Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Open-sourced Dataset Protection via Backdoor Watermarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.05821 v3 pith:QYDJE45W submitted 2020-10-12 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords datasetwatermarkingmethodopen-sourcedsamplessomebackdoordatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The rapid development of deep learning has benefited from the release of some high-quality open-sourced datasets ($e.g.$, ImageNet), which allows researchers to easily verify the effectiveness of their algorithms. Almost all existing open-sourced datasets require that they can only be adopted for academic or educational purposes rather than commercial purposes, whereas there is still no good way to protect them. In this paper, we propose a \emph{backdoor embedding based dataset watermarking} method to protect an open-sourced image-classification dataset by verifying whether it is used for training a third-party model. Specifically, the proposed method contains two main processes, including \emph{dataset watermarking} and \emph{dataset verification}. We adopt classical poisoning-based backdoor attacks ($e.g.$, BadNets) for dataset watermarking, ie, generating some poisoned samples by adding a certain trigger ($e.g.$, a local patch) onto some benign samples, labeled with a pre-defined target class. Based on the proposed backdoor-based watermarking, we use a hypothesis test guided method for dataset verification based on the posterior probability generated by the suspicious third-party model of the benign samples and their correspondingly watermarked samples ($i.e.$, images with trigger) on the target class. Experiments on some benchmark datasets are conducted, which verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dataset Ownership in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes dataset copyright protection into non-intrusive, minimally-intrusive, and maximally-intrusive methods.

Pith tools