Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 86 references

Critical dynamics of a scalar field near four spatial dimensions

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Omitting local friction from a scalar critical theory is renormalization-group invariant — coarse graining generates no friction — yet infrared-unstable: any nonzero friction drives the flow to overdamped Model A.

desk verdict A careful two-loop epsilon-expansion whose real payoff is separating 'invariant' from 'stable' for the dissipationless surface, with the invariance backed by explicit calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07292 v1 pith:UPBXOSBC submitted 2026-08-07 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-phnucl-th

Laura Batini , Eduardo Grossi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechhep-phnucl-th
keywords criticaldynamicsdynamicexponentModelAWilson-Fisherfixedpointepsilonexpansionsuperspaceformulationpropagatingmodesrenormalizationgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A non-conserved scalar order parameter in thermal equilibrium can in principle relax either through propagating (ballistic) modes, with dynamic exponent $z=1$, or through overdamped diffusion, as in Model A with $z=2$. This paper asks which behavior survives coarse graining, and separates the question into two parts: is the dissipationless surface $X=0$ invariant under the renormalization group, and is it infrared-stable? Working to two loops in an expansion about four spatial dimensions, the paper finds that the surface is invariant — coarse graining generates no local friction, only a nonanalytic term of the form $i\omega|\omega|$ that cannot renormalize the local dissipative coefficient. The surface is nevertheless infrared-unstable, because any nonzero equilibrium friction, however small, is a relevant perturbation. The paper concludes that propagating critical dynamics is a consistent but fine-tuned regime, while the generic infrared is overdamped Model A.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a superspace formulation of the stochastic Langevin dynamics in which the physical field, the response field, and the ghosts are components of one real superfield $\Phi(t,\mathbf{x},\theta,\bar\theta)$, with the inertial and dissipative operators kept as distinct superspace kernels. The entire equilibrium friction–noise multiplet is controlled by the single kernel $K_X = \frac{1}{2}[D,\bar D]\delta(Z-Z')$, and the free superpropagator has two Gaussian limits: an overdamped one with $z=2$ and a dissipationless propagating one with $z=1$. The decisive computation is the two-loop sunset self-energy on the $X=0$ surface, evaluated with a Hankel-contour representation that turns the oscillatory $\cos$ and $\sin$ propagators into Gaussian momentum integrals and isolates the ultraviolet poles; whether a local term linear in frequency is generated is read off from the Grassmann structure of this diagram, and the stability of the surface is decided by a composite-operator insertion of the same kernel $K_X$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the two-loop retarded self-energy at $d=4$ in the joint limit $m\to 0$, $\omega\to 0$ taken along a fixed ratio (for instance, constant $\omega^2/m^2$): if a coefficient linear in $i\omega$ that is analytic in $\omega$ appears, rather than the nonanalytic $i\omega|\omega|$, the invariance of the $X=0$ surface would be disproved. A numerical stochastic simulation or functional-RG flow initialized exactly on the dissipationless surface that generates a nonzero local friction-noise kernel under coarse graining would likewise settle the question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that invariance and infrared stability of the dissipationless surface $X=0$ are logically separate properties, and that the surface possesses the first but not the second. Invariance is shown to two loops: on the surface, the sunset contribution to the self-energy has no ultraviolet divergence linear in frequency. For finite mass the spectral-support argument rules out any energy-conserving channel at zero frequency, while in the massless limit the induced term is proportional to $i\omega|\omega|$, nonanalytic and vanishing faster than $i\omega$ as $\omega\to 0$, so it cannot be absorbed into the local dissipative coefficient $X$. Stability is tested by a composite-operator insertion of the equilibrium friction-noise kernel, whose renormalization gives a negative anomalous dimension for the dissipative coupling; the dimensionless ratio $\rho_r = x c_r$ of dissipative to propagating couplings therefore grows in the infrared, with eigenvalue $y_{X,\mathrm{WF}} = 1 + \epsilon^2/36 + O(\epsilon^3)$ at the Wilson–Fisher fixed point. The propagating endpoints ($z_{\mathrm{prop},G}=1$, $z_{\mathrm{prop,WF}} \simeq 1-0.00337\epsilon^2$) are therefore repulsive or saddle-like, while the overdamped Model A endpoint ($z_{\mathrm{od},G}=2$, $z_{\mathrm{od,WF}} \simeq 2+0.01345\epsilon^2$) is the only regime attractive in both the static and the dynamical directions.

Load-bearing premise

The invariance claim assumes that the critical corner where mass and frequency both vanish inherits the behavior found separately at finite mass with zero frequency and at zero mass with finite frequency, so that a local analytic friction term cannot slip in through that joint limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generic equilibrium critical dynamics of a non-conserved scalar is overdamped: the Model A exponent $z_{\mathrm{od,WF}} = 2 + (6\log(4/3)-1)\epsilon^2/54$ governs the infrared, where the second-order-in-time inertial kinetic term is irrelevant.
  • On the exactly dissipationless surface $X=0$, coarse graining generates no local friction at two loops; the induced dissipative structure is $i\omega|\omega|$, nonanalytic and subleading, so the surface is invariant under the RG flow.
  • Propagating critical dynamics is a consistent fixed point with $z_{\mathrm{prop,WF}} \simeq 1 - 0.00337\epsilon^2$, but it is fine-tuned: any nonzero friction is relevant with eigenvalue $y_{X,\mathrm{WF}} = 1 + \epsilon^2/36 > 0$, so the flow leaves the propagating regime.
  • The four fixed points on the mass-tuned critical surface split by stability: the propagating Gaussian point is repulsive in both directions, the overdamped Gaussian and the propagating Wilson–Fisher points are saddles, and the overdamped Wilson–Fisher point is the only one attractive in both directions.
  • The analysis is local in the dynamical phase diagram: it controls the neighborhoods of the endpoints $\rho_r = 0$ and $\rho_r \to \infty$, and does not by itself establish a single global RG trajectory connecting the propagating and overdamped regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the induced $i\omega|\omega|$ structure left on the dissipationless surface is itself a borderline non-Markovian memory kernel; at finite relative strength $\rho_r$ the effective dissipation might interpolate between local friction and this nonanalytic kernel, a crossover the endpoint expansion cannot describe.
  • Editorial extension: because the two dynamical limits share identical static fixed points and equal-time correlators, static measurements alone cannot certify which dynamical regime a system is in; distinguishing propagating from overdamped critical dynamics requires a dynamical probe, such as the frequency dependence of the response function or the presence of poles at $\omega \approx \pm c|\math
  • Editorial extension: the invariance-versus-stability distinction is a structural lesson that plausibly carries over to other dynamical universality classes with reversible mode couplings and to relativistic hydrodynamics — an invariant subspace can be repulsive, so 'no dissipation generated' and 'dissipation irrelevant' should be treated as separate checks in any effective theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an MSRJD/superspace formulation for a non-conserved scalar order parameter whose stochastic equation contains both an inertial second-order time derivative and a local friction–noise sector. It performs a two-loop renormalization-group analysis about d = 4 spatial dimensions, in which the static sector is the standard phi^4 theory, the overdamped limit reproduces the known two-loop Model A dynamic exponent, and the dissipationless limit yields an interacting propagating fixed point with z = 1 - 0.00337 epsilon^2 + O(epsilon^3). The central results are that the surface X = 0 (exactly zero local dissipation) is invariant under the perturbative RG flow, but that any nonzero dissipative perturbation is relevant at the propagating fixed point. The paper also presents a four-fixed-point phase diagram that combines the Gaussian/Wilson-Fisher static fixed points with the propagating/overdamped dynamical endpoints, and it explicitly qualifies the analysis as local in the dynamical phase diagram.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper makes a conceptually important contribution: it cleanly separates the statement that coarse-graining does not generate a local dissipative operator on the X = 0 surface from the statement that such an operator, if present, is relevant. This distinction is often conflated in discussions of overdamping near criticality. The technical development is substantial: the superspace Ward identities are solved for n-point functions, the Hankel-contour representation is used to reduce genuinely oscillatory two-loop integrals to parameter integrals that are evaluated explicitly, and the two-loop Model A check against the literature provides a strong internal consistency test. The paper contains no fitted parameters; all dynamic exponents are derived from the epsilon expansion, and the static counterterms are quoted from standard texts. The explicit analytic expressions, especially in Appendices B and D, make the calculation independently checkable.

minor comments (6)
  1. [6.3, Eqs. (6.29), (6.35), (6.38)] The Gamma-function prefactors in the massless-limit derivation appear inconsistent as printed: Eq. (6.29) contains Gamma(d - 7/2), whereas Eq. (6.35) contains Gamma(7/2 - d) Gamma(d - 3). The final d = 4 coefficient in Eq. (6.40) is unaffected because Gamma(d - 3) = Gamma(1) = 1 at d = 4, but the epsilon-dependent form should be corrected.
  2. [6.3, especially Eqs. (6.29)-(6.31)] The invariance proof treats the limits m > 0 with omega = 0 and m = 0 with finite omega separately, and the joint critical limit m -> 0, omega -> 0 is not discussed explicitly. The full expression (6.29) does determine this joint limit unambiguously, but the paper should state this explicitly, since the whole claim of invariance of X = 0 rests on it.
  3. [6.3.1, Eq. (6.31)] The finite-mass no-support argument is stated for omega = 0 without specifying the external momentum q = 0; since a local dissipative counterterm requires the q -> 0 limit, the argument should be framed as a statement about the zero-momentum spectral function, with the nonzero-momentum case contributing only nonlocal terms.
  4. [9, Eqs. (9.1)-(9.2)] The displayed exponents are missing equals signs as printed: "zod,WF2 + ..." and "zprop,WF1 - ..." should read "z_od,WF = 2 + ..." and "z_prop,WF = 1 - ...".
  5. [4.1.1, after Eq. (4.2)] The citation [10] for the Euclidean phi^4 two-point function is unusual; the standard textbook reference [60] would be the more appropriate source for this standard result.
  6. [2.4.1, Eqs. (2.78)-(2.80)] The sign conventions for the positive-time transform B(omega) and the resulting i omega terms in the superpropagator should be stated more explicitly, since the dissipative projection in Sections 5 and 7 depends sensitively on these signs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation chain is self-contained and the central results are obtained from explicit two-loop integrals, not from fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the dynamical action (2.47) is built from the stated Langevin equation (1.1)-(1.2), and the superspace Ward identities are derived in Sec. 2.4 and Appendix D rather than imported as an unverified premise. The static counterterms (4.21)-(4.23) are quoted from the external standard textbook [60] and the static RG functions (4.24)-(4.26) are checked against it; this is an external benchmark, not a circular input. The overdamped Model A exponent (5.16) is obtained from the explicit two-loop sunset integral in Sec. 5 and only afterwards compared with Refs. [75,76,12], so the comparison is verification, not construction. The propagating exponent (6.47) and the renormalization factor of the dissipative perturbation (7.45) come from the Hankel-contour integrals evaluated in Appendix B. No parameter is fitted to any target exponent, and no 'prediction' is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict. The self-citations (e.g. [31,36,70]) are contextual references to related FRG and dissipation work; they are not used to justify the central invariance or stability claims, which rest on the paper's own integrals. The only delicate point, the m=0, omega=0 corner in Sec. 6.3, is a limit-exchange/correctness question and not a circular construction: the paper's own Eq. (6.29), together with the separate finite-mass and fixed-frequency massless analyses, is what would settle it. Thus no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The parameters c and X are the theory's couplings whose RG flow is being computed, not numbers fitted to data. The only nontrivial assumptions are the equilibrium superspace setup, the subadditivity of the massive dispersion, and the locality of ultraviolet poles in the composite-operator insertion. No free parameters were fit to reproduce target results.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Equilibrium Gibbs initial ensemble and dynamical KMS symmetry are imposed for the finite-time functional.
    Sec. 2.2 uses P_eq proportional to exp(-beta E_tot) to cancel boundary terms; the entire equilibrium superspace formulation depends on this.
  • domain assumption The MSRJD superspace representation with BRST and KMS-conjugate symmetries correctly encodes the stochastic dynamics.
    Secs. 2.3-2.4; all Ward identities and the free propagator follow from this representation.
  • domain assumption Dimensional regularization with modified minimal subtraction captures the renormalization of the critical dynamics.
    Sec. 4.2 and Appendix A; static counterterms are quoted from Zinn-Justin and used to define beta functions.
  • standard math Massive relativistic dispersion is strictly subadditive: omega_{p1}+omega_{p2} > omega_{p1+p2}.
    Sec. 6.3.1 uses this to rule out spectral support of Sigma_1 at zero frequency.
  • domain assumption Ultraviolet poles in the integrated composite vertex are local, so evaluating at zero external frequency and momentum captures any local dissipative operator.
    Sec. 7.2; locality of the pole is shown in Eq. (7.42), but the assumption that no other local structure mixes is not proven to all orders.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical dynamics of a scalar field near four spatial dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UPBXOSBC

@misc{pith2026260807292,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical dynamics of a scalar field near four spatial dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UPBXOSBC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07292}
}
read the original abstract

The critical dynamics of a non-conserved order parameter is generally expected to become overdamped at long distances, even when propagating modes occur at microscopic or intermediate scales. We investigate the critical dynamics of a scalar field theory in thermal equilibrium which, in addition to local friction and noise, also contains a time-dependent second-order kinetic term. We show how to build a supersymmetric field-theory formulation. Using a two-loop expansion about four spatial dimensions, we show that the propagating and strictly overdamped limits share the same static Gaussian and Wilson-Fisher fixed points but realize distinct dynamical scaling regimes. The overdamped limit reproduces Model A. On the surface where local friction and noise vanish, the theory instead supports an interacting propagating fixed point whose dynamic exponent receives corrections at two loops. We demonstrate that coarse-graining does not generate a local dissipative operator on this surface, which therefore remains invariant under the RG flow. Local dissipation is nevertheless relevant at the propagating fixed point: an arbitrarily small equilibrium friction-noise perturbation drives the flow away from propagating scaling. Propagating critical dynamics thus defines a consistent but fine-tuned regime that is unstable to local equilibrium dissipation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Overdamping Phenomena near the Critical Point in O($N$) Model

    K. Ohnishi and T. Kunihiro,Overdamping phenomena near the critical point inO(N)model,Physics Letters B632(2006) 252 [nucl-th/0503017]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  2. [31]

    Dissipation dynamics of a scalar field

    L. Batini, E. Grossi and N. Wink,Dissipation dynamics of a scalar field,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125021 [2309.06586]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Hohenberg and B.I

    P.C. Hohenberg and B.I. Halperin,Theory of dynamic critical phenomena,Rev. Mod. Phys.49 (1977) 435

    1977

  4. [2]

    Folk and G

    R. Folk and G. Moser,Critical dynamics: A field-theoretical approach,J. Phys. A39(2006) R207

    2006

  5. [3]

    T¨ auber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014), 10.1017/CBO9781139046213

    U.C. T¨ auber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014), 10.1017/CBO9781139046213

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046213 2014

  6. [4]

    Theory of Critical Phenomena with Long-Range Temporal Interaction

    S. Zeng and F. Zhong,Theory of critical phenomena with long-range temporal interaction,Phys. Scr. 98(2023) 075017 [2212.11076]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    Sieberer, M

    L.M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl,Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems,Rep. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 096001 [1512.00637]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [6]

    Distinctive class of dissipation-induced phase transitions and their universal characteristics

    M. Soriente, T.L. Heugel, K. Omiya, R. Chitra and O. Zilberberg,Distinctive class of dissipation-induced phase transitions and their universal characteristics,Phys. Rev. Research3 (2021) 023100 [2101.12227]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

Show all 86 references
  1. [7]

    Khedri, D

    A. Khedri, D. Horn and O. Zilberberg,Fate of exceptional points in the presence of nonlinearities, 2208.11205

    arXiv

  2. [8]

    Rajagopal and F

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek,Static and dynamic critical phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition,Nucl. Phys. B399(1993) 395 [hep-ph/9210253]

    1993 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Soloviev and D. Teaney,Dynamics of theO(4)critical point in QCD,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 054512 [2111.03640]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Berges,Nonequilibrium quantum fields: From cold atoms to cosmology, inStrongly Interacting Quantum Systems out of Equilibrium, T

    J. Berges,Nonequilibrium quantum fields: From cold atoms to cosmology, inStrongly Interacting Quantum Systems out of Equilibrium, T. Giamarchi, A.J. Millis, O. Parcollet, H. Saleur and L.F. Cugliandolo, eds., vol. 99 ofLecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School, (Oxford), ...

    2016 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Moreau and J

    G. Moreau and J. Serreau,Unequal-time correlators of stochastic scalar fields in de sitter space, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 045015 [1912.05358]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Bausch, H.-K

    R. Bausch, H.-K. Janssen and H. Wagner,Renormalized field theory of critical dynamics,Z. Phys. B 24(1976) 113

    1976

  7. [14]

    Boyanovsky and H.J

    D. Boyanovsky and H.J. de Vega,Dynamics near the critical point: The hot renormalization group in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 085038 [hep-ph/0110012]

    2002 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Schweitzer, S

    D. Schweitzer, S. Schlichting and L. von Smekal,Spectral functions and dynamic critical behavior of relativisticZ 2 theories,Nuclear Physics B960(2020) 115165 [2007.03374]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,J

    T.W.B. Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,J. Phys. A9(1976) 1387

    1976

  10. [17]

    Kibble,Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,Phys

    T.W.B. Kibble,Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,Phys. Rept.67(1980) 183

    1980

  11. [18]

    Zurek,Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,Nature317(1985) 505

    W.H. Zurek,Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,Nature317(1985) 505

    1985

  12. [19]

    Son and M.A

    D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Dynamic universality class of the QCD critical point,Phys. Rev. D 70(2004) 056001 [hep-ph/0401052]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer and V. Skokov,Dynamic scaling of order parameter fluctuations in model B,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 074004 [2304.07279]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer and V.V. Skokov,Simulations of Stochastic Fluid Dynamics near a Critical Point in the Phase Diagram,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 032301 [2403.10608]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer and V.V. Skokov,Transport properties of stochastic fluids, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114026 [2510.12557]. – 55 –

    2025

  16. [23]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer and V. Skokov,Simulating stochastic fluid dynamics,EPJ Web Conf.364(2026) 15002 [2509.00545]

    2026 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Chattopadhyay, R

    C. Chattopadhyay, R. Maguire, J. Ott, T. Schaefer and V.V. Skokov,Critical dynamics of the superfluid phase transition in model F,Phys. Rev. A114(2026) 013312 [2603.21479]

    2026

  18. [25]

    Sieke, J

    L.J. Sieke, J. Fuchs and L. von Smekal,Non-equilibrium scaling across first-order transitions with self-interacting scalar fields,Nucl. Phys. B1029(2026) 117585 [2605.10346]

    2026 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi and D. Teaney,Dynamics of theO(4)critical point in QCD: Critical pions and diffusion in Model G,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 054037 [2306.06887]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Mazeliauskas, A. Soloviev and D. Teaney,Quenching through the QCD chiral phase transition,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114019 [2504.03514]

    2025

  21. [28]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Mazeliauskas, A. Soloviev and D. Teaney,Supercooled goldstone bosons at the QCD chiral phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 242303 [2504.03516]

    2025

  22. [29]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J.M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier et al.,The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications,Phys. Rept.910(2021) 1 [2006.04853]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Roth and L

    J.V. Roth and L. von Smekal,Critical dynamics in a real-time formulation of the functional renormalization group,JHEP10(2023) 065 [2303.11817]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J.V. Roth, Y. Ye, S. Schlichting and L. von Smekal,Dynamic critical behavior of the chiral phase transition from the real-time functional renormalization group,JHEP01(2025) 118 [2403.04573]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J.V. Roth, Y. Ye, S. Schlichting and L. von Smekal,Universal critical dynamics near the chiral phase transition and the QCD critical point,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L111901 [2409.14470]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Saito, H

    Y. Saito, H. Fujii, K. Itakura and O. Morimatsu,Microscopic identification of dissipative modes in relativistic field theories,Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2015(2015) 053A02 [1309.4892]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bors´ anyi, A

    S. Bors´ anyi, A. Patk´ os, J. Polonyi and Z. Sz´ ep,Fate of the classical false vacuum,Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 085013 [hep-th/0004059]

    2000 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Batini, A

    L. Batini, A. Chatrchyan and J. Berges,Real-time dynamics of false vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 023502 [2310.04206]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hatta and T

    Y. Hatta and T. Kunihiro,Renormalization group method applied to kinetic equations: Roles of initial values and time,Ann. Phys.298(2002) 24 [hep-th/0108159]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Tsumura, T

    K. Tsumura, T. Kunihiro and K. Ohnishi,Derivation of covariant dissipative fluid dynamics in the renormalization-group method,Phys. Lett. B646(2007) 134 [hep-ph/0609056]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kamenev,Many-body theory of non-equilibrium systems,Les Houches Summer School Proceedings 81(2005) 177 [cond-mat/0412296]

    A. Kamenev,Many-body theory of non-equilibrium systems,Les Houches Summer School Proceedings 81(2005) 177 [cond-mat/0412296]

    2005 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Floerchinger,Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations,JHEP05 (2012) 021 [1112.4374]

    S. Floerchinger,Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations,JHEP05 (2012) 021 [1112.4374]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Floerchinger,Variational principle for theories with dissipation from analytic continuation,JHEP 09(2016) 099 [1603.07148]

    S. Floerchinger,Variational principle for theories with dissipation from analytic continuation,JHEP 09(2016) 099 [1603.07148]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Braun, Y.-r

    J. Braun, Y.-r. Chen, W.-j. Fu, A. Geißel, J. Horak, C. Huang et al.,Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 061 [2206.10232]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Frangi and S

    G. Frangi and S. Grozdanov,Wilsonian renormalization group and thermal field theory in the schwinger–keldysh closed-time-path formalism,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085034 [2501.16441]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Stoetzel and S

    T. Stoetzel and S. Floerchinger,Shear viscosity of a relativistic scalar field from functional renormalization,2512.18740. – 56 –

  37. [45]

    Canet, H

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e and B. Delamotte,General framework of the non-perturbative renormalization group for non-equilibrium steady states,J. Phys. A44(2011) 495001 [1106.4129]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Floerchinger,Response theory for quantum fields in isolation,2604.13637

    S. Floerchinger,Response theory for quantum fields in isolation,2604.13637

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    C. Aron, G. Biroli and L.F. Cugliandolo,Symmetries of generating functionals of Langevin processes with colored multiplicative noise,J. Stat. Mech.2010(2010) P11018 [1007.5059]

    2010 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Marguet, E

    B. Marguet, E. Agoritsas, L. Canet and V. Lecomte,Supersymmetries in nonequilibrium langevin dynamics,Phys. Rev. E104(2021) 044120 [2101.08766]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu,Emergent supersymmetry in local equilibrium systems,JHEP01(2018) 040 [1701.07445]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Martin, E.D

    P.C. Martin, E.D. Siggia and H.A. Rose,Statistical dynamics of classical systems,Phys. Rev. A8 (1973) 423

    1973

  43. [51]

    Janssen,On a lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties,Z

    H.-K. Janssen,On a lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties,Z. Phys. B23(1976) 377

    1976

  44. [52]

    De Dominicis,Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques,J

    C. De Dominicis,Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques,J. Phys. Colloques37(1976) C1

    1976

  45. [53]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas,Random Magnetic Fields, Supersymmetry and Negative Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 744

    1979

  46. [54]

    Kurchan,Supersymmetry in spin glass dynamics,J

    J. Kurchan,Supersymmetry in spin glass dynamics,J. Phys. I France2(1992) 1333

    1992

  47. [55]

    Tyutin,Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism, 0812.0580

    I.V. Tyutin,Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism, 0812.0580

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    De Dominicis,Techniques de renormalisation de la theorie des champs et dynamique des phenomenes critiques,J

    C. De Dominicis,Techniques de renormalisation de la theorie des champs et dynamique des phenomenes critiques,J. Phys. Colloques37(1976) C1

    1976

  49. [57]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace,JHEP06(2017) 069 [1610.01940]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Kubo,Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo,Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12(1957) 570

    1957

  51. [59]

    Martin and J

    P.C. Martin and J. Schwinger,Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I,Phys. Rev.115(1959) 1342

    1959

  52. [60]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, vol

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, vol. 171 ofInternational Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 5 ed. (2021), 10.1093/oso/9780198834625.001.0001

    2021

  53. [61]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,JHEP09(2017) 096 [1701.07817]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    P. Gao, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Ghostbusters: Unitarity and Causality of Non-equilibrium Effective Field Theories,JHEP03(2020) 040 [1803.10778]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Intriligator and N

    K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg,Lectures on supersymmetric gauge theories and electric-magnetic duality, inLow-Dimensional Applications of Quantum Field Theory, L. Baulieu, V. Kazakov, M. Picco and P. Windey, eds., (Boston, MA), pp. 161–199, Springer US (1997), DOI

    1997

  56. [64]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,JHEP09(2017) 095 [1511.03646]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Hertz, Y

    J.A. Hertz, Y. Roudi and P. Sollich,Path integral methods for the dynamics of stochastic and disordered systems,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(2016) 033001

    2016

  58. [66]

    Rychkov,Four Lectures on the Random Field Ising Model, Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry, and Dimensional Reduction(3, 2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-42000-9, [2303.09654]

    S. Rychkov,Four Lectures on the Random Field Ising Model, Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry, and Dimensional Reduction(3, 2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-42000-9, [2303.09654]. – 57 –

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Haehl, R

    F.M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani,Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part II: thermal equivariant cohomology,JHEP06(2017) 070 [1610.01941]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Jensen, N

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom,Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace,JHEP09 (2018) 127 [1701.07436]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Jensen, R

    K. Jensen, R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva and A. Yarom,A panoply of Schwinger-Keldysh transport, SciPost Phys.5(2018) 053 [1804.04654]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Floerchinger and E

    S. Floerchinger and E. Grossi,Conserved and nonconserved Noether currents from the quantum effective action,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 085015 [2102.11098]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    De Dominicis and L

    C. De Dominicis and L. Peliti,Field-theory renormalization and critical dynamics aboveT c: Helium, antiferromagnets, and liquid-gas systems,Physical Review B18(1978) 353

    1978

  64. [72]

    Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf

    J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]

    2004 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Wilson and M.E

    K.G. Wilson and M.E. Fisher,Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.28(1972) 240

    1972

  66. [74]

    Wilson and J.B

    K.G. Wilson and J.B. Kogut,The renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,Phys. Rep.12 (1974) 75

    1974

  67. [75]

    Halperin, P.C

    B.I. Halperin, P.C. Hohenberg and S.-k. Ma,Calculation of dynamic critical properties using Wilson ’s expansion methods,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1548

    1972

  68. [76]

    Halperin, P.C

    B.I. Halperin, P.C. Hohenberg and S.-k. Ma,Renormalization-group methods for critical dynamics: I. recursion relations and effects of energy conservation,Phys. Rev. B10(1974) 139

    1974

  69. [77]

    Adzhemyan, D.A

    L.T. Adzhemyan, D.A. Evdokimov, M. Hnatiˇ c, E.V. Ivanova, M.V. Kompaniets, A. Kudlis et al., Model a of critical dynamics: Five-loopε-expansion study,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications600(2022) 127530 [2201.12640]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Schweitzer, S

    D. Schweitzer, S. Schlichting and L. von Smekal,Critical dynamics of relativistic diffusion,Nuclear Physics B984(2022) 115944 [2110.01696]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Watson,A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 ed

    G.N. Watson,A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 ed. (1944)

    1944

  72. [80]

    Abramowitz and I.A

    M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, eds.,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, no. 55 in National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1964)

    1964

  73. [81]

    Folk and G

    R. Folk and G. Moser,Critical dynamics of stochastic models with energy conservation (model c), Physical Review E69(2004) 036101

    2004

  74. [82]

    Mesterh´ azy, J.H

    D. Mesterh´ azy, J.H. Stockemer, L.F. Palhares and J. Berges,Dynamic universality class of model c from the functional renormalization group,Physical Review B88(2013) 174301 [1307.1700]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Israel and J.M

    W. Israel and J.M. Stewart,Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory,Annals Phys. 118(1979) 341

    1979

  76. [84]

    Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

    P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys. A45(2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bonart, L.F

    J. Bonart, L.F. Cugliandolo and A. Gambassi,Critical Langevin dynamics of theO(N) Ginzburg–Landau model with correlated noise,J. Stat. Mech.(2012) P01014 [1109.4107]

    2012 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Wang and U

    E. Wang and U. Heinz,Generalized fluctuation-dissipation theorem for nonlinear response functions, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025008 [hep-th/9809016]. – 58 –

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.