Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 87 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

MQTT integration with ROS 2 and FIWARE enables scalable robot collaboration in Mediterranean greenhouses by removing communication barriers.

2026-06-26 10:00 UTC pith:SMEQMYHB

load-bearing objection This is a straightforward engineering description of an MQTT-FIWARE bridge for ROS 2 in greenhouses, but the validation offers no numbers or baselines to back the performance claims. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.22682 v1 pith:SMEQMYHB submitted 2026-06-21 cs.RO

Integrated cloud-based architecture for robot-robot and human-robot collaboration using ROS 2--MQTT in Mediterranean Greenhouses

F. Ca\~nadas-Ar\'anega , M. Mu\~noz , J.C. Moreno , J.L. Blanco-Claraco This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords multi-robot systemsMQTT protocolROS 2greenhouse automationFIWARE platformedge computingcloud-based architectureagricultural robotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a hybrid cloud architecture using MQTT can connect local ROS 2 robot operations to a cloud decision support system in challenging greenhouse environments. It addresses how traditional ROS 2 struggles with node discovery and latency in narrow corridors with dense plants and metal structures. The proposed bridge allows fleets of robots to exchange telemetry, point clouds, and identification data for coordinated missions. Testing in simulation and real greenhouses showed maintained connectivity and data integrity. This supports running complex tasks locally while using cloud resources for oversight, pointing toward Greenhouse Models as a Service.

Core claim

The paper claims that the integration of MQTT effectively eliminates information silos, providing a scalable and decentralised solution for managing complex robotic missions executed locally via Edge Computing, through a two-way communication bridge between ROS 2 as edge platform and iVeg as DSS using MQTT and FIWARE.

What carries the argument

The ROS 2-MQTT-FIWARE two-way communication bridge that links edge computing robots with the cloud-based decision support system for data exchange in constrained environments.

Load-bearing premise

That ROS 2 encounters node discovery issues and latency spikes in Mediterranean greenhouses due to obstacles, foliage, and metallic interference, which the MQTT-FIWARE bridge resolves.

What would settle it

Running the same multi-robot mission in a real Mediterranean greenhouse using only ROS 2 versus using the MQTT bridge, and checking whether node discovery fails or latency spikes without the bridge.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Multi-robot systems can synchronize high-level telemetry and point cloud data despite network constraints.
  • Complex missions can be managed in a decentralized way with local execution.
  • Persistent connectivity and data integrity hold under adverse network conditions in greenhouses.
  • The architecture facilitates robot-robot and human-robot collaboration.
  • This sets a precedent for Greenhouse Models as a Service.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bridge may extend to other agricultural environments with similar interference issues.
  • Offloading coordination to the cloud could lower requirements for perfect on-site networks.
  • Integration with more IoT sensors could enhance the decision support capabilities.
  • Scaling tests with larger robot fleets would reveal limits of the decentralization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid cloud-based architecture integrating ROS 2 (as edge computing) with MQTT and the FIWARE platform to enable robot-robot and human-robot collaboration in Mediterranean greenhouses. It identifies ROS 2 node discovery and latency issues due to foliage, obstacles, and metallic interference, claims the MQTT-FIWARE bridge resolves these by eliminating information silos, and reports validation via high-fidelity simulation plus one real greenhouse test that maintained persistent connectivity, supporting complex missions executed locally and advancing Greenhouse Models as a Service (GMaaS).

Significance. If the architecture demonstrably resolves the stated communication bottlenecks with measurable improvements, the work would provide a concrete interoperability solution for multi-robot systems in constrained agrifood environments, potentially enabling scalable decentralized coordination where standard ROS 2 struggles.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the MQTT-FIWARE bridge 'reliably resolves' ROS 2 node discovery issues and latency spikes is load-bearing yet unsupported; the text states validation occurred in simulation and one real greenhouse scenario with 'persistent connectivity' maintained, but reports no quantitative metrics (e.g., latency, packet loss, discovery success rate), no baseline ROS 2 runs under identical interference conditions, and no isolation of environmental factors such as dense biomass or metallic structures.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that MQTT integration 'effectively eliminates information silos' and provides a 'scalable and decentralised solution' lacks supporting evidence such as measured data exchange rates, before/after silo metrics, or comparison of telemetry/point-cloud delivery performance against pure ROS 2.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback highlighting the need for stronger quantitative support in the abstract. We agree that the claims require explicit metrics and will revise the manuscript accordingly to address these points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the MQTT-FIWARE bridge 'reliably resolves' ROS 2 node discovery issues and latency spikes is load-bearing yet unsupported; the text states validation occurred in simulation and one real greenhouse scenario with 'persistent connectivity' maintained, but reports no quantitative metrics (e.g., latency, packet loss, discovery success rate), no baseline ROS 2 runs under identical interference conditions, and no isolation of environmental factors such as dense biomass or metallic structures.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract does not currently include quantitative metrics to support the resolution of discovery issues and latency. The validation is described qualitatively in the manuscript. In the revised version, we will update the abstract and add explicit results with measured latency values, packet loss rates, and discovery success rates from both the high-fidelity simulation and the real greenhouse test. We will also discuss environmental factors and note the absence of a direct baseline ROS 2 comparison under identical conditions, explaining that the experiments focused on demonstrating the hybrid system's performance in the target environment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that MQTT integration 'effectively eliminates information silos' and provides a 'scalable and decentralised solution' lacks supporting evidence such as measured data exchange rates, before/after silo metrics, or comparison of telemetry/point-cloud delivery performance against pure ROS 2.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's claim regarding elimination of information silos would be strengthened by quantitative evidence. The manuscript presents the architecture as enabling data exchange in constrained settings, but does not report specific rates or before/after comparisons. We will revise the abstract to include measured data exchange rates for telemetry and point-cloud data, along with any available performance comparisons, and adjust the language to reflect observed improvements rather than absolute elimination if the data warrant it. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; architecture proposal uses standard protocols with no derivations or fits

full rationale

The paper presents an engineering architecture for ROS 2-MQTT-FIWARE integration in greenhouses. It contains no equations, no parameter fitting, no derivations, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to inputs by construction. Validation is described at a high level (simulation plus one real scenario) without quantitative before/after metrics, but this is an evidence gap rather than circularity. The central claims rest on the described interoperability of existing protocols and are self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided information.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5832 in / 1082 out tokens · 36804 ms · 2026-06-26T10:00:13.923692+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The imperative to develop more sustainable agriculture demands a transition from isolated automation toward the deployment of multi-robot systems (MRS) in agrifood environments. However, Mediterranean greenhouse settings-characterized by narrow corridors, dense biomass, and structural metallic interference-pose significant challenges for robust and scalable communication between agents. Traditional robotic frameworks, such as ROS 2, frequently encounter node discovery issues and latency spikes due to dynamic obstacles, dense foliage, and other characteristic greenhouse elements, creating a critical bottleneck for real-time coordination. This paper proposes an innovative cloud-based hybrid architecture that establishes a two-way communication bridge between ROS 2, acting as an edge computing platform, and iVeg as a Decision Support System (DSS), using MQTT and the European FIWARE platform. The proposed framework enables seamless interoperability between fleets of multiple robots in environments with communication constraints, facilitating the synchronised exchange of high-level telemetry, point cloud data and farmer identification for collaboration, amongst other critical data. The architecture was validated in a high-fidelity simulation environment and subsequently tested in a real-world greenhouse scenario, demonstrating its ability to maintain persistent connectivity and data integrity under adverse network conditions. The results indicate that the integration of MQTT effectively eliminates information silos, providing a scalable and decentralised solution for managing complex robotic missions, which are executed locally via Edge Computing. This work sets a new methodological precedent for the concept of Greenhouse Models as a Service (GMaaS), bridging the gap between low-level robotic control and high-level, cloud-based IoT decision-making.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22682 by F. Ca\~nadas-Ar\'anega, J.C. Moreno, J.L. Blanco-Claraco, M. Mu\~noz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: General system block diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Greenhouse outdoor The site is situated at an elevation of 3 m above sea level, featuring a consistent 1% northern slope across the terrain. The testing grounds consist of a 1,850 m2 Mediterranean-style greenhouse (locally known as ”raspa y am￾agado“), characterised by a robust steel structural frame and a high-density polyethene cladding. From a robotics perspective, the facility is designed around a 2 m … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Greenhouse indoor ural ventilation, an integrated HVAC network, CO2 enrichment, and high￾pressure humidification systems maintains optimal agronomic conditions. 3.1.2. Simulator for AgroConnect greenhouse To validate the safety and interoperability of the multi-robot coordina￾tion algorithms before physical deployment, the proposed framework was first evaluated within a high-fidelity simulation environment… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Complete 3D greenhouse model (Cañadas-Aránega et al., 2026c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 3D Tomato plant model architecture through localized fog and edge computing layers. This design enables the robots not only to execute local manoeuvres autonomously but also to expose their internal edge-perception states to human supervisors in real time. • AgriCobIoT I (AGI) Based on the commercial Husky platform, AGI utilizes a differential drive system capable of executing zero-radius turns, an essenti… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Real 3D models and AGII used For the purpose of this study, the platform is equipped with the fol￾lowing core hardware layer: – HITTSON Industrial Control Unit: A high-performance onboard computer that serves as the agent’s edge-computing core. It fea￾tures an integrated Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) module, enabling low￾latency, bidirectional telemetry exchange with the local green￾house router. – Intel RealSense D4… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real 3D models and AGII used friction models to accurately simulate the interaction between the tires and the ground. The simulator supports using the most common modern mobile robotics and autonomous vehicle research sensors, such as RGB-D cameras or 2D and 3D LiDAR scanners. All depth-related sensors can accurately measure distances to user-supplied 3D models to define elements of a cus￾tom environment u… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Greenhouse environment with robots at MVSim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The basic YOLO network structure (Yayla et al., 2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: MQTT communication erability. The architecture integrates multiple layers—perception, process￾ing, and application—ensuring seamless collaboration between heterogeneous components such as sensors, actuators, and cloud services. Although this architecture was presented in a basic version in a previous paper (Muñoz et al., 2020b), the current implementation has evolved to incorporate ad￾vanced robotic capab… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Conceptual architecture for data management. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: YOLO process recognition A specialized background node, mqtt_feedback, continuously queries the cloud broker to retrieve the real-time spatial trajectories of neighbor￾ing agents. Concurrently, the deterministic decision-making logic (detailed in Section 4.3) tracks these incoming classification labels and confidence met￾rics (see Algorithm 2). Whenever an agent registers a person or a peer, a fleet-wide … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sample code for the ROS 2 to MQTT bridge, FIWARE and iVeg, where X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Communication and cooperation flow between the robots and the iVeg platform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Identification YOLO from AGI As a direct consequence of this cross-agent synchronization, when the 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Farmer and AGI identification from AGII [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Simulation update AGII local map 39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: iVeg dashboard for multi-robot monitoring during simulation. The interface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: YOLO farmer and AGII recognition from real AGI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Farmer and AGI identification from AGII from the AGI node. Concurrently, Figure 21b displays the live state of AGII’s local costmap monitored via RViz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Real update AGII local map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: End-to-end latency decomposition across the ROS 2–MQTT–FIWARE pipeline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_22.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A case study in European Mediterranean countries , journal =

    Feasibility analysis of robots in greenhouses. A case study in European Mediterranean countries , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100638 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100638 2024

  2. [2]

    2024 , issn =

    Comparative analysis of agricultural IoT systems: Case studies IoF2020 and CyberGreen , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101261 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.iot.2024.101261 2024

  3. [3]

    An iot architecture for water resource management in agroindustrial environments: A case study in almer

    Mu. An iot architecture for water resource management in agroindustrial environments: A case study in almer. Sensors , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  4. [4]

    IEEE Access , volume=

    AgriFusion: An architecture for IoT and emerging technologies based on a precision agriculture survey , author=. IEEE Access , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  5. [5]

    A context consideration , author=

    Robotics and labour in agriculture. A context consideration , author=. Biosystems Engineering , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  6. [6]

    Internet of Things , volume=

    Internet of things (IoT) and agricultural unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in smart farming: A comprehensive review , author=. Internet of Things , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  7. [7]

    Sustainability , volume=

    iPathology: robotic applications and management of plants and plant diseases , author=. Sustainability , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  8. [8]

    2019 third IEEE international conference on robotic computing (IRC) , pages=

    Crop and weeds classification for precision agriculture using context-independent pixel-wise segmentation , author=. 2019 third IEEE international conference on robotic computing (IRC) , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  9. [9]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=

    Analysis of morphology-based features for classification of crop and weeds in precision agriculture , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  10. [10]

    IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=

    A new IoT-based platform for greenhouse crop production , author=. IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  11. [11]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=

    Greenhouse models as a service (GMaaS) for simulation and control , author=. IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  12. [12]

    Scoping review , author=

    Robotics in greenhouses. Scoping review , author=. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  13. [13]

    Ieee Access , volume=

    Internet of things (IoT) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5G-IoT scenarios , author=. Ieee Access , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  14. [14]

    Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing , volume=

    Wireless communication technologies for IoT in 5G: Vision, applications, and challenges , author=. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  15. [15]

    IEEE Internet of things Journal , volume=

    An overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges , author=. IEEE Internet of things Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  16. [16]

    Jurnal pendidikan administrasi perkantoran (JPAP) , volume=

    Pembelajaran daring sebagai upaya study from home (SFH) selama pandemi covid 19 , author=. Jurnal pendidikan administrasi perkantoran (JPAP) , volume=

  17. [17]

    IEEE Internet of Things journal , volume=

    Internet of things for smart cities , author=. IEEE Internet of Things journal , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  18. [18]

    2024 , issn =

    Autonomous collaborative mobile robot for greenhouses: Design, development, and validation tests , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100606 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100606 2024

  19. [19]

    IEEE Systems Journal , volume=

    Campus edge computing network based on IoT street lighting nodes , author=. IEEE Systems Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  20. [20]

    Jornadas de Autom

    Navigation of an Ackermann robot for transport tasks in Mediterranean greenhouses using the MultiVehicle Simulator (MVSim) , author=. Jornadas de Autom

  21. [21]

    Modelado 3D y dise

    Moreno. Modelado 3D y dise. XLIII Jornadas de Autom. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  22. [22]

    2023 , url =

    Clearpath Robotics , title =. 2023 , url =

    2023

  23. [23]

    Sensors , VOLUME =

    Cañadas-Aránega, Fernando and Blanco-Claraco, Jose Luis and Moreno, Jose Carlos and Rodriguez-Diaz, Francisco , TITLE =. Sensors , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

    2024

  24. [24]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=

    A PID-based control architecture for mobile robot path planning in greenhouses , author=. IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  25. [25]

    SoftwareX , volume=

    MultiVehicle Simulator (MVSim): Lightweight dynamics simulator for multiagents and mobile robotics research , author=. SoftwareX , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  26. [26]

    2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages=

    Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot , author=. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages=. 2010 , organization=

    2010

  27. [27]

    2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=

    The marathon 2: A navigation system , author=. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=. 2020 , address=

    2020

  28. [28]

    Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on New Technologies for Sustainable Greenhouse Systems (Greensys) , pages=

    Navigation of a Differential Robot for Transporting Tasks in Mediterranean Greenhouses , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on New Technologies for Sustainable Greenhouse Systems (Greensys) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  29. [29]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

    Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  30. [30]

    mqtt\_client , year =

  31. [31]

    Collaborative Networks of Cognitive Systems: 19th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2018, Cardiff, UK, September 17-19, 2018, Proceedings 19 , pages=

    FIWARE open source standard platform in smart farming-a review , author=. Collaborative Networks of Cognitive Systems: 19th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2018, Cardiff, UK, September 17-19, 2018, Proceedings 19 , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  32. [32]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=

    Multi-modal communication system for mobile robot , author=. IFAC-PapersOnLine , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  33. [33]

    International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT) , volume=

    Robotic control using an android application , author=. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT) , volume=

  34. [34]

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering , volume=

    Robot Controlled Car Using Wi-Fi Module , author=. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering , volume=

  35. [35]

    2020 2nd International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA) , pages=

    Design and development of an agri-bot for automatic seeding and watering applications , author=. 2020 2nd International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA) , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  36. [36]

    2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) , pages=

    IoT based smart multi application surveillance robot , author=. 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  37. [37]

    ra: An in-situ visual authoring system for robot-iot task planning with augmented reality , author=

    V. ra: An in-situ visual authoring system for robot-iot task planning with augmented reality , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference , pages=

    2019

  38. [38]

    Multi-robots' communication system based on ZigBee network , year=

    Wan, Junli and Wang, Yanqiu and Qin, Qin and Li, Yanqin , booktitle=. Multi-robots' communication system based on ZigBee network , year=

  39. [39]

    2017 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE) , pages=

    Multiple motion control system of robotic car based on IoT to produce cloud service , author=. 2017 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE) , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  40. [40]

    and Selvalakshmi, M

    Vanitha, M. and Selvalakshmi, M. and Selvarasu, R. , booktitle=. Monitoring and controlling of mobile robot via internet through raspberry Pi board , year=

  41. [41]

    A Methodology for Integrating Internet of Things Platforms , year=

    Savaglio, Claudio and Fortino, Giancarlo and Gravina, Raffaele and Russo, Wilma , booktitle=. A Methodology for Integrating Internet of Things Platforms , year=

  42. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , volume=

    Internet of things as system of systems: A review of methodologies, frameworks, platforms, and tools , author=. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  43. [43]

    2026 , url =

    FIWARE , title =. 2026 , url =

    2026

  44. [44]

    , citeulike-article-id =

    Bradski, G. , citeulike-article-id =. Dr. Dobb's Journal of Software Tools , keywords =

  45. [45]

    YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021

    YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08430 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications , pages=

    Performance evaluation of mobile robotic system for monitoring and inspection using MQTT protocol and IoT technique , author=. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  47. [47]

    AI-IoT-Robotics Integration: Survey of Frameworks, Emerging Trends, and the Path Toward Connected Robotics , year=

    Bezerra, Ranulfo and Tadokoro, Satoshi and Ohno, Kazunori , journal=. AI-IoT-Robotics Integration: Survey of Frameworks, Emerging Trends, and the Path Toward Connected Robotics , year=

  48. [48]

    IFAC Proceedings Volumes , volume=

    Optimal greenhouse cultivation control: survey and perspectives , author=. IFAC Proceedings Volumes , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  49. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15162 , year=

    A ROS2 Benchmarking Framework for Hierarchical Control Strategies in Mobile Robots for Mediterranean Greenhouses , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15162 , year=

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , volume=

    Reconfigurable agricultural robotics: Control strategies, communication, and applications , author=. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  51. [51]

    International Symposium on Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture , pages=

    Agricultural unmanned ground vehicle (UGV): a brief overview , author=. International Symposium on Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  52. [52]

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , volume=

    A distributed framework for integrated task allocation and safe coordination in networked multi-robot systems , author=. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [53]

    Sensors , volume=

    Heterogeneous multi-robot system for mapping environmental variables of greenhouses , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  54. [54]

    Agronomy , volume=

    An overview of cooperative robotics in agriculture , author=. Agronomy , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  55. [55]

    IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=

    Internet of things for agricultural applications: The state of the art , author=. IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  56. [56]

    2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) , pages=

    An IoT agriculture system using FIWARE , author=. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  57. [57]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  58. [58]

    2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=

    Distributed knowledge leader selection for multi-robot environmental sampling under bandwidth constraints , author=. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  59. [59]

    Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=

    Deep learning with edge computing: A review , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  60. [60]

    Proceedings of the ieee/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Bounding box regression with uncertainty for accurate object detection , author=. Proceedings of the ieee/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  61. [61]

    Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon) , volume=

    Real-time environmental monitoring, visualization and notification system for construction H&S management , author=. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon) , volume=

  62. [62]

    Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences , volume=

    An Embedded Computer Vision Approach to Environment Modeling and Local Path Planning in Autonomous Mobile Robots , author=. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  63. [63]

    Science Robotics , volume=

    Robot Operating System 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild , author=. Science Robotics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  64. [64]

    Jornadas de Autom

    NBV Planning for the detection of hidden tomatoes in greenhouses with AgriSEE , author=. Jornadas de Autom

  65. [65]

    Biosystems engineering , volume=

    Wireless sensor networks for greenhouse climate and plant condition assessment , author=. Biosystems engineering , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  66. [66]

    Pattern Recognition Letters , volume=

    Detecting and tracking people in real time with RGB-D camera , author=. Pattern Recognition Letters , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  67. [67]

    Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Pointfusion: Deep sensor fusion for 3d bounding box estimation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  68. [68]

    2024 21st International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing (ICCWAMTIP) , pages=

    A survey of the yolo series of object detection algorithms , author=. 2024 21st International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing (ICCWAMTIP) , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  69. [69]

    Sensors , volume=

    A method for recognizing dead sea bass based on improved YOLOv8n , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  70. [70]

    An Adaptive Control Architecture for Slope and Terrain Compensation in Autonomous Navigation in Mediterranean Greenhouses , booktitle =

    Ca. An Adaptive Control Architecture for Slope and Terrain Compensation in Autonomous Navigation in Mediterranean Greenhouses , booktitle =. 2026 , address =

    2026

  71. [71]

    IEEE Control Systems Magazine , volume=

    Interconnected dynamic systems: An overview on distributed control , author=. IEEE Control Systems Magazine , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  72. [72]

    IEEE Communications Magazine , volume=

    Standards-based worldwide semantic interoperability for IoT , author=. IEEE Communications Magazine , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  73. [73]

    Shelby and K

    Z. Shelby and K. Hartke and C. Bormann , doi =. The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) , url =

  74. [74]

    Protocol interoperability of OPC UA in service oriented architectures , year=

    Derhamy, Hasan and Rönnholm, Jesper and Delsing, Jerker and Eliasson, Jens and van Deventer, Jan , booktitle=. Protocol interoperability of OPC UA in service oriented architectures , year=

  75. [75]

    MQTT Protocol: Fundamentals, Tools and Future Directions , year=

    Quincozes, Silvio and Emilio, Tubino and Kazienko, Juliano , journal=. MQTT Protocol: Fundamentals, Tools and Future Directions , year=

  76. [76]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , year=

    Autonomous robotic pepper harvesting: Imitation learning in unstructured agricultural environments , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , year=

  77. [77]

    Agriculture , volume=

    Review on key technologies for autonomous navigation in field agricultural machinery , author=. Agriculture , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  78. [78]

    Frontiers in Robotics and AI , volume=

    Integrating collaborative robots in manufacturing, logistics, and agriculture: Expert perspectives on technical, safety, and human factors , author=. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  79. [79]

    Smart Agricultural Technology , volume=

    Agricultural decision system based on advanced machine learning models for yield prediction: Case of East African countries , author=. Smart Agricultural Technology , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  80. [80]

    Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=

    Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in finance: a systematic literature review , author=. Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

Showing first 80 references.