Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

Axial w-mode frequencies of anisotropic neutron stars decrease monotonically with mass and follow an approximately linear relation with compactness whose slope and intercept depend on anisotropy strength.

2026-07-01 00:46 UTC pith:T5CUSFRU

load-bearing objection This is a straightforward numerical extension of w-mode calculations to anisotropic stars that reports monotonic trends and empirical fits, but the stable-branch identification rests on an unverified assumption. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2605.01737 v2 pith:T5CUSFRU submitted 2026-05-03 gr-qc

Axial w-modes of anisotropic neutron stars

classification gr-qc
keywords axial w-modesanisotropic neutron starscompactnessdamping timeHorvat ansatzBowers-Liang ansatzBSk21 equation of stateSLy4 equation of state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper solves the linearized axial perturbation equations for neutron star models built from the BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state together with the Horvat and Bowers-Liang prescriptions for pressure anisotropy. It reports that, for any fixed anisotropy strength, the w-mode frequency falls steadily as mass rises along the stable branch, while the frequency itself tracks stellar compactness in an approximately linear way. Anisotropy changes both the slope and intercept of that line, reverses the relative ordering of frequencies between radial-dominant and tangential-dominant cases at higher masses, and produces wider spreads under the Bowers-Liang ansatz. Damping times grow with mass, shorten when tangential pressure dominates, and are more sensitive to anisotropy in compact stars; empirical fitting formulas are supplied for both frequency and damping time.

Core claim

For each fixed anisotropy strength the axial w-mode frequency decreases monotonically with increasing stellar mass along the stable branch; the frequency displays an approximately linear dependence on compactness with anisotropy modifying slope and intercept; damping times increase with mass and shorten when tangential pressure exceeds radial pressure; the Bowers-Liang ansatz yields wider frequency spreads and systematically larger damping times than the Horvat ansatz; and empirical expressions for frequency and damping time are given as functions of compactness and anisotropy strength.

What carries the argument

Continued-fraction solution of the linearized axial perturbation equations on equilibrium configurations constructed with BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state and Horvat and Bowers-Liang anisotropy ansatzes.

Load-bearing premise

The pressure anisotropy in the neutron star models is adequately described by the Horvat and Bowers-Liang ansatz prescriptions over the parameter ranges considered.

What would settle it

Detection of axial w-mode frequencies in gravitational-wave signals from neutron-star mergers or oscillations that deviate from the reported linear compactness relation at the same mass and anisotropy strength.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At low masses configurations with dominant radial pressure show higher frequencies than those with dominant tangential pressure, but the ordering reverses near the maximum stable mass.
  • The Bowers-Liang ansatz produces a wider spread in both frequencies and damping times than the Horvat ansatz.
  • Damping times rise rapidly near the upper end of the stable branch and are shorter when tangential pressure dominates at fixed mass.
  • The sensitivity of damping time to anisotropy increases for more compact stars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear frequency-compactness relation holds, a detected w-mode could yield a direct compactness estimate once anisotropy strength is independently constrained.
  • Differences between the two ansatzes imply that the detailed radial profile of anisotropy must be known to high precision for accurate mode predictions.
  • The reported monotonic decrease with mass suggests that w-mode observations could help distinguish stable from unstable branches without requiring full radial-mode analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes axial w-modes of anisotropic neutron stars constructed from BSk21 and SLy4 equations of state together with the Horvat and Bowers-Liang anisotropy prescriptions. Linearized perturbation equations are solved via the continued-fraction method. The central results are that, for fixed anisotropy strength, the w-mode frequency decreases monotonically with mass along the stable branch (identified by the mass-central-density turning point), exhibits an approximately linear dependence on compactness whose slope and intercept are modified by anisotropy, and that empirical fitting formulae for both frequency and damping time are supplied as functions of compactness and anisotropy parameter. Damping times increase with mass, with ordering and sensitivity to the sign of anisotropy also reported.

Significance. If the stability identification and numerical accuracy hold, the work supplies concrete information on how pressure anisotropy alters w-mode frequencies and damping times for two realistic EOS, extending asteroseismology beyond the isotropic case. The direct numerical solution of the perturbation equations (rather than any fitted surrogate) and the provision of explicit empirical expressions are positive features that could facilitate comparison with future gravitational-wave data.

major comments (3)
  1. [abstract and results discussion of the stable branch] The repeated qualification that results hold 'along the stable branch' rests on identifying that branch solely via the standard turning-point criterion dM/dρ_c > 0. For anisotropic fluids the turning-point theorem does not automatically guarantee dynamical stability; differences between radial and tangential sound speeds can permit cracking or other instabilities even when dM/dρ_c > 0. The manuscript gives no indication that a radial-oscillation analysis or additional stability inequalities on the anisotropy parameter were performed. This directly affects the domain of validity of the monotonicity claim, the reported reversal of frequency ordering, and the empirical fits.
  2. [numerical method and results sections] The continued-fraction implementation is described as standard, yet the text reports neither convergence tests with respect to the continued-fraction depth, grid resolution, or matching radius, nor explicit validation benchmarks against known isotropic w-mode frequencies for the same EOS. Without these, the claimed linear dependence on compactness and the quantitative differences between the two anisotropy ansatzes cannot be assessed for numerical robustness.
  3. [final section presenting the empirical expressions] The empirical expressions for frequency and damping time are stated to be functions of compactness and anisotropy strength, but the fitting procedure, the range of models included, the number of data points, and any goodness-of-fit metrics are not supplied. This makes it impossible to judge how well the expressions reproduce the computed data or their extrapolation properties.
minor comments (1)
  1. [model section] Notation for the anisotropy parameters (e.g., the precise definition of the Horvat and Bowers-Liang strength parameters) should be collected in a single table or equation for easy reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity, documentation, and robustness.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [abstract and results discussion of the stable branch] The repeated qualification that results hold 'along the stable branch' rests on identifying that branch solely via the standard turning-point criterion dM/dρ_c > 0. For anisotropic fluids the turning-point theorem does not automatically guarantee dynamical stability; differences between radial and tangential sound speeds can permit cracking or other instabilities even when dM/dρ_c > 0. The manuscript gives no indication that a radial-oscillation analysis or additional stability inequalities on the anisotropy parameter were performed. This directly affects the domain of validity of the monotonicity claim, the reported reversal of frequency ordering, and the empirical fits.

    Authors: We agree that the turning-point criterion (dM/dρ_c > 0) is necessary but not always sufficient for full dynamical stability in anisotropic stars, where radial-tangential sound-speed differences can allow additional instabilities such as cracking. Our manuscript follows the standard practice in the anisotropic neutron-star literature by using this criterion to identify the stable branch. In the revision we will add an explicit caveat in the introduction, methods, and results sections stating this limitation and noting that a complete radial-oscillation analysis would be required to confirm stability against all modes. The reported monotonicity, ordering reversal, and empirical fits are presented strictly along the turning-point branch; we have not performed additional radial perturbation calculations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [numerical method and results sections] The continued-fraction implementation is described as standard, yet the text reports neither convergence tests with respect to the continued-fraction depth, grid resolution, or matching radius, nor explicit validation benchmarks against known isotropic w-mode frequencies for the same EOS. Without these, the claimed linear dependence on compactness and the quantitative differences between the two anisotropy ansatzes cannot be assessed for numerical robustness.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit convergence and validation tests were omitted. Although the continued-fraction scheme follows the standard formulation used in prior isotropic studies, we will add a dedicated appendix (or subsection) in the revised manuscript containing convergence tests with respect to continued-fraction depth, radial grid spacing, and matching radius. We will also include direct comparisons of our zero-anisotropy results against published axial w-mode frequencies for the BSk21 and SLy4 EOS to benchmark the implementation. These additions will allow quantitative assessment of the reported linear compactness dependence and anisotropy-induced differences. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [final section presenting the empirical expressions] The empirical expressions for frequency and damping time are stated to be functions of compactness and anisotropy strength, but the fitting procedure, the range of models included, the number of data points, and any goodness-of-fit metrics are not supplied. This makes it impossible to judge how well the expressions reproduce the computed data or their extrapolation properties.

    Authors: We agree that the fitting details are insufficient. In the revised manuscript we will expand the final section to specify: the fitting method (least-squares minimization), the exact ranges of compactness and anisotropy parameter values included, the total number of stellar models used, and quantitative goodness-of-fit measures (R² and root-mean-square residual). These additions will enable readers to evaluate the accuracy and extrapolation behavior of the provided empirical formulae. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical solution of perturbation equations

full rationale

The paper constructs stellar models from given EOS (BSk21, SLy4) and standard anisotropy ansatzes (Horvat, Bowers-Liang), then solves the linearized axial perturbation equations numerically via the continued-fraction method to obtain frequencies and damping times. Reported behaviors (monotonic decrease with mass on the stable branch, approximate linearity with compactness, ordering reversals) and the empirical expressions are direct outputs of these computations, not inputs or self-referential definitions. The stable-branch identification uses the conventional turning-point criterion (dM/dρ_c > 0), which is an external assumption independent of the w-mode results. No quoted step reduces by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior ansatzes from the same authors; the derivation chain is self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the two chosen anisotropy ansatzes as accurate models for neutron star matter and on the applicability of the continued-fraction method to the linearized axial perturbation equations in anisotropic spacetimes; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • anisotropy strength parameter
    The strength of anisotropy is introduced as a free parameter that is varied for each ansatz to study its effect on the modes.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Horvat ansatz and Bowers-Liang ansatz provide physically reasonable descriptions of pressure anisotropy in neutron stars.
    These specific prescriptions are adopted without derivation or independent validation shown in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The stellar models remain on the stable branch for the masses considered.
    The monotonic frequency trend is reported specifically along the stable branch.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5842 in / 1487 out tokens · 56692 ms · 2026-07-01T00:46:51.634887+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the axial $w$-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars. Stellar configurations are constructed using two realistic equations of state, BSk21 and SLy4, with two prescriptions for pressure anisotropy, the Horvat ansatz and the Bowers-Liang ansatz. The axial $w$-mode frequencies are computed by solving the linearized perturbation equations using a continued-fraction method. For each fixed anisotropy strength, the axial $w$-mode frequency decreases monotonically with increasing stellar mass along the stable branch, with its magnitude depending on both the equation of state and the nature of the anisotropy. At low stellar masses, configurations with dominant radial pressure ($p_r>p_t$) exhibit higher frequencies than those with dominant tangential pressure, whereas toward the upper end of the stable branch this ordering is reversed, and configurations with $p_t>p_r$ attain higher frequencies at the same mass. The axial $w$-mode frequency displays an approximately linear dependence on compactness, with anisotropy modifying both the slope and the intercept. The Bowers-Liang ansatz produces a wider spread in the frequency values compared to the Horvat ansatz. We also analyze the damping times associated with the axial $w$-modes and find that they increase with stellar mass, with a rapid rise toward the upper end of the stable branch. At a fixed mass, increasing the tangential pressure relative to the radial pressure leads to shorter damping times, while configurations with dominant radial pressure exhibit longer damping times. The sensitivity of the damping time to anisotropy is more pronounced for more compact stars, and the Bowers-Liang ansatz yields systematically larger damping times than the Horvat ansatz. Finally, we provide empirical expressions for the axial $w$-mode frequency and damping time as functions of stellar compactness and anisotropy strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01737 by Sushovan Mondal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mass–radius relations for anisotropic neutron-star configurations constructed using the BSk21 and SLy4 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Frequency-compactness and damping time-compactness relations of the fundamental axial view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Frequency-mass relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Damping time-mass relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Frequency-compactness relations of axial view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Damping time-compactness relations of axial view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonradial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial modes of anisotropic neutron stars show mass-scaled frequency and damping time with nearly universal quadratic dependence on compactness, insensitive to EOS and anisotropy model.

  2. Nonradial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Axial modes of anisotropic neutron stars are integrated numerically for realistic EOS; frequency falls with mass, damping time rises, and scaled quantities follow a near-universal quadratic in compactness that is larg...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the present work, we derive the governing equations for the axialw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars and compute their complex frequencies

    computed the polarw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars. In the present work, we derive the governing equations for the axialw-modes of anisotropic neutron stars and compute their complex frequencies. To solve these equa- tions and obtain the corresponding oscillation frequen- cies and damping times, we consider two realistic nuclear equations of state, na...

  2. [2]

    D. G. Yakovlev, P. Haensel, G. Baym, and C. J. Pethick, Lev Landau and the concept of neutron stars, Phys. Usp. 56, 289 (2013), arXiv:1210.0682 [physics.hist-ph]

  3. [3]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of stars, Phys. Z. Sowjetu- nion1, 285 (1932)

  4. [4]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, Cosmic Rays from Super- Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20, 259 (1934). 15

  5. [5]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, On Super-Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20, 254 (1934)

  6. [6]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equa- tions for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev.55, 364 (1939)

  7. [7]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neu- tron cores, Phys. Rev.55, 374 (1939)

  8. [8]

    Hewish, S

    A. Hewish, S. J. Bell, J. D. H. Pilkington, P. F. Scott, and R. A. Collins, Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source, Nature217, 709 (1968)

  9. [9]

    R. N. Manchesteret al., The Australia Telescope Na- tional Facility Pulsar Catalogue, Astron. J.129, 1993 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412641 [astro-ph]

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al., Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833

  12. [12]

    P. D. Lasky, Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: A Review, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.32, e034 (2015), arXiv:1508.06643 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    Haskell and D

    B. Haskell and D. I. Jones, Glitching pulsars as gravita- tional wave sources, Astropart. Phys.157, 102921 (2024), arXiv:2311.04586 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    Haskell and K

    B. Haskell and K. Schwenzer, Isolated Neutron Stars (2022) arXiv:2104.03137 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Kumar, P

    A. Kumar, P. Thakur, and M. Sinha, Non-radial oscilla- tions in newly born compact star considering effects of phase transition, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.530, 501 (2024), arXiv:2404.01252 [astro-ph.HE]

  16. [16]

    The imprint of the equation of state on the axial w-modes of oscillating neutron stars

    O. Benhar, E. Berti, and V. Ferrari, The Imprint of the equation of state on the axial w modes of oscillating neu- tron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.310, 797 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9901037

  17. [17]

    Exploring properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers

    A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas, and H.-T. Janka, Explor- ing properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 56 (2016), arXiv:1508.05493 [astro-ph.HE]

  18. [18]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-Radial Pulsa- tion of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis forL >= 2, Astrophys. J.149, 591 (1967)

  19. [19]

    Quasi-normal modes of superfluid neutron stars

    L. Gualtieri, E. M. Kantor, M. E. Gusakov, and A. I. Chugunov, Quasinormal modes of superfluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 024010 (2014), arXiv:1404.7512 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Oscillations of General Relativistic Superfluid Neutron Stars

    N. Andersson, G. L. Comer, and D. Langlois, Oscillations of general relativistic superfluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D66, 104002 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0203039

  21. [21]

    Density Discontinuity of a Neutron Star and Gravitational Waves

    H. Sotani, K. Tominaga, and K.-i. Maeda, Density dis- continuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D65, 024010 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0108060

  22. [22]

    Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars

    G. Miniutti, J. A. Pons, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, and V. Fer- rari, Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.338, 389 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0206142

  23. [23]

    Kunjipurayil, T

    A. Kunjipurayil, T. Zhao, B. Kumar, B. K. Agrawal, and M. Prakash, Impact of the equation of state on f- and p- mode oscillations of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D106, 063005 (2022), arXiv:2205.02081 [nucl-th]

  24. [24]

    D. Dey, J. A. Pattnaik, M. Bhuyan, R. N. Panda, and S. K. Patra, f-mode oscillations of dark mat- ter admixed quarkyonic neutron star, JCAP08, 003, arXiv:2412.06739 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    Universal relation in- volving fundamental modes in two-fluid dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars,

    H. Sotani and A. Kumar, Universal relation involv- ing fundamental modes in two-fluid dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1438 (2025), arXiv:2512.07105 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, J. Kunz, and V. Preut, Polar Quasinormal Modes of Neutron Stars in Massive Scalar-Tensor Theories, Front. in Phys.9, 741427 (2021), arXiv:2107.06726 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, Normal modes of a model radiating system, Gen. Rel. Grav.18, 913 (1986)

  28. [28]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, W-modes - A new fam- ily of normal modes of pulsating relativistic stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.255, 119 (1992)

  29. [29]

    Chandrasekhar and V

    S. Chandrasekhar and V. Ferrari, On the non-radial os- cillations of a star. III - A reconsideration of the axial modes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Se- ries A434, 449 (1991)

  30. [30]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Axial Modes for Relativistic Stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 1015 (1994)

  31. [31]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

  32. [32]

    L. K. Tsui and P. T. Leung, Universality in quasi-normal modes of neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.357, 1029 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412024

  33. [33]

    Probing dense matter in neutron stars with axial w-modes

    D. Chatterjee and D. Bandyopadhyay, Probing dense matter in neutron stars with axialwmodes, Phys. Rev. D80, 023011 (2009), arXiv:0904.1949

  34. [34]

    Stellar Oscillations in Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity

    H. Sotani and K. D. Kokkotas, Stellar oscillations in scalar-tensor theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D71, 124038 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506060

  35. [35]

    Axial Quasi-Normal Modes of Scalarized Neutron Stars with Realistic Equations of State

    Z. Altaha Motahar, J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Axial quasinormal modes of scalarized neu- tron stars with realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044032 (2018), arXiv:1807.02598

  36. [36]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo and K. Eickhoff, Axial quasinor- mal modes of static neutron stars in the nonminimal derivative coupling sector of Horndeski gravity: Spec- trum and universal relations for realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D97, 104002 (2018), arXiv:1803.01655

  37. [37]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, J. Kunz, K. V. Staykov, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Axial quasinormal modes of neutron stars inR 2 gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 104047 (2018), arXiv:1804.04060 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Lemaitre, The expanding universe, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, The expanding universe, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A53, 51 (1933)

  39. [39]

    R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity, Astrophys. J.188, 657 (1974)

  40. [40]

    Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann

    M. Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.10, 427 (1972)

  41. [41]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ruderman, Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 775 (1970)

  42. [42]

    R. F. Sawyer, Condensed pi- phase in neutron star mat- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 382 (1972)

  43. [43]

    Phase Transition and Anisotropic Deformations of Neutron Star Matter

    S. Nelmes and B. M. A. G. Piette, Phase transition and anisotropic deformations of neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. D85, 123004 (2012), arXiv:1204.0910 [astro-ph.SR]

  44. [44]

    Barreto and S

    W. Barreto and S. Rojas, An equation of state for radiat- ing dissipative spheres in general relativity, Astrophysics and space science193, 201 (1992)

  45. [45]

    Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science201, 191 (1993)

    W. Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science201, 191 (1993). 16

  46. [46]

    Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonperturbative analytical approach

    S. Yazadjiev, Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonper- turbative analytical approach, Phys. Rev. D85, 044030 (2012), arXiv:1111.3536 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Elastic Stars in General Relativity: I. Foundations and Equilibrium Models

    M. Karlovini and L. Samuelsson, Elastic stars in general relativity. 1. Foundations and equilibrium models, Class. Quant. Grav.20, 3613 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211026

  48. [48]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Compact elastic objects in general relativity, Physical Review D 105, 044025 (2022)

  49. [49]

    Herrera and N

    L. Herrera and N. O. Santos, Local anisotropy in self- gravitating systems, Phys. Rept.286, 53 (1997)

  50. [50]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi, f-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 123011 (2024), arXiv:2309.00439 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi, Quasinormal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D111, 103035 (2025), arXiv:2504.20589 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, V. Guedes, and K. Yagi, Nonradial instabilities in anisotropic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083020 (2024), arXiv:2405.04653 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    J. Yu, V. Guedes, S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, and K. Yagi, Space- time Quasi-normal Mode Oscillations of Anisotropic Neutron Stars, (2026), arXiv:2601.06962 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J. M. Pear- son, and S. Goriely, Analytical representations of unified equations of state for neutron-star matter, Astron. Astro- phys.560, A48 (2013), arXiv:1310.0049 [astro-ph.SR]

  55. [55]

    A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. As- trophys.380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

  56. [56]

    Chabanat, P

    E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabili- ties, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998)

  57. [57]

    Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with quasi-local equation of state

    D. Horvat, S. Ilijic, and A. Marunovic, Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with quasi-local equa- tion of state, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 025009 (2011), arXiv:1010.0878 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational wave spectrum of anisotropic neutron stars in Cowl- ing approximation, Phys. Rev. D85, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1203.3963 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Anisotropic neutron stars in $R^2$ gravity

    V. Folomeev, Anisotropic neutron stars inR 2 gravity, Phys. Rev. D97, 124009 (2018), arXiv:1802.01801 [gr- qc]

  60. [60]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, E. Berti, and L. C. B. Crispino, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in general relativity and scalar–tensor theory, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 145008 (2015), arXiv:1411.6286 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and F. D. Lora- Clavijo, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars with a parametrized equation of state, Phys. Rev. D110, 103004 (2024), arXiv:2410.06316 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    J. W. McKeeet al., A precise mass measurement of PSR J2045 + 3633, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.499, 4082 (2020), arXiv:2009.12283 [astro-ph.HE]

  63. [63]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952−0607: The Fastest and Heav- iest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [64]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

  65. [65]

    Relativistic Fluid Dynamics: Physics for Many Different Scales

    N. Andersson and G. L. Comer, Relativistic fluid dynam- ics: Physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Rel. 10, 1 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0605010

  66. [66]

    Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys

    Y. Kojima, Equations governing the nonradial oscilla- tions of a slowly rotating relativistic star, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4289 (1992)

  67. [67]

    E. W. Leaver, An Analytic Representation for the Quasi- Normal Modes of Kerr Black Holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

  68. [68]

    Leins, H

    M. Leins, H. P. Nollert, and M. H. Soffel, Nonradial os- cillations of neutron stars: A New branch of strongly damped normal modes, Phys. Rev. D48, 3467 (1993)

  69. [69]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998)