Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robustness Tests of NLP Machine Learning Models: Search and Semantically Replace

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.09978 v1 pith:TT6LZIMB submitted 2021-04-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Robustness Tests of NLP Machine Learning Models: Search and Semantically Replace

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords semanticallydifferentlearningmachinemodelsreplacesearchrobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a strategy to assess the robustness of different machine learning models that involve natural language processing (NLP). The overall approach relies upon a Search and Semantically Replace strategy that consists of two steps: (1) Search, which identifies important parts in the text; (2) Semantically Replace, which finds replacements for the important parts, and constrains the replaced tokens with semantically similar words. We introduce different types of Search and Semantically Replace methods designed specifically for particular types of machine learning models. We also investigate the effectiveness of this strategy and provide a general framework to assess a variety of machine learning models. Finally, an empirical comparison is provided of robustness performance among three different model types, each with a different text representation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.