Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction and Dipole-Exchange Curvature Effects on the Spin-Wave Spectra of Magnetic Nanotubes

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In magnetic nanotubes, interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction combines with exchange and dipolar fields to produce analytic, sign-dependent spin-wave nonreciprocity along the tube and chirality of azimuthal standing modes.

arxiv 2504.12219 v1 pith:SUY5SMJK submitted 2025-04-16 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft

B. Mimica-Figari , P. Landeros , R. A. Gallardo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft
keywords dzyaloshinskii-moriyaalonginteractionmodeswavesazimuthalfrequencyinfluence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Spin waves are collective ripples in the magnetization of a magnet. In a normal straight film, waves traveling left and right can differ in frequency only if some interaction breaks mirror symmetry. This paper studies such symmetry breaking in magnetic nanotubes, cylindrical shells, when the shell is coated with a heavy metal that creates a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, a twist-causing coupling between neighboring magnetic moments. The authors build an analytical model from the Landau-Lifshitz equation, including exchange, dipolar fields, radial anisotropy, and DMI, and solve for the spin-wave frequencies as functions of the wave vector along the tube and the azimuthal mode number l. They consider two magnetic states: magnetization along the tube axis and a vortex where magnetization circles the tube. A closed-form expression for the frequency difference between counter-propagating waves (Eq. 17) separates the effect of axial propagation from azimuthal standing waves. In the vortex state, waves along the axis become nonreciprocal because dipolar fields and DMI act together; the sign of DMI either amplifies or opposes the dipolar asymmetry depending on vortex handedness. In the axial state, azimuthal standing modes with opposite l have different frequencies, and exchange and DMI combine into an effective chiral parameter. Adding radial anisotropy lowers frequencies and, in the vortex state, pushes the dispersion minimum to a nonzero wave vector, where a soft mode signals the appearance of a chiral texture. The paper does not report experiments; the results are analytical predictions.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the spin-wave frequency shift under wave-vector inversion in a nanotube is given analytically by Eq. (17), Δf = (γμ0/π)(MsΔdip - HexΔex - HdmΔdm), with the axial part Δfk ∝ k Ms C sinθ [2D/(μ0Ms²) - Rm I1] (Eq. 18) and the azimuthal part Δfl ∝ (l/R) Ms cosθ [R I1 - 2D ln(1/β)/(μ0Ms²(1-β)) - 2lex²/(βR)] (Eq. 19). If correct, this means interfacial DMI, exchange, and dipolar fields jointly control the chirality of spin waves in nanotubes, with DMI either reinforcing or opposing dipolar asymmetry depending on the sign of D and the vortex helicity.

Load-bearing premise

The central predictions assume the interfacial DMI energy density of Eq. (A1) (taken from Ref. 90) correctly describes a heavy-metal-coated nanotube, and they rely on the ultrathin-shell midpoint approximation that forces (Λdip)ρχ = -(Λdip)χρ (Appendix B, Eq. B6c). If the physical DMI angular structure in a real coated tube differs from this model, or if thickness corrections are non-negligible, the predicted signs and magnitudes of Δfk and Δfl would change.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper: material constants (Permalloy) and geometric sizes are literature inputs, and D and Kρ are scanned. The derivation rests on four stated background assumptions, the least externally secured being the curvilinear DMI energy expression.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Landau-Lifshitz equation with linearized plane-wave dynamics (Eqs. 1-3).
    Foundation of spin-wave theory; assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption Interfacial DMI energy expression Edm = (D/Ms²) ∫ ρ̂·[(M(∇·M) - (M·∇)M] dV (Eq. A1, from Ref. 90).
    The specific form of DMI in a curved heavy-metal coated tube is taken from a cited prior model; the paper's DMI results inherit this model.
  • domain assumption Ultrathin nanotube and midpoint integration approximation for dipolar fields (Appendix B, Eq. B6).
    This allows Λρχ = -Λχρ and closed-form Δf expressions but limits validity to thin shells.
  • domain assumption Uniform equilibrium magnetization along a local direction with θ = 0 or π/2, stabilized by a field (Eq. 14).
    Dispersions are computed for idealized collinear and vortex states; DMI-induced equilibrium distortions are not included.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction and Dipole-Exchange Curvature Effects on the Spin-Wave Spectra of Magnetic Nanotubes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SUY5SMJK

@misc{pith2026250412219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction and Dipole-Exchange Curvature Effects on the Spin-Wave Spectra of Magnetic Nanotubes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SUY5SMJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12219}
}
read the original abstract

This work explores spin-wave dynamics in magnetic nanotubes, focusing on the influence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and curvature. The study uses analytical methods to examine how these factors influence the emergence of nonreciprocity and azimuthal standing waves in nanotubes with longitudinal magnetization along the axis or with a vortex-like magnetization. The interplay between exchange, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and dipolar couplings in determining the chirality of spin waves is discussed. When the magnetization is saturated along an axis, the spin waves propagating along it are symmetric under the inversion of the wave vector. However, magnetochirality, mainly driven by exchange and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya couplings, is observed in the azimuthal standing modes. In the vortex state, frequency nonreciprocity occurs for waves propagating along the tube, while the azimuthal modes remain reciprocal. For positive Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, and depending on the helicity of the vortex, the asymmetry induced by the dipolar interaction is reinforced, whereas a negative coupling opposes this asymmetry. The influence of radial anisotropy is also examined. It is found that radial anisotropy reduces the frequency of the modes and shifts the dispersion minimum to a finite wave vector in the vortex state. The properties of modes near zero frequency offer insight into the emergence of chiral magnetic textures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12219 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Ferromagnetic nanotube with an equilibrium magne [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a). This effect is explained by the dependence of the integral I (k,l) 1 on k, which is lost in the zeroth or￾der approximation considered in Eqs. (21) and (22) and higher order terms are needed. Note that these analytical expressions [Eqs. (21) and (22)] account for asymmetry in both k and l, providing insights into the role of curvature and the various interactions in SW dynamics. III. RESULTS In the subsequent d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spin-wave frequency as a function of the azimuthal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spin-wave dispersions calculated for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamic magnetization calculated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoupling size from magnetism: A length-scale boundary for curvature control in micrometer FePt Janus particles

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetization reversal in micrometer-scale FePt Janus particles is insensitive to curvature and governed by the fraction of L1₀ and A1 phases.

  2. Toroidal Moments in Confined Nanomagnets and their Impact on Magnonics

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An origin-independent toroidal moment criterion, including a new surface term, predicts the direction of magnon nonreciprocity across current-driven, textured, graded, and DMI-based magnetic systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Barman, G

    A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, S. Ladak, A. O. Adey- eye, M. Krawczyk, J. Gr¨ afe, C. Adelmann, S. Coto- fana, A. Naeemi, V. I. Vasyuchka, B. Hillebrands, S. A. Nikitov, H. Yu, D. Grundler, A. V. Sadovnikov, A. A. Grachev, S. E. Sheshukova, J.-Y. Duquesne, M. Marangolo, G. Csaba, W. Porod, V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, S. O. Demokritov, E. Albisetti, D. Petti, R....

    2021

  2. [2]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Bar- sukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Aker- man, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. Hillebrands, S. V. Kusminskiy, W. Zhang, C. R. Du, A. Finco, T. van der Sar, Y. K...

    2024

  3. [3]

    Jamali, J

    M. Jamali, J. H. Kwon, S.-M. Seo, K.-J. Lee, and H. Yang, Sci. Rep. 3, 3160 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    Albisetti, S

    E. Albisetti, S. Tacchi, R. Silvani, G. Scaramuzzi, S. Finizio, S. Wintz, C. Rinaldi, M. Cantoni, J. Raabe, G. Carlotti, R. Bertacco, E. Riedo, and D. Petti, Adv. Mater. 32, 1906439 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1114 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Damon and J

    R. Damon and J. Eshbach, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 308 (1961)

    1961

  7. [7]

    Gladii, M

    O. Gladii, M. Haidar, Y. Henry, M. Kostylev, and M. Bailleul, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054430 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Solano, O

    J. Solano, O. Gladii, P. Kuntz, Y. Henry, D. Halley, and M. Bailleul, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 124409 (2022)

    2022

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Szulc, J

    K. Szulc, J. Kharlan, P. Bondarenko, E. V. Tar- takovskaya, and M. Krawczyk, Phys. Rev. B109, 054430 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Gubbiotti, X

    G. Gubbiotti, X. Zhou, Z. Haghshenasfard, M. G. Cot- tam, A. O. Adeyeye, and M. Kostylev, Sci. Rep. 9, 4617 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Gubbiotti, A

    G. Gubbiotti, A. Barman, S. Ladak, C. Bran, D. Grundler, M. Huth, H. Plank, G. Schmidt, S. van Di- jken, R. Streubel, O. Dobrovoloskiy, V. Scagnoli, L. Hey- derman, C. Donnelly, O. Hellwig, L. Fallarino, M. B. Jungfleisch, A. Farhan, N. Maccaferri, P. Vavassori, P. Fischer, R....

    2025

  4. [12]

    R. A. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, T. Schneider, C. Gonzalez-Fuentes, A. Rold´ an-Molina, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, New J. Phys. 21, 033026 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Gr¨ unberg, J

    P. Gr¨ unberg, J. Appl. Phys.57, 3673 (1985)

    1985

  6. [14]

    K. Di, S. X. Feng, S. N. Piramanayagam, V. L. Zhang, H. S. Lim, S. C. Ng, and M. H. Kuok, Sci. Rep. 5, 10153 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    R. A. Gallardo, T. Schneider, A. K. Chaurasiya, A. Oelschl¨ agel, S. S. P. K. Arekapudi, A. Rold´ an-Molina, R. H¨ ubner, K. Lenz, A. Barman, J. Fassbender, J. Lind- ner, O. Hellwig, and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. Applied12, 034012 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    A. F. Franco and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. B 102, 184424 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Grassi, M

    M. Grassi, M. Geilen, D. Louis, M. Mohseni, T. Br¨ acher, M. Hehn, D. Stoeffler, M. Bailleul, P. Pirro, and Y. Henry, Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 024047 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Gladii, R

    O. Gladii, R. Salikhov, O. Hellwig, H. Schultheiss, J. Lindner, and R. A. Gallardo, Phys. Rev. B107, 104419 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Gallardo, M

    R. Gallardo, M. Weigand, K. Schultheiss, A. Kakay, R. Mattheis, J. Raabe, G. Sch¨ utz, A. Deac, J. Lindner, and S. Wintz, ACS Nano 18, 5249 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Girardi, S

    D. Girardi, S. Finizio, C. Donnelly, G. Rubini, S. Mayr, V. Levati, S. Cuccurullo, F. Maspero, J. Raabe, D. Petti, and E. Albisetti, Nat. Commun. 15, 3057 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. A. Ot´ alora, M. Yan, H. Schultheiss, R. Hertel, and A. K´ akay, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 227203 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    M. M. Salazar-Cardona, L. K¨ orber, H. Schultheiss, K. Lenz, A. Thomas, K. Nielsch, A. K´ akay, and J. A. Ot´ alora, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 262411 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    D. D. Sheka, O. V. Pylypovskyi, P. Landeros, Y. Gai- didei, A. K´ akay, and D. Makarov, Commun. Phys.3, 128 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    R. A. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104435 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    K¨ orber, R

    L. K¨ orber, R. Verba, J. A. Ot´ alora, V. Kravchuk, J. Lind- ner, J. Fassbender, and A. K´ akay, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014405 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Dzyaloshinsky, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  19. [27]

    Moriya, Phys

    T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 228 (1960)

    1960

  20. [28]

    Fert and P

    A. Fert and P. M. Levy, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1538 (1980)

    1980

  21. [29]

    R. L. Melcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 125 (1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    A. T. Costa, R. B. Muniz, S. Lounis, A. B. Klautau, and D. L. Mills, Phys. Rev. B 82, 014428 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P

    D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P. Landeros, J. Phys: Cond. Matt. 25, 156001 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Moon, S.-M

    J.-H. Moon, S.-M. Seo, K.-J. Lee, K.-W. Kim, J. Ryu, H.-W. Lee, R. D. McMichael, and M. D. Stiles, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184404 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    K. Di, V. L. Zhang, H. S. Lim, S. C. Ng, M. H. Kuok, J. Yu, J. Yoon, X. Qiu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 047201 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Cho, N.-H

    J. Cho, N.-H. Kim, S. Lee, J.-S. Kim, R. Lavrijsen, A. Solignac, Y. Yin, D.-S. Han, N. J. J. van Hoof, H. J. M. Swagten, B. Koopmans, and C.-Y. You, Nat. Commun. 6, 7635 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    A. A. Stashkevich, M. Belmeguenai, Y. Roussign´ e, S. M. Cherif, M. Kostylev, M. Gabor, D. Lacour, C. Tiusan, and M. Hehn, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214409 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Tacchi, R

    S. Tacchi, R. E. Troncoso, M. Ahlberg, G. Gubbiotti, M. Madami, J. ˚Akerman, and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147201 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    R. A. Gallardo, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, R. E. Troncoso, and P. Landeros, Three-dimensional magnonics: layered, micro-and nanostructures (Jenny Stanford Publishing, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2019) pp. 121–160

    2019

  30. [38]

    Kuepferling, A

    M. Kuepferling, A. Casiraghi, G. Soares, G. Durin, F. Garcia-Sanchez, L. Chen, C. H. Back, C. H. Marrows, S. Tacchi, and G. Carlotti, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015003 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Iguchi, S

    Y. Iguchi, S. Uemura, K. Ueno, and Y. Onose, Phys. Rev. B 92, 184419 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    S. Seki, Y. Okamura, K. Kondou, K. Shibata, M. Kubota, R. Takagi, F. Kagawa, M. Kawasaki, G. Tatara, Y. Otani, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235131 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Rohart and A

    S. Rohart and A. Thiaville, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184422 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    J. H. Franken, M. Herps, H. J. M. Swagten, and B. Koop- mans, Sci. Rep. 4, 5248 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    J. M. Lee, C. Jang, B.-C. Min, S.-W. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and J. Chang, Nano Lett. 16, 62 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50, 244001 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Y. Li, W. Zhang, V. Tyberkevych, W.-K. Kwok, A. Hoff- mann, and V. Novosad, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 130902 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Q. Wang, G. Csaba, R. Verba, A. V. Chumak, and P. Pirro, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 040503 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    D. D. Sheka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 230502 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Makarov and D

    D. Makarov and D. Sheka (Eds.), Curvilinear micro- magnetism: From fundamental to applications (Springer, 2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Sta˜ no and O

    M. Sta˜ no and O. Fruchart, Handbook of Magnetic Ma- terials 27, 155 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Landeros, J

    P. Landeros, J. A. Ot´ alora, R. Streubel, and A. K´ akay, Tubular geometries, in Curvilinear Micromagnetism: From Fundamentals to Applications, edited by D. Makarov and D. D. Sheka (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 163–213

    2022

  43. [51]

    Landeros, O

    P. Landeros, O. J. Suarez, A. Cuchillo, and P. Vargas, Phys. Rev. B 79, 024404 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    R¨ uffer, R

    D. R¨ uffer, R. Huber, P. Berberich, S. Albert, E. Russo- Averchi, M. Heiss, J. Arbiol, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, and D. Grundler, Nanoscale 4, 4989 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Mehlin, B

    A. Mehlin, B. Gross, M. Wyss, T. Schefer, G. T¨ ut¨ unc¨ uoglu, F. Heimbach, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, D. Grundler, and M. Poggio, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134422 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Vasyukov, L

    D. Vasyukov, L. Ceccarelli, M. Wyss, B. Gross, A. Schwarb, A. Mehlin, N. Rossi, G. T¨ ut¨ unc¨ uoglu, F. He- imbach, R. R. Zamani, A. Kov´ acs, A. Fontcuberta i Mor- ral, D. Grundler, and M. Poggio, Nano Lett. 18, 964 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    J. Yang, J. Kim, B. Kim, Y.-J. Cho, J.-H. Lee, and S.-K. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 123, 033901 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Landeros and A

    P. Landeros and A. S. N´ u˜ nez, J. Appl. Phys.108, 033917 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    M. Yan, C. Andreas, A. K´ akay, F. Garc´ ıa-S´ anchez, and R. Hertel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 252401 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Ot´ alora, J

    J. Ot´ alora, J. L´ opez-L´ opez, P. Landeros, P. Vargas, and A. N´ u˜ nez, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.341, 86 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Hertel, J

    R. Hertel, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 483002 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    J. A. Ot´ alora, A. K´ akay, J. Lindner, H. Schultheiss, A. Thomas, J. Fassbender, and K. Nielsch, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014403 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Brevis, L

    F. Brevis, L. K¨ orber, R. A. Gallardo, A. K´ akay, 12 and P. Landeros, The toroidal moments in confined nanomagnets and its impact on magnonics (2024), arXiv:2412.13309 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Brevis, P

    F. Brevis, P. Landeros, J. Lindner, A. K´ akay, and L. K¨ orber, Phys. Rev. B110, 134428 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Gallardo, P

    R. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054044 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    D. F. Gutierrez-Guzman, L. I. Lizardi, J. A. Ot´ alora, and P. Landeros, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 133702 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    We prefer to call it curling instead of helical state, to avoid confusion with the DMI-induced helical states

  58. [66]

    In the axial mag- netic state, nodal lines were found to be mainly straight along the circumference

    and in artificial chiral magnets with left or right- handed curling magnetizations [67]. In the axial mag- netic state, nodal lines were found to be mainly straight along the circumference. In contrast, for curling and cir- cumferential magnetization orientations, the nodal li...

  59. [67]

    M. C. Giordano, M. Hamdi, A. Mucchietto, and D. Grundler, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 024405 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    M. Xu, A. J. M. Deenen, H. Guo, and D. Grundler, Room temperature realization of artificial chiral magnets with reprogrammable magnon nonreciprocity at zero field (2024), arXiv:2404.19153 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2024

  61. [69]

    B. W. Zingsem, M. Farle, R. L. Stamps, and R. E. Cam- ley, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214429 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    R. A. Gallardo, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, T. Schneider, A. Rold´ an-Molina, F. Ma, R. E. Troncoso, K. Lenz, H. Fangohr, J. Lindner, and P. Landeros, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 067204 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Flores-Far´ ıas, R

    J. Flores-Far´ ıas, R. A. Gallardo, F. Brevis, A. Rold´ an- Molina, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, and P. Landeros, Sci. Rep. 12, 17831 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    Gallardo, P

    R. Gallardo, P. Alvarado-Seguel, F. Brevis, C. Gonzalez- Fuentes, J. Gonz´ alez, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, and A. Rold´ an-Molina, Results Phys.67, 108057 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    C. O. Avci, E. Rosenberg, L. Caretta, F. B¨ uttner, M. Mann, C. Marcus, D. Bono, C. A. Ross, and G. S. D. Beach, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 561 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Emori, U

    S. Emori, U. Bauer, S.-M. Ahn, E. Martinez, and G. S. D. Beach, Nat. Mater. 12, 611 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    K¨ orber and A

    L. K¨ orber and A. K´ akay, Phys. Rev. B 104, 174414 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    A. G. Gurevich and G. A. Melkov, Magnetization Oscillations and Waves (CRC Press, Inc, 1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    Kim, D.-S

    N.-H. Kim, D.-S. Han, J. Jung, K. Park, H. J. M. Swagten, J.-S. Kim, and C.-Y. You, Appl. Phys. Express 10, 103003 (2017)

    2017

  70. [78]

    A. S. Samardak, A. V. Davydenko, A. G. Kolesnikov, A. Y. Samardak, A. G. Kozlov, B. Pal, A. V. Ognev, A. V. Sadovnikov, S. A. Nikitov, A. V. Gerasimenko, I. H. Cha, Y. J. Kim, G. W. Kim, O. A. Tretiakov, and Y. K. Kim, NPG Asia Mater. 12, 51 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    Tacchi, J

    S. Tacchi, J. Flores-Far´ ıas, D. Petti, F. Brevis, A. Cat- toni, G. Scaramuzzi, D. Girardi, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, R. A. Gallardo, E. Albisetti, G. Carlotti, and P. Landeros, Nano Lett. 23, 6776 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Grohol, K

    D. Grohol, K. Matan, J.-H. Cho, S.-H. Lee, J. W. Lynn, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Nat. Mater. 4, 323 (2005)

    2005

  73. [81]

    Onoda and N

    S. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 027206 (2007)

    2007

  74. [82]

    Menzel, Y

    M. Menzel, Y. Mokrousov, R. Wieser, J. E. Bickel, E. Vedmedenko, S. Bl¨ ugel, S. Heinze, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197204 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    Ishizuka and N

    H. Ishizuka and N. Nagaosa, New J. Phys. 20, 123027 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    G. Leaf, H. Kaper, M. Yan, V. Novosad, P. Vavassori, R. E. Camley, and M. Grimsditch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 017201 (2006)

    2006

  77. [85]

    Montoncello, L

    F. Montoncello, L. Giovannini, F. Nizzoli, P. Vavassori, M. Grimsditch, T. Ono, G. Gubbiotti, S. Tacchi, and G. Carlotti, Phys. Rev. B 76, 024426 (2007)

    2007

  78. [86]

    R´ ıos-Venegas, F

    C. R´ ıos-Venegas, F. Brevis, R. A. Gallardo, and P. Lan- deros, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224403 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Grassi, M

    M. Grassi, M. Geilen, K. A. Oukaci, Y. Henry, D. Lacour, D. Stoeffler, M. Hehn, P. Pirro, and M. Bailleul, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094444 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    Kisielewski, P

    J. Kisielewski, P. Gruszecki, M. Krawczyk, V. Zablotskii, and A. Maziewski, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134416 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    Mimica-Figari, F

    B. Mimica-Figari, F. Brevis, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, R. Gal- lardo, and P. Landeros, unpublished (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    K. V. Yershov, V. P. Kravchuk, D. D. Sheka, and U. K. R¨ oßler, SciPost Phys.9, 043 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Mancilla-Almonacid, R

    D. Mancilla-Almonacid, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. S. N´ u˜ nez, and S. Allende, Nanotechnology 31, 125707 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Alvarado-Seguel and R

    P. Alvarado-Seguel and R. A. Gallardo, Phys. Rev. B 100, 144415 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.