Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-Intrusive Adaptation: Input-Centric Parameter-efficient Fine-Tuning for Versatile Multimodal Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.12100 v1 pith:RHRYCPME submitted 2023-10-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.MM

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.MM
keywords peftmodelsnon-intrusivefine-tuningintrusivelargetaskstechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) demonstrate excellent performance on a wide range of tasks by scaling up parameter counts from O(10^9) to O(10^{12}) levels and further beyond. These large scales make it impossible to adapt and deploy fully specialized models given a task of interest. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) emerges as a promising direction to tackle the adaptation and serving challenges for such large models. We categorize PEFT techniques into two types: intrusive and non-intrusive. Intrusive PEFT techniques directly change a model's internal architecture. Though more flexible, they introduce significant complexities for training and serving. Non-intrusive PEFT techniques leave the internal architecture unchanged and only adapt model-external parameters, such as embeddings for input. In this work, we describe AdaLink as a non-intrusive PEFT technique that achieves competitive performance compared to SoTA intrusive PEFT (LoRA) and full model fine-tuning (FT) on various tasks. We evaluate using both text-only and multimodal tasks, with experiments that account for both parameter-count scaling and training regime (with and without instruction tuning).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LoRA Is Slower Than You Think

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    On a single LLaMA2-7B MMLU run, updating the upper 24 of 32 layers with PaCA gave 52.02 average accuracy versus LoRA's 52.15, while cutting training time from 7:17 to 5:15.

Pith tools