Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Prompting Medical Large Vision-Language Models to Diagnose Pathologies by Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.21368 v3 pith:TACRGXVF submitted 2024-07-31 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords medicallvlmspathologiesperformancepromptingansweringdiagnoseextended
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved significant success in recent years, and they have been extended to the medical domain. Although demonstrating satisfactory performance on medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks, Medical LVLMs (MLVLMs) suffer from the hallucination problem, which makes them fail to diagnose complex pathologies. Moreover, they readily fail to learn minority pathologies due to imbalanced training data. We propose two prompting strategies for MLVLMs that reduce hallucination and improve VQA performance. In the first strategy, we provide a detailed explanation of the queried pathology. In the second strategy, we fine-tune a cheap, weak learner to achieve high performance on a specific metric, and textually provide its judgment to the MLVLM. Tested on the MIMIC-CXR-JPG and Chexpert datasets, our methods significantly improve the diagnostic F1 score, with the highest increase being 0.27. We also demonstrate that our prompting strategies can be extended to general LVLM domains. Based on POPE metrics, it effectively suppresses the false negative predictions of existing LVLMs and improves Recall by approximately 0.07.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Philosophy and Physics of Duality

    physics.hist-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A philosophical monograph that surveys dualities across physics and proposes a 'geometric view of theories' for theoretical equivalence, realism, and explanation.

  2. MRGAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Improved Medical Report Generation with Med-LVLMs

    cs.MA 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    MRGAgents fine-tunes one agent per chest X-ray disease and merges their sentences, reporting higher text metrics, but its evaluation uses oracle disease sentences and is not end-to-end.

Pith tools