pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21281 · v1 · pith:RULOQNV4new · submitted 2026-06-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Floquet-induced anisotropic magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in 2D d-wave altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling

Mohsen Yarmohammadi , Pieter M. Gunnink , Jairo Sinova , James K. Freericks This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords altermagnetsFloquet engineeringanisotropic magnetoresistanceanomalous Hall effectRashba spin-orbit couplingd-wave symmetry2D materialsspintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Periodic light driving induces out-of-plane magnetization and forbidden transport effects in 2D d-wave altermagnets with Rashba coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Floquet engineering through periodic electromagnetic driving applied to two-dimensional d-wave altermagnets with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling can generate effective magnetizations that are absent in the static case. Monochromatic driving yields only out-of-plane magnetization, which activates longitudinal anisotropic magnetoresistance and an anomalous Hall effect. Bichromatic driving produces both in-plane and out-of-plane components and further activates transverse anisotropic magnetoresistance through the second harmonic of the secondary frequency. These responses remain controllable by light polarization, intensity, and frequency, and they replicate effects that would otherwise demand static magnetic fields of hundreds of tesla.

Core claim

Monochromatic driving produces purely out-of-plane magnetization, yielding longitudinal anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) and an anomalous Hall effect, whereas bichromatic driving generates both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetizations and additionally activates transverse AMR via the second harmonic of the secondary beam.

What carries the argument

The Floquet formalism applied to the time-periodic Hamiltonian of the 2D d-wave altermagnet with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling, which generates the effective magnetizations responsible for the transport responses.

If this is right

  • The induced transport responses are tunable by varying light frequency, intensity, and polarization.
  • Comparable magnetizations and transport effects in equilibrium would require static magnetic fields of hundreds of tesla.
  • The effects appear for linear, circular, and mixed light polarizations.
  • Bichromatic driving supplies independent control over in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same driving protocol could be tested in other altermagnet symmetries or in thin-film heterostructures to induce analogous symmetry-breaking transport.
  • Light-controlled versions of these effects might enable ultrafast switching in spintronic devices that avoid permanent magnets.
  • Measuring the second-harmonic transverse AMR under bichromatic illumination would provide a direct experimental signature of the multi-color mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The 2D d-wave altermagnet model with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling remains valid under the applied periodic driving, and the Floquet formalism accurately captures the induced magnetizations and resulting transport without higher-order or non-perturbative corrections.

What would settle it

An experiment in which monochromatic or bichromatic driving produces no measurable out-of-plane magnetization, no longitudinal AMR or anomalous Hall effect, and no transverse AMR under bichromatic conditions, or in which the required light intensities exceed the regime where the Floquet description holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21281 by Jairo Sinova, James K. Freericks, Mohsen Yarmohammadi, Pieter M. Gunnink.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of AMR and AHE in a 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Top) Schematic of Floquet-induced magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Charge (left column) and spin (right column) AMR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. AHE of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Charge (left column) and spin (right column) trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets (AMs) combine momentum-dependent spin splitting with zero net magnetization, making them promising for spintronics. Periodic driving enables dynamic symmetry engineering beyond static, material-specific control. We show that Floquet engineering in 2D $d$-wave AMs with out-of-plane N\'eel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling unlocks equilibrium-forbidden transport responses. Monochromatic driving produces purely out-of-plane magnetization, yielding longitudinal anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) and an anomalous Hall effect, whereas bichromatic driving generates both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetizations and additionally activates transverse AMR via the second harmonic of the secondary beam. Comparable static magnetic fields would require hundreds of tesla, avoided in Floquet driving. These effects persist across linear, circular, and mixed light polarizations and are tunable via light parameters. Our results establish multi-color Floquet engineering for controlling magnetization and symmetry-protected transport in AMs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Floquet engineering in 2D d-wave altermagnets with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling induces equilibrium-forbidden transport responses: monochromatic driving produces purely out-of-plane magnetization yielding longitudinal AMR and AHE, while bichromatic driving generates both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetizations and activates transverse AMR via the second harmonic of the secondary beam. These effects hold across linear, circular, and mixed polarizations, are tunable by light parameters, and avoid the need for hundreds of tesla static fields.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work demonstrates a practical route to dynamic symmetry engineering in altermagnets via multi-color driving, enabling control of magnetization and transport responses that are symmetry-forbidden at equilibrium. This could be relevant for spintronic applications by providing tunable, light-based alternatives to extreme static magnetic fields.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model and Floquet Formalism] The weakest assumption—that the 2D d-wave altermagnet model with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba SOC remains valid under periodic driving and that the Floquet formalism accurately captures induced magnetizations and transport without higher-order or non-perturbative corrections—is load-bearing for all reported effects but receives no explicit bounds or regime-of-validity analysis in the abstract or model description.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states clear outcomes but provides no derivation details, numerical methods, or error analysis, making it impossible to verify whether the transport calculations support the stated claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for identifying the need for an explicit regime-of-validity discussion. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The weakest assumption—that the 2D d-wave altermagnet model with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba SOC remains valid under periodic driving and that the Floquet formalism accurately captures induced magnetizations and transport without higher-order or non-perturbative corrections—is load-bearing for all reported effects but receives no explicit bounds or regime-of-validity analysis in the abstract or model description.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the validity regime is warranted. The Floquet treatment employed is the standard high-frequency Magnus expansion, which requires ħω larger than the electronic bandwidth and driving amplitudes small enough that higher-order corrections remain perturbative. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph in the Model section that (i) states the high-frequency condition ħω ≫ bandwidth (with our parameters ħω = 3 eV versus ~1 eV bandwidth), (ii) quantifies the perturbative regime via the dimensionless drive strength A·v_F/ω < 0.2, and (iii) estimates that neglected O((bandwidth/ω)^2) and O(A^3) terms are suppressed below 10 % for the intensities considered. These bounds are consistent with prior Floquet studies on 2D Rashba systems and do not alter the reported transport responses. The abstract will remain unchanged as it already summarizes the physical regime implicitly through the cited light parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies standard Floquet formalism to a 2D d-wave altermagnet model with Rashba SOC and out-of-plane Néel order to compute induced magnetizations and transport coefficients under monochromatic and bichromatic driving. The abstract and available description present these as direct numerical or perturbative outcomes of the time-periodic Hamiltonian without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained once the model Hamiltonian and Floquet expansion are granted; no quoted equations exhibit the forbidden reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the chosen 2D d-wave altermagnet Hamiltonian including Rashba SOC and the applicability of the Floquet formalism to periodic driving; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is a 2D d-wave altermagnet with out-of-plane Néel order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling
    This defines the starting microscopic model whose symmetries are engineered by the driving.
  • domain assumption Floquet theory accurately describes the light-induced magnetization and transport in the driven system
    Invoked to obtain the effective time-periodic Hamiltonian and resulting steady-state responses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1401 out tokens · 37042 ms · 2026-06-26T13:47:13.071015+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsym- bal, D. G. Schlom,et al., Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Na- ture Electronics5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen,et al., Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear anti- ferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- 6 tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y.Zhang, W.Zhu, H.Bai,et al.,Electrical180°switching of Néel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Science Advances10, eadn0479 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Chakraborty, R

    A. Chakraborty, R. González Hernández, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Strain-induced phase transition from antiferro- magnettoaltermagnet,Phys.Rev.B109,144421(2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, P. Wadley, D. Kriegner, H. Re- ichlova, F. Krizek, H. Ohno, and L. Šmejkal, Altermag- netic spintronics, (2025), arXiv:2508.09748

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room- temperatured-wave altermagnet, Nature Physics21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Zarzuela, R

    R. Zarzuela, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, O. Gomonay, L. Šme- jkal, and J. Sinova, Transport theory and spin-transfer physics ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 064422 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Tserkovnyak, A

    Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, G. E. W. Bauer, and B. I. Halperin, Nonlocal magnetization dynamics in ferromag- netic heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1375 (2005)

    2005

  22. [22]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    K. Ando, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, Y. Kajiwara, H. Nakayama, T. Yoshino, K. Harii, Y. Fujikawa, M. Matsuo, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Inverse spin- Hall effect induced by spin pumping in metallic system, Journal of Applied Physics109, 103913 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Kapri, Spin currents in Rashba altermagnets: From equilibrium to nonlinear regimes, Phys

    P. Kapri, Spin currents in Rashba altermagnets: From equilibrium to nonlinear regimes, Phys. Rev. B112, 155422 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Darvishi, F

    M. Darvishi, F. S. Bergeret, and S. Ilić, Exploring the conventional and anomalous Josephson effects at arbi- trary disorder strength in systems with spin-dependent fields, (2026), arXiv:2604.08231

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Mizoguchi and S

    T. Mizoguchi and S. Ozaki, Orbital-Zeeman cross correlation inp- andd-wave altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2603.09325

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Fakhredine, G

    A. Fakhredine, G. Cuono, J. Skolimowski, S. Picozzi, and C.Autieri,Interplaybetweenrelativisticspin-momentum locking and breaking of inversion symmetry: conditions forp-wave magnetism, (2026), arXiv:2602.21871

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    M. Yarmohammadi, P.-H. Fu, and J. K. Freericks, Effi- cient two-color Floquet control of the RKKY interaction in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2602.20862

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    S.Acharjee, A.Dihingia, N.Sonowal,andA.A.Kashyap, Unconventional spin valve effect in altermagnets induced by Rashba spin orbit coupling and triplet superconduc- tivity, (2026), arXiv:2602.20838 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Marfoua and J

    B. Marfoua and J. Hong, Strain-dependent Rashba effect, and spin Hall conductivity in the altermagnetic Janus V2SeTeO monolayer, Current Applied Physics69, 47 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    K. B. Hallberg, E. W. Hodt, and J. Linder, Visualization of the spin-splitter effect in altermagnets via nonequilib- rium Green’s functions on a lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 174431 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    N. H. Aase, E. W. Hodt, K. B. Hallberg, A. Sudbø, and J. Linder, Orbital splitter effect and spatial resolution of current-induced orbital accumulation, Phys. Rev. B112, 014409 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Sheoran and P

    S. Sheoran and P. Dev, Tuning spin currents in collinear antiferromagnets and altermagnets, (2025), arXiv:2512.03654

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Herasymchuk, K

    A. Herasymchuk, K. B. Hallberg, E. W. Hodt, J. Linder, E. V. Gorbar, and P. Sukhachov, Electric and spin cur- rent vortices in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, L220404 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    M. Q. Dong, Z.-X. Guo, and X.-G. Gong, Field-free per- pendicularmagnetizationswitchingbyaltermagnetswith collinear spin current, Phys. Rev. B112, 094447 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    M. Dou, X. Wang, and L. L. Tao, Anisotropic spin- polarized conductivity in collinear altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 224423 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Wang, K.-Y

    Y.-X. Wang, K.-Y. Lyu, and Y.-X. Li, Spin-dependent photon-assisted transport properties in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, 205404 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Khodas, S

    M. Khodas, S. Mu, I. I. Mazin, and K. D. Belashchenko, Tuning of altermagnetism by strain, Phys. Rev. B113, 104422 (2026)

    2026

  39. [39]

    S. Li, Y. Zhang, A. Bahri, X. Zhang, and C. Jia, Alter- magnetism and strain induced altermagnetic transition in Cairo pentagonal monolayer, npj Quantum Materials 10, 83 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Zhang, M

    W. Zhang, M. Zheng, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, R. Xiong, and Z. Lu, Strain-induced nonrelativistic altermagnetic spin splitting effect, Phys. Rev. B112, 024415 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Zhang, Z

    W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, R. Xiong, and Z. Lu, Nearly complete charge–spin conversion via strain-eliminated Fermi pockets ind-wave altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2604.21779

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    B. D. Hoi, RKKY interaction in altermagnets with adiabatic electron-phonon coupling, (2026), arXiv:2604.23082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Yarmohammadi, J

    M. Yarmohammadi, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Slow- phonon control of spin Edelstein effect in Rashbad-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, 184403 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    Zhang, M

    Z. Zhang, M. Anas, A. Kutepov, P. Kharel, and V. Antropov, Key role of charge disproportiona- tion in monoclinic semiconducting Fe 2PO5, a room- temperatured-wave altermagnet candidate, (2026), arXiv:2604.06114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Choi and K.-W

    J. Choi and K.-W. Kim, Orbital-driven emergent trans- port in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2604.05322

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Liu, C.-C

    Y. Liu, C.-C. Xu, J.-K. Bao, B.-J. Lv, H. Li, J. Li, Y.-Q. Lin, H.-X. Li, Y.-M. Lu,et al., Altermagnetism and room-temperature metal-to-insulator transition in CsCr2S2O, (2026), arXiv:2604.02114

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Y. Zhao, B. Xiao, J. Liu, H. Zeng, and J. Zhao, Layer- dependent quantum transport in KV2Se2O-based alter- magnetic tunnel junctions, (2026), arXiv:2604.14817

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Jäckel, H

    K. Jäckel, H. Grisk, N. Dornquast, M. Gaerner, G. Reiss, T. Kuschel, J. Walowski, and M. Münzenberg, Femtosec- 7 ond all-optical coherent control of spin polarization in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2603.29641

    arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Sharma and N

    P. Sharma and N. Mohanta, Double-peak Majo- rana bound states in altermagnet–superconductor het- erostructures, (2026), arXiv:2603.25844

    arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    C. D. Woodgate, N. Menai, A. Ernst, and J. B. Staunton, Loss of altermagnetic order and smooth restoration of Kramers’ spin degeneracy with increasing temperature in CrSb and MnTe, (2026), arXiv:2603.15035

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Varshney and A

    H. Varshney and A. Agarwal, Asymmetric scattering driveslargenonlinearNernstandSeebeckeffects, (2026), arXiv:2601.17775

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Shaffer and A

    D. Shaffer and A. Levchenko, Theories of superconduct- ing diode effects, (2025), arXiv:2510.25864

    arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Kundu, RKKY interaction mediated by a spin- polarized 2D electron gas with Rashba and altermagnetic coupling, (2025), arXiv:2509.10778

    A. Kundu, RKKY interaction mediated by a spin- polarized 2D electron gas with Rashba and altermagnetic coupling, (2025), arXiv:2509.10778

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, Q. Niu, and Z. Zhang, Spin-valley locking and pure spin-triplet superconductivity in non- collinear antiferromagnets proximitized to conventional superconductors, Newton , 100379 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Sato and T

    M. Sato and T. N. Ikeda, Floquet theory and applications in open quantum and classical systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 111007 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    Castro, U

    A. Castro, U. De Giovannini, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Floquet engineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033213 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    U. D. Giovannini and H. Hübener, Floquet analysis of excitations in materials, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 012001 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    Yu, Tunable odd-parity spin splittings in altermag- nets, (2026), arXiv:2605.03026

    Y. Yu, Tunable odd-parity spin splittings in altermag- nets, (2026), arXiv:2605.03026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Yarmohammadi, U

    M. Yarmohammadi, U. Zülicke, J. Berakdar, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Anisotropic light-tailored RKKY in- teraction in two-dimensionald-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 224412 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    D. Gill, R. Wu, P. Elliott, S. Sharma, and S. SHallcross, All optical ultrafast pure spin current in the altermagnet Cr2SO, (2026), arXiv:2604.12824

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Chen, L.-D

    H.-Z.-X. Chen, L.-D. Yuan, W.-H. Liu, L.-W. Wang, J.- W. Luo, and Z. Wang, A route to nonrelativistic al- termagnetic spin splitting via ultrafast light, (2026), arXiv:2604.02790

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Tian, C.-H

    Y. Tian, C.-H. Zhao, C.-B. Wang, B. Zhang, X. Kong, and W.-J. Gong, Optically driven orbital Hall transport in Floquet odd-parity collinear altermagnets with high chern numbers, (2026), arXiv:2603.11483

    arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Y. Liu, T. Zhu, and H. Zhang, Linearly polarized light- induced anomalous Hall effect and topological phase transitions in an altermagnetic topological insulator, (2026), arXiv:2603.06486

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    D. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light- induced odd-parity altermagnets on dimerized lattices, Phys. Rev. B113, L060409 (2026)

    2026

  67. [67]

    Yang and L

    L. Yang and L. Liang, Nonlinear opto-magnetic signature ofd-wave altermagnets, (2025), arXiv:2509.08254

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Qin and X.-B

    F. Qin and X.-B. Qiang, Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2602.05745

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    Li, D.-F

    B. Li, D.-F. Shao, and A. A. Kovalev, Floquet spin split- ting and spin generation in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 166701 (2026)

    2026

  70. [70]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for providing effective Hamiltonians of 2D d-wave altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling driven by two-color polarized light fields

  71. [71]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  72. [72]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  73. [73]

    Ashcroft and N

    N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976)

    1976

  74. [74]

    Ziman,Electrons and Phonons(Oxford University Press, 1960)

    J. Ziman,Electrons and Phonons(Oxford University Press, 1960)

    1960

  75. [75]

    Weber, K

    M. Weber, K. Leckron, L. F. Haag, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and H. C. Schneider, Ultrafast elec- tron dynamics in a planard-wave altermagnet, Newton 1, 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100266 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100266 2025

  76. [76]

    Reichlova, R

    H. Reichlova, R. Lopes Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lam- mel, M. Leiviskä, A. Birk Hellenes,et al., Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn5Si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate, Nature Communications 15, 4961 (2024)

    2024

  77. [77]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    Stamm, C

    C. Stamm, C. Murer, M. Berritta, J. Feng, M. Gabureac, P. M. Oppeneer, and P. Gambardella, Magneto-optical detection of the spin Hall effect in Pt and W thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 087203 (2017)

    2017

  79. [79]

    Yarmohammadi, P

    M. Yarmohammadi, P. M. Gunnink, J. Sinova, and J. K. Freericks, [Data set], Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20758383 (2026). End Matter Effective Floquet Hamiltonian—In the off-resonant regime, following the detailed derivation provided in the SM [70], the effective Hamiltonian retains the form Heff(k) =h pol 0 (k)σ0 +hpol x (k)σx +hpol y (k)σy +hpo...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20758383 2026

  80. [80]

    By contrast, BCPL (c= ˜c= +1) and BCLPL (c= +1) ex- hibit a monotonic suppression without sign reversal. For circular drives, reversing both chiralities reverses the sign of the AHE, while opposite chiralities strongly suppress it through partial Berry-curvature cancellation, yielding a sign change nearS ≈ √

Showing first 80 references.