REVIEW 5 cited by
SONICS: Synthetic Or Not -- Identifying Counterfeit Songs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The recent surge in AI-generated songs presents exciting possibilities and challenges. These innovations necessitate the ability to distinguish between human-composed and synthetic songs to safeguard artistic integrity and protect human musical artistry. Existing research and datasets in fake song detection only focus on singing voice deepfake detection (SVDD), where the vocals are AI-generated but the instrumental music is sourced from real songs. However, these approaches are inadequate for detecting contemporary end-to-end artificial songs where all components (vocals, music, lyrics, and style) could be AI-generated. Additionally, existing datasets lack music-lyrics diversity, long-duration songs, and open-access fake songs. To address these gaps, we introduce SONICS, a novel dataset for end-to-end Synthetic Song Detection (SSD), comprising over 97k songs (4,751 hours) with over 49k synthetic songs from popular platforms like Suno and Udio. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of modeling long-range temporal dependencies in songs for effective authenticity detection, an aspect entirely overlooked in existing methods. To utilize long-range patterns, we introduce SpecTTTra, a novel architecture that significantly improves time and memory efficiency over conventional CNN and Transformer-based models. For long songs, our top-performing variant outperforms ViT by 8% in F1 score, is 38% faster, and uses 26% less memory, while also surpassing ConvNeXt with a 1% F1 score gain, 20% speed boost, and 67% memory reduction.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Evaluating Fake Music Detection Performance Under Audio Augmentations
SONICS, a recent fake-music detector, suffers large accuracy drops under light audio augmentations and fails to generalize to unseen generative models.
-
Double Entendre: Robust Audio-Based AI-Generated Lyrics Detection via Multi-View Fusion
A late-fusion model that combines ASR-transcribed lyrics and speech embeddings detects AI-written lyrics from audio alone, achieving 94.9% recall in-domain and staying robust to attacks.
-
Exploring listeners' perceptions of AI-generated and human-composed music for functional emotional applications
Preference and perceived emotional efficacy dissociate for AI-generated versus human-composed music, with listeners preferring AI tracks but crediting human tracks with stronger functional emotion elicitation.
-
Segment Transformer: AI-Generated Music Detection via Music Structural Analysis
A two-stage transformer framework classifies AI-generated music from short clips and beat-segmented full tracks, reporting 99.9% accuracy on SONICS without releasing code or ablations.
-
Breaking the Barriers of Text-Hungry and Audio-Deficient AI
A proposed audio-native translation framework called MAST with fractional diffusion is described, but no evidence is given that it produces working translations.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.