Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Generative Models for Detector Signature Simulation: A Taxonomic Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.09597 v2 pith:UB5QSMVC submitted 2023-12-15 physics.ins-det cs.LGhep-exhep-phphysics.data-an

Deep Generative Models for Detector Signature Simulation: A Taxonomic Review

classification physics.ins-det cs.LGhep-exhep-phphysics.data-an
keywords detectorsimulationmodelsphysicssignaturecomputationaldeepgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In modern collider experiments, the quest to explore fundamental interactions between elementary particles has reached unparalleled levels of precision. Signatures from particle physics detectors are low-level objects (such as energy depositions or tracks) encoding the physics of collisions (the final state particles of hard scattering interactions). The complete simulation of them in a detector is a computational and storage-intensive task. To address this computational bottleneck in particle physics, alternative approaches have been developed, introducing additional assumptions and trade off accuracy for speed.The field has seen a surge in interest in surrogate modeling the detector simulation, fueled by the advancements in deep generative models. These models aim to generate responses that are statistically identical to the observed data. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive and exhaustive taxonomic review of the existing literature on the simulation of detector signatures from both methodological and application-wise perspectives. Initially, we formulate the problem of detector signature simulation and discuss its different variations that can be unified. Next, we classify the state-of-the-art methods into five distinct categories based on their underlying model architectures, summarizing their respective generation strategies. Finally, we shed light on the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in detector signature simulation, setting the stage for future research and development.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A universal vision transformer for fast calorimeter simulations

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A vision-transformer flow-matching model generates calorimeter showers across regular and irregular detector geometries at millisecond speeds, and pretraining plus fine-tuning cuts training cost by about half.