Evaluating Precise Geolocation Inference Capabilities of Vision Language Models
Reviewed by Pithpith:UVEWP2TXopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The prevalence of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) raises important questions about privacy in an era where visual information is increasingly available. While foundation VLMs demonstrate broad knowledge and learned capabilities, we specifically investigate their ability to infer geographic location from previously unseen image data. This paper introduces a benchmark dataset collected from Google Street View that represents its global distribution of coverage. Foundation models are evaluated on single-image geolocation inference, with many achieving median distance errors of <300 km. We further evaluate VLM "agents" with access to supplemental tools, observing up to a 30.6% decrease in distance error. Our findings establish that modern foundation VLMs can act as powerful image geolocation tools, without being specifically trained for this task. When coupled with increasing accessibility of these models, our findings have greater implications for online privacy. We discuss these risks, as well as future work in this area.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Pixels to Places: A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Image Geolocalization Ability in Large Language Models
IMAGEO-Bench evaluates 10 LLMs on image geolocalization across global street scenes, US POIs, and private images, revealing closed-source model advantages and biases favoring high-resource regions.
-
Do VLMs See What Sensors Feel? A Scalable Expert-Guided Design for Wheelchair Accessibility Assessment from Street View
Expert-guided VLMs produce accessibility ratings from street-view images that show negative correlation and distributional similarity with GPS-derived wheelchair dwell times as a mobility-friction proxy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.