REVIEW 1 cited by
Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As machine learning systems grow in scale, so do their training data requirements, forcing practitioners to automate and outsource the curation of training data in order to achieve state-of-the-art performance. The absence of trustworthy human supervision over the data collection process exposes organizations to security vulnerabilities; training data can be manipulated to control and degrade the downstream behaviors of learned models. The goal of this work is to systematically categorize and discuss a wide range of dataset vulnerabilities and exploits, approaches for defending against these threats, and an array of open problems in this space. In addition to describing various poisoning and backdoor threat models and the relationships among them, we develop their unified taxonomy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remedies
Many FL defenses are evaluated on overly easy datasets and attacks, and this paper demonstrates with case studies that those easy settings can make weak defenses look strong.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.