Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

First-order Policy Optimization for Robust Markov Decision Process

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.10579 v2 pith:QXKTLSM6 submitted 2022-09-21 cs.LG cs.AImath.OC

First-order Policy Optimization for Robust Markov Decision Process

classification cs.LG cs.AImath.OC
keywords robustpolicyfirst-orderepsilonmethodcomplexitydecisiondescent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We consider the problem of solving robust Markov decision process (MDP), which involves a set of discounted, finite state, finite action space MDPs with uncertain transition kernels. The goal of planning is to find a robust policy that optimizes the worst-case values against the transition uncertainties, and thus encompasses the standard MDP planning as a special case. For $(\mathbf{s},\mathbf{a})$-rectangular uncertainty sets, we establish several structural observations on the robust objective, which facilitates the development of a policy-based first-order method, namely the robust policy mirror descent (RPMD). An $\mathcal{O}(\log(1/\epsilon))$ iteration complexity for finding an $\epsilon$-optimal policy is established with linearly increasing stepsizes. We further develop a stochastic variant of the robust policy mirror descent method, named SRPMD, when the first-order information is only available through online interactions with the nominal environment. We show that the optimality gap converges linearly up to the noise level, and consequently establish an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\epsilon^2)$ sample complexity by developing a temporal difference learning method for policy evaluation. Both iteration and sample complexities are also discussed for RPMD with a constant stepsize. To the best of our knowledge, all the aforementioned results appear to be new for policy-based first-order methods applied to the robust MDP problem.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Natural Policy Gradient as Doubly Smoothed Policy Iteration: A Bellman-Operator Framework

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Natural policy gradient is a special case of doubly smoothed policy iteration that achieves distribution-free global geometric convergence to an epsilon-optimal policy in O((1-gamma)^{-1} log((1-gamma)^{-1} epsilon^{-...

  2. Revisiting Subgradient Dominance in Robust MDPs: Counterexamples, Hardness, and Sufficient Conditions

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RMDPs lack subgradient dominance in general and admit suboptimal local minima; finding epsilon-optimal policies is NP-hard for finite transition uncertainty sets, but the dominance property holds when worst-case kerne...

  3. Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Robust Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Epigraph Form

    cs.LG 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Presents the first algorithm to identify an ε-optimal policy in robust constrained MDPs via epigraph form and bisection search with Õ(ε^{-4}) robust policy evaluations.

  4. Robust Markov Decision Processes on Continuous State Spaces

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Develops stochastic first-order methods for robust policy evaluation and approximate policy iteration in continuous-state robust MDPs, achieving 'O(1/ε^{2}) sample complexity for both evaluation and optimization.

  5. Sample Complexity for Markov Decision Processes and Stochastic Optimal Control with Static Risk Measures

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    State augmentation converts static risk measures on total cost into dynamic programs, yielding sample-complexity bounds for risk-averse MDPs and stochastic optimal control under φ-divergence robustness.

  6. Value Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Value mirror descent integrates mirror descent into value iteration for discounted MDPs, delivering near-optimal sample complexity of order |S||A|(1-γ)^{-3}ε^{-2} for general convex regularizers and bounded Bregman di...

  7. Sample Complexity for Markov Decision Processes and Stochastic Optimal Control with Static Risk Measures

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    State augmentation allows dynamic programming and sample complexity bounds for MDPs and optimal control under static risk measures including CVaR.

  8. Non-Asymptotic Convergence of Stochastic Iterative Algorithms: A Lyapunov Framework

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey of Lyapunov techniques using generalized Moreau envelopes as universal functions for non-asymptotic mean-square convergence analysis of stochastic iterative algorithms under contractive operators.