REVIEW 2 cited by
LabelBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Adaptive Label-Efficient Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Labeled data are critical to modern machine learning applications, but obtaining labels can be expensive. To mitigate this cost, machine learning methods, such as transfer learning, semi-supervised learning and active learning, aim to be label-efficient: achieving high predictive performance from relatively few labeled examples. While obtaining the best label-efficiency in practice often requires combinations of these techniques, existing benchmark and evaluation frameworks do not capture a concerted combination of all such techniques. This paper addresses this deficiency by introducing LabelBench, a new computationally-efficient framework for joint evaluation of multiple label-efficient learning techniques. As an application of LabelBench, we introduce a novel benchmark of state-of-the-art active learning methods in combination with semi-supervised learning for fine-tuning pretrained vision transformers. Our benchmark demonstrates better label-efficiencies than previously reported in active learning. LabelBench's modular codebase is open-sourced for the broader community to contribute label-efficient learning methods and benchmarks. The repository can be found at: https://github.com/EfficientTraining/LabelBench.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
To Label or Not to Label: PALM -- A Predictive Model for Evaluating Sample Efficiency in Active Learning Models
PALM fits a four-parameter saturation curve to early active learning accuracy data and extrapolates it to predict the full learning trajectory.
-
Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs
Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.