pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20417 · v1 · pith:UMJUUPNHnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· nucl-th· quant-ph

Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories for Particle and Nuclear Physics

Zohreh Davoudi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 06:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phnucl-thquant-ph
keywords quantum simulationlattice gauge theoryparticle physicsnuclear physicsdense matterquantum algorithms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum simulation provides polynomially efficient algorithms for lattice gauge theory problems that scale exponentially on classical computers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Lattice field theory has produced strong results on hadronic spectra and reactions but cannot efficiently handle problems with dense matter or general dynamical phenomena, since those demands grow exponentially with system size. The paper positions quantum simulation as the alternative, because quantum algorithms and hardware can perform the same simulations with only polynomial growth in resources. It describes the specific physics questions this shift could open, the layered strategy of theory plus algorithm plus hardware co-design, and the current state of implementations. If the approach succeeds, it would let researchers compute quantities in nuclear physics that remain inaccessible today.

Core claim

The author establishes that quantum simulation, enabled by quantum-computing algorithms and hardware, supplies polynomially efficient methods for lattice gauge theories and thereby overcomes the exponential scaling barrier that limits classical lattice field theory when addressing dense matter and dynamical phenomena in particle and nuclear physics.

What carries the argument

Quantum algorithms that simulate the real-time evolution and observables of lattice gauge theories, replacing classical exponential resource costs with polynomial scaling through quantum operations.

If this is right

  • Dense nuclear matter and finite-density QCD become computationally accessible without exponential cost blow-up.
  • Real-time dynamical processes and non-equilibrium gauge-theory evolution can be simulated directly.
  • Co-design between quantum hardware and lattice-gauge algorithms accelerates progress toward useful system sizes.
  • New classes of hadronic reactions and decays that involve strong time dependence fall within reach.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar polynomial scaling advantages might transfer to gauge-theory simulations in condensed-matter systems that share the same local symmetry structure.
  • Hybrid classical-quantum workflows could serve as stepping stones while full fault-tolerant quantum hardware is still developing.
  • Success on gauge theories could encourage analogous quantum approaches for other exponentially hard problems in high-energy physics such as real-time scattering.

Load-bearing premise

That continued work on algorithms, error control, and hardware will reach the maturity needed for practical quantum advantage on lattice gauge theory problems.

What would settle it

A controlled demonstration in which a quantum device computes a gauge-theory observable for a lattice size where any classical algorithm requires resources that grow exponentially beyond the capacity of existing supercomputers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20417 by Zohreh Davoudi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A roadmap for leveraging quantum simulation and quantum computation in particle and nuclear physics. The rapid development of quantum-simulation and quantum-computing paradigms promises more efficient routes to addressing the problems above. The reason is twofold. On one hand, quantum Hilbert spaces can be encoded far more efficiently in quantum units (such as qubits). On the other hand, operations can be … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Depicted are the quantum-simulation steps. Conventional lattice-QCD computations can inform and facilitate the state-preparation step, while high-performance (classical) computing will be needed to store and analyze vast quantum measurements. Time evolution can be accelerated by quantum processors, providing quantum advantage in many applications. and quantum input and output. Artificial intelligence and m… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (top) Diagram of the lattice distribution of    000 0.05 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Results for n =1, 2, 3 (Left, Middle, Right . Thus, a plaquette string is created by two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. S (a) Time evolution of the average gap on dynamics in a (2+1)D 𝑍L [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (see Methods) shows the dynamics of probabilities after these quenches for other relevant states, where we observe how the populations for the intermediate states depicted in [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. A honeycomb with its six internal links (solid lines) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. R l sults of the 1+1 D Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model are below g qp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Trotter time evolution of for NP = 5 with 11 system qub times, the asymptotic |2i particle bidtifiblt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Thecolumnslabeled (⇥2 hibit the expected time dependence of an exponential 108 000 ± 006 012 ± 009 090 ± f an exponentialtermediate states that are energetic pp( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Exam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Lattice field theory, along with its algorithmic and hardware ecosystems, has been at the forefront of computational particle and nuclear physics. It continues to deliver impressive results on the hadronic spectrum, structure, decays, and reactions. Yet, this vigorous campaign has fallen short in addressing a range of problems involving dense matter and general dynamical phenomena. The reason is that such problems require an exponential scaling of computing time and space in system size. Quantum simulation, enabled by quantum-computing algorithms and hardware technology, promises a way forward by offering several polynomially efficient algorithms compared with their inefficient classical counterparts. Lattice gauge theorists have engaged in a multi-pronged program to leverage such new possibilities, and have steadily advanced the state of theory, algorithm, and hardware implementations and co-design. In this talk, I motivate the quantum-computational lattice-field-theory program; introduce the questions such a program is expected to address and the strategies it involves; report on recent progress; and end with a note on challenges and opportunities ahead.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a conference talk that motivates the quantum-computational lattice-field-theory program for particle and nuclear physics. It notes the successes of classical lattice field theory while identifying its exponential scaling limitations for dense matter and general dynamical phenomena, and positions quantum simulation as offering polynomially efficient alternatives drawn from the broader literature. The talk introduces the questions and strategies of the program, reports on recent progress across theory, algorithms, and hardware co-design, and closes with challenges and opportunities.

Significance. If the multi-pronged program described matures, it could enable simulations of regimes currently intractable on classical hardware, such as dense matter and real-time dynamics. The manuscript provides a clear high-level roadmap and correctly credits collaborative advances, but its significance as a standalone contribution is limited because it presents no new derivations, algorithms, benchmarks, or quantitative results.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that quantum simulation supplies 'several polynomially efficient algorithms' for dense matter and dynamical phenomena is asserted without any concrete algorithm, complexity analysis, or reference to a specific result inside the manuscript, leaving the promise unsupported at the level of detail required to assess its load-bearing role for the overall motivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on this conference talk manuscript. We address the single major comment below and have incorporated a revision to strengthen the abstract.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that quantum simulation supplies 'several polynomially efficient algorithms' for dense matter and dynamical phenomena is asserted without any concrete algorithm, complexity analysis, or reference to a specific result inside the manuscript, leaving the promise unsupported at the level of detail required to assess its load-bearing role for the overall motivation.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states the claim at a high level without an explicit pointer. The manuscript body introduces algorithmic strategies for lattice gauge theories and reports recent progress, including references to specific polynomial-time approaches in the literature for dense matter and real-time dynamics. To make the abstract self-contained and directly responsive to the referee's concern, we will add a brief parenthetical reference to one such established result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; high-level overview without derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is a conference talk that motivates a research program in quantum simulation for lattice gauge theories. It states high-level promises drawn from the broader literature (e.g., polynomial efficiency of quantum algorithms versus exponential classical scaling) without presenting any new equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or technical results. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, self-citation chains, or fitted inputs called predictions. The text is self-contained as an external motivation and progress report, with no internal derivation chain to inspect for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific model, derivation, or quantitative claim is advanced in the abstract; the ledger is therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5701 in / 911 out tokens · 47002 ms · 2026-05-21T06:31:13.670067+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Davoudi et al., inSnowmass 2021, 9, 2022 [2209.10758]

    Z. Davoudi et al., inSnowmass 2021, 9, 2022 [2209.10758]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Luscher,Commun

    M. Luscher,Commun. Math. Phys.105(1986) 153

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    X. Ji,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 262002 [1305.1539]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323 [1005.3035]

    work page arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Topological entanglement entropy

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 110405

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States

    H. Li and F.D.M. Haldane,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 010504 [0805.0332]. 14 Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories for Particle and Nuclear PhysicsZohreh Davoudi

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Mueller, T.V

    N. Mueller, T.V. Zache and R. Ott,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 011601 [2107.11416]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Davoudi, C

    Z. Davoudi, C. Jarzynski, N. Mueller, G. Oruganti, C. Powers and N.Y. Halpern,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 250402 [2404.02965]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Feynman,International Journal of Theoretical Physics21(1982) 467

    R.P. Feynman,International Journal of Theoretical Physics21(1982) 467

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    Lloyd,Science273(1996) 1073

    S. Lloyd,Science273(1996) 1073

    work page 1996

  13. [13]

    Altman et al.,PRX Quantum2(2021) 017003 [1912.06938]

    E. Altman et al.,PRX Quantum2(2021) 017003 [1912.06938]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond

    J. Preskill,Quantum2(2018) 79 [1801.00862]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Régent,2507.03678

    F.-M.L. Régent,2507.03678

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Harmalkar, H

    S. Harmalkar, H. Lamm and S. Lawrence

    work page

  17. [17]

    Gupta, C.D

    N. Gupta, C.D. White and Z. Davoudi,2506.02313

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Aidelsburger et al.,Phil

    M. Aidelsburger et al.,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380(2021) 20210064 [2106.03063]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Zohar,Phil

    E. Zohar,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A380(2022) 20210069 [2106.04609]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Halimeh, M

    J.C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke and B. Yang,Nature Phys.21(2025) 25 [2310.12201]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Funcke, T

    L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen and S. Kühn,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 228 [2302.00467]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories

    J.C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papić and Z. Davoudi,2509.03586

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Tong, V.V

    Y. Tong, V.V. Albert, J.R. McClean, J. Preskill and Y. Su,Quantum6(2022) 816 [2110.06942]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Ciavarella, S

    A.N. Ciavarella, S. Hariprakash, J.C. Halimeh and C.W. Bauer,2508.00061

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    J. Yang, C.F. Kane and S. Jabeen,2604.24896

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Bauer, Z

    C.W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, N. Klco and M.J. Savage,Nature Rev. Phys.5(2023) 420 [2404.06298]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Bauer et al.,PRX Quantum4(2023) 027001 [2204.03381]

    C.W. Bauer et al.,PRX Quantum4(2023) 027001 [2204.03381]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Davoudi,2507.15840

    Z. Davoudi,2507.15840

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer

    T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto,Phys. Rev. A73(2006) 022328 [quant-ph/0510027]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories

    S.P. Jordan, K.S.M. Lee and J. Preskill,Science336(2012) 1130 [1111.3633]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    H. Lamm, S. Lawrence and Y. Yamauchi,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 034518 [1903.08807]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    A.F. Shaw, P. Lougovski, J.R. Stryker and N. Wiebe,Quantum4(2020) 306 [2002.11146]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Haase, L

    J.F. Haase, L. Dellantonio, A. Celi, D. Paulson, A. Kan, K. Jansen et al.,Quantum5(2021) 393 [2006.14160]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Ciavarella, N

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco and M.J. Savage,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 094501 [2101.10227]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Kan and Y

    A. Kan and Y. Nam,2107.12769

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Davoudi, A.F

    Z. Davoudi, A.F. Shaw and J.R. Stryker,Quantum7(2023) 1213 [2212.14030]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Murairi, M.J

    E.M. Murairi, M.J. Cervia, H. Kumar, P.F. Bedaque and A. Alexandru,Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 094504 [2208.11789]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Rhodes, M

    M.L. Rhodes, M. Kreshchuk and S. Pathak,PRX Quantum5(2024) 040347 [2405.10416]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Lamm, Y.-Y

    H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Shu, Y.-L. Wang and B. Xu,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054505 [2405.12890]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Balaji, C

    P. Balaji, C. Conefrey-Shinozaki, P. Draper, J.K. Elhaderi, D. Gupta, L. Hidalgo et al.,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054511 [2503.08866]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Halimeh, M

    J.C. Halimeh, M. Hanada and S. Matsuura,2506.18966

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Froland, D.M

    H. Froland, D.M. Grabowska and Z. Li,2512.22782. 15 Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories for Particle and Nuclear PhysicsZohreh Davoudi

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Davoudi and J

    Z. Davoudi and J. Stryker,in preparation(2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Kogut and L

    J.B. Kogut and L. Susskind,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 395

    work page 1975

  45. [45]

    Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer

    E.A. Martinez et al.,Nature534(2016) 516 [1605.04570]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Mou and B

    Z.-G. Mou and B. Chakraborty,2510.27668

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Klco, J.R

    N. Klco, J.R. Stryker and M.J. Savage,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 074512 [1908.06935]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Ciavarella and C.W

    A.N. Ciavarella and C.W. Bauer,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111901 [2402.10265]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Ciavarella, I.M

    A.N. Ciavarella, I.M. Burbano and C.W. Bauer,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054514 [2503.11888]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Mueller, T

    N. Mueller, T. Wang, O. Katz, Z. Davoudi and M. Cetina,Nature Commun.16(2025) 5492 [2408.00069]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Vodeb, J.-Y

    J. Vodeb, J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hallam, A. Rava, G. Humar, D. Willsch et al.,Nature Phys.21 (2025) 386 [2406.14718]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    De et al.,2410.13815

    A. De et al.,2410.13815

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Cochran et al.,Nature642(2025) 315 [2409.17142]

    T.A. Cochran et al.,Nature642(2025) 315 [2409.17142]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra et al.,Nature642(2025) 321 [2410.16558]

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra et al.,Nature642(2025) 321 [2410.16558]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Chen, Y.-T

    J.-W. Chen, Y.-T. Chen and G. Meher,2506.16829

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    K. Lee, F. Turro and X. Yao,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 054514 [2409.13830]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Farrell, M

    R.C. Farrell, M. Illa, A.N. Ciavarella and M.J. Savage,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 114510 [2401.08044]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Davoudi, C.-C

    Z. Davoudi, C.-C. Hsieh and S.V. Kadam,Quantum8(2024) 1520 [2402.00840]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Y. Chai, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, V.R. Pascuzzi, F. Tacchino et al.,Quantum9(2025) 1638 [2312.02272]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Farrell, N.A

    R.C. Farrell, N.A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa and J. Preskill,2505.03111

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Schuhmacher, G.-X

    J. Schuhmacher, G.-X. Su, J.J. Osborne, A. Gandon, J.C. Halimeh and I. Tavernelli, 2505.20387

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Davoudi, C.-C

    Z. Davoudi, C.-C. Hsieh and S.V. Kadam,2505.20408

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Farrell, I.A

    R.C. Farrell, I.A. Chernyshev, S.J.M. Powell, N.A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa and M.J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 054513 [2209.10781]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Chernyshev et al.,Nature Commun.17(2026) 1826 [2506.05757]

    I.A. Chernyshev et al.,Nature Commun.17(2026) 1826 [2506.05757]

    work page arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Rosanowski, A

    E.O. Rosanowski, A. Crippa, L. Funcke, P.V. Itaborai, K. Jansen and S. Singh,2509.20558

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Than et al.,Nature Commun.16(2025) 10288 [2501.00579]

    A.T. Than et al.,Nature Commun.16(2025) 10288 [2501.00579]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    S.Saner,O.Băzăvan,D.J.Webb,G.Araneda,C.J.Ballance,R.Srinivasetal.,2507.19588

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Davoudi, N.M

    Z. Davoudi, N.M. Linke and G. Pagano,Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) 043072 [2104.09346]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Than, S.V

    A.T. Than, S.V. Kadam, V. Vikramaditya, N.H. Nguyen, X. Liu, Z. Davoudi et al., 2509.11477

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Crane et al.,2409.03747

    E. Crane et al.,2409.03747

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Popov, M

    P.P. Popov, M. Meth, M. Lewenstein, P. Hauke, M. Ringbauer, E. Zohar etal.,Phys. Rev. Res. 6(2024) 013202 [2307.15173]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Illa, C.E.P

    M. Illa, C.E.P. Robin and M.J. Savage,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 014507 [2403.14537]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Kürkçüoglu, H

    D.M. Kürkçüoglu, H. Lamm and A. Maestri,2410.16414

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T

    D. González-Cuadra, T.V. Zache, J. Carrasco, B. Kraus and P. Zoller,Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 160501 [2203.15541]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Meth et al.,Nature Phys.21(2025) 570 [2310.12110]

    M. Meth et al.,Nature Phys.21(2025) 570 [2310.12110]. 16

    work page arXiv 2025