Comment on "Taleyarkhan et al. Reply:"

B. Naranjo

REVIEW

Comment on "Taleyarkhan et al. Reply:"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0702009 v1 pith:SGGKQG6K submitted 2007-02-01 physics.gen-ph nucl-exnucl-thphysics.data-an

Comment on "Taleyarkhan et al. Reply:"

B. Naranjo This is my paper

classification physics.gen-ph nucl-exnucl-thphysics.data-an

keywords commentreplyspectrataleyarkhancavitation-fusioncf-252coauthorsconclude

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

In their Reply to my previous Comment, Taleyarkhan and coauthors measure their detectors' responses to a Cf-252 source, concluding that the resulting spectra differ substantially from the cavitation-fusion spectra published earlier in their Letter. On the contrary, I conclude that the two data sets are qualitatively consistent.

Comment on "Taleyarkhan et al. Reply:"

discussion (0)