REVIEW 3 cited by
Factify 2: A Multimodal Fake News and Satire News Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Factify 2: A Multimodal Fake News and Satire News Dataset
read the original abstract
The internet gives the world an open platform to express their views and share their stories. While this is very valuable, it makes fake news one of our society's most pressing problems. Manual fact checking process is time consuming, which makes it challenging to disprove misleading assertions before they cause significant harm. This is he driving interest in automatic fact or claim verification. Some of the existing datasets aim to support development of automating fact-checking techniques, however, most of them are text based. Multi-modal fact verification has received relatively scant attention. In this paper, we provide a multi-modal fact-checking dataset called FACTIFY 2, improving Factify 1 by using new data sources and adding satire articles. Factify 2 has 50,000 new data instances. Similar to FACTIFY 1.0, we have three broad categories - support, no-evidence, and refute, with sub-categories based on the entailment of visual and textual data. We also provide a BERT and Vison Transformer based baseline, which achieves 65% F1 score in the test set. The baseline codes and the dataset will be made available at https://github.com/surya1701/Factify-2.0.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation
SynCred-Bench shows that 15 MLLMs reach only 10.5% TPR, open-source detectors under 5%, commercial APIs 57.6%, and humans 63% TPR at 5% FPR when identifying AI-generated images with synthetic credibility.
-
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity
An adaptive multimodal fact-checking system improves accuracy by having an Analyzer determine when visual evidence is necessary before the Verifier assesses claim veracity.
-
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity
AMuFC improves multimodal fact-checking accuracy by adaptively determining visual evidence necessity via a dedicated Analyzer before verification rather than always incorporating images.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.