Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

State-of-the-Art Approaches to Enhancing Privacy Preservation of Machine Learning Datasets: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.16847 v2 pith:QROMFDBA submitted 2024-02-25 cs.CR cs.AI

State-of-the-Art Approaches to Enhancing Privacy Preservation of Machine Learning Datasets: A Survey

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords privacydatalearningtrainingmachineppmltechniquesenhancing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper examines the evolving landscape of machine learning (ML) and its profound impact across various sectors, with a special focus on the emerging field of Privacy-preserving Machine Learning (PPML). As ML applications become increasingly integral to industries like telecommunications, financial technology, and surveillance, they raise significant privacy concerns, necessitating the development of PPML strategies. The paper highlights the unique challenges in safeguarding privacy within ML frameworks, which stem from the diverse capabilities of potential adversaries, including their ability to infer sensitive information from model outputs or training data. We delve into the spectrum of threat models that characterize adversarial intentions, ranging from membership and attribute inference to data reconstruction. The paper emphasizes the importance of maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of training data, outlining current research efforts that focus on refining training data to minimize privacy-sensitive information and enhancing data processing techniques to uphold privacy. Through a comprehensive analysis of privacy leakage risks and countermeasures in both centralized and collaborative learning settings, this paper aims to provide a thorough understanding of effective strategies for protecting ML training data against privacy intrusions. It explores the balance between data privacy and model utility, shedding light on privacy-preserving techniques that leverage cryptographic methods, Differential Privacy, and Trusted Execution Environments. The discussion extends to the application of these techniques in sensitive domains, underscoring the critical role of PPML in ensuring the privacy and security of ML systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POPS: Recovering Unlearned Multi-Modality Knowledge in MLLMs with Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prompt-optimized suffixes plus synthetic fine-tuning recover ~82% of knowledge that multimodal unlearning methods claim to erase from MLLMs.

  2. Metaverse in Smart Cities: Transforming Urban Life and Governance

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 3.0

    A PRISMA-based systematic literature review mapping metaverse applications in smart cities onto Giffinger's six pillars, with case studies of ten cities and a SWOT analysis of risks and countermeasures.