Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 56 references

Road maps fused with satellite images supply weather-invariant geometric cues that improve drone-to-satellite matching accuracy.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 20:47 UTC pith:R657O6ZK

load-bearing objection Road maps give a practical prior for weather-robust drone geo-localization, but the untested alignment assumption is the main soft spot. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2605.14925 v2 pith:R657O6ZK submitted 2026-05-14 cs.CV cs.LG

Road Maps as Free Geometric Priors: Weather-Invariant Drone Geo-Localization with GeoFuse

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords drone geo-localizationroad mapsweather-invariantcross-modal fusionsatellite imagerycontrastive learninggeometric priorsGeoFuse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents GeoFuse as a fusion framework that adds readily available road map tiles to satellite imagery for drone geo-localization. It claims that road networks and building footprints deliver structural layout information that stays stable when drone photos suffer from rain, fog, or reduced visibility. The method augments two standard benchmarks with aligned road maps, introduces a token- and channel-level fusion module with dynamic gating, and applies class-level cross-view contrastive learning to align degraded drone features with the fused representations. Experiments report consistent gains over prior approaches on the University-1652 and DenseUAV datasets under varied weather conditions.

Core claim

GeoFuse integrates precisely aligned road map tiles with satellite imagery via token-level and channel-level interactions inside a flexible fusion module equipped with a lightweight dynamic gating mechanism; class-level cross-view contrastive learning then aligns weather-degraded drone features with these fused satellite-roadmap representations, yielding higher Recall@1 scores than existing methods on the augmented University-1652 and DenseUAV benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The flexible fusion module that combines satellite and road map features via token-level and channel-level interactions with a lightweight dynamic gating mechanism that adaptively weights modality contributions per instance.

Load-bearing premise

Road map data can be precisely aligned with satellite imagery and supplies strong geometric layout cues that remain useful after fusion even when drone images are degraded by weather.

What would settle it

Performance gains disappear on a benchmark where road map tiles are deliberately shifted or rotated relative to the satellite images while keeping all other training details fixed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Existing geo-localization benchmarks can be extended at low cost by adding geo-aligned road map layers that provide structural priors.
  • Dynamic gating allows the model to down-weight road map contributions on instances where they add little value.
  • Class-level contrastive learning produces representations that tolerate partial occlusions and noise in the drone view.
  • The same fusion approach can be applied to other cross-view tasks that already have access to map data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Open map repositories could serve as an ongoing source of free priors for any satellite-based localization pipeline.
  • The method may reduce the need for weather-specific data augmentation once geometric structure is explicitly supplied.
  • Similar fusion could be tested on ground-to-aerial or cross-season matching where layout cues also stay stable.
  • If alignment between maps and imagery proves reliable at city scale, the approach could transfer to real-time drone navigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that road maps provide free, weather-invariant geometric priors that can be fused with satellite imagery via a token- and channel-level interaction module with dynamic gating; combined with class-level cross-view contrastive learning, the resulting GeoFuse model yields weather-resilient drone-to-satellite matching and improves Recall@1 by +3.46% on University-1652 and +23.18% on DenseUAV over prior SOTA.

Significance. If the gains are reproducible and the alignment assumption holds, the work supplies a practical, low-cost route to weather-robust geo-localization by exploiting an existing public modality, which could be directly useful for real-world drone deployment.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims rest on the premise of 'precisely aligned' road map tiles, yet no experiment, ablation, or noise-injection test evaluates robustness to realistic georeferencing offsets (meter-scale shifts, projection mismatches, or temporal discrepancies common in OSM data). Without such evidence the reported Recall@1 improvements cannot be considered load-bearing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for highlighting the importance of alignment robustness. We address the concern directly below and will revise the manuscript to include supporting experiments.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims rest on the premise of 'precisely aligned' road map tiles, yet no experiment, ablation, or noise-injection test evaluates robustness to realistic georeferencing offsets (meter-scale shifts, projection mismatches, or temporal discrepancies common in OSM data). Without such evidence the reported Recall@1 improvements cannot be considered load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree this is a valid limitation: the current manuscript relies on the assumption of precise alignment without quantifying sensitivity to realistic OSM offsets. In the revision we will add a dedicated ablation section that injects controlled georeferencing noise (random translations of 1–5 m, small rotations, and simulated temporal discrepancies) into the road-map tiles on both benchmarks. We will report Recall@1 curves under increasing offset magnitudes and show that the reported gains remain positive and competitive with prior SOTA even under moderate misalignment, thereby providing the missing load-bearing evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical fusion framework is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents GeoFuse as an empirical cross-modal fusion method that augments benchmarks with road map tiles, applies token/channel interactions plus dynamic gating, and uses class-level contrastive learning. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described approach. Performance gains are reported from experiments on external benchmarks rather than any reduction to the method's own inputs by construction. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no equations, training details, or modeling choices, so the ledger cannot be populated beyond the high-level assumption stated in the weakest_assumption field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5814 in / 1099 out tokens · 21276 ms · 2026-06-30T20:47:49.431278+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Drone-view geo-localization aims to match a query drone image, often captured under adverse weather conditions (e.g., rain, snow, fog), against a gallery of geo-tagged satellite images. Weather-induced degradations in the drone view, such as noise, reduced visibility, and partial occlusions, severely exacerbate the intrinsic cross-view domain gap. While prior methods predominantly rely on weather-specific architectures or data augmentations, they have largely overlooked road map data, a readily available modality that provides strong, inherently weather-invariant geometric layout cues (e.g., road networks and building footprints) at negligible additional cost. We introduce GeoFuse, a cross-modal fusion framework that integrates precisely aligned road map tiles with satellite imagery to yield more discriminative and weather-resilient representations. We first augment the existing University-1652 and DenseUAV benchmarks with geo-aligned road maps, supplying structural priors robust to meteorological variations. Building on this, we propose a flexible fusion module that combines satellite and road map features via token-level and channel-level interactions, with a lightweight dynamic gating mechanism that adaptively weights modality contributions per instance. Finally, we employ class-level cross-view contrastive learning to promote robust alignment between weather-degraded drone features and the fused satellite-roadmap representations. Extensive experiments under diverse weather conditions show that GeoFuse consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving +3.46% and +23.18% Recall@1 accuracy on the University-1652 and DenseUAV benchmarks, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14925 by (2) Hangzhou Dianzi University), Tingyu Wang, Yunsong Fang, Zhedong Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Intuitive illustra￾tion of how the “free” road map provides ge￾ometric structural priors to assist robust match￾ing between drone-view and satellite-view images, particularly under adverse weather conditions. Satellite Drone Road Map Fog Rain Snow Fog+Rain Fog+Snow Rain+Snow Dark Overexposure Wind applications, including autonomous navigation, urban monitoring, emergency re￾sponse, and environmental mappin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Road map collection process. The obtained text-free road maps preserve the underlying road topology and spatial layout while eliminating semantic cues from map annotations. ing road map tiles are retrieved via the Google Maps API3 at an optimally se￾lected zoom level that balances the visibility of the road network structure and the spatial coverage consistent with the satellite images used in our experime… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The brief overview of GeoFuse. Given the visual input triplet of road maps, satellite images, and drone images, together with multi-weather textual descriptions of the drone images, we first extract visual and textual features through a shared￾weight image encoder and a dedicated text encoder. The framework then processes two branches: a drone-text alignment branch for multi-weather cross-modal matching, a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison on University-1652. We show heatmaps and top-5 re￾trieval results between our method and the baseline under different weather conditions. The correct matches are highlighted in yellow boxes, while the incorrect matches are enclosed in blue boxes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    Ahn, W.J., Park, S.Y., Pae, D.S., Choi, H.D., Lim, M.T.: Bridging viewpoints in cross-view geo-localization with siamese vision transformer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

  2. [2]

    Neurocomputing300, 70–79 (2018)

    Cai, J., Luo, J., Wang, S., Yang, S.: Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective. Neurocomputing300, 70–79 (2018)

  3. [3]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Chen, Z., Yang, Z.X., Rong, H.J.: Multi-level embedding and alignment network with consistency and invariance learning for cross-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

  4. [4]

    In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision

    Chu, M., Zheng, Z., Ji, W., Wang, T., Chua, T.S.: Towards natural language- guided drones: Geotext-1652 benchmark with spatial relation matching. In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 213–231. Springer (2024)

  5. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(7), 4376–4389 (2021)

    Dai, M., Hu, J., Zhuang, J., Zheng, E.: A transformer-based feature segmentation and region alignment method for uav-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(7), 4376–4389 (2021)

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing33, 493–508 (2023)

    Dai, M., Zheng, E., Feng, Z., Qi, L., Zhuang, J., Yang, W.: Vision-based uav self-positioning in low-altitude urban environments. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing33, 493–508 (2023)

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Deuser, F., Habel, K., Oswald, N.: Sample4geo: Hard negative sampling for cross- view geo-localisation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 16847–16856 (2023)

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the 2023 Workshop on UAVsinMultimedia:CapturingtheWorldfromaNewPerspective.pp.7–11(2023)

    Deuser, F., Habel, K., Werner, M., Oswald, N.: Orientation-guided contrastive learning for uav-view geo-localisation. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Workshop on UAVsinMultimedia:CapturingtheWorldfromaNewPerspective.pp.7–11(2023)

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers)

    Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidi- rectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers). pp. 4171–4186 (2019)

  10. [10]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Dosovitskiy, A.: An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recogni- tion at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2020)

  11. [11]

    IEEE Access (2024)

    Durgam, A., Paheding, S., Dhiman, V., Devabhaktuni, V.: Cross-view geo- localization: a survey. IEEE Access (2024)

  12. [12]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (2025)

    Gan, W., Zhou, Y., Hu, X., Zhao, L., Huang, G., Hou, M.: Learning robust feature representation for cross-view image geo-localization. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (2025)

  13. [13]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2025)

    Gao, Y., Liu, H., Wei, X.: Semantic concept perception network with interactive prompting for cross-view image geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2025)

  14. [14]

    He,K.,Zhang,X.,Ren,S.,Sun,J.:Deepresiduallearningforimagerecognition.In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778 (2016)

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.Q.: Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4700–4708 (2017)

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Ju, H., Huang, S., Liu, S., Zheng, Z.: Video2bev: Transforming drone videos to bevs for video-based geo-localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 27073–27083 (2025)

  17. [17]

    International journal of computer vision123(1), 32–73 (2017)

    Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.J., Shamma, D.A., et al.: Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. International journal of computer vision123(1), 32–73 (2017)

  18. [18]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Liang, J., Bao, M., Dong, H., Xie, L., Liu, R.W., Chen, N.: Dstg: Distillation swin transformer for cross-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

  19. [19]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2024)

    Lin,J.,Luo,Z.,Lin,D.,Li,S.,Zhong,Z.:Aself-adaptivefeatureextractionmethod for aerial-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2024)

  20. [20]

    In: European conference on computer vision

    Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., Zitnick, C.L.: Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In: European conference on computer vision. pp. 740–755. Springer (2014)

  21. [21]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Liu, C., Peng, S., Li, S., Qiu, H., Xia, Y., Li, Z., Zhao, L.: A novel eagle framework for robust uav-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

  22. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liu, L., Li, H.: Lending orientation to neural networks for cross-view geo- localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 5624–5633 (2019)

  23. [23]

    Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., Guo, B.: Swin transformer:Hierarchicalvisiontransformerusingshiftedwindows.In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 10012–10022 (2021)

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., Xie, S.: A convnet for the 2020s. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 11976–11986 (2022)

  25. [25]

    Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding

    Oord, A.v.d., Li, Y., Vinyals, O.: Representation learning with contrastive predic- tive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 (2018)

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision (ECCV)

    Pan, X., Luo, P., Shi, J., Tang, X.: Two at once: Enhancing learning and gen- eralization capacities via ibn-net. In: Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 464–479 (2018)

  27. [27]

    Advances in neural information processing sys- tems32(2019)

    Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al.: Pytorch: An imperative style, high- performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems32(2019)

  28. [28]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 8748–8763. PmLR (2021)

  29. [29]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32(2019)

    Shi, Y., Liu, L., Yu, X., Li, H.: Spatial-aware feature aggregation for image based cross-view geo-localization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32(2019)

  30. [30]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence45(3), 2682–2697 (2022)

    Shi, Y., Yu, X., Liu, L., Campbell, D., Koniusz, P., Li, H.: Accurate 3-dof cam- era geo-localization via ground-to-satellite image matching. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence45(3), 2682–2697 (2022)

  31. [31]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2025)

    Sun, J., Huang, J., Jiang, X., Zhou, Y., VONG, C.M.: Cgsi: Context-guided and uav’s status informed multimodal framework for generalizable cross-view geo- localization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2025)

  32. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Tian, Y., Chen, C., Shah, M.: Cross-view image matching for geo-localization in urban environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3608–3616 (2017)

  33. [33]

    Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems30(2017)

    Vaswani,A.,Shazeer,N.,Parmar,N.,Uszkoreit,J.,Jones,L.,Gomez,A.N.,Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems30(2017)

  34. [34]

    In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision

    Vyas, S., Chen, C., Shah, M.: Gama: Cross-view video geo-localization. In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 440–456. Springer (2022)

  35. [35]

    Pattern Recognition152, 110363 (2024)

    Wang, T., Zheng, Z., Sun, Y., Yan, C., Yang, Y., Chua, T.S.: Multiple-environment self-adaptive network for aerial-view geo-localization. Pattern Recognition152, 110363 (2024)

  36. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(2), 867–879 (2021)

    Wang, T., Zheng, Z., Yan, C., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Zheng, B., Yang, Y.: Each part matters: Local patterns facilitate cross-view geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(2), 867–879 (2021)

  37. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    Wang, T., Zheng, Z., Zhu, Z., Sun, Y., Yan, C., Yang, Y.: Learning cross-view geo- localization embeddings via dynamic weighted decorrelation regularization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

  38. [38]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 5301–5319 (2023)

    Wang, X., Xu, R., Cui, Z., Wan, Z., Zhang, Y.: Fine-grained cross-view geo- localization using a correlation-aware homography estimator. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 5301–5319 (2023)

  39. [39]

    In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Confer- ence on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

    Wen,J.,Yu,H.,Zheng,Z.:Weatherprompt:Multi-modalityrepresentationlearning for all-weather drone visual geo-localization. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Confer- ence on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

  40. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Com- puter Vision

    Workman, S., Souvenir, R., Jacobs, N.: Wide-area image geolocalization with aerial reference imagery. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Com- puter Vision. pp. 3961–3969 (2015)

  41. [41]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report

    Wu, C., Li, J., Zhou, J., Lin, J., Gao, K., Yan, K., Yin, S.m., Bai, S., Xu, X., Chen, Y., et al.: Qwen-image technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324 (2025)

  42. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2025)

    Wu,N.,Yang,C.,Qi,B.,Zhu,M.,Li,J.,Luo,X.:Ccigeo:Cross-viewandcross-day- night image geo-localization using daytime image supervision. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2025)

  43. [43]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

    Xia, P., Wan, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhang, Y., Deng, J.: Enhancing cross-view geo- localization with domain alignment and scene consistency. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

  44. [44]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing227, 1–11 (2025)

    Xia, P., Yu, L., Wan, Y., Wu, Q., Chen, P., Zhong, L., Yao, Y., Wei, D., Liu, X., Ru, L., et al.: Cross-view geo-localization with panoramic street-view and vhr satellite imagery in decentrality settings. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing227, 1–11 (2025)

  45. [45]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Xie, K., Zhou, W., Huang, X., Guan, H., Yulong, F.: Self-supervised cross-view graph search framework for ground-to-satellite geo-localization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00842 (2021)

    Yang, H., Lu, X., Zhu, Y.: Cross-view geo-localization with evolving transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00842 (2021)

  47. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., Zhao, H.: Depth anything: Un- leashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10371–10381 (2024)

  48. [48]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Ye, J., Lin, H., Ou, L., Chen, D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q., He, C., Li, W.: Where am i? cross-view geo-localization with natural language descriptions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5890–5900 (2025)

  49. [49]

    arXiv:2111.08276 , year=

    Zeng, Y., Zhang, X., Li, H.: Multi-grained vision language pre-training: Aligning texts with visual concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08276 (2021)

  50. [50]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Zhang, X., Sultani, W., Wshah, S.: Cross-view image sequence geo-localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. pp. 2914–2923 (2023)

  51. [51]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing62, 1–12 (2024)

    Zhao, H., Ren, K., Yue, T., Zhang, C., Yuan, S.: Transfg: A cross-view geo- localization of satellite and uavs imagery pipeline using transformer-based feature aggregation and gradient guidance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing62, 1–12 (2024)

  52. [52]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing63, 1–12 (2025)

    Zhao, Q., Zhou, J., Wang, T., Chen, Q., Lu, R., Yan, C.: P2fcn: Environment- independent uav-view geo-localization via pixel-to-feature co-enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing63, 1–12 (2025)

  53. [53]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM interna- tional conference on Multimedia

    Zheng, Z., Wei, Y., Yang, Y.: University-1652: A multi-view multi-source bench- mark for drone-based geo-localization. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM interna- tional conference on Multimedia. pp. 1395–1403 (2020)

  54. [54]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Zhou, X., Yang, X., Zhang, Y.: Cdm-net: A framework for cross-view geo- localization with multimodal data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zhu, S., Shah, M., Chen, C.: Transgeo: Transformer is all you need for cross-view image geo-localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1162–1171 (2022)

  56. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zhu, S., Yang, T., Chen, C.: Vigor: Cross-view image geo-localization beyond one- to-one retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3640–3649 (2021)