Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 27 references

Gravitational Influence on the Quantum Speed Limit in Flavor Oscillations of Neutrino-Antineutrino System

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutrinos oscillate faster near spinning black holes, with the quantum speed limit shrinking as specific angular momentum increases.

desk verdict A concrete new gravitational-potential calculation in Kerr spacetime is undermined by an admitted but incorrect mass-matrix assumption that all subsequent results inherit. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18604 v1 pith:QODGWVMM submitted 2024-11-27 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thquant-ph

Abhishek Kumar Jha , Banibrata Mukhopadhyay , Mriganka Dutta , Mayank Pathak , Subhashish Banerjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thquant-ph PACS 04.62.-v14.60.Pq04.70.-s03.65.-w
keywords quantumspeedlimitneutrinooscillationsneutrino-antineutrinosystemKerrblackholeprimordialBoyer-LindquistcoordinatesBuresanglecurvedspacetimeDiracequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates whether the gravitational field of a spinning primordial black hole can accelerate the flavor evolution of a neutrino-antineutrino system. Using Boyer-Lindquist coordinates, the authors derive an analytical four-vector gravitational potential in a Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian and show that it introduces an axial-vector term that modifies the neutrino's effective mass matrix. Within a two-flavor model with Majorana masses, the gravitational potential changes the oscillation probabilities, the Bures angle, and the quantum speed limit for an electron-flavor neutrino moving radially away from the black hole. The central result is that increasing the black hole's specific angular momentum $a$ significantly reduces the QSL time $T_{\rm QSL}(r)$ near the hole, so a rapidly spinning black hole permits faster flavor conversion than a slowly spinning one. Far from the hole the gravitational effect fades and the evolution returns to its vacuum speed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the four-vector gravitational potential $B_d=\epsilon_{abcd}\omega^{bac}$ constructed from the spin connection using the Schwinger gauge of tetrads; it enters the curved-spacetime Dirac Lagrangian as the axial-vector interaction $B_d\gamma^d\gamma^5$. In the Weyl basis this contribution becomes $B_1\sigma_1+B_2\sigma_2$ in the block-diagonal mass matrix, which the authors reduce by explicit assumption to the scalar $\pm(B_1+B_2)$. This scalar replaces the vacuum masses, determines the mixing angles through the unitary matrix $T$, and controls the survival probability, the Bures angle, and the QSL time. The quantum speed limit formula $T_{\rm QSL}=\hbar S_0/\Delta H$, with $S_0=\cos^{-1}(\sqrt{|T_{ee}|^2})$, is the tool that turns the oscillation probability into a minimum evolution time.

What would settle it

Compute the exact eigenvalues of the $4\times4$ effective mass matrix in Eq. (17) without replacing $B_1\sigma_1+B_2\sigma_2$ by $\pm(B_1+B_2)$; if those exact eigenvalues differ significantly from the approximate ones at $a=0.998$, the reported $T_{\rm QSL}$ reduction would not survive in the full model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the gravitational field of a Kerr black hole, expressed through the four-vector potential $B_d$ computed from the spin connection in the Schwinger gauge, controls the speed of two-flavor neutrino-antineutrino oscillations. With the effective mass matrix approximated as having diagonal entries $\mp(B_1+B_2)$ and off-diagonal entry $-m$, the mixing angles $\theta_e,\theta_\mu,\phi_1,\phi_2$, the survival probability $P_s(r)=|T_{ee}(r)|^2$, the Bures angle $S_0(r)=\cos^{-1}(\sqrt{|T_{ee}(r)|^2})$, and the quantum speed limit $T_{\rm QSL}(r)=S_0(r)/\Delta H(r)$ all become functions of radial distance $r$, polar angle $\theta$, and specific angular momentum $a$. For $\theta=\pi/4$, the authors find that increasing $a$ from $0.1$ to $0.998$ raises the magnitude of the gravitational vector potential and pushes $T_{\rm QSL}/r$ below $1$ near the black hole, meaning the electron-flavor state reaches its final state in less than the coordinate propagation time. The effect disappears at large $r$, where $T_{\rm QSL}/r\to1$ regardless of $a$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's quantitative results depend on the assumption that the operator $B_1\sigma_1+B_2\sigma_2$ can be replaced by the scalar $\pm(B_1+B_2)$, even though $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ do not commute; the authors state this explicitly and defer the general noncommuting treatment to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near a rapidly spinning primordial black hole ($a=0.998$), the quantum speed limit for the initial electron-flavor state drops below the coordinate traversal time, $T_{\rm QSL}/r<1$, while for a slowly spinning hole ($a=0.1$) the bound stays close to $1$.
  • The gravitational speed-up is confined to a limited radial range near the horizon, because $|B_d|$ falls monotonically with $r$ and the survival probability oscillates most strongly where the gravitational potential is largest.
  • Far from the black hole the two-flavor oscillation returns to vacuum behavior, with mixing angles saturating toward $\pi/4$ and the QSL time approaching its maximum bound.
  • The entire effect is spin-induced: both $B_1$ and $B_2$ vanish when $a=0$, so a Schwarzschild black hole produces no such neutrino-antineutrino coupling in this model.
  • The analytic form of $B_d$ in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates gives a direct handle on gravitational Zeeman-like shifts in the dispersion relations of neutrinos and antineutrinos near rotating astrophysical sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the scalar-eigenvalue approximation were replaced by the exact noncommuting treatment of $B_1\sigma_1+B_2\sigma_2$, the quantitative $T_{\rm QSL}$ values would shift, though the growth of $|B|=\sqrt{B_1^2+B_2^2}$ with $a$ suggests the spin-induced speed-up could survive.
  • Inference: extending the calculation to non-radial geodesics or to an ensemble of trajectories from an accretion disk would yield an angle-averaged quantum speed limit closer to what an astrophysical neutrino detector could observe.
  • Inference: the same effective mass mechanism should apply to any neutral fermion with a Majorana mass, which could make the predicted QSL reduction testable through neutrino-antineutrino asymmetry or flavor ratios from primordial black hole evaporation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies two-flavor neutrino-antineutrino oscillations around a spinning primordial black hole in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates, deriving a gravitational four-vector potential that enters an axial-vector coupling in the Dirac equation. The authors construct an effective mass matrix for the neutrino-antineutrino system, compute mixing angles, survival probabilities, Bures angles, and a quantum speed limit (QSL) time, and conclude that the QSL time is significantly reduced as the black hole's specific angular momentum a increases. The central technical step is a simplification in which the non-commuting spin terms B1σ1 + B2σ2 in the mass matrix are replaced by the scalars ±(B1+B2), a step the authors explicitly label as an assumption. All subsequent results, including the QSL claim, inherit this assumption.

Significance. If the central derivation were sound, the paper would offer an interesting application of quantum speed limit techniques to gravitational neutrino oscillations, with a concrete prediction about spin-dependent enhancement of flavor conversion near rapidly rotating black holes. The paper makes a useful pedagogical contribution by exhibiting the gravitational potential in the Dirac Hamiltonian for Kerr spacetime and by connecting it to the neutrino-antineutrino mass matrix formalism. However, the main conclusion—that the QSL time decreases with increasing a—rests on an admitted but unjustified algebraic replacement in the mass matrix, so the physical significance is currently not established. The paper also contains a framework (Bures angle and QSL in curved spacetime) that could be of broader interest if placed on a firmer footing.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (18)] The paper's abstract and conclusions frame the results as findings about gravitational influence on transition probabilities and QSL time, but the derivation rests on the explicit assumption in Eq. (18). In its current form, the manuscript does not provide a derivation of that assumption, and the promise that the general matrix 'also leads to similar results' is not a substitute for a proof. Therefore the conclusions should be regarded as conditional on an unverified premise.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 6] The text says 'Eq. (5) shows that the Hamiltonian obtained from the Lagrangian equation is Hermitian,' but Eq. (5) is the Lagrangian density, not the Hamiltonian. Please clarify the derivation of the Hamiltonian and its Hermiticity.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (10)] The units of the radial coordinate r are not stated explicitly in the figures. If r is measured in units of the gravitational radius, this should be stated in the axes or captions, especially because the paper also uses M=1 and introduces the PBH mass MB in eV.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (33)] The notation m1,2 and m(e,µ)1,2 is used without an explicit statement of how the two-flavor block masses in Eq. (33) relate to the single-flavor eigenvalues in Eq. (19); a short clarifying sentence would help the reader follow the construction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QSL computation uses external PDG masses and a stated model assumption; the gravitational potential is derived from the Kerr metric, and the TQSL result is not fed back into any input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is largely self-contained and non-circular. The gravitational vector potential B_d is computed from the Kerr metric in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates via tetrads and spin connections (Eqs. 7-11), independent of the later QSL result. The PDG neutrino parameters (Table 1) are external inputs, used once to fix Majorana masses (m_e, m_mu, m_e_mu) and then propagated through mixing angles, survival probabilities, Bures angle, and TQSL (Eqs. 35-43); none of the predicted probabilities or speed-limit times are used to adjust these inputs. The QSL time is related to the survival probability by the standard definition S0 = arccos(sqrt(P_s)) and the external Mandelstam-Tamm bound (Eq. 39), so Eq. (43) is a definitional application rather than a circular reduction. The only potentially load-bearing model step is the replacement of B1*sigma1+B2*sigma2 by ±(B1+B2) in Eq. (18), which the authors explicitly label as an assumption ('We have assumed the effective mass matrix to have the form given in Eq. (18)'). That is an unproven ansatz and a derivation gap, not an equivalence-by-construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; it should be flagged as a correctness risk, not as circularity. Self-citations to Refs. 8, 9, and 27 provide the earlier neutrino-gravity formalism and a QSL-in-neutrino application, but the present paper recomputes the gravitational potential and propagates it explicitly; these citations are background or prior independent work rather than a self-citation chain that forces the central result. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the curved-spacetime Dirac formalism from Refs. 8 and 9, a Majorana-spinor ansatz, the assumed block form of the mass matrix, and several scenario choices (PBH mass, momentum, hierarchy, trajectory). The only strictly paper-specific axiom is the reduction to Eq. (18), which is admitted as an assumption.

free parameters (7)
  • PBH mass M_B = 10^17 x 5.61 x 10^35 eV (about 10^20 g)
    Scenario parameter that sets the scale of the gravitational potential; chosen so that |B| is of order eV near the horizon. Not fitted to the paper's own data.
  • Neutrino momentum |p| = 1 eV
    Hand-chosen value in the relativistic limit; sets the magnitude of E_nu - E_nuc and hence the oscillation phase.
  • Majorana mass m (single-flavor section) = 0.0497666 eV
    Taken from the two-flavor analysis in Sec. 5; used in Secs. 4 and Fig. 2.
  • Electron and muon Majorana masses me, m_mu = me = 0.0497666 eV, m_mu = 0.0500574 eV
    Derived from PDG 2024 inverted-hierarchy best fit (Table 1) assuming the lightest neutrino mass is zero; they set the vacuum oscillation scales.
  • Majorana mixing mass me_mu = 0.000347999 eV
    Derived from PDG 2024 inverted-hierarchy best fit; sets the two-flavor mixing strength.
  • Specific angular momentum a = 0.1 and 0.998 (scanned)
    Chosen control values; the paper's central comparison is between low and high spin.
  • Initial radial distance r1 = unspecified; r1 > r_es
    Lower limit of the radial null integral in Eq. (25); the plotted oscillation probabilities depend on its value, but it is not stated.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The gravitational coupling of a Dirac field in curved spacetime can be written as the axial vector term B_d gamma^d gamma^5 with B_d = epsilon_abcd omega^bac.
    Adopted from Refs. 8 and 9; the paper uses this to build the effective mass matrix (Secs. 2-3).
  • domain assumption The neutrino is treated as a Majorana spinor in the Weyl representation with a two-component structure |Psi> = (psi^c, psi).
    Standard in the authors' formalism (Ref. 9); it fixes the form of the Majorana mass matrix in Eq. (13).
  • ad hoc to paper The effective mass matrix can be reduced to the 2x2 block form of Eq. (18), in which B1 sigma1 + B2 sigma2 is replaced by the scalar +/- (B1+B2).
    The paper states this is an assumption and defers the general case to future work (Sec. 3, after Eq. (19)); this is the load-bearing assumption for all later results.
  • domain assumption The Dirac Hamiltonian in the chosen coordinates is Hermitian and time-independent, so the flat-spacetime QSL formula applies.
    Invoked in Sec. 6 to justify Eq. (39); the Hermiticity of the curved-spacetime Hamiltonian is asserted, not demonstrated, and the Hamiltonian depends on the radial trajectory.
  • domain assumption Neutrinos propagate radially outward along null geodesics with dtheta = dphi = 0, and coordinate time t is related to r by Eq. (25).
    Used to convert oscillation probabilities and QSL times from t to r in Secs. 4-6; this restricts the result to a special trajectory.
  • domain assumption Neutrino masses follow inverted hierarchy with the lightest mass equal to zero, using PDG 2024 best-fit values.
    Used in Sec. 5 to compute me, m_mu, me_mu from Table 1; other hierarchies or nonzero lightest mass would change the numbers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Influence on the Quantum Speed Limit in Flavor Oscillations of Neutrino-Antineutrino System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QODGWVMM

@misc{pith2026241118604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Influence on the Quantum Speed Limit in Flavor Oscillations of Neutrino-Antineutrino System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QODGWVMM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18604}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum speed limit (QSL) during the time evolution of neutrino-antineutrino system under the influence of the gravitational field of a spinning primordial black hole (PBH). We derive an analytical expression for the four-vector gravitational potential in the underlying Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian using the Boyer-Lindquist (BL) coordinates. This gravitational potential leads to an axial vector term in the Dirac equation in curved spacetime, contributing to the effective mass matrix of the neutrino-antineutrino systems. Our findings indicate that the gravitational field, expressed in BL coordinates, significantly influences the transition probabilities in two-flavor oscillations of the neutrino-antineutrino system. We then apply the expression for transition probabilities between states to analyze the Bures angle, which quantifies the closeness between the initial and final states of the time-evolved flavor state. We use this concept to probe the QSL for the time evolution of the initial flavor neutrino state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18604 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The magnitude of gravitational vector potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Mixing angle θν and (b) the survival probability Ps of the initial state |ν1⟩ are shown as a function of radial distance r from the black hole at a low (dashed line) and a high value (solid line) of specific angular momentum (a), when θ = π 4 and m = 0.0497666 eV. radial distance r from the black hole, where the magnitude of gravitational vector potential is low, θν saturates to π/4 for both values of a. The tim… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In the two-flavor scenario, mixing angles (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the two-flavor scenario, mixing angles (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the two-flavor scenario, the survival probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In the two-flavor scenario, (a) the Bures angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. B. Balantekin and G. M. Fuller,Neutrinos in Cosmology and Astrophysics , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71 (2013), 162-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.03. 008

    doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.03 2013

  2. [2]

    W. X. Chen and A. M. Beloborodov,Neutrino-Cooled Accretion Disks around Spin- ning Black Hole , Astrophys. J. 657 (2007), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 508923

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    R Surman et al,The role of neutrinos in r-process nucleosynthesis in supernovae and gamma-ray bursts, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.35 014059 (2008).https://dx.doi. org/10.1088/0954-3899/35/1/014059

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/1/014059 2008

  4. [4]

    M. A. Luty,Baryogenesis via leptogenesis , Phys. Rev. D45 (1992), 455-465. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.455

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.455 1992

  5. [5]

    Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium , Sov

    B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium , Sov. Phys. JETP6 (1957), 429

    work page 1957

  6. [6]

    S. M. Bilenky,The History of neutrino oscillations , Phys. Scripta T121, 17-22 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2005/T121/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2005/t121/001 2005

  7. [7]

    R. N. Mohapatra and P. B. Pal,Massive neutrinos in physics and astrophysics , World Sci. Lect. Notes Phys.41 (1991), 1-318, https://doi.org/10.1142/5024

    doi:10.1142/5024 1991

  8. [8]

    Mukhopadhyay,Gravity induced neutrino-antineutrino oscillation: CPT and lepton number non-conservation under gravity , Class

    B. Mukhopadhyay,Gravity induced neutrino-antineutrino oscillation: CPT and lepton number non-conservation under gravity , Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007), 1433-1442, https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/6/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/6/004 2007

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Sinha and B

    M. Sinha and B. Mukhopadhyay,CPT and lepton number violation in neutrino sector: Modified mass matrix of neutrino coupled to gravity , Phys. Rev. D77 (2008), 025003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.025003

    2008 doi

  2. [10]

    V. D. Barger, J. G. Learned, S. Pakvasa and T. J. Weiler,Neutrino decay as an explanation of atmospheric neutrino observations , Phys. Rev. Lett.82 (1999), 2640- 2643, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2640

    1999 doi

  3. [11]

    Barenboim, J

    G. Barenboim, J. F. Beacom, L. Borissov and B. Kayser,CPT Violation and the November 28, 2024 2:4 ws-procs961x669 WSPC Proceedings - 9.61in x 6.69in ws-procs961x669 page 16 16 Nature of Neutrinos , Phys. Lett. B537 (2002), 227-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0370-2693(02)01947-0

    2002

  4. [12]

    Mohanty, B

    S. Mohanty, B. Mukhopadhyay and A. R. Prasanna,Experimental tests of curvature couplings of fermions in general relativity , Phys. Rev. D65 (2002), 122001, https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.122001

    2002 doi

  5. [13]

    Singh and B

    P. Singh and B. Mukhopadhyay,Gravitationally induced neutrino asymmetry , Mod. Phys. Lett. A18 (2003), 779-785, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732303009691

    2003 doi

  6. [14]

    D. V. Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller,Dark matter: A Spin one half fermion field with mass dimension one? , Phys. Rev. D72 (2005), 067701, https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.72.067701

    2005

  7. [15]

    Mukhopadhyay, Neutrino asymmetry around black holes: Neutrinos interact with gravity , Mod

    B. Mukhopadhyay, Neutrino asymmetry around black holes: Neutrinos interact with gravity , Mod. Phys. Lett. A20 (2005), 2145-2156. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0217732305017640

    2005

  8. [16]

    Debnath, B

    U. Debnath, B. Mukhopadhyay and N. Dadhich,Space-time curvature coupling of spinors in early universe: Neutrino asymmetry and a possible source of baryo- genesis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21 (2006), 399-408, https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0217732306019542

    2006

  9. [17]

    Mukhopadhyay, T

    B. Mukhopadhyay, T. Ghosh and S. K. Ganguly, Gravitational geometric phase , The Sixteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, pp. 689-698 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1142/9789811269776_0052

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Thakuria, A

    D. Thakuria, A. Srivastav, B. Mohan, A. Kumari and A. K. Pati,Generalised quantum speed limit for arbitrary time-continuous evolution, J. Phys. A57, no.2, 025302 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad15ad

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, 1973, ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

    1973

  12. [20]

    Ghosh and B

    T. Ghosh and B. Mukhopadhyay,Geometric phase for Dirac Hamiltonian under grav- itational fields in the nonrelativistic regime , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30 (2021) no.12, 2150090, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271821500905

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Schwinger,Energy and Momentum Density in Field Theory , Phys

    J. Schwinger,Energy and Momentum Density in Field Theory , Phys. Rev.130 (1963), 800-805, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.800

    1963 doi

  14. [22]

    M. V. Gorbatenko and V. P. Neznamov, A Modified Method for Deriving Self- Conjugate Dirac Hamiltonians in Arbitrary Gravitational Fields and Its Application to Centrally and Axially Symmetric Gravitational Fields , [arXiv:1107.0844 [gr-qc]], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1107.0844

    doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    V. P. Neznamov and V. E. Shemarulin, Analysis of Half-Spin Particle Mo- tion in Kerr–Newman Field by Means of Effective Potentials in Second-Order Equations, Grav. Cosmol. 24 (2018) no.2, 129-138, https://doi.org/10.1134/ S0202289318020111

    2018

  16. [24]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group ), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024), https: //pdg.lbl.gov/2024/html/authors_2024.html

    2024

  17. [25]

    Mandelstam, L., Tamm, I. (1991). The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics , In: Bolotovskii, B.M., Frenkel, V.Y., Peierls, R. (eds) Selected Papers. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-74626-0_8

    1991

  18. [26]

    Margolus and L

    N. Margolus and L. B. Levitin,The Maximum speed of dynamical evolution , Physica D 120 (1998), 188-195, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789%2898%2900054-2

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    Bouri, A

    S. Bouri, A. K. Jha and S. Banerjee,Probing CP Violation and Mass Hierarchy in Neutrino Oscillations in Matter through Quantum Speed Limits , [arXiv:2405.13114 [hep-ph]] https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13114

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.