pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31840 · v1 · pith:UJYBRDM5new · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

Designing topological edge currents in chiral active matter

Yuta Kuroda , Ellen Meyberg , Gaurav Gardi , Thomas Speck , Saeed Osat This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords chiral active mattertopological edge modesedge currentschirality switchingphase separationhydrodynamic theoryactive swimmers
0
0 comments X

The pith

A model of chiral active swimmers with chirality switching produces robust topological edge currents along boundaries and interfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a particle model of two-dimensional chiral active swimmers that switch chirality and shows that this produces persistent edge currents independent of confinement geometry or defects. These currents are identified as genuine topological edge modes through analysis of linearized hydrodynamic equations obtained from bottom-up coarse-graining of the microscopic dynamics. Chirality switching also drives phase separation into domains that carry distinct topological properties, with currents flowing along the interfaces between them. This mechanism is presented as distinct from motility-induced phase separation and is captured by the derived continuum theory.

Core claim

The edge currents in the system are genuine topological edge modes because chirality switching creates an effective coexistence of two topologically distinct domains whose interfaces support protected transport, as established by the topological classification of the linearized hydrodynamic equations.

What carries the argument

The linearized hydrodynamic equations obtained from bottom-up coarse-graining of the particle model; their topological properties classify the edge modes.

If this is right

  • Single-particle edge currents arise regardless of wall shape or defects.
  • Collective phase separation occurs with currents along the resulting interfaces.
  • The separation is explained as coexistence of topologically distinct domains.
  • The model supplies design rules for robust edge currents in active matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The topological character could protect currents against additional weak perturbations not included in the current model.
  • Tuning the switching rate experimentally might allow direct control over the presence or direction of the currents.
  • The domain-coexistence picture could be tested by measuring local topological markers at interfaces in simulations or experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The bottom-up coarse-graining procedure produces a hydrodynamic theory whose linearized equations correctly capture the topological character of the microscopic dynamics without omitted terms that would alter the edge-mode classification.

What would settle it

Checking whether edge currents persist or reverse when the chirality switching rate is varied across a threshold that changes the sign of the relevant topological invariant extracted from the hydrodynamic equations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31840 by Ellen Meyberg, Gaurav Gardi, Saeed Osat, Thomas Speck, Yuta Kuroda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A chiral active particle with linear speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Single particle edge currents in three different wall and defect geometries. The upper row, panels (a)-(c), and the lower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase diagram for a single particle confined to a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase separation in the presence of chirality switching. Typical particle configurations at (a) Ω = 0, (b) Ω = 2, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Collective edge currents in phase-separated states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effective hydrodynamic theory. (a) Linearly unstable region obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Band structure obtained from the effective Hamiltonian. (a) Energy bands under half-periodic boundary conditions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Schematic of an edge current along a domain wall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Edge occupation probability and total edge current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Experimental demonstration of an edge current in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Particle configurations colored according to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Local polarization in a phase-separated state. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Interacting chiral active Brownian particles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Density dependence of phase separation induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (a) Schematic illustration of the local frame used to compute the pair distribution function. The pair distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Ω dependence of the angle of the symmetry axis of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Real part of the dispersion relation at (a) Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Edge modes and band structure of the effective Hamiltonian. The band structure (gray lines) is obtained in the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Achieving robust functionality in active matter driven away from thermal equilibrium is a current theoretical and experimental challenge. Several recent studies have reported edge currents--persistent transport along walls and density inhomogeneities--in chiral active matter. Yet, the microscopic rules that render these edge currents robust with respect to the confinement geometry and defects remain elusive. Here, we introduce a simple particle model of two-dimensional chiral active swimmers that undergo chirality switching and demonstrate that the model exhibits robust edge currents, i.e., when a single particle is confined, edge currents arise regardless of the confinement geometry or the presence of defects. We also investigate the collective behavior of interacting particles in bulk and find that chirality switching induces phase separation accompanied by edge currents along interfaces. This phase separation is distinct from motility-induced phase separation and is qualitatively explained by an effective hydrodynamic theory derived via bottom-up coarse-graining. Furthermore, by analyzing the topological properties of the linearized hydrodynamic equations, we show that the edge currents in our system are genuine topological edge modes. Notably, phase separation induced by chirality switching can be regarded as the coexistence of two topologically distinct domains. Our results provide guidelines for designing robust edge currents in active matter systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a 2D particle model of chiral active swimmers that undergo chirality switching. Simulations show robust edge currents for single particles independent of confinement geometry or defects. In the collective regime, chirality switching induces phase separation accompanied by edge currents along interfaces, distinct from motility-induced phase separation. A bottom-up coarse-graining procedure yields an effective hydrodynamic theory that qualitatively accounts for the phase separation. Linearization of the hydrodynamic equations followed by topological analysis is used to argue that the observed edge currents are genuine topological edge modes and that the phase-separated state corresponds to the coexistence of two topologically distinct domains.

Significance. If the topological classification survives the approximations inherent to the coarse-graining, the work would supply a concrete microscopic mechanism for engineering protected edge transport in active matter via chirality switching. The bottom-up link between particle rules and a hydrodynamic topological invariant is a strength that could inform both theory and experiment in non-equilibrium soft matter.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hydrodynamic theory derivation] The section deriving the hydrodynamic equations via bottom-up coarse-graining provides no quantitative validation (e.g., moment matching, correlation-function comparison, or truncation-error estimates) that the retained terms preserve the topological invariants of the microscopic dynamics. Because the subsequent claim that edge currents are topological edge modes rests entirely on the linearized hydro equations, omitted higher-order spatial derivatives or closure approximations could shift the winding number or non-Hermitian invariant and invalidate the classification.
  2. [Topological properties of the linearized equations] In the topological analysis of the linearized hydrodynamic equations, the classification of the edge modes and the interpretation of phase separation as coexistence of two topologically distinct domains are presented without a sensitivity test showing that the invariant remains unchanged when small neglected terms (consistent with the coarse-graining) are restored. This directly affects the central assertion that the edge currents are protected topological modes.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results on collective behavior] Figure captions for the collective simulations should explicitly state the system size, number of independent runs, and error estimation method used for the reported interface currents.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting important points regarding the hydrodynamic derivation and topological analysis. Below we respond to each major comment. We agree that additional discussion of the approximation's robustness would strengthen the presentation and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hydrodynamic theory derivation] The section deriving the hydrodynamic equations via bottom-up coarse-graining provides no quantitative validation (e.g., moment matching, correlation-function comparison, or truncation-error estimates) that the retained terms preserve the topological invariants of the microscopic dynamics. Because the subsequent claim that edge currents are topological edge modes rests entirely on the linearized hydro equations, omitted higher-order spatial derivatives or closure approximations could shift the winding number or non-Hermitian invariant and invalidate the classification.

    Authors: The coarse-graining retains the leading-order terms in density and polarization that encode the chirality-switching mechanism responsible for the non-reciprocal coupling. While we did not include explicit moment-matching or truncation-error estimates in the original manuscript, the resulting hydrodynamic equations reproduce the qualitative features of the microscopic simulations, including the emergence of edge currents at interfaces. The topological classification follows from the structure of these leading terms (specifically the antisymmetric coupling that opens a gap in the dispersion). Higher-order gradient terms are expected to be irrelevant for the long-wavelength edge modes. We will add a supplementary discussion clarifying the regime of validity of the truncation and why the retained terms suffice to protect the invariant. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Topological properties of the linearized equations] In the topological analysis of the linearized hydrodynamic equations, the classification of the edge modes and the interpretation of phase separation as coexistence of two topologically distinct domains are presented without a sensitivity test showing that the invariant remains unchanged when small neglected terms (consistent with the coarse-graining) are restored. This directly affects the central assertion that the edge currents are protected topological modes.

    Authors: The linearization is performed around the uniform state, and the winding number is determined by the leading-order matrix whose off-diagonal terms arise directly from chirality switching. Small higher-order corrections consistent with the coarse-graining would shift eigenvalues continuously but leave the gap open and the winding number unchanged within the parameter range where phase separation occurs. Nevertheless, to address the concern directly we will include a short sensitivity check in the revised manuscript by adding a representative higher-order term to the linearized operator and recomputing the invariant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained bottom-up

full rationale

The paper introduces a microscopic particle model with chirality switching, derives an effective hydrodynamic theory via explicit bottom-up coarse-graining, linearizes the resulting PDEs, and computes topological invariants on those linearized equations. No quoted step shows a parameter fitted to data then relabeled as a prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing claim that reduces to a prior self-citation whose content is unverified. The topological classification is performed on the output of the coarse-graining step rather than being presupposed by it; omitted higher-order terms are an accuracy concern, not a circularity mechanism. The central claim therefore rests on independent content generated from the microscopic rules.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the bottom-up coarse-graining and the assumption that linearization of the resulting hydrodynamic equations yields a well-defined topological classification; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linearized hydrodynamic equations derived from the particle model possess well-defined topological invariants that classify edge modes.
    Invoked to conclude that observed currents are genuine topological edge modes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5745 in / 1208 out tokens · 38083 ms · 2026-07-01T02:25:24.651672+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    fOgAZ4mnHlbUAexwlMHmq3PdJp8=

    Local polarization in a phase-separated state Figure 11 depicts the local polarization in the phase- separated state shown in Fig. 5. We calculate the local polarization by taking the spatial average ofe(ϕ j) over a small circular region of radius 3σ. We see that the behavior of the local polarization is the same as that of the velocity field shown in Fig...

  2. [2]

    4(g) in the main text, we show the global hex- atic order parameter averaged over all particles

    Hexatic order parameter In Fig. 4(g) in the main text, we show the global hex- atic order parameter averaged over all particles. As Ω increases, Ψ 6 jumps to a finite value and subsequently decreases. The decrease in Ψ 6 at large Ω stems from the presence of multiple dense clusters. To illustrate this, Figs. 12(a)-(c) present particle configurations at th...

  3. [3]

    Xp+5F/5ZDKOuB+nqKTh+hoKyr64=

    Density dependence of phase separation with edge currents In Sec. IV, we primarily discuss phase separation at the packing fractionφ= 0.4. In Fig. 13, we show that 15 0 º 2º B C <latexit sha1_base64="Xp+5F/5ZDKOuB+nqKTh+hoKyr64=">AAAEzHichVNNb9NAEJ0UA6V8NIULEpeIqIhTtIlQQRxQVS5cQG1K0kpJZK3NJljxx8p2XILlKwf+AAe4gFQkxM/gwhmJQ38C4lgkLhx4uzEtENXeKPbsmzczb8a7lnS...

  4. [4]

    Xp+5F/5ZDKOuB+nqKTh+hoKyr64=

    Current along a domain wall in interacting particles In Fig. 8(b) in the main text, we show that a single chi- ral active Brownian particle exhibits edge currents along the domain boundary in a system composed of two do- mains with opposite signs of chirality. The same behav- ior is observed even for interacting particles. To demon- 0 30 60 90 B 0 30 60 9...

  5. [5]

    8(c) and (d) in the main text, we show the lo- cal effective chirality Ω′ in a phase-separated state, where the inside of the droplet exhibits a liquid-like structure

    Local effective chiral torque in a clustering state In Figs. 8(c) and (d) in the main text, we show the lo- cal effective chirality Ω′ in a phase-separated state, where the inside of the droplet exhibits a liquid-like structure. As discussed in Sec. IV, the system also exhibits cluster- ing states, in which multiple dense clusters coexist and 16 their int...

  6. [6]

    OauuOyif6Ctlv2+ieA3q33d77Ho=

    Closure approximation In this section, we derive Eq. (14) in the main text. Here, we roughly follow Refs. [105, 117]. The one-body distribution function is defined by Ψ(r, ϕ, t) = * NX j=1 δ(r−r j(t))δ2π(ϕ−ϕ j(t)) + ,(E1) whereδ 2π(ϕ) =P n∈Z δ(ϕ+ 2nπ). Using the Itˆ o formula and Eqs. (1) and (2), the time derivative of Ψ(r, ϕ, t) reads ∂tΨ =− ∇ ·[µG+v 0e...

  7. [7]

    (E17) In the main text, we used Eq

    Approximation for nematic tensor The nematic tensorQis defined by Q(r, t) = * NX j=1 e(ϕj(t))e(ϕj(t))− 1 2 1 δ(r−r j(t)) + . (E17) In the main text, we used Eq. (18) to expressQin terms of the polarization and density field. We here derive this approximated formula. To systematically address the hierarchy in the orienta- tion, we first expand the one-body...

  8. [8]

    (14) is based on a closure approximation

    Modified equations As discussed in Appendix E 1, the derivation of Eq. (14) is based on a closure approximation. In this approximation, we used the fact that the pair distribu- tion function is axisymmetric with respect to the orienta- tione(ϕ), at least for small Ω. However, this assumption should be modified if Ω orαis large. Here, we briefly dis- cuss ...

  9. [9]

    free- energy

    Scalar field theory for odd fluids Here, we briefly discuss a possible connection between our hydrodynamic equations and a scalar field theory for odd fluids. For active fluids, scalar field theories, such as active Model B(+), have often been used to study large- scale collective behavior [129–132]. Even for chiral active fluids, several studies have pro...

  10. [10]

    type I” and “type II,

    Linear stability In Sec. IV, we considered the linear stability of our hydrodynamic equations at the level of the adiabatic ap- proximation. Here, we briefly discuss the linear stability 0 10 20 30 40 50 ≠/Dr 0 20 40 60 80 100Æ`p/µ Unstable (type II) Unstable (type I) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Ω0/Ω§ 20 40 60 80v0/p BΩ§µDr 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 q °1.5 °1.0 °...

  11. [11]

    (F4) We now rescale the field variable as ˆψ(q) =S ˆψ′(q) with S= diag(1, s, s)

    Effective Hamiltonian Equation (F2) (without the Helmholtz decomposition) can be rewritten asi∂ t ˆψ(q, t) =H(q) ˆψ(q, t) with the Hamiltonian-like matrixH(q) =iG(q): H(q) =   −ibq2 λqx λqy λ2qx −λ ⊥qy −i(1 +νq 2)−i(W −ν oq2) λ2qy +λ ⊥qx i(W −ν oq2)−i(1 +νq 2)  . (F4) We now rescale the field variable as ˆψ(q) =S ˆψ′(q) with S= diag(1, s, s). The equa...

  12. [12]

    [79, 118], the Chern numbers were calculated for systems described by the Hermitian matrix given by Eq

    Chern numbers In Refs. [79, 118], the Chern numbers were calculated for systems described by the Hermitian matrix given by Eq. (F6). In this section, we calculate the Chern numbers from the effective Hamiltonian, Eq. (F4), and show that they are identical to those calculated from the Hermitian part in Eq. (F6). Our effective Hamiltonian is non-Hermitian, ...

  13. [13]

    7 in the main text

    Band structure Here, we provide the technical details of the numerical calculation of the band structure shown in Fig. 7 in the main text. To obtain the band structure, we consider a system that is periodic in they-direction and open in thex-direction, following Ref. [81]. The effective Hamil- tonian in real space reads H=   ib∇2 −ivs∂x −ivs∂y −ivs∂x +i...

  14. [14]

    Here, we show that the edge modes can also be obtained semi-analytically by starting from an ansatz for the edge solutions and imposing appropriate boundary conditions

    Edge modes In the main text, we obtain the topological edge modes by discretizing the matrixHunder half-periodic bound- ary conditions. Here, we show that the edge modes can also be obtained semi-analytically by starting from an ansatz for the edge solutions and imposing appropriate boundary conditions. We consider the eigenvalue prob- lemHφ(x, y) =Eφ(x, ...

  15. [15]

    We introduce this rescaling to improve the numerical stability of the computation described be- low

    We also rescale coefficients asA ′ α =A αe−καL and B′ α =B αe−καL. We introduce this rescaling to improve the numerical stability of the computation described be- low. Applying the boundary conditions then yields six equations, which can be written in the following matrix form: MBC A′ B′ := M− L M− R M+ L M+ R A′ B′ =O,(F31) whereA ′ = (A′ 1, A′ 2, A′ 3)⊤...

  16. [16]

    Qian, Phosphorylation Energy Hypothesis: Open Chemical Systems and Their Biological Functions, Annu

    H. Qian, Phosphorylation Energy Hypothesis: Open Chemical Systems and Their Biological Functions, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.58, 113 (2007)

    2007

  17. [17]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Ramaswamy, The Mechanics and Statistics of Ac- tive Matter, Annu

    S. Ramaswamy, The Mechanics and Statistics of Ac- tive Matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Tailleur, G

    J. Tailleur, G. Gompper, M. C. Marchetti, J. M. Yeo- mans, and C. Salomon,Active Matter and Nonequi- librium Statistical Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 112, September 2018 (Oxford University Press, 2022)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel Type of Phase Transition in a Sys- tem of Self-Driven Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  22. [22]

    Cavagna and I

    A. Cavagna and I. Giardina, Bird flocks as condensed matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics5, 183 (2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    Dombrowski, L

    C. Dombrowski, L. Cisneros, S. Chatkaew, R. E. Gold- stein, and J. O. Kessler, Self-Concentration and Large- Scale Coherence in Bacterial Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 098103 (2004)

    2004

  24. [24]

    Sanchez, D

    T. Sanchez, D. T. N. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Spontaneous motion in hierarchically as- sembled active matter, Nature491, 431 (2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    Volpe, I

    G. Volpe, I. Buttinoni, D. Vogt, H.-J. K¨ ummerer, and C. Bechinger, Microswimmers in patterned environ- ments, Soft Matter7, 8810 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    Buttinoni, J

    I. Buttinoni, J. Bialk´ e, F. K¨ ummel, H. L¨ owen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled col- loidal particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 238301 (2013)

    2013

  27. [27]

    Nishiguchi and M

    D. Nishiguchi and M. Sano, Mesoscopic turbulence and local order in janus particles self-propelling under an ac electric field, Phys. Rev. E92, 052309 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Kitano, Biological robustness, Nat

    H. Kitano, Biological robustness, Nat. Rev. Genet.5, 826 (2004)

    2004

  29. [29]

    L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    H. L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Chiral active matter, EPL 139, 67001 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    K¨ ummel, B

    F. K¨ ummel, B. ten Hagen, R. Wittkowski, I. Buttinoni, R. Eichhorn, G. Volpe, H. L¨ owen, and C. Bechinger, Circular motion of asymmetric self-propelling particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 198302 (2013)

    2013

  32. [32]

    Zhang, A

    B. Zhang, A. Sokolov, and A. Snezhko, Reconfigurable emergent patterns in active chiral fluids, Nature Com- munications11, 4401 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Mano, J.-B

    T. Mano, J.-B. Delfau, J. Iwasawa, and M. Sano, Op- timal run-and-tumble–based transportation of a janus particle with active steering, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences114, E2580 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    I. H. Riedel, K. Kruse, and J. Howard, A self-organized vortex array of hydrodynamically entrained sperm cells, Science309, 300 (2005)

    2005

  35. [35]

    Patra, K

    P. Patra, K. Beyer, A. Jaiswal, A. Battista, K. Rohr, F. Frischknecht, and U. S. Schwarz, Collective migra- 24 tion reveals mechanical flexibility of malaria parasites, Nature Physics18, 586 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    W. R. DiLuzio, L. Turner, M. Mayer, P. Garstecki, D. B. Weibel, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Es- cherichia coli swim on the right-hand side, Nature435, 1271 (2005)

    2005

  37. [37]

    Di Leonardo, D

    R. Di Leonardo, D. Dell’Arciprete, L. Angelani, and V. Iebba, Swimming with an image, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 038101 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    Siebers, A

    F. Siebers, A. Jayaram, P. Bl¨ umler, and T. Speck, Ex- ploiting compositional disorder in collectives of light- driven circle walkers, Science Advances9, eadf5443 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Collective behavior of chiral active matter: Pattern formation and enhanced flock- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 058002 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    N. Kruk, J. A. Carrillo, and H. Koeppl, Traveling bands, clouds, and vortices of chiral active matter, Phys. Rev. E102, 022604 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Ventejou, H

    B. Ventejou, H. Chat´ e, R. Montagne, and X.-q. Shi, Susceptibility of orientationally ordered active matter to chirality disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 238001 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Liao and S

    G.-J. Liao and S. H. L. Klapp, Emergent vortices and phase separation in systems of chiral active particles with dipolar interactions, Soft Matter17, 6833 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Q.-L. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra, and R. Ni, Nonequilibrium strongly hyperuniform fluids of circle active particles with large local density fluctuations, Science Advances 5, eaau7423 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    Huang, W

    M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu, and H. P. Zhang, Circular swimming motility and disordered hyperuni- form state in an algae system, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences118, e2100493118 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Zhang and A

    B. Zhang and A. Snezhko, Hyperuniform active chiral fluids with tunable internal structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 218002 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Kuroda and K

    Y. Kuroda and K. Miyazaki, Microscopic theory for hyperuniformity in two-dimensional chiral active fluid, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment , 103203 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Kuroda, T

    Y. Kuroda, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Singular density correlations in chiral active fluids in three di- mensions, Phys. Rev. E112, 045426 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    V. E. Debets, H. L¨ owen, and L. M. C. Janssen, Glassy dynamics in chiral fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 058201 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Kuroda, T

    Y. Kuroda, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Long- range translational order and hyperuniformity in two- dimensional chiral active crystal, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012048 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Jeong, Y

    K. Jeong, Y. Kuroda, Y. Asatani, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Crystallization of chiral active brownian particles at low densities, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043212 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Caprini, B

    L. Caprini, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Self-reverting vortices in chiral active matter, Commun. Phys.7, 153 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 471 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    B. C. van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. M. Irvine, D. Bar- tolo, and V. Vitelli, Spatiotemporal order and emergent edge currents in active spinner materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 12919 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    A. Negi, K. Beppu, and Y. T. Maeda, Geometry-induced dynamics of confined chiral active matter, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023196 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Alsallom and D

    F. Alsallom and D. T. Limmer, Origin of edge currents in chiral active liquids (2026), arXiv:2603.18159 [cond- mat.soft]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    C. B. Caporusso, G. Gonnella, and D. Levis, Phase co- existence and edge currents in the chiral lennard-jones fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 168201 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    Adorj´ ani, A

    B. Adorj´ ani, A. Lib´ al, C. Reichhardt, and C. J. O. Re- ichhardt, Phase separation, edge currents, and hall ef- fect for active matter with magnus dynamics, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal E47, 40 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Siebers, R

    F. Siebers, R. Bebon, A. Jayaram, and T. Speck, Col- lective hall current in chiral active fluids: Coupling of phase and mass transport through traveling bands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2320256121 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    Y. Zhou, Q. Yin, S. Nayak, P. Bag, P. K. Ghosh, Y. Li, and F. Marchesoni, Visual quorum sensing in chiral sus- pensions: Hyperuniformity and edge currents, PNAS Nexus4, pgaf373 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Bubble phase induced by odd interactions in chiral systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics162, 161101 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Equation of state for the edge flow of chiral colloidal fluids

    J. Metzger, C. Hargus, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Equation of state for the edge flow of chiral colloidal fluids (2026), arXiv:2604.18708 [cond-mat.soft]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    B. Wang, P. Pietzonka, and F. J¨ ulicher, Edge Cur- rents Shape Condensates in Chiral Active Matter, arXiv:2603.20064

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    J.-C. Tsai, F. Ye, J. Rodriguez, J. P. Gollub, and T. C. Lubensky, A chiral granular gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 214301 (2005)

    2005

  64. [64]

    Caprini, U

    L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Active thermodynamics of inertial chiral ac- tive gases: equation of state and edge currents (2025), arXiv:2509.05053 [cond-mat.soft]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    A particle-resolved rheological study of chirality transfer and odd transport

    R. Goerlich, A. P. Antonov, K. S. Olsen, L. Caprini, C. Scholz, H. L¨ owen, and Y. Roichman, A particle- resolved rheological study of chirality transfer and odd transport (2026), arXiv:2605.25136 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Tierno, R

    P. Tierno, R. Muruganathan, and T. M. Fischer, Vis- coelasticity of dynamically self-assembled paramagnetic colloidal clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 028301 (2007)

    2007

  67. [67]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. M. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nature Physics15, 1188 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Massana-Cid, D

    H. Massana-Cid, D. Levis, R. J. H. Hern´ andez, I. Pag- onabarraga, and P. Tierno, Arrested phase separation in chiral fluids of colloidal spinners, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042021 (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    Katuri, N

    J. Katuri, N. Kaur, W. Uspal, A. Cornelius, D. Quashie, and J. Ali, Control of colloidal cohesive states in active chiral fluids, Communications Physics7, 291 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Bricard, J.-B

    A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, D. Das, C. Savoie, V. Chikkadi, K. Shitara, O. Chepizhko, F. Peruani, D. Saintillan, and D. Bartolo, Emergent vortices in pop- ulations of colloidal rollers, Nature Communications6, 7470 (2015)

    2015

  71. [71]

    Workamp, G

    M. Workamp, G. Ramirez, K. E. Daniels, and J. A. Dijksman, Symmetry-reversals in chiral active matter, 25 Soft Matter14, 5572 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    P. Liu, H. Zhu, Y. Zeng, G. Du, L. Ning, D. Wang, K. Chen, Y. Lu, N. Zheng, F. Ye, and M. Yang, Oscil- lating collective motion of active rotors in confinement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 11901 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    X. Yang, C. Ren, K. Cheng, and H. P. Zhang, Robust boundary flow in chiral active fluid, Phys. Rev. E101, 022603 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    Beppu, Z

    K. Beppu, Z. Izri, T. Sato, Y. Yamanishi, Y. Sumino, and Y. T. Maeda, Edge current and pairing order tran- sition in chiral bacterial vortices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2107461118 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    H. Li, H. Chat´ e, M. Sano, X.-q. Shi, and H. P. Zhang, Robust Edge Flows in Swarming Bacterial Colonies, Phys. Rev. X14, 041006 (2024)

    2024

  76. [76]

    Yashunsky, D

    V. Yashunsky, D. J. G. Pearce, C. Blanch-Mercader, F. Ascione, P. Silberzan, and L. Giomi, Chiral edge current in nematic cell monolayers, Phys. Rev. X12, 041017 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  78. [78]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  79. [79]

    Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantiza- tion of the hall conductance, Annals of Physics160, 343 (1985)

    M. Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantiza- tion of the hall conductance, Annals of Physics160, 343 (1985)

    1985

  80. [80]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

Showing first 80 references.