation tools. Despite significantly affecting a wide range of downstream applications, the distributions of these generated images are still not fully understood, especially when it comes to the potential stereotypical attributes of different genders. In this work, we propose a paradigm (Gender Presentation Differences) that utilizes fine-grained self-presentation attributes to study how gender is presented differently in text-to-image models. By probing gender indicators in the input text (e.g., "a woman" or "a man"), we quantify the frequency differences of presentation-centric attributes (e.g., "a shirt" and "a dress") through human annotation and introduce a novel metric: GEP. Furthermore, we propose an automatic method to estimate such differences. The automatic GEP metric based on our approach yields a higher correlation with human annotations than that based on existing CLIP scores, consistently across three state-of-the-art text-to-image models. Finally, we demonstrate the generalization ability of our metrics in the context of gender stereotypes related to occupations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI Model

    cs.HC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Teenagers can carry out a full AI audit of a real product and reach conclusions that largely match expert analysis, while adding new concerns like age bias.

Pith tools