Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

A simple operator Θ = η^{-4}D lifts every rank-p character solution from Wronskian index ℓ to ℓ+p, reducing quasi-character classification to low-index sectors.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:35 UTC pith:SVMLSSAU

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful new operator construction, with careful explicit checks, but the 'generates all' claim is not yet proved. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18375 v1 pith:SVMLSSAU submitted 2026-07-20 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.NTmath.QAmath.RT

Unlocking the Wronskian Tower: A Simplification of the Holomorphic Modular Bootstrap

Arpit Das , Sunil Mukhi This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.NTmath.QAmath.RT MSC 11F1111F0381T40
keywords modular linear differential equationsWronskian indexquasi-charactersrational conformal field theoryvector-valued modular formsdifferential operatorsq-series sign patternscharacter classification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Characters of rational conformal field theories can be studied as solutions of modular linear differential equations, but classification becomes harder as the Wronskian index ℓ grows because new movable poles and accessory parameters appear. This paper introduces the weight-preserving operator Θ = η^{-4}D, whose action raises ℓ by the rank p while preserving modular covariance and bounded-denominator integrality of q-series. In rank two, combining Θ with the modular functions j^{1/3} and (j−1728)^{1/2} generates every allowed even Wronskian sector from the ℓ=0 equation; in rank three it generates every ℓ that is a multiple of three from the ℓ=0 sector. The consequence is that the classification of quasi-characters, and hence of candidate RCFT characters, collapses to the rigid low-ℓ sectors. As a first application, the paper proves the previously conjectured sign-alternation pattern of rank-two ℓ=2 quasi-character coefficients.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the modular-covariant derivative Θ ≡ η^{-4}D, together with multiplier-system-matched multiplication by j^{1/3} and (j−1728)^{1/2}, maps solutions of the rank-p modular linear differential equation with Wronskian index ℓ to solutions with index ℓ+p, preserving rationality with bounded denominators. Because rank-two MLDEs have even ℓ, repeated application from the rigid (2,0) equation produces every rank-two Wronskian sector, with exactly one new non-rigid parameter appearing at ℓ=6 and, more generally, polynomial operators of the form (3.35) intended to span every (2,6r) sector. Since rank-three MLDEs have ℓ a multiple of three, the same construction reduces

What carries the argument

The central object is the Θ-map Θ ≡ η^{-4}D, formed from the eta-function η and the weight-raising modular derivative D; it has modular weight zero but inherits a nontrivial multiplier system from η^{-4}, so it bridges different Wronskian-index sectors rather than acting inside one. The full generation machinery is the polynomial operator Σ X_{pqr} j^{p/3}(j−1728)^{q/2}Θ^r of Eq. (3.35), whose terms are chosen to share exponents and S/T phases so that they map vector-valued modular forms to vector-valued modular forms while raising ℓ by 2n in rank two and 3n in rank three. Matching multiplier systems and leading q-powers is what fixes which combinations are allowed; the operator preserves bo

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the polynomial operators (3.35) with their displayed parameters span the full solution space of the generic (2,6r) MLDE for every r, and similarly that rank-three generation needs only a complete (3,0) classification; this is verified in detail only at rank two, ℓ=6, with higher cases left as an exercise.

What would settle it

Take the (2,6) or (2,12) MLDE, choose a quasi-character solution with non-rigid parameters far from the Θ-built locus, and test whether its q-series can be expressed as a finite combination of Θ-polynomial images of (2,0) solutions with bounded denominators; a residual parameter or an unpaired exponent would falsify the 'generates all' claim. Alternatively, find a rank-three ℓ=3 quasi-character whose parameters violate the no-logarithm relation ν3 = 864ν1, since the inverse Θ-map requires that relation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Rank-two quasi-character classification reduces to the ℓ=0 equation: all higher even-ℓ solutions are Θ-polynomial images of (2,0) solutions, with new free parameters appearing only at ℓ=6 and its multiples.
  • Rank-three classification across the whole Wronskian tower reduces to classifying the (3,0) quasi-characters; once that sector is complete, ℓ=3, 6, 9, ... follow by iteration.
  • For ranks four and above, classification reduces to the finitely many sectors with 0 ≤ ℓ < p, plus the iterated towers above them.
  • The sign-alternation and geometric-growth estimates for ℓ=2 coefficients, previously only conjectured, become consequences of the ℓ=0 estimates via the Θ-map.
  • The construction gives an explicit route to candidate RCFT characters at high ℓ without directly solving high-order MLDEs with movable poles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the completeness assumption for (2,6r) and rank-three sectors holds, the Θ-map effectively inverts the difficulty hierarchy of the modular bootstrap: hard high-ℓ equations become generated data derived from the rigid ℓ=0 sectors.
  • The Θ-map's multiplier-system shift corresponds to changing the central charge by 4, and in rank two can flip c to −c after exchanging components; this may have a physical interpretation as a reflection or coset-type construction that the paper does not develop.
  • The same transfer of sign and growth control could be iterated to prove analogous sign stabilisation for ℓ=4 or rank-three quasi-characters, where only numerical evidence currently exists.
  • A practical programme suggested by the paper is to complete the finite set of sectors ℓ=0,...,p−1 for rank p≥4; once that is done, the Θ-towers would supply all higher-ℓ quasi-characters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a weight-preserving differential operator Θ ≡ η^{-4}D that maps solutions of a rank-p MLDE with Wronskian index ℓ to solutions of an MLDE with index ℓ+p, at the price of changing the modular multiplier system by v_η^{-4}. For rank 2, the paper explicitly shows that Θ maps (2,0) MMS solutions to (2,2) solutions and is invertible; that Θ^2 combined with j^{1/3} reproduces the rigid (2,4) sector; and that Θ^3 + β j^{1/3}Θ + γ(j-1728)^{1/2} maps (2,0) solutions into the generic non-rigid (2,6) MLDE, with the movable-pole and accessory parameters p, b_4 given in Eqs. (3.33)–(3.34). It then asserts that polynomial operators of the form Eq. (3.35), acting on ℓ=0 solutions, generate all rank-2 Wronskian sectors. For rank 3, the paper derives the (3,0)→(3,3) map and its inverse, uses the no-logarithm condition to reduce the ℓ=3 parameter count, and asserts that repeated application generates all ℓ=3r sectors. As an application, the Θ-map is used to prove the previously conjectured sign patterns and growth bounds for ℓ=2 rank-2 quasi-characters. The paper closes with comparisons to Kaneko–Zagier operators and Bantay–Gannon duality.

Significance. If the completeness assertions were fully established, the paper would provide a significant structural simplification of the holomorphic modular bootstrap, reducing high-ℓ Wronskian sectors to low-ℓ data. The explicit computations are a real strength: the (2,0)→(2,6) computation matches the generic movable-pole MLDE with the correct parameter count, the (3,0)→(3,3) derivation and the no-logarithm condition in Appendix D are clean, and the proof of the ℓ=2 sign conjecture is a genuine advance that builds on the authors' earlier ℓ=0 theorem. The comparison to Bantay–Gannon duality is also informative. However, the paper's headline claim that the Θ-map 'generates all' higher-ℓ sectors rests on an unproved surjectivity statement, and for rank 3 also on a complete (3,0) classification that the paper admits does not yet exist. These gaps do not invalidate the explicit constructions, but they do mean the central completeness claims need either proof or careful weakening.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.35)] The claim that the polynomial operators Σ X_{pqr} j^{p/3}(j-1728)^{q/2} Θ^r generate all rank-2 quasi-characters is not proved. The only non-rigid case worked out in detail is ℓ=6, where the three candidate terms in Eq. (3.23) reduce to one new parameter. For ℓ=6r, r>1, the text after Eq. (3.34) explicitly leaves the construction as 'an exercise to the reader', and the sentence after Eq. (3.35) asserting 'the same number of free parameters as the most general equation of this type' is an assertion, not a derivation. This is load-bearing: the number of monomials in Eq. (3.35) grows quadratically in r, while the expected number of surviving parameters grows linearly. Without an explicit rank computation, an induction, or a general algebraic argument, the surjectivity of Eq. (3.35) is unsupported. The individual Θ-images are valid solutions, but the 'generates all' claim requires the missin
  2. [§4.1, after Eq. (4.15)] The rank-3 completeness claim is also asserted rather than proved. The text states that 'repeated application of the Θ-map together with suitable functions of j ... can be seen to generate MLDE solutions for all ℓ=3r' and then concludes that all rank-3 quasi-characters are generated from ℓ=0 data. This requires a rank-3 analogue of Eq. (3.35), a surjectivity proof for each step, and a complete classification of (3,0) quasi-characters. The paper itself states in §2.3 and in the Discussion that no complete rank-3 ℓ=0 classification exists. Thus the advertised reduction of the rank-3 Wronskian tower to the (3,0) sector is conditional. The theorem should be stated conditionally or the missing surjectivity lemma supplied.
  3. [§4.2] The statement that for any rank p, knowledge of all quasi-character solutions with ℓ<p lets the Θ-map 'do the rest' is a universal completeness claim that inherits the same surjectivity problem. The examples of rank-4 and rank-5 ℓ=2 solutions show only that one must start from the correct residue class modulo p; they do not show that the polynomial operators in Eq. (3.35) or their higher-rank analogues are surjective at each step. As written, this paragraph overstates what has been established. I recommend either proving the operators' rank at each level or reformulating the statement as a conjecture/programme.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, around Eq. (3.17)] The list of j^{(2)} values can be checked directly; the mapping (M^{(0)}, j^{(0)}) → (-M^{(0)}-1, 24-j^{(0)}) is correct for the seven families. The example with A_1 is helpful and should be kept. Typos: 'MMSS-matrix' should be 'MMS matrix'.
  2. [Eq. (5.22)] The sign formula for a^{(2)}_{0,n}(M^{(2)}) starts at n=1. It may be worth explicitly stating that the n=0 leading coefficient is positive, as is done in Eq. (5.20); the reader has to infer this from the displayed ranges.
  3. [Appendix C] The notation (M,j) is redefined locally as (M^{(0)},j^{(0)}); this is fine but should be flagged more prominently. Also 'resepctively' and 'Previosuly' are typos.
  4. [§2.1, Eq. (2.3)] The notation D^p with various subscript conventions is standard but can be confusing. A one-line reminder of the convention in Eq. (2.2) when D appears without a subscript in Θ would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction found; the 'generates all' completeness is an unproven surjectivity claim backed partly by prior co-authored work, which is a rigor gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are self-contained. The Θ-map from ℓ=0 to ℓ=2 is verified by direct differentiation (Eqs. (3.3)-(3.5)), the ℓ=4 collapse is shown explicitly (Eq. (3.20)), and the ℓ=6 map is checked in detail, producing the expected single new parameter (Eqs. (3.23)-(3.34)). In rank 3, the Θ-image is computed directly and satisfies the no-logarithm condition; the inverse map is explicit (Eqs. (4.7)-(4.15)). The sign proof for ℓ=2 coefficients is a genuine reduction to the independently proven ℓ=0 sign theorem from [38], not an assumption of the target ℓ=2 signs. No equation is defined in terms of its target, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only concern is that the global claim 'differential operators of the form Eq. (3.35) generate all rank-2 quasi-characters' depends on the surjectivity of the polynomial operator family, which is verified only for the first non-rigid case ℓ=6; for ℓ=6r with r>1 the paper says 'we leave this as an exercise to the reader' (Section 3.2). The completeness assertion also leans on the prior co-authored classification [13]. This is a missing proof and a load-bearing self-citation, but not a circular step: the higher-ℓ solutions are constructed without assuming the completeness that is claimed. The rank-3 'all ℓ=3r' claim similarly depends on an unproven span of the Θ-operators, but the individual constructions are valid. These gaps reduce confidence in the headline completeness claim, but they are correctness-risk issues, not self-referential reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction's core is a mathematical identity: Θ shifts each leading exponent by −1/6 and hence ℓ by p via the valence formula. The free data are MLDE parameters (μ, β, γ) and family labels (M, j), which are classification parameters rather than fitted constants. Completeness at arbitrary ℓ rests on an unproven spanning assumption for Eq. (3.35), though in rank 2 it is known to be true from [13]. No new physical entity is introduced; the Θ operator is an explicitly defined mathematical tool.

free parameters (4)
  • μ (MMS / ℓ=0 MLDE parameter) = μ = −c(c+4)/576 for rank 2; μ1, μ2 for rank 3
    Central-charge parameter of the source MLDE; the Θ-map carries it to higher-ℓ equations and labels the resulting families.
  • β, γ (ℓ=6 operator coefficients) = one independent combination (γ + μ/3)/(β − μ) up to overall scale
    Introduced in Eq. (3.23) to match the single non-rigid parameter of the (2,6) MLDE; verified to yield the movable pole p in Eq. (3.33).
  • Family labels M(ℓ), j(ℓ) = M ∈ Z; j(0) ∈ {1,2,14/5,4,26/5,6,7}; j(2) ∈ {23,22,106/5,20,94/5,18,17}
    Index the infinite quasi-character families with c(ℓ)=24M(ℓ)+j(ℓ). These label the solutions, not fitted constants.
  • Movable pole / accessory parameters p_I, b_{4,I} = expressed in terms of μ, β, γ in Eqs. (3.33)-(3.34) for r=1
    Parameters of the generic ℓ=6r MLDE; the Θ-map is claimed to reproduce them at every r, but only r=1 is explicitly checked.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Valence formula for the Wronskian: Σ_i α_i = p(p−1)/12 − ℓ/6
    Used to show Θ shifts ℓ by p (Eq. (4.1)); foundational to the claimed generation mechanism.
  • standard math Ramanujan identities: DE4 = −E6/3, DE6 = −E4^2/2, Dη=0, j^{1/3}=η^{-8}E4, (j−1728)^{1/2}=η^{-12}E6
    Used throughout the explicit computations (Eq. (A.2)).
  • domain assumption Allowed Wronskian indices: even for rank 2 [35], multiples of 3 for rank 3 [20]
    Needed for the claim that Θ generates all sectors starting from ℓ=0.
  • domain assumption Bounded-denominator integrality is preserved by Θ and multiplication by j^{1/3}, (j−1728)^{1/2}
    Argued in §3.2 using positivity of the eta-expansion coefficients E_s and integrality of the j-power functions.
  • ad hoc to paper Eq. (3.35) polynomial operators span the full solution space of the generic (p, ℓ+pn) MLDE
    Verified only for rank-2 ℓ=6; asserted for all higher ℓ and rank 3. This is the weak premise of the completeness claim.
  • domain assumption The no-logarithm condition ν3 = 864ν1 (Appendix D) is necessary and sufficient for well-behaved (3,3) solutions
    Used to identify the Θ-image with the full ℓ=3 family; derived in Appendix D and assumed to exhaust the non-logarithmic sector.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31645 in / 18568 out tokens · 143479 ms · 2026-08-01T15:35:12.155046+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Characters of rational conformal field theories solve modular linear differential equations labelled by their order and the Wronskian index $\ell$. Direct classification of admissible solutions by solving MLDEs becomes increasingly difficult at higher $\ell$ -- where movable poles and accessory parameters appear. In this work we introduce differential operators that relate higher-$\ell$ solutions to lower-$\ell$ ones while preserving modular covariance and integrality of the \(q\)-series. In rank two, this generates all allowed Wronskian sectors from the Mathur--Mukhi--Sen equation. In rank three and higher, it reduces the construction of higher-$\ell$ quasi-characters to simpler equations with lower $\ell$. This gives an efficient new route for organising candidate RCFT characters, and more generally quasi-characters, across the Wronskian tower. As an application, we apply our construction to prove a previously conjectured property on the signs of $\ell=2$ quasi-characters in rank 2.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  2. [2]

    Mukhi and B.C

    S. Mukhi and B.C. Rayhaun,Classification of unitary RCFTs with two primaries and central charge less than 25,Commun. Math. Phys.401(2023) 1899 [2208.05486]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Rayhaun,Bosonic rational conformal field theories in small genera, chiral fermionization, and symmetry/subalgebra duality,J

    B.C. Rayhaun,Bosonic rational conformal field theories in small genera, chiral fermionization, and symmetry/subalgebra duality,J. Math. Phys.65(2024) 052301 [2303.16921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Anderson and G.W

    G. Anderson and G.W. Moore,Rationality in conformal field theory,Commun. Math. Phys. 117(1988) 441

    1988

  5. [5]

    Mathur, S

    S.D. Mathur, S. Mukhi and A. Sen,On the classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Lett.B213(1988) 303

    1988

  6. [6]

    Gannon,The theory of vector-modular forms for the modular group,Contrib

    T. Gannon,The theory of vector-modular forms for the modular group,Contrib. Math. Comput. Sci.8(2014) 247 [1310.4458]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Rowell, R

    E. Rowell, R. Stong and Z. Wang,On classification of modular tensor categories, Communications in Mathematical Physics292(2009) 343 [0712.1377]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Mathur, S

    S.D. Mathur, S. Mukhi and A. Sen,Reconstruction of Conformal Field Theories from modular geometry on the torus,Nucl. Phys.B318(1989) 483

    1989

  9. [9]

    Mathur, S

    S.D. Mathur, S. Mukhi and A. Sen,Differential equations for correlators and characters in arbitrary Rational Conformal Field Theories,Nucl. Phys.B312(1989) 15

    1989

  10. [10]

    Harvey and Y

    J.A. Harvey and Y. Wu,Hecke relations in Rational Conformal Field Theory,JHEP09(2018) 032 [1804.06860]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Kawasetsu and Y

    K. Kawasetsu and Y. Sakai,Modular linear differential equations of fourth order and minimal W -algebras,J. Algebra506(2018) 445 [1803.02022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Arike, K

    Y. Arike, K. Nagatomo and Y. Sakai,Vertex operator algebras, minimal models, and modular linear differential equations of order 4,J. Math. Soc. Jap.70(2018) 1347

    2018

  13. [13]

    Chandra and S

    A.R. Chandra and S. Mukhi,Towards a classification of two-character Rational Conformal Field Theories,JHEP04(2019) 153 [1810.09472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    J.-B. Bae, S. Lee and J. Song,Modular constraints on superconformal field theories,JHEP01 (2019) 209 [1811.00976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Mukhi, R

    S. Mukhi, R. Poddar and P. Singh,Rational CFT with three characters: the quasi-character approach,JHEP05(2020) 003 [2002.01949]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Grady, C.H

    J.C. Grady, C.H. Lam, J.E. Tener and H. Yamauchi,Classification of extremal vertex operator algebras with two simple modules,Journal of Mathematical Physics61(2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Franc and G

    C. Franc and G. Mason,Classification of some vertex operator algebras of rank 3,Algebra & Number Theory14(2020) 1613 [1905.07500]. – 43 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Kaidi and E

    J. Kaidi and E. Perlmutter,Discreteness and integrality in Conformal Field Theory,JHEP02 (2021) 064 [2008.02190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee and M. Sarkis,Fermionic rational conformal field theories and modular linear differential equations,PTEP2021(2021) 08B104 [2010.12392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Kaidi, Y.-H

    J. Kaidi, Y.-H. Lin and J. Parra-Martinez,Holomorphic modular bootstrap revisited,JHEP12 (2021) 151 [2107.13557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Das, C.N

    A. Das, C.N. Gowdigere and J. Santara,Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 0 or 2,JHEP11(2021) 195 [2108.01060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee and M. Sarkis,Bootstrapping fermionic rational CFTs with three characters,JHEP01(2022) 089 [2108.01647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Franc and G

    C. Franc and G. Mason,Character vectors of strongly regular vertex operator algebras,SIGMA 18(2022) 085 [2111.04616]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Kaidi, M

    J. Kaidi, M. Martone, L. Rastelli and M. Weaver,Needles in a haystack. An algorithmic approach to the classification of 4dN= 2 SCFTs,JHEP03(2022) 210 [2202.06959]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee and L. Li,On classification of fermionic Rational Conformal Field Theories,JHEP02(2023) 079 [2210.06805]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    K. Lee, K. Sun and H. Wang,On intermediate Lie algebraE 7+1/2,Lett. Math. Phys.114 (2024) 13 [2306.09230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Pan and Y

    Y. Pan and Y. Wang,Flavored modular differential equations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 085027 [2306.10569]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Das, C.N

    A. Das, C.N. Gowdigere and S. Mukhi,Meromorphic cosets and the classification of three-character CFT,JHEP03(2023) 023 [2212.03136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Govindarajan and J

    S. Govindarajan and J. Santara,Two approaches to the holomorphic modular bootstrap,JHEP 10(2025) 181 [2503.23761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Govindarajan, A

    S. Govindarajan, A. Sadanandan and J. Santara,Quasi-characters for three-character Rational Conformal Field Theories,JHEP06(2026) 133 [2510.24248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Govindarajan, A

    S. Govindarajan, A. Jain, A. Sadanandan and A. Kidambi,S-matrices in the holomorphic modular bootstrap approach,2602.14665

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    Das, C.N

    A. Das, C.N. Gowdigere, S. Mukhi and J. Santara,Modular differential equations with movable poles and admissible RCFT characters,JHEP12(2023) 143 [2308.00069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Bantay,Modular differential equations for characters of RCFT,JHEP06(2010) 021 [1004.2579]

    P. Bantay,Modular differential equations for characters of RCFT,JHEP06(2010) 021 [1004.2579]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Nagatomo, Y

    K. Nagatomo, Y. Sakai and D. Zagier,Modular linear differential operators and generalized Rankin-Cohen brackets,2210.10686. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Naculich,Differential equations for rational conformal characters,Nucl

    S.G. Naculich,Differential equations for rational conformal characters,Nucl. Phys.B323 (1989) 423

    1989

  36. [36]

    Hampapura and S

    H.R. Hampapura and S. Mukhi,On 2d Conformal Field Theories with Two Characters,JHEP 01(2016) 005 [1510.04478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Gaberdiel, H.R

    M.R. Gaberdiel, H.R. Hampapura and S. Mukhi,Cosets of Meromorphic CFTs and Modular Differential Equations,JHEP04(2016) 156 [1602.01022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. Mukhi,Signs, growth and admissibility of quasi-characters and the holomorphic modular bootstrap for RCFT,2507.07170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Schellekens,Meromorphic c = 24 Conformal Field Theories,Commun

    A.N. Schellekens,Meromorphic c = 24 Conformal Field Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.153 (1993) 159 [hep-th/9205072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  40. [40]

    Chandra and S

    A.R. Chandra and S. Mukhi,Curiosities above c = 24,SciPost Phys.6(2019) 053 [1812.05109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Hampapura and S

    H.R. Hampapura and S. Mukhi,Two-dimensional RCFT’s without Kac-Moody symmetry, JHEP07(2016) 138 [1605.03314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Franc and G

    C. Franc and G. Mason,Hypergeometric series, modular linear differential equations and vector-valued modular forms,The Ramanujan Journal41(2016) 233

    2016

  43. [43]

    Christe and F

    P. Christe and F. Ravanini,A new tool in the classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Lett.B217(1989) 252

    1989

  44. [44]

    Gowdigere, S

    C.N. Gowdigere, S. Kala and J. Santara,Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 3 or 4,JHEP01(2026) 012 [2308.01149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Bantay and T

    P. Bantay and T. Gannon,Conformal characters and the modular representation,JHEP02 (2006) 005 [hep-th/0512011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [46]

    Bantay and T

    P. Bantay and T. Gannon,Vector-valued modular functions for the modular group and the hypergeometric equation,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 651 [0705.2467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. Mukhi,unpublished

  48. [48]

    Beem and L

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli,Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,JHEP08(2018) 114 [1707.07679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Govindarajan and A

    S. Govindarajan and A. Sadanandan,Updating the holomorphic modular bootstrap,2604.11277

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Z. Duan, K. Lee and K. Sun,Hecke relations, cosets and the classification of 2d RCFTs,JHEP 09(2022) 202 [2206.07478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Kaneko and D

    M. Kaneko and D. Zagier,Supersingular j-invariants, hypergeometric series, and Atkin ’s orthogonal polynomials,AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics7(1998) 97

    1998

  52. [52]

    Kaneko and M

    M. Kaneko and M. Koike,On modular forms arising from a differential equation of hypergeometric type,The Ramanujan Journal7(2003) 145. – 45 –

    2003

  53. [53]

    Kaneko,On modular forms of weight (6n + 1)/5 satisfying a certain differential equation, in Number Theory, W

    M. Kaneko,On modular forms of weight (6n + 1)/5 satisfying a certain differential equation, in Number Theory, W. Zhang and Y. Tanigawa, eds., (Boston, MA), pp. 97–102, Springer US, 2006

    2006

  54. [54]

    Kaneko, K

    M. Kaneko, K. Nagatomo and Y. Sakai,The third order modular linear differential equations, Journal of Algebra485(2017) 332

    2017

  55. [55]

    Alexandrov, S

    S. Alexandrov, S. Feyzbakhsh, A. Klemm and B. Pioline,Quantum geometry and mock modularity,2312.12629

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Alexandrov, S

    S. Alexandrov, S. Feyzbakhsh, A. Klemm, B. Pioline and T. Schimannek,Quantum geometry, stability and modularity,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.18(2024) 49 [2301.08066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Alexandrov, A

    S. Alexandrov, A. Klemm and B. Pioline,Large Order Enumerative Geometry, Black Holes and Black Rings,2605.19552

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Breckenridge, R.C

    J.C. Breckenridge, R.C. Myers, A.W. Peet and C. Vafa,D-branes and spinning black holes, Phys. Lett. B391(1997) 93 [hep-th/9602065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    Kaneko, K

    M. Kaneko, K. Nagatomo and Y. Sakai,Modular forms and second order ordinary differential equations: Applications to vertex operator algebras,Lett. Math. Phys.103(2013) 439

    2013

  60. [60]

    Bringmann, B

    K. Bringmann, B. Kane, A. Pahari and L. Rolen,Strict log-concavity of k-coloured partitions, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics(2026) 1. – 46 –

    2026