REVIEW 13 cited by
LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?
read the original abstract
Multi-step spatial reasoning entails understanding and reasoning about spatial relationships across multiple sequential steps, which is crucial for tackling complex real-world applications, such as robotic manipulation, autonomous navigation, and automated assembly. To assess how well current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have acquired this fundamental capability, we introduce LEGO-Puzzles, a scalable benchmark designed to evaluate both spatial understanding and sequential reasoning in MLLMs through LEGO-based tasks. LEGO-Puzzles consists of 1,100 carefully curated visual question-answering (VQA) samples spanning 11 distinct tasks, ranging from basic spatial understanding to complex multi-step reasoning. Based on LEGO-Puzzles, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs and uncover significant limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities: even the most powerful MLLMs can answer only about half of the test cases, whereas human participants achieve over 90% accuracy. Furthermore, based on LEGO-Puzzles, we design generation tasks to investigate whether MLLMs can transfer their spatial understanding and reasoning abilities to image generation. Our experiments show that only GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0-Flash exhibit a limited ability to follow these instructions, while other MLLMs either replicate the input image or generate completely irrelevant outputs. Overall, LEGO-Puzzles exposes critical deficiencies in existing MLLMs' spatial understanding and sequential reasoning capabilities, and underscores the need for further advancements in multimodal spatial reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
VGenST-Bench: A Benchmark for Spatio-Temporal Reasoning via Active Video Synthesis
VGenST-Bench is a new video benchmark for MLLM spatio-temporal reasoning built via generative synthesis, a multi-agent pipeline with human oversight, a 3x2x2 taxonomy, and hierarchical tasks separating perception from...
-
SpaceVista: All-Scale Visual Spatial Reasoning from mm to km
SpaceVista contributes a 1M-QA, 38K-video all-scale spatial reasoning dataset spanning mm to km, a manually verified benchmark, and a fine-tuned 7B MLLM with scale experts and progressive reward training.
-
Vesta: A Generalist Embodied Reasoning Model
Vesta is a unified embodied generalist model that outperforms specialist baselines by over 20% on average and improves real-world robotic task success by over 35%.
-
Seeing Time: Benchmarking Chronological Reasoning and Shortcut Biases in Vision-Language Models
Introduces ChronoVision benchmark with three datasets showing VLMs rely on superficial cues such as color filters rather than genuine chronological reasoning.
-
Brick-Composer: Using MLLMs for Assembly with Diverse Bricks
Brick-Composer trains MLLMs on brick assembly via three signals, raising step-level success from under 1% to around 15% on the new BC-Bench benchmark.
-
Flat-Pack Bench: Evaluating Spatio-Temporal Understanding in Large Vision-Language Models through Furniture Assembly
Flat-Pack Bench is a new evaluation suite that shows state-of-the-art LVLMs perform poorly on nuanced spatio-temporal reasoning required for furniture assembly videos.
-
Do MLLMs Really Understand Space? A Mathematical Reasoning Evaluation
MLLMs show a large gap in spatial mathematical reasoning compared to humans, and a new 10,000-problem dataset helps narrow it through training.
-
Diagnosing Corruption-Induced Reliability Failures in Vision-Language Models
Mild visual corruption can boost a vision-language model's top-1 accuracy while its confidence–correctness alignment (measured by the new RAS score) degrades.
-
SpatialThinker: Reinforcing Scene Graph-Grounded Spatial Reasoning via Dense Rewards
Dense scene-graph-grounded rewards let a 7B multimodal LLM trained on 7K synthetic questions beat SFT and sparse-RL baselines and outscore GPT-4o on average across 12 spatial/real-world benchmarks.
-
Sample-Efficient Post-Training for LEGO Spatial-Physics Reasoning
PVPO is a sample-efficient RL method that improves semantic, geometric, and physical quality in LLM LEGO assembly generation by mitigating the PhysHack failure mode where validity alone fails to ensure fidelity.
-
What's Holding Back Latent Visual Reasoning?
Latent visual reasoning fails in current models because standard datasets make oracle latents uninformative and inference-time latents collapse away from useful representations.
-
Reversing the Flow: Generation-to-Understanding Synergy in Large Multimodal Models
Generation-to-Understanding synergy lets multimodal models create self-generated visual edits as intermediate steps, improving performance on twelve benchmarks while revealing limits in task-aligned self-reflection.
-
The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes
A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.