Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Two of the seven 'Qi-Xiu' parity-violating terms act only on scalar-induced gravitational waves, producing circular polarization even when linear waves propagate at light speed.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 03:37 UTC pith:TM5AHNBR

load-bearing objection The structural observation about L3/L4 is worth attention, but the numerical section is internally inconsistent: the scalar transfer function used does not solve the paper's own background equations. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2602.07430 v2 pith:TM5AHNBR submitted 2026-02-07 gr-qc

Circularly polarized gravitational waves from parity-violating scalar-tensor theory

Jia-Xi Feng , Jia-Yuan Fang , Xian Gao This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords parity-violating scalar-tensor gravityQi-Xiu Lagrangiansscalar-induced gravitational wavescircular polarizationstochastic gravitational wave backgroundprimordial gravitational wavesghost-free theoriesradiation era
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies gravitational waves in a parity-violating scalar-tensor (PVST) theory built from seven ghost-free monomials, the 'Qi-Xiu' Lagrangians. It shows that five of the terms make linear tensor modes propagate in a polarization-dependent way, yielding chiral primordial spectra. The key new claim is that the remaining two terms, L3 and L4, are absent from linear tensor dynamics but enter the second-order source that drives scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs); therefore parity violation can appear in the induced stochastic background even when the linear propagation speed equals the speed of light. Working in a radiation-dominated era, the paper computes the SIGW energy density and degree of circular polarization for monochromatic and lognormal curvature spectra, finding deviations from general relativity near the peak and circular polarization up to roughly 0.5. A nonzero circular polarization in a stochastic gravitational-wave background is a distinctive observable for upcoming space-based detectors.

Core claim

The central discovery is a decoupling: in the PVST framework, the parity-violating coefficients c1 and c2 that govern linear tensor propagation come only from L1, L2, L5, L6, and L7, while L3 and L4 contribute exclusively to the cubic scalar-scalar-tensor interaction that sources SIGWs. After deriving the second-order equation of motion, the paper isolates the parity-violating source terms proportional to the couplings b3 and b4, neglects the other PV channels, and computes the kernel for SIGWs. In the radiation era with φ' = ±2/(κ η) and constant b3, b4, the resulting fractional energy density Ω_GW exceeds the GR prediction near the peak scale, and the right- and left-handed power spectra s

What carries the argument

The 'Qi-Xiu' Lagrangians: seven ghost-free parity-violating scalar-tensor monomials classified by derivative count. Linear tensor dynamics are governed by two time-dependent coefficients c1 and c2 built from L1, L2, L5, L6, and L7; L3 and L4 appear only in the second-order source as coefficients in the parity-violating source term. Their role is to make the right- and left-handed SIGW kernels unequal while leaving the linear Green's function identical to GR, so a net circular polarization of the stochastic background emerges from the source rather than from propagation.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical predictions assume that during the radiation-dominated era the scalar field obeys φ' = ±2/(κ η) (Eq. 65), which requires a specific relation between the scalar kinetic energy and a potential term that the paper does not spell out; if the actual scalar-field evolution differs, the computed Ω_GW and Π curves do not follow.

What would settle it

Recompute the L3/L4 kernel integrals using a different radiation-era scalar background, such as a canonical free scalar with φ' ∝ η^{-2}, and check whether the right-left asymmetry survives the integration; if the parity-violating source integrals vanish or change sign, the central claim fails. Observationally, a sufficiently sensitive measurement of the induced background's circular-polarization Stokes V parameter that finds Π consistent with zero at the predicted peak would falsify the plotted scenarios.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If a stochastic gravitational-wave background of scalar origin is observed with circular polarization but GR-like tensor propagation, it points to L3- and L4-type parity-violating source terms.
  • Primordial gravitational-wave spectra in PVST gravity are chiral, with a degree of circular polarization proportional to (9c2 - c1)ε*, while L3 and L4 leave those linear spectra unchanged.
  • Around the peak or resonance frequency, Ω_GW is enhanced relative to general relativity and Π reaches about 0.5 for monochromatic spectra; lognormal spectra show a smoother, similar signature.
  • Future space-based detectors that can measure the cross-correlation of the stochastic background could detect or constrain this circular-polarization signal.
  • A complete second-order calculation including all seven Lagrangians and non-constant couplings remains open; the present numerical results assume constant b3, b4 in a radiation-dominated era.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the L3 and L4 source terms scale with k^4 times the couplings, the polarization effect is strongest at high frequencies; searches should prioritize high-frequency scalar peaks over nanohertz bands.
  • The same source-term mechanism should apply to other second-order tensor-generation channels, suggesting a broader class of chiral gravitational-wave backgrounds in PVST gravity.
  • The c_T = 1 constraints involve only five coefficients, leaving b3 and b4 unconstrained; a polarization measurement of SIGWs could separately bound these two couplings even where linear gravitational-wave speed is tightly constrained.
  • To turn the radiation-era prediction into a complete model, one would add an explicit potential realizing φ' = ±2/(κ η) and verify the background's stability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies parity-violating scalar-tensor (PVST) theory built from the seven ghost-free Qi-Xiu Lagrangians. At linear order, it derives the quadratic tensor action and shows that L1, L2, L5, L6, L7 modify GW propagation and produce chiral primordial spectra, while L3 and L4 are absent. At second order, it derives the SIGW equation of motion and identifies L3 and L4 as entering only through the source term, so parity-violating SIGWs can arise even when linear tensor propagation is GR-like. The paper then computes the SIGW energy density and circular polarization during a radiation-dominated era for monochromatic and lognormal curvature spectra, reporting a degree of circular polarization up to about 0.5. The main technical content is in the detailed appendices, which give the cubic actions, source coefficients, and kernels.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would establish a distinctive phenomenological signature: parity violation in scalar-induced gravitational waves without any modification of linear GW propagation speed. The derivation of the second-order SIGW equation in a PVST framework and the explicit classification of L3 and L4 as pure source-term contributions are useful and nontrivial. The paper also includes detailed appendices and cleanly reduces to GR in the zero-coupling limit. However, the quantitative results of Section V are undermined by an internal inconsistency in the radiation-era scalar dynamics, so the specific predictions, including the claimed Π≃0.5, are not currently supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [§V, Eqs. (65)–(67); Appendix B] The radiation-era calculation uses the wrong scalar transfer function for the model's own scalar sector. For the background (65), eliminating δφ from the linear perturbation equations (B4)–(B7) via (B5) yields ψ'' + 4Hψ' + k²ψ = 0, i.e. c_s² = 1, not ψ'' + 4Hψ' + (k²/3)ψ = 0. Hence Eq. (67) is not a solution of the paper's own equations. Consequently, the source terms fPV3 and fPV4 in Eqs. (74)–(78), the kernels in Appendix C, and all ΩGW and Π curves in Figs. 1–6 are computed with the radiation-fluid transfer function rather than the scalar-field transfer function of the PVST theory. This internal inconsistency directly undermines the central quantitative claim Π≃0.5 in Sec. V.B.1.
  2. [§V, background setup] The paper does not specify the potential V(φ) realizing Eq. (65), nor does it state whether the radiation era is supported by the scalar field alone or by an additional radiation component. If the scalar field is the only matter, its perturbations propagate at c_s²=1, contradicting the use of Eq. (67); if a radiation fluid dominates instead, φ is a spectator and φ' = ±2/(κη) is not the free-field solution (which would give φ' ∝ η^{-2}) without a tuned potential. In either reading, the numerical evaluation of Sec. V does not implement a consistent physical model. The authors should recompute the SIGW kernels and figures with a specified, consistent matter content and the corresponding scalar transfer function, or add a radiation fluid and treat the scalar field as a spectator with the correct background dynamics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (65)] The expression is typographically ambiguous: 'φ′ = ± 2/κ η−1' should read 'φ′ = ±2/(κη)' or similar.
  2. [Figures 1–6] The figures contain rendering errors: symbols such as '3' and '4' appear instead of C3 and C4. Please correct the fonts/glyphs.
  3. [§V, after Eq. (71)] The sentence 'Substituting Eq. (67) into Eqs. (72)-(74)' is confusing because Eq. (74) already contains Tψ; the intended substitution is into the explicit integral expressions. Please rephrase.
  4. [§IV, Eq. (58)] The notation X is used both for the kinetic term X = -1/2 ∇^a φ ∇_a φ and as a subscript in coefficients like b_nX. This is understandable but should be explicitly noted to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: L3/L4 source-term derivation is self-contained; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

No circular steps found. The quadratic tensor action and the SIGW EOM are obtained by direct variation of the explicit Lagrangian (1)-(10). The identification of L3 and L4 as source-only terms follows from the absence of b3,b4 in c1,c2 (15)-(16) and from the explicit PV cubic actions (A1)-(A7); this is a derived property, not an input. The c_T=1 conditions (22)-(25) are derived in the paper, with [49] cited only as 'also consistent,' so not load-bearing. The Qi-Xiu basis is taken from [92], a self-citation by author X. Gao, but the present calculations use only the monomial forms and do not depend on the ghost-freeness proof; the classification is external published work, not an unverified uniqueness claim that forces the results. No parameters are fitted to the target outputs: C3 and C4 are chosen freely, and the GR limit (76) reproduces the known kernel [10]. The numerical computations in Sec. V are parameter-dependent predictions, not constructions. As a correctness caveat (not circularity), Eq. (65) sets a canonical-scalar radiation-like background (φ'=±2/(κη)), but Eq. (67) imports the perfect-fluid radiation transfer function from [10]; from (B4)-(B7) the scalar-field sound speed is 1, so ψ''+4Hψ'+k^2ψ=0, not the k^2/3 version solved by (67). This internal inconsistency affects the quantitative curves, but it does not constitute a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation uses the Qi-Xiu Lagrangian basis from [92] as an input; no new physical entities are invented and no data are fitted. The main assumptions are the completeness/ghost-freeness of that basis, the radiation-era background with a tuned scalar potential, and the restriction to constant L3/L4 couplings for numerical spectra.

free parameters (5)
  • b1...b7 coupling functions
    Coefficients of the seven Qi-Xiu Lagrangians in Eq. (3). They are arbitrary functions of φ and X; no data are used to fix them, but every predicted spectrum and Π depends on them.
  • M_PV
    Mass scale introduced in Eq. (14) to organize c1 and c2. Not fit; dimensionful parameter of the PV sector.
  • C3 = b3/a0^2, C4 = b4/a0^2 = 5, 10, 15 k_s^{-4} in figures
    Chosen by hand for the plots; the size of the Ω_GW deviation and the Π peak scales with these values.
  • A_ζ, k_s, σ = σ = 0.2, 0.3 in lognormal plots
    Amplitude, peak scale and width of the curvature power spectrum; assumed inputs, not fit.
  • slow-roll parameters ϵ1, ϵ2, ϵ3
    Used in the uniform-asymptotic solution (30)-(31); standard background parameters, not fitted.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The seven Qi-Xiu Lagrangians form the complete ghost-free basis of PVST monomials up to d=4.
    Taken from [92] (same group); the paper's enumeration of which L_n contributes where depends on this completeness.
  • domain assumption PV terms do not change the background or linear scalar dynamics; ϕ=ψ and no anisotropic stress.
    Stated in Sec. II and Appendix B. Needed so the standard GR transfer function T_ψ can be used for SIGWs.
  • domain assumption Slow-roll inflation with small PV corrections for the primordial GW spectrum.
    Sec. III.B; used to truncate at ϵ* and to use Airy-function solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper Radiation era is supported by a scalar field with φ' = ±2/(κ η), which requires a tuned potential with K = 2V (or an extra radiation component).
    Eq. (65) adopts this solution without giving the potential; the source coefficients for the numerical spectra depend on it.
  • ad hoc to paper b3 and b4 are treated as constant in the kernel evaluation.
    Sec. V.A says 'assuming constant couplings b3 and b4'; general b_n(φ,X) would change f_PV.
  • standard math The uniform asymptotic approximation of [93-95] gives the Bunch-Davies normalized tensor solution used in Eq. (41).
    Central to the primordial chiral spectrum formula.
  • domain assumption At the present epoch x→∞ and time averaging are valid for Ω_GW.
    Sec. V.B and Appendix C.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23837 in / 23248 out tokens · 207720 ms · 2026-08-03T03:37:01.969232+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study both primordial gravitational waves (GWs) and scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) in a class of the parity-violating scalar-tensor (PVST) theory, of which the Lagrangian is the linear combination of seven ghost-free parity-violating scalar-tensor monomials dubbed the "Qi-Xiu" Lagrangians. At linear order, we obtain the quadratic action for tensor perturbations and show that parity-violating terms associated with L_1, L_2, L_5, L_6, and L_7 render the tensor propagation polarization dependent, leading to chiral primordial spectra and a nonvanishing degree of circular polarization. At second order, we derive the equation of motion for SIGWs and identify the explicit parity-violating source terms. In particular, L_3 and L_4 enter exclusively through the source term for SIGWs, allowing parity violation to arise even when the linear GWs' propagation remains effectively general-relativity-like. During the radiation-dominated era, we compute the fractional energy density of SIGWs for both monochromatic and log-normal curvature power spectra. We find that, around the peak frequency, SIGWs in PVST gravity exhibit characteristic deviations from those in general relativity, resulting in a nonzero degree of circular polarization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07430 by Jia-Xi Feng, Jia-Yuan Fang, Xian Gao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The fractional energy density Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The degree of circular polarization of SIGWs with a monochromatic curvature spectrum. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The fractional energy density Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The degree of circular polarization of SIGWs with a lognormal spectrum. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The fractional energy density Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The degree of circular polarization of SIGWs with a lognormal spectrum. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parity-violating spatially covariant gravity at total derivative order $d=5$

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    At total derivative order five, parity-violating spatially covariant gravity has exactly 59 independent monomials, and their tensor-perturbation response is controlled by four coefficient combinations producing helici...

  2. Spatially covariant gravity with two degrees of freedom: A perturbative analysis up to cubic order

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Five explicit polynomial spatially covariant gravity Lagrangians up to total derivative order three are identified that propagate only two degrees of freedom up to cubic order in perturbations around a cosmological ba...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 89 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The analytical solution of EOM for primordial GWs Primordial GWs correspond to tensor perturbations on a homogeneous and isotropic background, with their EOM given by Eq. (20). To compute the power spectra, we adopt the uniform asymptotic approximation method [93–95] to obtain an analytical solution. For convenience, Eq. (20) can be rewritten as ˜γA′′ k +...

  2. [2]

    The power spectra and degree of circular polarization of primordial GWs With the approximate solution of primordial GWs derived above, the corresponding power spectraP R,L T in the superhorizon limity→0 are given by P R T = 2k3 π2 ˜γR BR 2 ,P L T = 2k3 π2 ˜γL BL 2 .(39) In this limit, the approximate form of ˜γA reads ˜γA(y)≃ i√ 2k 1 g(y) 1 4 exp Z y0 y p...

  3. [3]

    Parity-conserving contributions The PC parts coincide with those in GR. The quadratic PC action takes the standard form S(PC) hh = 1 2κ2 Z d4x a2 16 (h′ ij)2 −(∂ khij)2 ,(50) and the cubic PC term describing the scalar–tensor interaction is given by S(PC) ssh = 1 2κ2 Z d4x a2 2 2∂iψ∂jψ+κ 2∂iδφ∂jδφ hij,(51) Therefore, the PC dynamics are identical to those in GR

  4. [4]

    (15)-(16)

    Parity-violating contributions The PV part of the quadratic action can be written as S(PV) hh = 1 2κ2 Z d4x a2 16 c1(η) aMPV ϵijkh′ il∂jh′ k l + c2(η) aMPV ϵijk∂2hil∂jh l k ,(52) wherec 1 andc 2 (arising fromL 1,2,5,6,7) are defined in Eqs. (15)-(16). The PV cubic action, which describes the interaction between two scalar perturbations and one tensor mode...

  5. [5]

    Monochromatic spectrum We consider a monochromatic curvature perturbations [7, 97], Pζ(k) =A ζδ(log(k/k s)).(81) wherek s is the peak scale, andA ζ is the amplitude. After straightforward calculations, the fractional energy density of SIGWs is found to be ΩGW(k) = A2 ζ 12˜k2 4− ˜k2 4 !2 X A=R,L ˜I A(k, ˜k−1, ˜k−1, x→ ∞)2Θ(2− ˜k),(82) where ˜k=k/k s. The d...

  6. [6]

    Qi-Xiu” Lagrangians) were identified. By analyzing both primordial GWs and SIGWs, we disentangle the contributions of the “Qi-Xiu

    The lognormal spectrum To study a more realistic scenario, we consider a lognormal primordial spectrum for the curvature perturbation [11, 97], Pζ(k) = Aζ√ 2πσ exp − log2(k/ks) 2σ2 ,(86) whereσcharacterizes the width of the peak. In the limitσ→0, the lognormal power spectrum reduces to the monochromatic form. For this spectrum, the energy density of SIGWs...

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]. 29 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Π σ=0.2 3=10ks -4 3=5ks -4 σ=0.3 3=10ks -4 3=5ks -4 10-2 10-1 100 101-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 k/ks Π 4=10ks -4 4=5ks -4 10-2 10-1 100 101 k/ks 4=10ks -4 4=5ks -4 FIG. 6. The degree of circular polarization of SIGWs with ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0612013

    arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Baumann, P

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, Phys. Rev. D76, 084019 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0703290

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Saito and J

    R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 161101 (2009), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)], arXiv:0812.4339 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Phys. Rev. D97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    J. R. Espinosa, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, JCAP09, 012, arXiv:1804.07732 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    G. Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Yuan and Q.-G

    C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang, iScience24, 102860 (2021), arXiv:2103.04739 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, and T. Terada, (2025), arXiv:2511.07266 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro- ph.HE]. 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L9 (2023), arXiv:2306.16217 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Zic et al., Publ

    A. Zic et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.40, e049 (2023), arXiv:2306.16230 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA), Astron. Astrophys.678, A48 (2023), arXiv:2306.16224 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Xu et al., Res

    H. Xu et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Afzal et al

    A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys.685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Cai, X.-C

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-C. He, X.-H. Ma, S.-F. Yan, and G.-W. Yuan, Sci. Bull.68, 2929 (2023), arXiv:2306.17822 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Z. Yi, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Wang, and F. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 120404 (2023), arXiv:2307.02467 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Yi, Z.-Q

    Z. Yi, Z.-Q. You, and Y. Wu, JCAP01, 066, arXiv:2308.05632 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, J.-P. Li, and Q.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012060 (2024), arXiv:2307.00572 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Liu, Z.-C

    L. Liu, Z.-C. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D109, L061301 (2024), arXiv:2307.01102 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    L. Liu, Y. Wu, and Z.-C. Chen, JCAP04, 011, arXiv:2310.16500 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Z.-C. Chen, J. Li, L. Liu, and Z. Yi, Phys. Rev. D109, L101302 (2024), arXiv:2401.09818 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Danzmann, Class

    K. Danzmann, Class. Quant. Grav.14, 1399 (1997)

    1997

  37. [37]

    Amaro-Seoane et al

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050075 (2020), arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Luo et al

    J. Luo et al. (TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro- ph.IM]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Y. Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang, Nature Astron.5, 881 (2021), arXiv:2109.07442 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Kawamura et al., PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    S. Kawamura et al., PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Maggiore et al

    M. Maggiore et al. (ET), JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  44. [44]

    T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Phys. Rev.104, 254 (1956)

    1956

  45. [45]

    C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, Phys. Rev.105, 1413 (1957)

    1957

  46. [46]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 221301 (2020), arXiv:2011.11254 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D106, 063503 (2022), arXiv:2205.13962 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    O. H. E. Philcox, Phys. Rev. D106, 063501 (2022), arXiv:2206.04227 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and R. N. Cahn, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522, 5701 (2023), arXiv:2206.03625 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Seto, Phys

    N. Seto, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 251101 (2020), arXiv:2009.02928 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Orlando, M

    G. Orlando, M. Pieroni, and A. Ricciardone, JCAP03, 069, arXiv:2011.07059 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [52]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  53. [53]

    Horava, Phys

    P. Horava, Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009), arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Crisostomi, K

    M. Crisostomi, K. Noui, C. Charmousis, and D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. D97, 044034 (2018), arXiv:1710.04531 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Gao and X.-Y

    X. Gao and X.-Y. Hong, Phys. Rev. D101, 064057 (2020), arXiv:1906.07131 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Hu and X

    Y.-M. Hu and X. Gao, Phys. Rev. D105, 044023 (2022), arXiv:2111.08652 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Hu and X

    Y.-M. Hu and X. Gao, Phys. Rev. D104, 104007 (2021), arXiv:2104.07615 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    R.-G. Cai, C. Fu, and W.-W. Yu, Phys. Rev. D105, 103520 (2022), arXiv:2112.04794 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Q. Wu, T. Zhu, R. Niu, W. Zhao, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D105, 024035 (2022), arXiv:2110.13870 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    M. Li, H. Rao, and D. Zhao, JCAP11, 023, arXiv:2007.08038 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  61. [61]

    M. Li, H. Rao, and Y. Tong, Phys. Rev. D104, 084077 (2021), arXiv:2104.05917 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Rao, Phys

    H. Rao, Phys. Rev. D104, 124084 (2021), arXiv:2107.08597 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Li and D

    M. Li and D. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B827, 136968 (2022), arXiv:2108.01337 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    M. Li, Z. Li, and H. Rao, Phys. Lett. B834, 137395 (2022), arXiv:2201.02357 [gr-qc]. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    M. Li, Y. Tong, and D. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D105, 104002 (2022), arXiv:2203.06912 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Hohmann and C

    M. Hohmann and C. Pfeifer, Phys. Lett. B834, 137437 (2022), arXiv:2203.01856 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Conroy and T

    A. Conroy and T. Koivisto, JCAP12, 016, arXiv:1908.04313 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  68. [68]

    Z. Chen, Y. Yu, and X. Gao, JCAP06, 001, arXiv:2212.14362 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Satoh, S

    M. Satoh, S. Kanno, and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. D77, 023526 (2008), arXiv:0706.3585 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    Saito, K

    S. Saito, K. Ichiki, and A. Taruya, JCAP09, 002, arXiv:0705.3701 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Yunes, R

    N. Yunes, R. O’Shaughnessy, B. J. Owen, and S. Alexander, Phys. Rev. D82, 064017 (2010), arXiv:1005.3310 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    Takahashi and J

    T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 231301 (2009), arXiv:0904.0554 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    Y. S. Myung, Phys. Lett. B684, 1 (2010), arXiv:0911.0724 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    A. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D87, 103512 (2013), arXiv:1208.5490 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Huang, A. Wang, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D88, 063508 (2013), arXiv:1305.0600 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  76. [76]

    Cannone, J.-O

    D. Cannone, J.-O. Gong, and G. Tasinato, JCAP08, 003, arXiv:1505.05773 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    W. Zhao, T. Liu, L. Wen, T. Zhu, A. Wang, Q. Hu, and C. Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 630 (2020), arXiv:1909.13007 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    W. Zhao, T. Zhu, J. Qiao, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D101, 024002 (2020), arXiv:1909.10887 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    J. Qiao, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D101, 043528 (2020), arXiv:1911.01580 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    J. Qiao, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D100, 124058 (2019), arXiv:1909.03815 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.