Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 90 references

The paper claims that a single neural pipeline, trained only on binary labels, can detect gravitational microlensing events via calibrated Bayes factors and infer their parameters in milliseconds, recovering low-magnification finite-source

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:18 UTC pith:UJ4D7NIF

load-bearing objection Solid methods paper: the relative claim (Evidence Network beats oracle hard cuts on finite-source microlensing) holds, but the 99.9% headline is conditional on a recoverability filter whose pass rate is never reported. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20260 v1 pith:UJ4D7NIF submitted 2026-07-22 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA

Microlensing Detection and Inference via Learned Bayes Factors

Nolan Smyth , Laurence Perreault-Levasseur , Yashar Hezaveh This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
keywords gravitational microlensingBayes factor estimationsimulation-based inferencetransformer encoderamortized posterior estimationfinite-source eventsfree-floating planetsRoman Space Telescope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to replace the hard, threshold-based criteria used by current microlensing surveys with a unified neural framework. It trains an Evidence Network to estimate Bayes factors for signal versus noise directly from binary-labeled simulated light curves, and shares its transformer encoder with a Neural Posterior Estimator so detected events get amortized parameter posteriors. On simulated Roman Space Telescope data, the detector reaches 99.9% detection efficiency at a false-positive rate below 6e-4 on clean Gaussian noise, with the largest gains in the finite-source regime (ρ≳5) that dominates short free-floating planet events. If these numbers hold on real data, the framework would both recover events that threshold cuts systematically miss and deliver posteriors fast enough for real-time survey analysis.

Core claim

The central claim is that microlensing detection can be framed as Bayesian model comparison and solved by learning the Bayes factor from binary labels, and that this detection can share a single transformer embedding with parameter inference. The Evidence Network, trained with the l-POP exponential loss on equal signal/noise simulations, outputs calibrated Bayes factors that outperform literature hard cuts (including oracle-parameter versions) across the finite-source point-lens parameter space, especially for large source radius ρ≳5 where it holds about 95% detection versus about 65% for hard cuts. The shared encoder plus a masked autoregressive flow yields posteriors that pass TARP coverag

What carries the argument

The Evidence Network with the leaky parity-odd power (l-POP) exponential loss, which turns binary labels into calibrated Bayes factors; and the shared transformer encoder with a classification token that aggregates irregularly-sampled light-curve points via attention masking, feeding both the detection head and the masked autoregressive flow (Neural Posterior Estimation) for amortized posterior inference.

Load-bearing premise

The headline detection and false-positive numbers assume the test light curves contain only microlensing signals plus Gaussian noise, and that the same simulation pipeline, including the recoverability filters, produces both training and test data; real Roman fields will include flares, eclipsing binaries, variables, and instrumental systematics that the network has never seen.

What would settle it

Run the trained Evidence Network on a simulated test set that adds stellar flares, eclipsing binaries, cataclysmic variables, and correlated noise to the noise-only distribution, and measure the false-positive rate at the same log10 K > 0.8 threshold; if it rises above about 6e-4, the survey-level claim fails. Alternatively, repeat detection on a test set that excludes the recoverability filters (fewer than 5 points near peak or peak SNR below 5) to measure how much of the 99.9% efficiency depends on those cuts.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the network's performance holds on real data, Roman's microlensing survey will recover a larger fraction of short-duration, finite-source events (free-floating planets) than threshold-based pipelines.
  • Detection becomes a calibrated Bayesian comparison: thresholds can be set to target false-positive rates or incorporate prior odds, replacing ad-hoc Δχ² cuts.
  • Parameter inference is amortized: once trained, posteriors for new events are produced in milliseconds rather than minutes, enabling real-time analysis of billions of light curves.
  • The shared transformer encoder means features transfer from inference to detection: a detection head trained on the frozen inference encoder reaches the same detection rate at a fraction of training cost.
  • Because the transformer handles gaps and irregular sampling without imputation, the same pipeline can be applied to other irregularly-sampled time-domain surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: If real Roman fields contain stellar flares, eclipsing binaries, or correlated noise, the network's false-positive rate will almost certainly rise above 6e-4; the paper's published upper bound applies only to a clean Gaussian-noise test set, so survey-level performance depends on retraining with contaminant classes.
  • Editorial: The recoverability filters used when generating training data (minimum points near peak, baseline coverage, peak SNR >5) mean the reported 99.9% efficiency characterizes a pre-selected recoverable sub-population; survey-level completeness over all events is an open question.
  • Editorial: The same Evidence Network + NPE architecture could be applied to other transient searches (supernovae, exoplanet transits, variable-star classification) whenever a forward simulator can generate binary-labeled training data.
  • Editorial: Because the model uses box-uniform priors rather than a Galactic population model, per-event Bayes factors and posteriors may be biased when applied to the real event population; hierarchical population-level inference would be needed to convert them into survey-yield predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified framework for gravitational microlensing detection and parameter inference. Detection is cast as Bayesian model comparison via Evidence Networks trained on binary signal/noise labels to estimate Bayes factors, and inference is performed with Neural Posterior Estimation; both share a transformer encoder that handles irregularly sampled light curves without imputation. On simulated Roman Space Telescope-like FSPL light curves with data augmentation and Gaussian noise, the Evidence Network achieves 99.9% detection efficiency at a detection threshold that yields zero false positives among 5,000 noise events (95% upper limit 6e-4), outperforming literature and re-tuned hard-cut detectors. The gains are largest in the extreme finite-source regime (rho ≳ 5), where reported detection efficiency is ~95% versus ~65% for hard cuts. The paper also validates the Evidence Network on a toy model with analytic Bayes factors, performs a shared-encoder ablation, and benchmarks NPE wall-clock speed against MCMC.

Significance. If the reported numbers hold, this is a useful and timely contribution: it is the first application of Evidence Networks to irregularly sampled astrophysical time series, and the combination of amortized detection and inference with a shared transformer encoder is a natural fit for Roman's microlensing survey. The toy-model validation against analytic Bayes factors (Appendix A) is a strong check that binary labels alone can recover calibrated Bayes-factor estimates. The hard-cut comparison is conservative, since the hard cuts are evaluated with oracle (true) parameters, which strengthens the claimed advantage in the finite-source regime. The shared-encoder ablation (Appendix C) and the wall-clock benchmark (Appendix D) are also valuable practical additions. However, the headline detection efficiency and the posterior calibration claims are conditional on in-distribution, recoverability-filtered, Gaussian-noise simulations; these conditionality issues need to be quantified and reconciled before the results can support the broader survey-level claims made in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, §3.1] The 99.9% detection efficiency (and the ~95% rate in the rho≳5 bin) is measured on test events that already pass the §2.2 recoverability filters: at least 5 points within 1.5tE of the peak, at least 5 points beyond 3tE, and peak SNR > 5. The paper never reports the fraction of events drawn from the §2.1 priors that actually pass these filters after the §2.2 augmentation. This matters quantitatively: in the extreme finite-source regime the peak magnification is only ~1+2/rho^2, so a substantial fraction of the prior volume will fail the peak-SNR>5 criterion unless the noise realization is unusually favorable. As written, the 99.9% and ~95% figures are conditional on a pre-selected, high-quality sub-population, not survey-level detection rates. Please report the filter pass rate as a function of the model parameters (especially rho), and either report an unconditional efficiency that inclu
  2. [§3.2, Table 4, Appendix E] The claim of 'good calibration' from the TARP coverage test is in tension with the per-parameter coverage reported in Table 4. The 68% credible-interval coverage is 0.826 for t0, 0.636 for u0, 0.661 for log10 tE, 0.553 for log10 rho, and 0.643 for fs — all below the nominal 0.68, and for log10 rho substantially so. TARP coverage is a joint coverage statistic and can pass even when individual parameters are miscalibrated in different directions. The manuscript should reconcile the TARP statement with these per-parameter numbers, report coverage separately in degenerate regions, and avoid the unqualified 'well-calibrated posteriors' conclusion unless the per-parameter miscalibration is corrected or explicitly discussed as a known limitation.
  3. [§3.1] The sentence 'we adopt a detection threshold of log10 K > 0.8 (equivalently, K > 6.3, or approximately 1 in a million chance of misclassification under ideal conditions)' is incorrect as written. With equal prior odds, K=6.3 corresponds to a posterior signal probability of roughly 0.86, not 10^-6. The threshold was actually selected by requiring zero false positives on the validation set; the '1 in a million' phrasing appears to conflate a binomial upper limit on the validation false-positive count with a per-event misclassification probability. Please correct this sentence and state explicitly how the operating point was selected and what it means probabilistically.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2] The discussion correctly acknowledges that the reported false-positive rate is not survey-level because astrophysical contaminants and non-Gaussian noise are absent from the training and test sets. It would be helpful to also acknowledge that the test set is generated by the same simulation pipeline as the training set, so the reported detection efficiency is an in-distribution upper bound. A brief statement on expected sensitivity to distribution shift would make the limitations section more complete.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states that re-tuned hard cuts are shown as dashed lines, but the legend in the figure body does not clearly distinguish as-published and re-tuned versions. Please ensure the line styles and legend entries match the caption.
  3. [Appendix E, Table 4] The text says '95% credible-interval coverage remaining between 0.90 and 0.97 throughout,' which matches Table 4. However, the 68% coverage values are much lower and deserve a direct comment in the main text, not only in the appendix. This is related to the second major comment.
  4. [§2.5] The speedup factor of ~16,000x is reported for a specific MCMC configuration (32 walkers, 1,000-step burn-in) with a CPU-side likelihood evaluator. The text acknowledges that optimizing MCMC could reduce the gap. It would be useful to state explicitly that the wall-clock comparison is not a tuned MCMC benchmark, to avoid over-generalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the detection results are empirical comparisons on simulations, anchored by an analytic toy-model validation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not self-referential. The Evidence Network is trained on binary labels only, and the claim that the l-POP-Exponential loss recovers log Bayes factors is inherited from Jeffrey & Wandelt (2024), with an independent toy-model check (Appendix A) against closed-form analytic Bayes factors. The paper explicitly states: 'The analytic logK values in our toy model (Appendix A) serve solely for post-hoc validation.' The microlensing detection comparison is against literature hard cuts on a shared test set, with hard cuts given oracle true parameters ('hard-cut statistics use oracle (true) parameters, so the comparison is conservative'), so the headline 99.9% efficiency is not forced by the network's training objective. The detection threshold is chosen on a validation set, which is standard model selection rather than a fitted input being renamed as a prediction. The §2.2 recoverability filters (peak SNR>5, sampling criteria) define the evaluation population and limit external generalization, but they do not make the detection rate equivalent to the filter by construction: the network still misses 4 of 5,000 events, and the hard cuts underperform on the same filtered set. Self-citations (Smyth et al. 2025; Lemos et al. 2023; Filipp et al. 2024) are contextual or methodological and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work to force the central result. The paper is self-contained against an external benchmark (analytic toy model) and against literature hard-cut baselines, so the appropriate score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It depends on several hand-chosen simulation/selection choices (priors, augmentations, recoverability filters, detection threshold) and on external theoretical results (l-POP loss, simulator accuracy). The Bayes-factor claim is partially validated externally via the toy model, but the microlensing-specific calibration is an extrapolation.

free parameters (4)
  • Detection threshold = log10 K > 0.8
    Selected on the validation set to achieve zero false positives (§3.1); the headline FPR upper limit depends on this choice.
  • Box-uniform prior ranges = t0∈[0,20], u0∈[0,1.5], log10 tE∈[-1,1.3], log10 ρ∈[-2,1], fs∈[0.1,1.0]
    Chosen ad hoc in §2.1; the paper acknowledges production priors should come from galactic population models. These priors define the Bayes factor and the training distribution.
  • Recoverability filter thresholds = ≥5 points within 1.5tE; ≥5 points beyond 3tE; SNR > 5
    Hand-chosen criteria in §2.2 that determine which simulated events enter training/test; the absolute 99.9% efficiency is conditional on these filters.
  • Data augmentation ranges = 0–3 gaps, 1–10 days; 0–60% dropout; σ∈[0.001,0.02]
    Hand-chosen simulation conditions in §2.2 that define the evaluation distribution and therefore the measured detection rates.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The l-POP exponential loss with α=2 minimized over binary labels yields an estimate of the log Bayes factor (Jeffrey & Wandelt 2024).
    Eqs. (4)-(5) rely on the theoretical result from the cited Evidence Networks paper; the toy-model validation is the only in-paper check.
  • domain assumption ESPLMag2/VBBinaryLensing magnification tables correctly model finite-source point-lens light curves.
    The simulator is the backend of pyLIMA's FSPL model (§2.1); the paper does not independently verify it.
  • domain assumption Gaussian noise plus the specified augmentation (gaps, dropout, photometric scatter) adequately approximates Roman observing conditions for this benchmark.
    The paper explicitly states astrophysical contaminants are excluded (§4.2), so the benchmark is for the signal-detection problem in isolation.
  • ad hoc to paper Applying recoverability filters to the generated sample is a fair way to define the detection-efficiency benchmark.
    §2.2 applies these filters to training samples and §3.1 uses the same generator for the test set; this conditioning is not mentioned in the abstract and affects the absolute claim.
  • ad hoc to paper Box-uniform priors over θ are sufficient for a meaningful Bayes factor and posterior evaluation.
    §2.1 acknowledges these priors are not production-ready; they are used for the benchmark and the NPE training.
  • domain assumption The transformer and normalizing flow have sufficient capacity to represent the Bayes factor and posterior on this problem.
    Standard neural-network approximation assumptions; the toy model gives evidence for the Bayes-factor head but not for FSPL posteriors.
  • ad hoc to paper Calibration of the Evidence Network on the analytic toy model transfers to the FSPL microlensing problem.
    The toy model has closed-form Bayes factors (Appendix A), but no ground-truth Bayes factors are computed for microlensing, so the 'calibrated' claim for microlensing relies on transfer.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16809 in / 13769 out tokens · 116201 ms · 2026-08-01T10:18:40.463848+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a unified framework for gravitational microlensing event detection and parameter inference. Traditional pipelines use deterministic hard cuts on photometric statistics, systematically missing low-magnification events in the finite-source regime. We instead frame detection as Bayesian model comparison using Evidence Networks, which learn calibrated Bayes factors from binary-labeled simulations, and combine this with Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) for amortized parameter inference. Both share a transformer encoder that handles irregularly-sampled time series without imputation. On simulated Roman Space Telescope data, our Evidence Network achieves $99.9\%$ detection efficiency with a false-positive rate below $6\times10^{-4}$ on simulated data with augmentation and noise, but no astrophysical confounders. Gains are most dramatic in the extreme finite-source regime ($\rho \gtrsim 5$), where detection rates reach ${\sim}95\%$ versus ${\sim}65\%$ for hard cuts, precisely the short-duration free-floating planet events most constraining for formation scenarios. Our NPE provides calibrated posteriors, working towards real-time analysis at survey scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20260 by Laurence Perreault-Levasseur, Nolan Smyth, Yashar Hezaveh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Joint architecture for microlensing detection and parameter inference. Simulated light curves undergo data augmentation and padding. A shared transformer encoder with multi-head self-attention processes the irregularly-sampled time series into a fixed￾dimensional summary statistic, the shared representation s. Two specialized heads operate on s. The detection branch outputs calibrated Bayes factors log10 K… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Detection efficiency as a function of FSPL parameters for the Evidence Network and literature hard cuts. The Evidence Network maintains high efficiency in the extreme finite-source regime (ρ ≳ 5) where hard cuts systematically fail. Both as-published and re-tuned hard cuts are shown with re-tuned shown as dashed lines; hard-cut statistics use oracle (true) parameters, so the comparison is conservative. Err… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Posterior calibration assessment for the events detected by the Evidence Network. Top row and middle-left: Injected vs. recovered parameter values show strong correlation with ideal 1:1 line (gray dashed). Shaded regions show 68% credible intervals. Note physical degeneracies: u0 is only constrained when u0 > ρ (impact parameter exceeds source size), while ρ is only constrained when u0 < ρ (finite-source e… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Toy Data Examples. The top row are noise-only and the bottom row are high Bayes-factor signals with the true underlying signal shown in red. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 False Positive Rate 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 True Positive Rate Network (AUC=0.723) Oracle (AUC=0.724) (a) ROC curve comparing Evidence Network to oracle classifier 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Predicted P(signal) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Observed fraction Ideal … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Toy model validation with analytic Bayes factors. (a) The Evidence Network achieves near-oracle ROC performance (AUC=0.725 vs 0.726), demonstrating it extracts essentially all discriminative information. (b) Calibration curve shows predicted model posteriors match empirical signal fractions, confirming the network produces well-calibrated Bayes factor estimates from binary labels alone. rarely clears the 3… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative events detected by the Evidence Network (with log10 K > 14, strong detections) but missed by hard cuts from Johnson et al. (2020). These examples illustrate systematic failures of threshold-based detection: low peak magnification (top left, middle), observation gaps interrupting consecutive high-SNR points (top right, bottom left), and ongoing events without established baseline (bottom midd… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: decomposes these residuals against the physically relevant axes. The log10 ρ bias is consistent with zero in the well-resolved finite-source regime (u0 ≫ ρ) and develops a structured bias only as u0 ∼ ρ, exactly where the u0↔ρ degeneracy folds two physical solutions onto one light curve. The fs bias shrinks with peak magnification, as expected from the (fs, Apeak) degeneracy. Finally, u0 recovery is essent… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [2]

    and Hodgkin, Simon T

    Dong, Subo and Wu, Zexuan and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Udalski, Andrzej and Mroz, Przemek and Rybicki, Krzysztof A. and Hodgkin, Simon T. and Wyrzykowski, Lukasz and Eyer, Laurent and Bensby, Thomas and Chen, Ping and Wang, Sharon X. and Gould, Andrew and Yang, Hongjing and Albrow, Michael D. and Chung, Sun-Ju and Han, Cheongho and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Jung, Youn ...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [3]

    and Yarndley, J

    Keehan, D. and Yarndley, J. and Rattenbury, N. , year = 2022, month = oct, journal =. Microlensing Model Inference with Normalising Flows and Reversible Jump. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2022.100657 , urldate =

    arXiv 2022

  3. [4]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02639 , urldate =

    Miyazaki, Shota and Kawahara, Hajime , year = 2025, month = oct, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02639 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2510.02639 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02639 2025

  4. [5]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume =

    A Differentiable Binary Microlensing Model Using Adaptive Contour Integration Method , author =. The Astronomical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb1b2 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2501.07268 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [6]

    KMT-2025-BLG-1314 and KMT-2025-BLG-1392: two microlensing planetary/brown-dwarf candidates analyzed with differentiable code

    Ren, Haibin and Zang, Weicheng and Zhu, Wei and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Tang, Yuchen and Zhang, Jiyuan and Albrow, Michael D. and Chung, Sun-Ju and Gould, Andrew and Han, Cheongho and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Jung, Youn Kil and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Yang, Hongjing and Yee, Jennifer C. and Kim, Dong-Jin and Lee, Chung-Uk and Park, Byeong-Gon and Tang,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.01735 2026

  6. [7]

    Sumi, Takahiro and Buckley, David A. H. and Kutyrev, Alexander S. and Tamura, Motohide and Bennett, David P. and Bond, Ian A. and Cataldo, Giuseppe and Durbak, Joseph M. and Cenko, S. Bradley and Fixsen, Dale and Guiffreda, Orion and Hamada, Ryusei and Hirao, Yuki and Idei, Asahi and Kelly, Dan and Loose, Markus and Lotkin, Gennadiy N. and Lyness, Eric I....

    arXiv 2025

  7. [8]

    and Bachelet, Etienne and Zohrabi, Farzaneh and Verma, Himanshu and Crisp, Alison and Huston, Macy and McGee, Carissma and Penny, Matthew and Abrams, Natasha S

    Terry, Sean K. and Bachelet, Etienne and Zohrabi, Farzaneh and Verma, Himanshu and Crisp, Alison and Huston, Macy and McGee, Carissma and Penny, Matthew and Abrams, Natasha S. and Albrow, Michael D. and Anderson, Jay and Bagheri, Fatemeh and Beaulieu, Jean-Phillipe and Bellini, Andrea and Bennett, David P. and Bergsten, Galen and Bhadra, T. Dex and Bhatta...

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13974 2025

  8. [9]

    Wilks, S. S. , year = 1938, month = mar, journal =. The. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732360 , urldate =

    arXiv 1938

  9. [10]

    Distinguishing a Planetary Transit from False Positives: A

    Salinas, Helem and Pichara, Karim and Brahm, Rafael and. Distinguishing a Planetary Transit from False Positives: A. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1173 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1173

  10. [11]

    Legin, Ronan and Adam, Alexandre and Hezaveh, Yashar and Levasseur, Laurence Perreault , year = 2023, month = jun, journal =. Beyond. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd645 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2302.03046 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [12]

    Legin, Ronan and Isi, Maximiliano and Wong, Kaze W. K. and Hezaveh, Yashar and. Gravitational-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.19956 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2410.19956 , publisher =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.19956

  12. [13]

    Papamakarios, George and Pavlakou, Theo and Murray, Iain , year = 2018, month = jun, number =. Masked. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.07057 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1705.07057 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07057 2018

  13. [14]

    pyLIMA : an open source package for microlensing modeling. I. presentation of the software and analysis on single lens models

    Bachelet, E. and Norbury, M. and Bozza, V. and Street, R. , year = 2017, month = sep, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1709.08704 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1709.08704 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.08704 2017

  14. [15]

    Transformer

    Smyth, Nolan and. Transformer. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.11687 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2512.11687 , primaryclass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11687

  15. [16]

    Papamakarios, George and Murray, Iain , year = 2018, month = apr, number =. Fast \. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1605.06376 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1605.06376 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06376 2018

  16. [17]

    , year = 2024, month = jan, number =

    Jeffrey, Niall and Wandelt, Benjamin D. , year = 2024, month = jan, number =. Evidence. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.11241 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2305.11241 , publisher =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11241 2024

  17. [18]

    and Kamiya, K

    Sumi, T. and Kamiya, K. and Udalski, A. and Bennett, D. P. and Bond, I. A. and Abe, F. and Botzler, C. S. and Fukui, A. and Furusawa, K. and Hearnshaw, J. B. and Itow, Y. and Kilmartin, P. M. and Korpela, A. and Lin, W. and Ling, C. H. and Masuda, K. and Matsubara, Y. and Miyake, N. and Motomura, M. and Muraki, Y. and Nagaya, M. and Nakamura, S. and Ohnis...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [19]

    and Soszynski, Igor and Wyrzykowski, Lukasz and Pietrukowicz, Pawel and Ulaczyk, Krzysztof and Skowron, Dorota and Pawlak, Michal , year = 2017, month = aug, journal =

    Mroz, Przemek and Udalski, Andrzej and Skowron, Jan and Poleski, Radoslaw and Kozlowski, Szymon and Szymanski, Michal K. and Soszynski, Igor and Wyrzykowski, Lukasz and Pietrukowicz, Pawel and Ulaczyk, Krzysztof and Skowron, Dorota and Pawlak, Michal , year = 2017, month = aug, journal =. No Large Population of Unbound or Wide-Orbit. doi:10.1038/nature232...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [20]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.04750 , urldate =

    Koblischke, Nolan and Bovy, Jo , year = 2024, month = nov, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.04750 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2411.04750 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.04750 2024

  20. [21]

    Zhang, Gemma and Helfer, Thomas and Gagliano, Alexander T. and. Maven:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.16829 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2408.16829 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.16829

  21. [22]

    and Hundertmark, Markus P

    Abrams, Natasha S. and Hundertmark, Markus P. G. and Khakpash, Somayeh and Street, Rachel A. and Jones, R. Lynne and Lu, Jessica R. and Bachelet, Etienne and Tsapras, Yiannis and Moniez, Marc and Blaineauu, Tristan and Di Stefano, Rosanne and Makler, Martin and Varela, Anibal and Rabus, Markus , year =. Microlensing. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2309.15310 , urldat...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.15310

  22. [23]

    2009 , month = aug, journal =

    Difference Imaging Photometry of Blended Gravitational Microlensing Events with a Numerical Kernel , author =. 2009 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15098.x , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:0905.3003 , primaryclass =

    arXiv 2009

  23. [24]

    and Dieters, S

    Batista, Virginie and Gould, A. and Dieters, S. and Dong, Subo and Bond, I. and Beaulieu, J. P. and Maoz, D. and Monard, B. and Christie, G. W. and McCormick, J. and Albrow, M. D. and Horne, K. and Tsapras, Y. and Burgdorf, M. J. and Novati, S. Calchi and Skottfelt, J. and Caldwell, J. and Kozlowski, S. and Kubas, D. and Gaudi, B. S. and Han, C. and Benne...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [25]

    Primordial

    Bellomo, Nicola and Bernal, Jos. Primordial. 2018 , month = jan, journal =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/004 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1709.07467 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    Galactic

    Binney, James and Tremaine, Scott , year =. Galactic. Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition , urldate =

  26. [27]

    Sbi Reloaded: A Toolkit for Simulation-Based Inference Workflows , shorttitle =

    Boelts, Jan and Deistler, Michael and Gloeckler, Manuel and. Sbi Reloaded: A Toolkit for Simulation-Based Inference Workflows , shorttitle =. 2025 , month = aug, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.17337 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2411.17337 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.17337 2025

  27. [28]

    RTModel: a platform for real-time modeling and massive analysis of microlensing events

    Bozza, V. , year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.04092 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2405.04092 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04092

  28. [29]

    and Bachelet, E

    Bozza, V. and Bachelet, E. and Bartoli. 2018 , month = oct, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1791 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1805.05653 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [30]

    Formation of Terrestrial Planets

    Clement, Matthew S. and Izidoro, Andre and Raymond, Sean N. and Deienno, Rogerio , year =. Formation of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.03453 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2411.03453 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.03453

  30. [31]

    Coleman, Gavin A. L. and DeRocco, William , year =. Predicting the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.05992 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2407.05992 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05992

  31. [32]

    Davenport, James R. A. and Hawley, Suzanne L. and Hebb, Leslie and Wisniewski, John P. and Kowalski, Adam F. and Johnson, Emily C. and Malatesta, Michael and Peraza, Jesus and Keil, Marcus and Silverberg, Steven M. and Jansen, Tiffany C. and Scheffler, Matthew S. and Berdis, Jodi R. and Larsen, Daniel M. and Hilton, Eric J. , year =. Kepler. doi:10.48550/...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.3723

  32. [33]

    Reconstructing the Free-floating Planet Mass Function with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

    DeRocco, William and Penny, Matthew T. and Johnson, Samson A. and McGill, Peter , year =. Reconstructing the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.00092 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2505.00092 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.00092

  33. [34]

    Rogue Worlds Meet the Dark Side: Revealing Terrestrial-Mass Primordial Black Holes with the

    DeRocco, William and Frangipane, Evan and Hamer, Nick and Profumo, Stefano and Smyth, Nolan , year =. Rogue Worlds Meet the Dark Side: Revealing Terrestrial-Mass Primordial Black Holes with the. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023013 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2311.00751 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [35]

    Erickson, Sydney and. Lens. 2024 , month = oct, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.10123 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2410.10123 , publisher =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10123 2024

  35. [36]

    Robustness of

    Filipp, Andreas and Hezaveh, Yashar and. Robustness of. 2024 , month = nov, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.05905 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2411.05905 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.05905 2024

  36. [37]

    2013 , month = mar, journal =

    Emcee:. 2013 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.1086/670067 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1202.3665 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [38]

    The population of long-period transiting exoplanets

    The Population of Long-Period Transiting Exoplanets , author =. 2016 , month = oct, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1607.08237 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1607.08237 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.08237 2016

  38. [39]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09978 , urldate =

    2023 , month = apr, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09978 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2203.09978 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09978 2023

  39. [40]

    Scott , year =

    Gaudi, B. Scott , year =. Distinguishing. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/306256 , urldate =

    doi:10.1086/306256

  40. [41]

    Scott , year =

    Gaudi, B. Scott , year =. Microlensing. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125518 , urldate =

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125518

  41. [42]

    and Bachelet, E

    Godines, D. and Bachelet, E. and Narayan, G. and Street, R. A. , year =. A. Astronomy and Computing , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2019.100298 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2004.14347 , primaryclass =

    arXiv 2019

  42. [43]

    Golovich, Nathan and Dawson, William and Bartoli. A. 2022 , month = apr, journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac5969 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac5969 2022

  43. [44]

    and Chung, Sun-Ju and Han, Cheongho and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Yang, Hongjing and Yee, Jennifer C

    Gould, Andrew and Jung, Youn Kil and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Dong, Subo and Albrow, Michael D. and Chung, Sun-Ju and Han, Cheongho and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Yang, Hongjing and Yee, Jennifer C. and Zang, Weicheng and Cha, Sang-Mok and Kim, Dong-Jin and Kim, Seung-Lee and Lee, Chung-Uk and Lee, Dong-Joo and Lee, Yongseok and Pa...

    arXiv 2022

  44. [45]

    and Nonnenmacher, Marcel and Macke, Jakob H

    Greenberg, David S. and Nonnenmacher, Marcel and Macke, Jakob H. , year =. Automatic. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1905.07488 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1905.07488 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.07488 1905

  45. [46]

    Degeneracy between Lensing and Occultation in the Analysis of Self-lensing Phenomena

    Han, Cheongho , year =. Degeneracy between. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1603.03500 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1603.03500 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.03500

  46. [47]

    and Penny, Matthew T

    Johnson, Samson A. and Penny, Matthew T. and Gaudi, B. Scott and Kerins, Eamonn and Rattenbury, Nicholas J. and Robin, Annie C. and Novati, Sebastiano Calchi and Henderson, Calen B. , year =. Predictions of the. The Astronomical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aba75b , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2006.10760 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [48]

    Scott and Street, R

    Khakpash, Somayeh and Pepper, Joshua and Penny, Matthew and Gaudi, B. Scott and Street, R. A. , year =. Classifying. The Astronomical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd6cc , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2101.04019 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [49]

    and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Albrow, Michael D

    Kim, Hyoun-Woo and Hwang, Kyu-Ha and Gould, Andrew and Yee, Jennifer C. and Ryu, Yoon-Hyun and Albrow, Michael D. and Chung, Sun-Ju and Han, Cheongho and Jung, Youn Kil and Lee, Chung-Uk and Shin, In-Gu and Shvartzvald, Yossi and Zang, Weicheng and Cha, Sang-Mok and Kim, Dong-Jin and Kim, Seung-Lee and Lee, Dong-Joo and Lee, Yongseok and Park, Byeong-Gon ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [50]

    and Ba, Jimmy , year =

    Kingma, Diederik P. and Ba, Jimmy , year =. Adam:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1412.6980 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980

  50. [51]

    , year =

    Klypin, Anatoly and Zhao, HongSheng and Somerville, Rachel S. , year =. arXiv , keywords =:astro-ph/0110390 , doi =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    Massive heartbeat stars from TESS. I. TESS sectors 1-16

    Massive Heartbeat Stars from. 2021 , month = jan, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2012.11559 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2012.11559 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.11559 2021

  52. [53]

    , year =

    Koshimoto, Naoki and Baba, Junichi and Bennett, David P. , year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a8 , urldate =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a8

  53. [54]

    Searching for

    Kunimoto, Michelle and DeRocco, William and Smyth, Nolan and Bryson, Steve , year =. Searching for. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.11666 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2404.11666 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11666

  54. [55]

    and Scholz, Aleks and Mu

    Langeveld, Adam B. and Scholz, Aleks and Mu. The. 2024 , month = aug, eprint =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6f0c , urldate =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6f0c 2024

  55. [56]

    Sampling-

    Lemos, Pablo and Coogan, Adam and Hezaveh, Yashar and. Sampling-. 2023 , month = jun, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.03026 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2302.03026 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.03026 2023

  56. [57]

    and Ip, Wing-Huen , year =

    Lin, Chia-Lung and Apai, Daniel and Giampapa, Mark S. and Ip, Wing-Huen , year =. Scalable,. arXiv , langid =:2409.02540 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [58]

    , year =

    McMillan, Paul J. , year =. The Mass Distribution and Gravitational Potential of the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1608.00971 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1608.00971 , publisher =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.00971

  58. [59]

    Mendoza, Guadalupe Tovar and Davenport, James R. A. and Agol, Eric and Jackman, James A. G. and Hawley, Suzanne L. , year =. Llamaradas. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.05706 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2205.05706 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05706

  59. [60]

    Introduction to

    Meneghetti, Massimo , langid =. Introduction to

  60. [61]

    Did the terrestrial planets of the Solar System form by pebble accretion?

    Morbidelli, Alessandro and Kleine, Thorsten and Nimmo, Francis , year =. Did the Terrestrial Planets of the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.09271 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2411.09271 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.09271

  61. [62]

    2020 , month = sep, journal =

    Identifying Microlensing Events Using Neural Networks , author =. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/70.3.1 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2008.11930 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [63]

    Mroz, Przemek and Udalski, Andrzej and Szymanski, Michal K. and Soszynski, Igor and Pietrukowicz, Pawel and Kozlowski, Szymon and Poleski, Radoslaw and Skowron, Jan and Ulaczyk, Krzysztof and Gromadzki, Mariusz and Rybicki, Krzysztof and Iwanek, Patryk and Wrona, Marcin and Mroz, Mateusz J. , year =. Limits on Planetary-Mass Primordial Black Holes from th...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06251

  63. [64]

    and Udalski, A

    Mroz, P. and Udalski, A. and Szymanski, M. K. and Kapusta, M. and Soszynski, I. and Wyrzykowski, L. and Pietrukowicz, P. and Kozlowski, S. and Poleski, R. and Skowron, J. and Skowron, D. and Ulaczyk, K. and Gromadzki, M. and Rybicki, K. and Iwanek, P. and Wrona, M. and Ratajczak, M. , year =. Microlensing Optical Depth and Event Rate toward the. The Astro...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    and Udalski, A

    Mroz, P. and Udalski, A. and Szymanski, M. K. and Soszynski, I. and Wyrzykowski, L. and Pietrukowicz, P. and Kozlowski, S. and Poleski, R. and Skowron, J. and Skowron, D. and Ulaczyk, K. and Gromadzki, M. and Rybicki, K. and Iwanek, P. and Wrona, M. and Ratajczak, M. , year =. No Massive Black Holes in the. Nature , volume =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07704-...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    TESS Free-floating Planet Candidate Is Likely a Stellar Flare

    Mroz, Przemek , year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.16480 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2404.16480 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16480

  66. [67]

    and Montet, Benjamin T

    Palumbo, Elsa K. and Montet, Benjamin T. and Feinstein, Adina D. and Bouma, Luke G. and Hartman, Joel D. and Hillenbrand, Lynne A. and. Evidence for. 2022 , month = jan, journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac38a5 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2107.05649 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [68]

    and Gaudi, B

    Penny, Matthew T. and Gaudi, B. Scott and Kerins, Eamonn and Rattenbury, Nicholas J. and Mao, Shude and Robin, Annie C. and Novati, Sebastiano Calchi , year =. Predictions of the. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aafb69 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1808.02490 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    and Lam, Casey Y

    Perkins, Scott Ellis and McGill, Peter and Dawson, William and Abrams, Natasha S. and Lam, Casey Y. and Ho, Ming-Feng and Lu, Jessica R. and Bird, Simeon and Pruett, Kerianne and Golovich, Nathan and Chapline, George , year =. Disentangling the. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09bf , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2310.03943 ,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    Hints of an Anomalous Lens Population towards the Galactic Bulge

    Perkins, Scott E. and McGill, Peter and Dawson, William A. and Ho, Ming-Feng and Abrams, Natasha S. and Bird, Simeon and Lu, Jessica R. , year =. Hints of an. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.22037 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2503.22037 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.22037

  70. [71]

    A Bayesian method for detecting stellar flares

    Pitkin, M. and Williams, D. and Fletcher, L. and Grant, S. D. T. , year =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1406.1712 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1406.1712 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1712

  71. [72]

    and Dawson, W

    Pruett, K. and Dawson, W. and Medford, M. S. and Lam, C. and Lu, J. R. and Golovich, N. and Chapline, G. , year =. Primordial. arXiv , keywords =:2211.06771 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [73]

    Simulating

    Sajadian, Sedighe and Kalantari, Atousa and Fatheddin, Hossein and Khakpash, Somayeh , year =. Simulating. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.14231 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2408.14231 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.14231

  73. [74]

    Parallax

    Sangtarash, Parisa and Sajadian, Sedighe , year =. Parallax. arXiv , langid =:2403.16089 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [75]

    , year =

    Shukla, Satya Narayan and Marlin, Benjamin M. , year =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2012.00168 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2012.00168 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00168 2012

  75. [76]

    2020 , month = mar, number =

    On the Wave Optics Effect on Primordial Black Hole Constraints from Optical Microlensing Search , author =. 2020 , month = mar, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1905.06066 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1905.06066 , publisher =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.06066 2020

  76. [77]

    Sumi, Takahiro and. Free-. 2023 , month = jul, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.08280 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2303.08280 , publisher =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08280 2023

  77. [78]

    and Coughlin, Jeffrey L

    Thompson, Susan E. and Coughlin, Jeffrey L. and Hoffman, Kelsey and Mullally, Fergal and Christiansen, Jessie L. and Burke, Christopher J. and Bryson, Steve and Batalha, Natalie and Haas, Michael R. and Catanzarite, Joseph and Rowe, Jason F. and Barentsen, Geert and Caldwell, Douglas A. and Clarke, Bruce D. and Jenkins, Jon M. and Li, Jie and Latham, Davi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06758 2018

  78. [79]

    and Kaiser, Lukasz and Polosukhin, Illia , year =

    Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Jones, Llion and Gomez, Aidan N. and Kaiser, Lukasz and Polosukhin, Illia , year =. Attention. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1706.03762 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762

  79. [80]

    2023 , month = dec, number =

    Microlensing of Strongly Lensed Quasars , author =. 2023 , month = dec, number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2312.00931 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2312.00931 , publisher =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00931 2023

  80. [81]

    2025 , month = mar, journal =

    Via. 2025 , month = mar, journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ada4b5 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:2501.06293 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.