Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13052 v1 pith:RJA7GJJM submitted 2024-05-19 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords personalityinferencesinteractionsuseraccuracyacrosschatbotinfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This study investigates the capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer the Big Five personality traits from free-form user interactions. The results demonstrate that a chatbot powered by GPT-4 can infer personality with moderate accuracy, outperforming previous approaches drawing inferences from static text content. The accuracy of inferences varied across different conversational settings. Performance was highest when the chatbot was prompted to elicit personality-relevant information from users (mean r=.443, range=[.245, .640]), followed by a condition placing greater emphasis on naturalistic interaction (mean r=.218, range=[.066, .373]). Notably, the direct focus on personality assessment did not result in a less positive user experience, with participants reporting the interactions to be equally natural, pleasant, engaging, and humanlike across both conditions. A chatbot mimicking ChatGPT's default behavior of acting as a helpful assistant led to markedly inferior personality inferences and lower user experience ratings but still captured psychologically meaningful information for some of the personality traits (mean r=.117, range=[-.004, .209]). Preliminary analyses suggest that the accuracy of personality inferences varies only marginally across different socio-demographic subgroups. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs for psychological profiling based on conversational interactions. We discuss practical implications and ethical challenges associated with these findings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dark Personality Traits and Online Toxicity: Linking Self-Reports to Reddit Activity

    cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dark personality traits show weak, mostly non-significant links to toxicity in Reddit comments, while self-reported engagement with incivility strongly aligns with measurable toxic language.

  2. ClassComet: Exploring and Designing AI-generated Danmaku in Educational Videos to Enhance Online Learning

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AI-written danmaku, combining content and emotion types, can match human comment quality and significantly boost learner engagement and quiz gains in short educational videos.

Pith tools