REVIEW 5 cited by
Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents in Remote Sensing Platforms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Tool-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in remote sensing (RS) applications. However, existing benchmarks assume question-answering input templates over predefined image-text data pairs. These standalone instructions neglect the intricacies of realistic user-grounded tasks. Consider a geospatial analyst: they zoom in a map area, they draw a region over which to collect satellite imagery, and they succinctly ask "Detect all objects here". Where is `here`, if it is not explicitly hardcoded in the image-text template, but instead is implied by the system state, e.g., the live map positioning? To bridge this gap, we present GeoLLM-QA, a benchmark designed to capture long sequences of verbal, visual, and click-based actions on a real UI platform. Through in-depth evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs over a diverse set of 1,000 tasks, we offer insights towards stronger agents for RS applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
RS-Claw: Progressive Active Tool Exploration via Hierarchical Skill Trees for Remote Sensing Agents
RS-Claw enables remote sensing agents to actively explore tools via hierarchical skill trees, achieving up to 86% token compression and outperforming flat registration and RAG baselines on Earth-Bench.
-
Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions
Agentic AI faces structural challenges in remote sensing due to geospatial data properties and workflow constraints, requiring EO-native agents built around structured state, tool-aware reasoning, and validity-aware e...
-
Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions
Agentic AI for remote sensing requires new designs centered on structured geospatial state, tool-aware reasoning, verifier-guided execution, and physical validity rather than generic extensions.
-
Bridging Perception and Action: A Lightweight Multimodal Meta-Planner Framework for Robust Earth Observation Agents
The LMMP framework improves tool-calling accuracy and task success rates for Earth observation agents by grounding plans in multimodal features and remote sensing expert knowledge via a two-stage training process.
-
Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions
Position paper identifies structural challenges in applying generic agentic AI to Earth Observation and outlines design principles for EO-native agents focused on geospatial state and validity.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.