Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 50 references

The paper argues that gravitational waves emitted by decaying cosmic superstrings can brake a rolling modulus and solve the overshoot problem, producing a multi-peaked high-frequency stochastic background.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:41 UTC pith:RRGBFCCB

load-bearing objection A real step forward in multi-species cosmic-superstring dynamics, but the abstract oversells a condition-dependent result and the benchmark sits outside the paper's own adiabatic regime. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26124 v1 pith:RRGBFCCB submitted 2026-07-28 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Gravitational Waves from Multiple Cosmic Superstrings and the Overshoot Problem

Luca Brunelli , Michele Cicoli , Muhammad Hassan , Seyed Ehsan Qoreishi , Francisco Gil Pedro This is my paper
classification hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph MSC 83E3083F0583C35 PACS 04.30.-w98.80.Cq11.25.-w
keywords cosmic superstringsovershoot problemmoduli dynamicsgravitational wavestime-dependent tensiondynamical systemstype IIB string cosmologystochastic gravitational wave background
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to show that gravitational waves emitted by decaying cosmic superstrings can solve the overshoot problem in post-inflationary string cosmology. In the model, a rolling volume modulus drags three species of string loops whose tensions depend on the modulus. The heavier effective strings (from wrapped NS5- and D3-branes) decay early into gravitational waves, and that radiation background brakes the modulus through Hubble friction, preventing it from overshooting its minimum. The lighter fundamental strings survive longer and decay while the modulus oscillates, carrying about a third of the energy density at that time. If correct, the model removes the need to invoke an external radiation component and predicts a multi-peaked, high-frequency gravitational-wave signal as a signature.

Core claim

The central claim is that including gravitational-wave emission from string loops qualitatively changes the overshoot dynamics. Without emission, slow-redshifting NS5-strings are the main brake on the rolling modulus; with emission, those heavy strings rapidly evaporate into gravitational waves, which then dominate the energy density and provide Hubble friction that stabilises the modulus even when F-strings would otherwise re-inject kinetic energy and cause overshoot. Stabilisation requires the initial F-string abundance to be suppressed relative to the D3- and NS5-string populations. The spectra of the three species peak at different frequencies set by their decay times, producing a multi-

What carries the argument

An autonomous dynamical system tracking the energy fractions of the rolling modulus (kinetic, potential), a radiation fluid, and three loop species, extended by a dimensionless gravitational-wave emission rate δ_j = ΓGμ/(Hℓ). The couplings β_j — 1/2 for F-strings, 1/3 for wrapped D3-brane strings, 1/6 for wrapped NS5-brane strings — set how strongly each loop species exchanges energy with the modulus. The load-bearing mechanism is the competition between that energy drain and loop decay into radiation, with the radiation acting as Hubble friction.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism assumes that a loop with slowly varying tension radiates gravitational waves at the same rate as a constant-tension loop; no numerical simulation of time-dependent-tension loops exists, so the constant-tension emission law is the load-bearing assumption.

What would settle it

Run a numerical simulation of a single cosmic string loop whose tension changes on a timescale long compared with its oscillation period, and compare the emitted gravitational-wave power and the loop-length evolution with the constant-tension law P_GW = ΓGμ². A deviation beyond the adiabatic correction would invalidate the friction mechanism; agreement would support it.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The overshoot problem can be resolved without postulating an external radiation bath; the gravitational waves emitted by the string loops themselves create the radiation background that brakes the modulus.
  • Successful stabilisation requires the initial F-string abundance to be sufficiently suppressed relative to the D3- and NS5-string populations, giving a concrete condition on initial loop abundances.
  • The stochastic gravitational-wave background is multi-peaked at high frequencies, with peak positions set by the decay times of each string species; the F-string spectrum also carries features from the kination and modulus-oscillation eras.
  • The spectral peaks survive a late modulus-dominated epoch that dilutes the signal, so the high-frequency background remains a possible observable.
  • A gravitational-wave background carrying most of the energy density does not invalidate perturbation theory, because the energy is carried by high frequency rather than large amplitude.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this friction mechanism generalises, any decaying heavy relic that sources gravitational radiation during a modulus roll could replace the string loops; the paper leaves this connection unexplored.
  • The requirement that F-strings start subdominant could be tested statistically in a string landscape: the fraction of flux vacua satisfying that condition would estimate the prior probability of successful stabilisation.
  • The predicted peak pattern offers a sharper observational target than a single power law: a future high-frequency detector could search for the relative peak frequencies that encode the wrapping numbers of the brane species.
  • The paper treats loops as non-interacting; including intercommutation and network formation could shift the loop-length distribution and the timing of F-string decay, a natural next step to confirm the peak structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the post-inflationary dynamics of a volume modulus rolling down an LVS potential, coupled to three species of cosmic superstrings (F-, D3-, and NS5-strings) whose tensions depend exponentially on the modulus. It constructs an autonomous dynamical system, classifies the fixed points (Table I), and performs extensive scans over initial conditions to determine when the modulus avoids the overshoot problem. The new ingredient is the inclusion of gravitational-wave emission from loop decay, P_GW = ΓGμ², and its backreaction as a radiation fluid. The authors find that early decay of the heavier NS5- and D3-string populations produces a GW radiation background whose friction can stabilise the modulus, provided the initial F-string abundance is sufficiently suppressed; F-strings survive longer, decay near the minimum, and can carry about 1/3 of the total energy density. The resulting stochastic GW spectrum is computed and shown to have a multi-peaked, high-frequency signal (Figs. 16 and 17).

Significance. If the core mechanism is correct, the paper offers a string-theoretic resolution of the overshoot problem that does not require an externally imposed radiation component, and it predicts a species-dependent, high-frequency GW spectrum that could serve as a distinctive observational signature. The dynamical-system construction is careful, the fixed-point table is explicit, and the authors are transparent about key limitations: footnote 3 notes the absence of time-dependent-tension simulations, and the discussion in Sec. III C acknowledges the monochromatic-loop and fixed-width-distribution approximations. The main value of the paper lies in this internally coherent phenomenological framework, but the headline claims depend on two load-bearing conditions that are not fully reflected in the abstract: a strongly suppressed F-string abundance and the validity of the constant-tension emission formula in the adopted benchmark.

major comments (2)
  1. The benchmark used for the headline spectrum violates the paper's own adiabaticity criterion. The bound in Eq. (33) gives |(dμ/dt)/μ| T ≲ 6β Hℓ. For the F-string component (β_F=1/2) with H_inℓ_in=0.3, this equals 0.9, i.e. O(1), not ≪1; Hℓ=0.3 is also not 'much less than 1'. Since Eq. (31) uses Γ values extracted from constant-tension simulations (footnote 3), μ-dot corrections are uncontrolled in exactly the component that survives longest and produces the '1/3 energy density' and late-time peaks in Fig. 16. A change in the GW power at O(1) would directly alter both the friction mechanism that prevents overshoot and the predicted spectrum. Please either re-run the benchmark with Hℓ small enough that 6βHℓ≲0.1 (e.g. Hℓ≲0.03 for F-strings), or provide a quantitative estimate or model of μ-dot corrections to P_GW and show that the stabilisation and multi-peak structure survive.
  2. The abstract states, without qualification, that 'overshooting the minimum is prevented' by GW friction from early decays. The body, however, shows that stabilisation occurs only when the initial F-string abundance is strongly suppressed relative to the D3- and NS5-string populations. In Figs. 12 and 13 stabilisation is recovered only after lowering Ω_F from 5×10^-3 to 10^-4 (with Ω_3=Ω_5=5×10^-3) or from 2×10^-3 to 10^-3 (with Ω_3=Ω_5=0.1), and Fig. 14 shows no stable region when the initial F-string abundance is comparable to the other species. This condition is not a minor detail; it is the reason the proposed mechanism can fail, since the long-lived F-strings re-inject kinetic energy into the modulus at late times. The abstract, introduction, and conclusions should state this suppression condition explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. The claim that δ_in_5 is 'always of order 1' for Φ_in<14, g_s ~ H_inℓ_in ~ 0.1, and Γ=50 appears numerically inconsistent with Eq. (47). Direct evaluation at Φ_in=14 gives δ_in_5 ~ 10^-4, and even at Φ_in=6 with g_s=0.3, Hℓ=0.3 one finds δ_in_5 ~ 5×10^-2. Please check the prefactor in (45)-(47) or clarify the intended parameter range.
  2. The fixed-point table includes the two-parameter families T_2^{(j)} with radiation, but the text never discusses their stability or role in the scans. A brief comment on whether these fixed points are relevant for the overshoot analysis would be useful.
  3. The log-normal smoothing is applied by imposing a fixed width at each emission time on the single-length solution, rather than evolving an actual length distribution with its own backreaction. The manuscript explicitly acknowledges this, but the abstract's spectral claim ('multi-peaked signal') should be tempered by this caveat, since a fully self-consistent treatment could modify the peak amplitudes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained given the stated dynamical-system inputs and the explicitly flagged ΓGμ² approximation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The dynamical system (19)-(22) and the GW-extended system (38)-(43) are solved from stated initial conditions; the overshoot/no-overshoot outcomes and the present-day GW spectrum (63)-(66) are computed outputs, not fitted quantities. The 'early decay' of NS5/D3 strings is not an imposed assumption: δ_j is defined in (39) from microphysical tensions (45)-(47), and δ_5 ~ O(1) for the chosen LVS parameters is a derived consequence rather than an input. The GW-radiation friction mechanism is a new step in the argument, not a restatement of any prior result. Refs [6,7] (partly by the present authors) supply background framework and fixed-point classification, but the central claim is obtained by integrating the system in this paper, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Footnote 3 honestly records that Γ values come from constant-tension simulations because no time-dependent-tension simulation exists, and Sec. III C explicitly states that the length-distribution smearing is imposed phenomenologically and that a fully self-consistent treatment is left for future work; these are validity caveats, not circular reductions. The skeptical adiabaticity estimate (33), with Hℓ=0.3 giving |μdot/μ|T ∼ O(1) for F-strings, is an internal correctness risk for the use of the constant-tension formula P_GW=ΓGμ², but it does not make any predicted quantity equal to an input by construction. No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a string-theory model with many tunable parameters and initial conditions: potential shape, Phi_min, loop abundances, loop sizes, g_s, Gamma, and the modulus decay width. No new entities are introduced beyond the already-hypothesised F-, D3-, and NS5-strings. The physically load-bearing input is the constant-tension gravitational-wave emission law, applied despite the absence of time-dependent-tension simulations.

free parameters (9)
  • LVS potential parameters epsilon and delta = epsilon=0.013, delta=5.397e-12
    Chosen so that V(Phi_min)=0 at Phi_min=19 M_p (Sec. II C). The shape of the potential controls the overshoot dynamics.
  • Minimum field value Phi_min = 19 M_p
    Chosen to avoid the cosmological moduli problem; affects the field excursion and the amount of kinetic energy to be drained.
  • Benchmark initial field position and velocity = Phi_in=6 M_p, Phi_dot_in=0
    Used for the evolution and spectrum benchmarks; stability maps scan around these values.
  • Benchmark initial loop energy fractions = Omega_F^in=1e-3, Omega_3^in=2e-2, Omega_5^in=2e-2
    These initial abundances determine which species dominates when; the spectrum benchmark is sensitive to them.
  • Initial loop sizes H_in ell_in = 0.3 (spectrum), 0.1 (stability scans)
    Controls the subhorizon condition and the initial emission parameter delta_j.
  • String coupling g_s = 0.3
    Sets the initial tensions and the emission parameters through Eqs. (45)-(47).
  • Loop gravitational-wave emission coefficient Gamma = 50
    Taken from constant-tension simulations; no time-dependent-tension simulation exists (footnote 3). It sets the decay rates and the spectrum amplitude.
  • Modulus decay loop factor c = 1/(4*pi)
    Sets the modulus decay width in Eq. (65) and hence the duration of modulus domination and the gravitational-wave dilution.
  • Absolute potential scale / modulus mass and reheating scale = not explicitly stated
    The spectrum formula (66) depends on H_in, H_Phi, and H_rh, but the paper does not fix an absolute V0 or reheating temperature, leaving the overall normalisation under-specified.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption FLRW background with a perfect barotropic fluid and non-interacting string-loop fluids
    Used throughout Sec. II B to build the autonomous system (19)-(22).
  • domain assumption Loop number density redshifts as a^-3 and loop length obeys ell = ell_in sqrt(mu_in/mu) (Eq. 5)
    Adopted from refs. [2,3]; this is the source of the V^{-beta} redshift behaviour in Eq. (30).
  • domain assumption Tension depends exponentially on the modulus, mu = mu0 exp(-sqrt(6) beta Phi/M_p), with beta_F=1/2, beta_3=1/3, beta_5=1/6
    Derived from type IIB brane-wrapping relations in Sec. II C; the beta hierarchy drives the different decay times.
  • domain assumption LVS potential form (24) is a valid description of the volume modulus for large volume
    Used for the full-potential stability scans; the exponential approximation is used earlier.
  • domain assumption Loop gravitational-wave power is P_GW = Gamma G mu^2 with constant Gamma, even for time-dependent tension
    Adopted in Sec. III with an adiabaticity argument (Eqs. 31-33); footnote 3 notes no time-dependent-tension simulation exists.
  • domain assumption The modulus decays with width Gamma_Phi = (c V)^2 m_phi^3/M_p^2 into Higgses
    Used in Sec. III C to estimate the duration of modulus domination and the dilution of the gravitational-wave signal.
  • domain assumption Monochromatic loop population at each time, with an optional instantaneous log-normal width
    Used to compute the spectrum (Eqs. 59-68); the log-normal smearing is imposed phenomenologically and the authors state that a fully self-consistent treatment is left for future work.
  • standard math Isaacson effective stress tensor describes the gravitational-wave background
    Used in App. A to argue perturbation theory remains valid when the gravitational-wave energy density is large.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32285 in / 13762 out tokens · 124946 ms · 2026-08-01T00:41:46.490033+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Post inflationary string cosmology can feature an initial population of multiple species of cosmic superstrings whose tension is controlled by a modulus rolling over a steep potential toward a late-time minimum. We perform a full analysis of the associated dynamical system, finding that overshooting the minimum is prevented by the friction of a radiation background of gravitational waves produced from the early decay of effective strings arising from NS5- and D3-branes wrapped around internal cycles. On the other hand, fundamental strings survive longer and decay when the modulus is oscillating around the minimum and they have about $1/3$ of the total energy density. The spectrum of gravitational waves generated by the decays of these multiple cosmic superstrings, even if diluted by a late epoch of modulus domination, can still result in a high-frequency, multi-peaked signal, offering an observational signature of generic features of string theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26124 by Francisco Gil Pedro, Luca Brunelli, Michele Cicoli, Muhammad Hassan, Seyed Ehsan Qoreishi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: LVS potential (24) for the canonically normalised volume Φ for ϵ = 0.013 and δ = 5.397 × 10−12 . down towards infinity. To avoid this problem, a mechan￾ism is needed that is sufficiently efficient at draining kin￾etic energy from the rolling field, thus effectively braking its descent. Ref. [7] considered the consequence that a single string loop fluid has on a field rolling down the po￾tential (24) toward… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the energy densities of the system with an exponential potential with λ = 3. The initial conditions are chosen to get a clear distinction between the three loop-dominated eras, setting Ωin k = 0, Ω in F = 0.8 × 10−2 , Ωin 3 = 10−4 and Ωin 5 = 10−8 . If we assume that the brane wraps the cycle correspond￾ing to the volume modulus, then by (27) we get: µ3 ≃ M2 s V 1/3 ≃ M2 p e − 2 3 √3 2 Φ , (28… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scan of initial conditions for Φin and Ωin k with Ω in loop = 4.5 × 10−3 . Blue dots correspond to stabilisation, while red dots to overshooting. As can be appreciated therein, a major role in the stabilisation is played by NS5-strings, as was expected. Given that the initial energy densities for each loop spe￾cies are the same, the NS5-strings, which redshift the slower, come to dominate the energy densit… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scan of initial conditions for Φin and Ωin k for various values of Ωin loop. In each case Ωin j = Ωin loop/3. Blue dots correspond to stabilisation, while red dots to overshooting. Top to bottom: Ωin loop = 0.008 , 0.012 , 0.02. ing the total fraction of energy density in loops, we are also increasing Ωin 5 , which is good to avoid overshooting. This shows in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stabilisation map of the field in the absence of radiation with multiple loop species. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale and in each case we set Ωin k = 0. Different colours indicate different fractions of energy density in each loop species Ω in F , Ω in 3 , Ω in 5  /Ω in loop. at Ωin loop ∼ 0.01. Here the same competing effects among the redshifts of D3- and NS5-strings allow the field to have… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the energy densities of the dynamical system (19)-(22) with radiation and an exponential potential with λ = 3. The initial conditions are Ω in k = 0, Ωin F = 10−2 , Ωin 3 = 3 × 10−4 , Ωin 5 = 10−6 and Ω in rad = 10−2 , chosen to show different eras in the evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of the energy densities in the presence of radiation. The initial conditions are Φ = 6Mp, Ωin k = 0, Ω in rad = 10−2 , and Ωin loop = 5 × 10−5 , with equal repartition among loop species. The field overshoots without radiation. fraction of loops fixed, we find a similar phenomenon as that displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Stabilisation map of the field with radiation and multiple loop species. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale and in each case we set Ωin k = 0. Different colours indicate different fractions of energy density in each loop species Ω in F , Ω in 3 , Ω in 5  /Ω in loop. extrapolated by numerical simulations.3 Let us comment that in the case of a time-dependent tension, (31) may, in principle, be mod… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scan of initial conditions for Φin and Ωin k for various values of Ωin rad. In each case Ωin loop = 4.5 × 10−3 and Ω in j = Ωin loop/3. Blue dots correspond to stabilisation, while red dots to overshooting. Top to bottom: Ω in rad = 0.005 , 0.01 , 0.02. ard form of the emitted power per string loop [42, 43]: PGW = dEGW dt = ΓGµ2 , (31) where G = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of the energy densities for Γ = 50, Hinℓ in F = Hinℓ in 3 = Hinℓ in 5 = 0.1, and fixed Ωin 3 = Ωin 5 = 0.1. The top panel corresponds to Ωin F = 0.002 and exhibits overshooting, while the bottom panel shows that reducing the initial F-string fraction to Ωin F = 0.001 restores stabilisation. NS5-string populations, we do not find any region of parameter space where the modulus successfully stabil… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Note, in particular, that the energy density in F-strings before their decay is about 1/3 of the total. Under the assumption of non-interacting loops, we will compute the GW spectrum for each string species separ￾ately by generalising (while also reviewing) the approach of [8], allowing the cosmic strings to decay before matter 0 5 10 15 0.0 N 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Ω Ωk ΩV ΩF Ω3 Ω5 ΩGW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Stability maps in the (Φin, Ω in loop) plane for Γ = 50 and Hinℓ in F = Hinℓ in 3 = Hinℓ in 5 = 0.1, considering different initial loop configurations. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale. Blue points correspond to stabilisation, while red points to overshooting. tion theory is safe due to the fact that the high energy of these GWs is accounted for by their high frequency, rather than their amplit… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: GW spectrum from the three string loop species for the evolution in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: GW spectrum sourced by the F-string loop population for the evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1–155, [2303.04819]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy and N. S. Gonz´ alez,Percolating cosmic string networks from kination,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 083537, [2406.12637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Revello and G

    F. Revello and G. Villa,Cosmic (super)strings with a time-varying tension,JCAP04(2025) 049, [2411.04186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Brunelli, M

    L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli and F. G. Pedro,Growth of cosmic strings beyond kination,JCAP07(2025) 010, [2503.11293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Ghoshal, F

    A. Ghoshal, F. Revello and G. Villa,Cosmic superstrings in large volume compactifications: PTAs, LISA and time-varying tension,JCAP08(2025) 092, [2504.20994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    S´ anchez Gonz´ alez, J

    N. S´ anchez Gonz´ alez, J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland and E. Hardy,Dynamical systems and superstring phases in the early universe,JHEP10(2025) 121, [2505.14187]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Brunelli, M

    L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli and F. Gil Pedro,Dynamics of cosmic superstrings and the overshoot problem,JCAP 05(2026) 042, [2510.06359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy and N. S´ anchez Gonz´ alez,High-frequency Gravitational Waves from Superstring Phases in the Early Universe, 2511.16404

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    Brunelli,Growth of Cosmic Strings with Field-Dependent Tension, 11, 2025,2511.16725

    L. Brunelli,Growth of Cosmic Strings with Field-Dependent Tension, 11, 2025,2511.16725

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    H. L. S. Chun and J. Conlon,Evolution of Generic Varying-Tension Cosmic Strings in Expanding Spacetimes,2512.05170

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    Brunelli, F

    L. Brunelli, F. Revello and G. Villa,The gravitational wave landscape of cosmic string networks with varying tension,2601.10790

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,JHEP03(2005) 007, [hep-th/0502058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    aqp5C68zSLoD2pn3JLL1bZoCaqU=

    Such large backgrounds of GWs at the time of their emission are a general prediction of this model. In the following section, we investigate what observational con- sequences these have on the stochastic GW background observed today. One could also be worried that, if such a large energy density is stored in GWs at any given time during the system evoluti...

  14. [14]

    J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz,Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,JHEP08(2005) 007, [hep-th/0505076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,General Analysis of LARGE Volume Scenarios with String Loop Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP10(2008) 105, [0805.1029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Brustein and P

    R. Brustein and P. J. Steinhardt,Challenges for superstring cosmology,Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 196–201, [hep-th/9212049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  17. [17]

    Kaloper and K

    N. Kaloper and K. A. Olive,Dilatons in string cosmology,Astropart. Phys.1(1993) 185–194

    1993

  18. [18]

    Barreiro, B

    T. Barreiro, B. de Carlos and E. J. Copeland, Stabilizing the dilaton in superstring cosmology,Phys. 18 Rev. D58(1998) 083513, [hep-th/9805005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    Brustein, S

    R. Brustein, S. P. de Alwis and P. Martens, Cosmological stabilization of moduli with steep potentials,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 126012, [hep-th/0408160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Kaloper, J

    N. Kaloper, J. Rahmfeld and L. Sorbo,Moduli entrapment with primordial black holes,Phys. Lett. B 606(2005) 234–244, [hep-th/0409226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Battefeld and S

    T. Battefeld and S. Watson,String gas cosmology,Rev. Mod. Phys.78(2006) 435–454, [hep-th/0510022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    Itzhaki and E

    N. Itzhaki and E. D. Kovetz,Inflection Point Inflation and Time Dependent Potentials in String Theory, JHEP10(2007) 054, [0708.2798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    J. P. Conlon, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and F. Quevedo, Volume Modulus Inflation and the Gravitino Mass Problem,JCAP09(2008) 011, [0806.0809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    B. S. Acharya, P. Kumar, K. Bobkov, G. Kane, J. Shao and S. Watson,Non-thermal Dark Matter and the Moduli Problem in String Frameworks,JHEP06(2008) 064, [0804.0863]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello,Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy, JHEP11(2022) 155, [2207.00567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Mosny, J

    M. Mosny, J. P. Conlon and E. J. Copeland, Self-Tracking Solutions for Asymptotic Scalar Fields, 2507.04161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory,Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 046005, [hep-th/0301240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  28. [28]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Klevers, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter, JHEP05(2014) 001, [1312.0014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,De Sitter from T-branes,JHEP03(2016) 141, [1512.04558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Saltman and E

    A. Saltman and E. Silverstein,The Scaling of the no scale potential and de Sitter model building,JHEP11 (2004) 066, [hep-th/0402135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    Gallego, M

    D. Gallego, M. C. D. Marsh, B. Vercnocke and T. Wrase,A New Class of de Sitter Vacua in Type IIB Large Volume Compactifications,JHEP10(2017) 193, [1707.01095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. L¨ ust, A. Schachner and S. Schreyer, Effective potentials, warping, and implications for F-term uplifting,JHEP05(2026) 286, [2512.17995]

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    G. D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E. W. Kolb, S. Raby and G. G. Ross,Cosmological Problems for the Polonyi Potential,Phys. Lett. B131(1983) 59–64

    1983

  34. [34]

    Banks, D

    T. Banks, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson,Cosmological implications of dynamical supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 779–787, [hep-ph/9308292]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [35]

    de Carlos, J

    B. de Carlos, J. A. Casas, F. Quevedo and E. Roulet, Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,Phys. Lett. B318(1993) 447–456, [hep-ph/9308325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  36. [36]

    C. P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh and R.-J. Zhang,The Inflationary brane anti-brane universe,JHEP07(2001) 047, [hep-th/0105204]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    G. R. Dvali, Q. Shafi and S. Solganik,D-brane inflation, in4th European Meeting From the Planck Scale to the Electroweak Scale, 5, 2001,hep-th/0105203

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister and S. P. Trivedi,Towards inflation in string theory,JCAP10(2003) 013, [hep-th/0308055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov and L. McAllister,Towards an Explicit Model of D-brane Inflation,JCAP01(2008) 024, [0706.0360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov, L. McAllister and P. J. Steinhardt,A Delicate universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 141601, [0705.3837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Cicoli, C

    M. Cicoli, C. Hughes, A. R. Kamal, F. Marino, F. Quevedo, M. Ramos-Hamud et al.,Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 315, [2410.00097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia and F. G. Pedro,Microscopic Origin of Volume Modulus Inflation,JCAP12(2015) 040, [1509.07748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin,Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3052

    1985

  44. [44]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000

    2000

  45. [45]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi and A. Schachner,Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape,JHEP07(2025) 271, [2501.03984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi and A. Schachner,Parameter compression in the flux landscape,2603.04941

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, A. Maharana and P. Piantadosi, Flux Vacua Near the Boundary of Large Complex Structure,2607.20777

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker, J. Jaeckel and M. Wittner, Axions in String Theory – Slaying the Hydra of Dark Radiation,JHEP09(2022) 198, [2203.08833]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    R. A. Isaacson,Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics,Phys. Rev.166(1968) 1263–1271

    1968

  50. [50]

    R. A. Isaacson,Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Ef fective Stress Tensor,Phys. Rev.166(1968) 1272–1279

    1968