Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

Scaling Laws for Precision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04330 v2 pith:UE2SBYHP submitted 2024-11-07 cs.LG cs.CL

Scaling Laws for Precision

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords traininglawsprecisionscalinginferencemodelmodelspretraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Low precision training and inference affect both the quality and cost of language models, but current scaling laws do not account for this. In this work, we devise "precision-aware" scaling laws for both training and inference. We propose that training in lower precision reduces the model's "effective parameter count," allowing us to predict the additional loss incurred from training in low precision and post-train quantization. For inference, we find that the degradation introduced by post-training quantization increases as models are trained on more data, eventually making additional pretraining data actively harmful. For training, our scaling laws allow us to predict the loss of a model with different parts in different precisions, and suggest that training larger models in lower precision may be compute optimal. We unify the scaling laws for post and pretraining quantization to arrive at a single functional form that predicts degradation from training and inference in varied precisions. We fit on over 465 pretraining runs and validate our predictions on model sizes up to 1.7B parameters trained on up to 26B tokens.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reference Traces for Auditing Invisible Weight Updates and Guiding Exact-Budget Protection

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Weight updates that fall below half a ULP freeze coordinates deterministically, and freeze time is predictable a priori from a high-precision trajectory and mantissa length alone.

  2. Reliability Scaling Laws for Quantized Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reliability of quantized LLMs peaks nonlinearly at 4-bit precision under fixed total model bits, while accuracy scales monotonically, and quantization can improve robustness to natural perturbations.

  3. LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The Shannon Scaling Law treats LLM training as noisy-channel transmission and predicts U-shaped performance degradation when signal-to-noise ratio falls below a threshold, outperforming monotonic scaling laws on Pythi...

  4. When NPUs Are Not Always Faster: A Stage-Level Analysis of Mobile LLM Inference

    cs.AR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Stage-level profiling on mobile SoC finds CPUs faster than NPUs in prefill (up to 1.6x) and only modest NPU gains in decode (1.05-1.2x), plus rising energy with greater NPU offload.

  5. Switch-KD: Visual-Switch Knowledge Distillation for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 0.5B student VLM distills from a 3B teacher using visual-switch distillation and DBiLD loss to gain 3.6 points on average across 10 multimodal benchmarks without architecture changes.

  6. CAGE: Curvature-Aware Gradient Estimation For Accurate Quantization-Aware Training

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    CAGE, a curvature-aware correction that adds the quantization error to the gradient, reduces loss in low-bit quantization-aware training, letting 3-bit CAGE-trained models match 4-bit baseline-trained models.

  7. Scaling Laws Meet Model Architecture: Toward Inference-Efficient LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A conditional scaling law fitted on over 200 models from 80M to 3B parameters identifies architectures that deliver up to 2.1% higher accuracy and 42% higher inference throughput than LLaMA-3.2 under the same training budget.

  8. Reference Traces for Auditing Invisible Weight Updates and Guiding Exact-Budget Protection

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A matched high-precision reference trace forecasts invisible weight-update events in controlled low-precision runs, and a pre-frozen 10% fp32-master mask recovers ~61% of the RNE-vs-fp32 loss gap on three unseen targets.

  9. Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A sparse-activation model predicts double-descent loss with distinct under- and over-parameterized scaling exponents set by sparsity, plus a compute-optimal frontier favoring dataset growth.

  10. MixLLM: LLM Quantization with Global Mixed-precision between Output-features and Highly-efficient System Design

    cs.LG 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MixLLM uses global output-feature importance to set mixed bit-widths for LLM quantization and adds two-step dequantization plus software pipelining for system efficiency.

  11. GoldenFloat: A Phi-Derived Static-Split Floating-Point Family from GF4 to GF1024 with a Lucas-Exact Integer Identity

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GoldenFloat introduces a phi-derived rule for setting exponent and fraction widths across floating-point formats from 4 to 1024 bits, backed by open RTL generator, Lucas-exact accumulator, and FPGA implementation.

  12. A Hardware-Aware, Per-Layer Methodology for Post-Training Quantization of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    SOP post-training quantization for LLMs reports lower weight reconstruction error than per-layer FP8 at 1.5 bpw lower cost using per-layer codebook search and hardware-aware formats.

  13. On the Quantization Robustness of Diffusion Language Models in Coding Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Diffusion coding model CoDA shows smaller accuracy drops than Qwen3-1.7B under 2-4 bit quantization on HumanEval and MBPP.

  14. Continued AI Scaling Requires Repeated Efficiency Doublings

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Continued AI scaling remains feasible only if efficiency doublings recur repeatedly to keep logical compute affordable.