Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.06677 v3 pith:QHRN43O4 submitted 2020-08-15 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

Preferential Bayesian optimisation with Skew Gaussian Processes

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords functionpreferencegaussianjudgmentslaplacemethodmodeloptimisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Preferential Bayesian optimisation (PBO) deals with optimisation problems where the objective function can only be accessed via preference judgments, such as "this is better than that" between two candidate solutions (like in A/B tests or recommender systems). The state-of-the-art approach to PBO uses a Gaussian process to model the preference function and a Bernoulli likelihood to model the observed pairwise comparisons. Laplace's method is then employed to compute posterior inferences and, in particular, to build an appropriate acquisition function. In this paper, we prove that the true posterior distribution of the preference function is a Skew Gaussian Process (SkewGP), with highly skewed pairwise marginals and, thus, show that Laplace's method usually provides a very poor approximation. We then derive an efficient method to compute the exact SkewGP posterior and use it as surrogate model for PBO employing standard acquisition functions (Upper Credible Bound, etc.). We illustrate the benefits of our exact PBO-SkewGP in a variety of experiments, by showing that it consistently outperforms PBO based on Laplace's approximation both in terms of convergence speed and computational time. We also show that our framework can be extended to deal with mixed preferential-categorical BO, where binary judgments (valid or non-valid) together with preference judgments are available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. End-to-end probabilistic hierarchical forecasting of large hierarchies via probabilistic top-down

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    e2eTD forecasts a small subset of aggregate series (~0.3% of hierarchy) and propagates joint samples via probabilistic top-down disaggregation to produce coherent probabilistic forecasts, achieving lowest weighted sca...

  2. Model selection with proper scoring rules on data sets of time series: prefer the mean scaled score

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Mean scaled score is recommended over rank-based aggregation for model selection on time series datasets because skewness causes non-mean criteria to select misspecified models with short tests.