Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

TRIDENT: Benchmarking LLM Safety in Finance, Medicine, and Law

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.21134 v2 pith:QY2CSW6D submitted 2025-07-22 cs.CL cs.CYcs.LG

TRIDENT: Benchmarking LLM Safety in Finance, Medicine, and Law

classification cs.CL cs.CYcs.LG
keywords safetydomain-specificmodelsdomainsfinancellmstrident-benchbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains such as law, finance, and medicine, systematically evaluating their domain-specific safety and compliance becomes critical. While prior work has largely focused on improving LLM performance in these domains, it has often neglected the evaluation of domain-specific safety risks. To bridge this gap, we first define domain-specific safety principles for LLMs based on the AMA Principles of Medical Ethics, the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and the CFA Institute Code of Ethics. Building on this foundation, we introduce Trident-Bench, a benchmark specifically targeting LLM safety in the legal, financial, and medical domains. We evaluated 19 general-purpose and domain-specialized models on Trident-Bench and show that it effectively reveals key safety gaps -- strong generalist models (e.g., GPT, Gemini) can meet basic expectations, whereas domain-specialized models often struggle with subtle ethical nuances. This highlights an urgent need for finer-grained domain-specific safety improvements. By introducing Trident-Bench, our work provides one of the first systematic resources for studying LLM safety in law and finance, and lays the groundwork for future research aimed at reducing the safety risks of deploying LLMs in professionally regulated fields. Code and benchmark will be released at: https://github.com/zackhuiiiii/TRIDENT.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VoxSafeBench: Not Just What Is Said, but Who, How, and Where

    cs.SD 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    VoxSafeBench reveals that speech language models recognize social norms from text but fail to apply them when acoustic cues like speaker or scene determine the appropriate response.

  2. You Snooze, You Lose: Automatic Safety Alignment Restoration through Neural Weight Translation

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NeWTral is a non-linear weight translation framework using MoE routing that reduces average attack success rate from 70% to 13% on unsafe domain adapters across Llama, Mistral, Qwen, and Gemma models up to 72B while r...

  3. StealthGraph: Exposing Domain-Specific Risks in LLMs through Knowledge-Graph-Guided Harmful Prompt Generation

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    StealthGraph generates implicit domain-relevant harmful prompts via knowledge-graph guidance and two-strategy obfuscation to enable more realistic red-teaming of LLM safety.

  4. PolicyAlign: Direct Policy-Based Safety Alignment for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PolicyAlign aligns LLMs to natural-language safety policies by synthesizing violating instructions and performing on-policy self-distillation with policy-sensitive filtering, improving safety without high-quality supe...