REVIEW 8 cited by
Navigating LLM Ethics: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study addresses ethical issues surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) within the field of artificial intelligence. It explores the common ethical challenges posed by both LLMs and other AI systems, such as privacy and fairness, as well as ethical challenges uniquely arising from LLMs. It highlights challenges such as hallucination, verifiable accountability, and decoding censorship complexity, which are unique to LLMs and distinct from those encountered in traditional AI systems. The study underscores the need to tackle these complexities to ensure accountability, reduce biases, and enhance transparency in the influential role that LLMs play in shaping information dissemination. It proposes mitigation strategies and future directions for LLM ethics, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration. It recommends ethical frameworks tailored to specific domains and dynamic auditing systems adapted to diverse contexts. This roadmap aims to guide responsible development and integration of LLMs, envisioning a future where ethical considerations govern AI advancements in society.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
EPT Benchmark: Evaluation of Persian Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
A new Persian-Islamic trustworthiness benchmark ranks Claude highest and Qwen lowest across eight LLMs and finds safety is the weakest dimension.
-
Multi-Modal Requirements Data-based Acceptance Criteria Generation using LLMs
Multi-modal RAG (text plus UI screenshots) with reward-based polishing generates acceptance criteria from user stories that three industry experts rated near 4/5 on relevance, correctness, and understandability.
-
Large Language Models for Agent-Based Modelling: Current and possible uses across the modelling cycle
A structured review showing that current LLM use in agent-based modelling is concentrated in implementation, with untapped but risky potential across problem formulation, conceptualization, verification, validation, i...
-
TRIDENT: Benchmarking LLM Safety in Finance, Medicine, and Law
Trident-Bench provides 2,652 professionally validated harmful prompts across finance, law, and medicine, and shows that domain-specialized LLMs often comply with unethical requests more than generalist models.
-
H2HTalk: Evaluating Large Language Models as Emotional Companion
H2HTalk is a new 4,650-scenario benchmark that scores LLM emotional companions on dialogue, memory, and itinerary planning, and finds models struggle with implicit needs and long-horizon memory.
-
Software Engineering for Large Language Models: Research Status, Challenges and the Road Ahead
A literature review organizes LLM development into a six-phase software engineering lifecycle and identifies challenges and research directions for each phase.
-
SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation
A systematization-of-knowledge survey that categorizes LLM privacy risks into training data, prompts, outputs, and agents, and reviews limitations of current mitigations.
-
A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models
A survey that organizes LLM hallucination types, causes, benchmarks, and mitigations, and restates the theorem that hallucination is inevitable for computable LLMs.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.